TEXT AND. DATA MINING. ACCEPTABILITY OF. Height of each bar corresponds to the net support for each licence: + first pre
OPEN ACCESS SURVEY: EXPLORING THE VIEWS OF
TAYLOR & FRANCIS
AND ROUTLEDGE AUTHORS
55%
71%
45%
PERCEIVED
BENEFITS
OF OPEN
ACCESS
PUBLISHING
25%
% shown is level of agreement Exploring the Views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge Authors
2014
CREATIVE
+41% 5% 28%
COMMONS
– +
18%
LICENCE
PREFERENCES
1ST preference
2ND
preference
+17% 9%
11%
– +
LEAST
+13%
preferred
8% 8%
15%
– +
13%
Height of each bar corresponds to the net support for each licence: + first preferences + second preferences – last preferences
ACCEPTABILITY OF
TEXT AND
DATA MINING Acceptable
Unacceptable
COMMERCIAL
VS. NON– COMMERCIAL
ARTICLE
18%
RE-USE
$ 67%
$
18%
68% Acceptable
8%
4%
– +
52%
-40%
Unacceptable Exploring the Views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge Authors
2014
MOST PREFERRED LICENCE BY COUNTRY ALL COUNTRIES WITH MORE THAN 100 RESPONDENTS
CANADA UNITED STATES
NETHERLANDS BELGIUM SWEDEN UK GERMANY FRANCE ITALY PORTUGAL GREECE IRAN SPAIN
JAPAN CHINA TAIWAN
INDIA
BRAZIL AUSTRALIA SOUTH AFRICA
NEW ZEALAND
CC BY-NC-ND
Copyright Assignment
Equal split between CC BY-NC-ND and Copyright Assignment
Exclusive Licence to Publish
Equal split between CC BY-NC-ND and Exclusive Licence to Publish
LEAST PREFERRED LICENCE BY COUNTRY ALL COUNTRIES WITH MORE THAN 100 RESPONDENTS NETHERLANDS BELGIUM CANADA
UK FRANCE PORTUGAL
UNITED STATES
SWEDEN GERMANY
ITALY GREECE SPAIN
CHINA
IRAN INDIA
JAPAN TAIWAN
55% – 64%
45% – 54%
BRAZIL AUSTRALIA
35% – 44% 25% – 34%
SOUTH AFRICA
NEW ZEALAND
All countries selected CC BY as their least preferred licence – shading indicates the % of authors Exploring the Views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge Authors
2014
PEER REVIEW PREFERENCES
80%
HOW OFTEN AUTHORS FIND EACH OF FOLLOWING TYPES OF PEER REVIEW USEFUL
3 2
35%
4
1
5
% shown on the right are the authors who selected ‘often’ or ‘always’
32%
IMPORTANCE OF RAPID
PEER REVIEW 40%
60%
20%
80%
20% 0%
75%
100%
% of authors who rate the importance of rapid peer review 4 or 5 out of 5 Exploring the Views of Taylor & Francis and Routledge Authors
