24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., ) ) Pet - Politico

Dec 24, 2015 - against any of these employees within the 10(b) period. We reject this argument because ... (e) Within 14 days after service by the Region, post at its San Ramon, California facility copies of the attached notice marked ...... Congress empowered workers to act concertedly for their mu- tual aid and benefit in ...
333KB Sizes 3 Downloads 157 Views
Case: 16-60005

Document: 00513328840

Page: 1

Date Filed: 01/05/2016

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

____________________________________ ) 24 HOUR FITNESS USA, INC., ) ) Petitioner, ) ) v. ) ) NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ) BOARD, ) ) Respondent. ) ____________________________________)

Case No. _____________

PETITION FOR REVIEW OF FINAL ORDER OF THE NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD

Pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 160(f) and Fed. R. App. P. 15, 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. hereby petitions the Court for review of the Decision and Order of the National Labor Relations Board entered December 24, 2015 in the matter of 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Alton J. Sanders, Case No. 20-CA-035419. 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. is aggrieved by the Board’s decision and order, and requests that it be set aside. A copy of the decision and order is attached. Respectfully submitted this 31st day of December 2015.

By:

/s/ Rex S. Heinke REX S. HEINKE

AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 2029 Century Park East, Suite 2400 Los Angeles, CA 90067 (310) 229-1000 [email protected]

Counsel for 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.

Case: 16-60005

Document: 00513328840

Page: 2

Date Filed: 01/05/2016

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE This is to certify that the undersigned caused to be served on December 31, 2015, a copy of 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.’s Petition for Review via first class U.S. Mail to the following: Judith A. Scott SERVICE EMPLOYEES INT’L UNION 1800 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 Tel: (202) 730-7455 Email: [email protected]

Michael Rubin ALTSHULER BERZON LLP 177 Post Street, Suite 300 San Francisco, CA 94108 Tel: (415) 421-7151 Email: [email protected] Counsel for Service Employees Int’l Union

Cliff Palefsky MCGUINN, HILLSMAN & PALEFSKY 535 Pacific Avenue San Francisco, CA 94133-4628 Tel: (415) 421-9292 Email: [email protected]

Willis J. Goldsmith Kristina A. Yost JONES DAY 222 East 41st Street New York, NY 10017 Tel: (212) 326-3939 Email: [email protected] [email protected]

Counsel for Charging Party Alton J. Sanders

Counsel for amicus curiae United States Chamber of Commerce

/s/ Rex S. Heinke__________________________ Rex S. Heinke AKIN GUMP STRAUSS HAUER & FELD LLP 2029 CENTURY PARK EAST, SUITE 2400 LOS ANGELES, CA 90067 (310) 229-1000 (telephone) Counsel for 24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc.

2

Case: 16-60005

Document: 00513328840

NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the bound volumes of NLRB decisions. Readers are requested to notify the Executive Secretary, National Labor Relations Board, Washington, D.C. 20570, of any typographical or other formal errors so that corrections can be included in the bound volumes.

24 Hour Fitness USA, Inc. and Alton J. Sanders. Case 20–CA–035419 December 24, 2015 DECISION AND ORDER BY CHAIRMAN PEARCE AND MEMBERS MISCIMARRA AND MCFERRAN On November 6, 2012, Administrative Law Judge William L. Schmidt issued the attached decision. The Respondent filed exceptions and a supporting brief. The Acting General Counsel filed an answering brief and cross-exceptions with a supporting brief. The Charging Party together with the Intervenor Union (collectively, the Charging Party) filed a cross-exception and a combined brief in opposition to the Respondent’s exceptions and in support of its cross-exception. The Respondent filed a combined answering brief to the Acting General Counsel’s and Charging Party’s cross-exceptions, and separate reply briefs to the Acting General Counsel’s and the Charging Party’s answering briefs. In addition, the Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the Respondent. The National Labor Relations Board has delegated its authority in this procee