Birther Scorecard - tesibria - Typepad

5 downloads 223 Views 2MB Size Report
Apr 12, 2012 - to certify that Craig is “natural born citizen” eligible for presidency), ...... Paige v. Obama, No.
BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

1.

Allen v. Soetoro (FOIA)

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

D. Ariz. (Federal Court) 4:09-cv-00373 Justia - RECAP H

H

H

HF

1

Kenneth L. Allen Citation

2.

Allen v. Obama et al Kenneth L. Allen

Arizona Pima County Super. Ct. C20121046 Citation

3.

Allen v. Barack Obama et al Kenneth L. Allen

American Grand Jury Mack H. Ellis Donald McDougall

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

M.D. Tenn (Federal) 3:09mc00215 Justia - RECAP

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED as to Request for Obama documents Remaining Claims Voluntarily DISMISSED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

F

9th Circuit: 10-15290 Appeal as to Obama docs

---

APPEAL DISMISSED 9th Circuit: 11-15094 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

DISMISSED Amended Complaint Filed Feb. 24, 2012

No Gov. defended

---

No ---

---

No appearance on behalf of Obama; AZ Democratic Party defended

Allen v. Obama et al, No. C20121046 (Ariz. Pima County Super. Ct. Feb. 24, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot). DISMISSED

Notice of Appeal Filed – but appeal apparently abandoned thereafter

No ---

No appearance on behalf of Obama; AZ Democratic Party defended

Allen v. Obama et al, No. C20121317 (Ariz. Pima County Super. Ct., Mar. 7, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot; finding that Obama is a “natural born citizen” under Wong Kim Ark; and expressly rejecting argument that Minor v. Happersett holds otherwise). No DISMISSED H

---

H

Citation

“Obama Defense”

Allen v. Soetoro, 4:09-cv-00373 (D. Ariz. Jan. 29, 2010) (dismissing FOIA action seeking documents related to Obama’s eligibility) aff’d, No, 11-15094 (9th Cir. Jul. 23, 2012).

Arizona Pima County Super. Ct. C20121317 Citation

4.

Original Decision

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

In re Am. Grand Jury, No. 3:09-mc-00215 (M.D. Tenn. Nov. 6, 2009) (summarily rejecting grand jury “presentment” challenging President Obama’s eligibility to serve as President as having no force under U.S. Constitution or law).

*Note that the string cite has not been updated for more than a year as of today’s date. However, once updated, it will be found at the same link. **The docket for one Judd case and one Strunk case remains open. However, while technically “pending” in that the docket remains open, the cases either have never been litigated (Judd), or the relive requested in the complaint/initiating document has been denied. Therefore, we have designated these cases as non-pending. 1

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 1 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

5.

American Grand Jury 2 Robert C. Laity, Robert J. Campbell

Original Decision

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s)

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

F

No

W.D.N.Y. (Federal) No Number Assigned

REJECTED

---

H

---

F

Court dismissed sua sponte

6.

Anderson v. Obama Daniel G. Anderson William Colliton, M.D. Richard P. Delaney, M.D. Richard Loria, M.D. Lorenzo Marcolin, M.D. Gaetano Molinari, M.D. James Ronan, M.D. Edward Sheridan, M.D. Edward Soma, M.D. Ronald Uscinski, M.D.

American Grand Jury, No Number Assigned (W.D.N.Y. Sept. 29, 2009) (letter from court staff attorney explaining that court could not accept “presentment” prepared by public, seeking to indict Obama for ineligibility to hold office and related matters).

Citation U.S. Supreme Court (Issue not raised in D.Md. and 4th Cir.)

Petition for Rehearing (to address birther issue) 10-1951 (4th Cir.) DENIED (No birther claims made) (No. 10-612)

8:10-cv-00017-PJM (D. Md.) (No birther claims made)

No

Anderson v. Obama, No. 10-612, 2012 WL 1969419 (U.S. Jun. 4, 2012) (denying motion for leave to file petition for rehearing in case challenging the Patient Protection and Affordable Health Care Act, where petition sought an order compelling (a) the U.S. Marshalls to travel to Hawaii; (b) the Hawaii Department of Health to release the “original” birth certificate of Obama to the U.S. Marshalls; (c) the U.S. Marshalls to bring the certificate to the Supreme Court; and (d) the U.S. Secret Service to examine and verify whether the document is a forgery).

Citation

2

Note: American Grand Jury has attempted to file multiple additional “presentments,” in at least the following courts: Alabama Federal Court – Southern District (Donald Gaines); California Federal Court – Central District (Armando Carranza); Connecticut Supreme Court (Unknown); Florida Federal Court – Northern District (Norman Caron); Kansas State Court (Wichita/18th Judicial District) (Bradley Kramer); New Hampshire State Court (Salem District) (Unknown); New Hampshire Federal District Court (Daniel Hunt); Tennessee Federal Court – Western District (Donald McDougall); Middle District Texas Federal Court – Western District (Lesley Lawson). To date, however, there is no indication that any of these courts have accepted the documents as filed and, therefore, they are not “pending.” H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

H

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

H

H

Page 2 of 84

H

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Indiana Appellate Court DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

H

7.

Ankeny v. Daniels Steve Ankeny

Indiana State Court Marion Superior Court 49D10-0812-PL-55511

Archibald v. DOJ George H. Archibald

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Petition for Rehearing DENIED

No ---

Obama not a defendant

Indiana Supreme Court Transfer to Ind. Sup. Ct. DENIED

Citation

8.

DISMISSED

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:11-cv-02028-RBW PACER | RECAP Citation

Ankeny v. Governor of the State of Indiana, No. 49D10-0812-PL-055511, 2009 WL 1632611 (Ind. Marion County Super. Ct. Mar. 16, 2009) (dismissing challenge to McCain’s and Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, 916 N.E.2d 678 (Ind. Ct. App. 2009) (holding that Obama, who was born in Hawaii, is a “natural born citizen” eligible to be president), transfer denied, 929 N.E.2d 789 (Ind. 2010). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Archibald v. U.S. Dept. of Justice, No. 1:11-cv-02028-RBW (D.D.C., Mar. 13, 2013) (dismissing FOIA case seeking information on FBI background check of Obama in 2008 presidential campaign, alleging that records could show he was not qualified to be president).

Page 3 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED Motion for Reconsideration DENIED Motion to Transfer DENIED Motion for Reconsideration (Aug 2012) DENIED H

H

9.

H

H

Barnett et al v Obama et al Pamela Barnett

Citation

10.

Begay v. Obama Arnold James Begay

D. Ariz. (Federal) No. 2:12-cv-01948-PGR— BSB PACER - RECAP H

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

H

C.D. Cal. (Federal) 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Justia - RECAP

Appeal(s)

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

9th Circuit: Kreep as Atty: 09-56827 Taitz as Atty: 10-55084 AFFIRMED Reh’g and Reh’g En Banc DENIED

(Keyes et al v. Obama)

Writ of Mandamus filed in 10-55084 DENIED3

---

H

H

“Obama Defense”

F

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 11-1225)

No Gov. defending

Barnett v. Obama, No. 8:09-cv-00082, 2009 WL 3861788 (C.D. Cal. Oct. 29, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; criticizing conduct of plaintiff’s counsel in case filed on behalf of active and former military personnel, state representatives, taxpayers, relatives, and political candidates), order clarified, 2009 WL 8557250 (C.D. Cal. Dec. 16, 2009), aff’d sub nom. Drake v. Obama, 664 F.3d 774 (9th Cir., 2011), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, Nos. 09-56827, 10-55084 (Feb. 2, 2012), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 2748 (U.S. Jun. 11, 2012); motion for recon, No. 8:09-cv-00082 (Aug 31, 2012) (denying petition for rehearing/reopening of case in district court).

DISMISSED

---

---

No Court dismissed sua sponte

H

Citation

Begay v. Obama, No. 2:12-cv-01948 (D. Ariz., Sept. 24, 2013) (dismissing complaint alleging Obama not eligible to be president).

3

Note: On November 3, 2011, Taitz filed an Emergency Petition for Writ of Mandamus, seeking order directing Hawaii officials to provide access to original birth certificate documents regarding Obama. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 4 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s)

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

Application (08A391)

DENIED4 H

rd

3 Circuit: 08-4340 Emgcy Motion: DENIED 2nd Emgcy Motion: DENIED H

11.

Berg v. Obama et al Philip Berg

E.D. Pa. (Federal) 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Justia - RECAP H

H

H

H

H

DISMISSED H

Appeal DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs taxed against Berg H

12.

13.

Berg v. Obama Philip Berg (False Claims Act)

Berg v. Obama Philip Berg

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:08cv01933 Justia - RECAP H

H

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 186 MD 2012 Citation

DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED H

H

Yes

---

DC Circuit: 09-5362 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED H

H

---

No Gov. defending

Berg v. Obama, No. 1:08-cv-01933 (D.D.C. June 9, 2009) (dismissing qui tam case claiming Obama is not a U.S. citizen), recons. denied, 656 F. Supp. 2d 107 (D.D.C. 2009), aff’d, 383 F. App’x. 7 (D.C. Cir. 2010). DISMISSED

---

---

Yes

Berg v. Obama, No. 186 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 16, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot).

4

129 S.Ct. 1030, 173 L.Ed.2d 290, 77 USLW 3428.

5

129 S.Ct. 920, 173 L.Ed.2d 158, 77 USLW 3281, 77 USLW 3392, 77 USLW 3399.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

Berg v. Obama, 574 F. Supp. 2d 509 (E.D. Pa. 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; characterizing various plaintiff’s claims as frivolous), aff’d, 586 F.3d 234 (3d Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 555 U.S. 1126 (2009).

H

Citation

DENIED Rule 11 Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 08-570) 5 H

H

Citation

Application (08A505)

Page 5 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

14.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

16.

Beverly v. FEC Arnold Dewalt Beverly

H

H

17.

DISMISSED H

Citation Washington State Supreme Court 82473-8 Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

9th Circuit: 09-15562 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Reconsideration DENIED H

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 09-794)

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Beverly v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 1:08-cv-01538-AWI-GSA, 2009 WL 196361 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 28, 2009) (dismissing case that included claims regarding Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, No. 09-15562 (9th Cir. July 1, 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 1732 (2010). DISMISSED

DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

No ---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Bowhall v. Obama, No. 2:10-cv-0609, 2010 WL 4932747, (M.D. Ala. Nov. 30, 2010) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not a “natural born citizen,” as frivolous), aff’d, No. 10-15938-C (11th Cir. Apr. 4, 2011) (affirming order that complaint was frivolous).

Texas State Court Williamson County, (368th Judicial District) 08-1001-C365

Broe v. Reed James Broe

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

H

Citation

Appeal(s)

H

M.D. Ala. (Federal) 2:10cv00609 Justia - RECAP

Bowhall v. Obama William E. Bowhall

Brockhausen v. Andrade Jody A. Brockhausen

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

E.D. Cal. (Federal) 1:08-cv-01538-AWI-GSA Justia - RECAP

Citation

15.

Original Decision

DISMISSED H

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Brockhausen v. Andrade, No. 08-1001-C368 (Tex. Williamson County Dist. Ct. (368th) Jan. 22, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). Action filed in Supreme Court

DISMISSED H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Broe v. Reed, No. 82473-8 (Wash. Jan. 8, 2009) (dismissing writ of mandamus challenging Obama’s eligibility).

Page 6 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name The Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama et al6

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Mo. (Federal) 6:08cv03405 Justia - RECAP H

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

H

No. 11-3557 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No ---

No appearance made on behalf of Obama

Church of Jesus Christ Christian/Aryan Nations of Missouri et al v. Obama, No. 6:08cv03405, 2011 WL 4916569 (W.D. Mo. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing case brought on, among other bases, that, as non-white, Obama is not eligible to hold office), aff’d, No. 09-5012 (8th Cir. Jan. 31, 2012).

Citation

No. 09-5012 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED H

18.

Cohen v. Obama L. Charles Cohen

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:08cv02150 Justia - RECAP H

H

H

20.

Collette v. Obama et al Jerry Collette

Connerat v. Browning William Spencer Connerat III

Fla. Circuit Court (6th Cir) No. 512012CA2041WS

Florida State Court State Supreme Court SC08-2338

DISMISSED

Action filed in Supreme Court

DISMISSED H

H

Citation

Court dismissed sua sponte

---

---

Yes

Collette v Obama et al, No. 512012CA2041WS (Fla. 6th Cir. Ct., Sept. 9, 2012 (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 ballot).

Citation

H

Petition for Rehearing Denied Petition for Rehearing En Banc Denied

No ---

Cohen v. Obama, No. 1:08-cv-02150, 2008 WL 5191864 (D.D.C. Dec. 11, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, 332 F. App’x. 640 (D.C. Cir. 2009) (per curiam), reh’g and reh’g en banc denied, No. 09-5012 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 25, 2009).

Citation

19.

DISMISSED H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

No ---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Connerat v. Browning, 999 So. 2d 644 (Table) 2008 WL 5378138 (Fla.2008) (dismissing petition for extraordinary emergency writ of mandamus challenging Obama’s eligibility).

6

Note: We previously counted this case as a “birther case.” We did so based on some secondary reporting on the case, which was the only information available at the time because the docket was “sealed” and not available to the public. However, it has since become available and our review indicates that although the plaintiffs clearly sought to prevent Obama from serving as President, they did not base their opposition on any birther theories; rather, the apparent basis was the fact that Obama is not white. Therefore, we have removed this case from the “count,” while keeping the RECAP/related information available for archival purposes. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 7 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

21.

22.

23.

24.

25.

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

Connerat v. Obama William Spencer Connerat III

Constitution Party v. Lingle Alan Keyes

Cook v. Good et al Stefan Cook

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Florida State Court Pinellas County Small Claims Court No. 09003103SC

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No DISMISSED

---

H

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

H

Citation

Connerat v. Obama, No. 09003103SC (Fla. Pinellas County Small Claims Ct. May 5, 2009) (dismissing claim brought against Obama on grounds that he is not “natural born citizen).

Florida State Court Pinellas County Small Claims Court No. 09005522SC

No DISMISSED

---

H

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

H

Citation

Connerat v. Obama, No. 09005522SC (Fla. Pinellas County Small Claims Ct. Jul 28, 2009) (dismissing claim brought against Obama on grounds that he is not “natural born citizen).

M.D. Fla. (Federal) 8:11-cv-01359 Justia - RECAP Citation Hawaii Supreme Court No. 29743

Citation M.D. Ga. (Federal) 4:2009cv00082 Justia - RECAP H

H

No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Connerat v. Obama, No. 8:11-cv-01359-SDM-TGW (M.D. Fla. Dec. 21, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). Action filed in Supreme Court

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED H

H

H

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Constitution Party v. Lingle, No. 29473, 2008 WL 5125984 (Haw. Dec. 5, 2008) (dismissing complaint contesting 2008 Presidential election results and rejecting contention that defendant improperly failed to require proof that candidate Barack Obama was qualified to be a candidate for President of the United States), recons. denied (Dec. 12, 2008). TRO DENIED CASE DISMISSED H

H

11th Circuit: 09-14698C Appeal DISMISSED H

---

No Gov. defended

H

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision

Cook v. Good, No. 4:09-cv-00082, 2009 WL 2163535 (M.D. Ga. July 16, 2009) (denying TRO seeking stay of military orders pending confirmation of Obama’s eligibility; dismissing case), appeal dismissed, No. 0914698-CC (11th Cir. Nov. 24, 2009). Page 8 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

26.

27.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket M.D. Fla. (Federal) 8:2009cv01382 Justia - RECAP

Cook v. Simtech, et al Stefan Cook

Corbett v. Bowen Joan Corbett

H

H

H

Citation California Orange County Superior Court 30-2008-00114112-CU-FRCJC Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

TRO DENIED; CASE DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED H

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

F

No

H

H

“Obama Defense”

---

---

H

Court dismissed sua sponte

Cook v. Simtech, No. 8:2009cv01382 (M.D. Fla., July 27, 2009), recons. denied, (Aug. 6, 2009) (finding motion to reconsider “frivolous and wholly without merit). No DISMISSED

---

---

Case dismissed before any defendants made an appearance

Corbett v. Bowen, No. 30-2008-00114112-CU-FR- CJC, (Cal. Orange Cty. Super. Ct. June 8, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility).

Page 9 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 28.

29.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Citation

Craig v. United States Steven Lee Craig

W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:09-cv-00343-F Justia - RECAP H

H

31.

7

Craig v. United States (FOIA) Steven Lee Craig

W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:10-cv-01345-C Justia - RECAP H

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

H

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No ---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Craig v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec. et al, No. 5:10-cv-00659-C (W.D. Okla. July 3, 2010) (dismissing case challenging various government publications defining term “natural born citizen” as unconstitutional).

Relief DENIED

10th Circuit: No. 11-9501 Decision AFFIRMED Petition for Reh’g DENIED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Craig v. Holder, No. 11-9501 (10th Cir. Mar. 17, 2011) (affirming Board of Immigration denial of request to certify that Craig is “natural born citizen” eligible for presidency), reh’g denied (Apr. 29, 2011). DISMISSED Leave to Amend DENIED H

H

H

Citation

Appeal(s)

DISMISSED

U.S. Board of Immigration Appeals.

Citation

30.

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

W.D. Okla. (Federal) 5:10-cv-00659-C

Craig v. U.S. Dept. of Homeland Sec., et al Steven Lee Craig

Craig v. Holder Steven Lee Craig

Original Decision

10th Circuit: No. 09-6082 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED H

Rule 11 Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (08-10817)7 H

No Court dismissed sua sponte

Craig v. United States, No. 5:09-cv-00343-F (W.D. Okla. Apr. 3, 2009) (dismissing case seeking declaration regarding definition of natural born citizen as “incomprehensible and frivolous”), aff’d, No. 096082, 340 F. App’x. 471 (10th Cir. 2009), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 141 (2009).

DISMISSED

10th Circuit: 11-6017 DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

Craig v. United States, No. 5:10-cv-01345-C (W.D. Okla., Jan. 4, 2011) (Dismissing VOIA action brought to obtain documents related to federal definition of “natural born citizen”), appeal voluntarily dismissed, No. 11-6017 (10th Cir. Feb. 10, 2011).

130 S.Ct. 141, 78 USLW 3181.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 10 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 32.

Craig v. Oklahoma Steven Lee Craig

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Daniels v. Husted (OH SOS) Susan Daniels

34.

35.

Dawson v. Obama Kenneth D. Dawson

Dean v. Obama Thomas Dean

E.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:08cv02754 Justia - RECAP H

H

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

DISMISSED

---

---

Citation New York Board of Elections No number Assigned

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

No Obama not a Defendant

Daniels v. Husted, No. 12M000653 (Oh. Commn Pleas Ct, Sept. 7, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed seeking to prevent Obama from being on ballot in Ohio 2012 general election). ---

---

---

---

In re: Daniels, Misc. No. 223 (Oh. Commn Pleas Ct, filed Sept. 12, 2012) (affidavit filed pursuant to Oh. Rev. Code. § 2935.09).8 DISMISSED Recommendation & Order H

H

No ---

---

H

H

Citation

8

N/A: Original filing in OK Supreme Court

US Supreme Court

Craig v. Oklahoma, No. MA-109808 (Okla. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing application seeking determination of definition of “natural born citizen” for purposes of presidential eligibility).

Oh. Common Pleas Ct Geauga County Misc. No. #223 Citation

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED (Application Denied; All Justices Concur)

Oh. Common Pleas Ct Geauga County No. 12M000653 SCRIBD Docs Citation

Daniels Susan Daniels

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Oklahoma Supreme Court No. MA-109808 Citation

33.

Original Decision

Court dismissed sua sponte

Dawson v. Obama, No. 2:08cv02754, 2009 WL 532617 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 2, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

Unknown

In re Objection of Thomas Dean, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid).

Not “counted” because not an actual court case. However, included in scorecard for links/tracking purposes.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 11 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

36.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

New Jersey State Court

Donofrio v Wells Leo Donofrio

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Action filed in Appeals Court

No. AM-0153-08T2 APPLICATION DENIED

NJ Supreme Court APPLICATION DENIED H

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Application DENIED (No. 08A407)9

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Donofrio v. Wells, No. AM-0153-08T2 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. Oct. 30, 2008) (denying application for emergent relief challenging eligibility of McCain and Obama), aff’d, No. _____ (N.J. Oct. 31, 2008), application for stay denied, 129 S. Ct. 752 (2008). 3rd App. District No. C072854 (2012)

37.

Dummett et al v. Bowen

California Superior Court Sacramento County No. 34-2012-80001091

DISMISSED

Ealey v. Sarah Obama James E. Ealey10

S.D. Tex. (Federal) 4:08-mc-00504 Justia - RECAP H

H

9

Petition for Writ of Certiorari. DENIED (No. 14-826)

No

Dummett at al v. Bowen, No. 34-2012-80001091(Cal. Sacramento Cty. Sup. Ct., Oct. 26, 2012) (dismissing birther case seeking to prevent placement of Obama on 2012 general election ballot), appeal dismissed, No. C07254 (Cal. App. Ct. (3rd Div.) Apr. 4, 2013), aff’d, No. C073763 (Cal. App. Ct. (3rd Div.) Jul. 21, 2014), cert. denied, No. 14-826 (U.S. Mar. 23, 2015). DISMISSED H

H

Citation

No. C073763 (2014)

DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs taxed against appellant

John Albert Dummett, r.; Markham Robinson; The Constitution Party; Gil Houston; Larry Lakamp; Milo L. Johnson; Joe Ott

Citation

APPEAL DISMISSED Costs taxed against appellant

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

No ---

Obama not a Defendant; Court dismissed sua sponte

Ealey v. Sarah Obama, No. 4:08-mc-00504 (S.D. Tex. Oct. 20, 2008) (dismissing case alleging that Obama’s grandmother cast spells on various people in the United States).

129 S.Ct. 752, 172 L.Ed.2d 724, 77 USLW 3344.

10

Note: We had originally classified this as a birther case; however upon further review, we’ve determined that the case alleges no birther factual or legal theories. Therefore, we’ve retained it on the chart, but did not count it as a “birther case.” Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 12 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Easterling v. Obama Scott Easterling

US Supreme Court Not Docketed11

Not Docketed

---

---

Never docketed/accepted by Court

Alaska Division of Elections No Number Assigned

REJECTED

---

---

No

38.

39.

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

Epperly v. Obama Gordon Warren Epperly

Citation Alaska Superior Court No. IJU-12-694-CI Citation D. Alaska Federal Court No. 1:12-cv-00011-TMB Justia | RECAP

Citation

40.

Essek v. Obama Daniel John Essek

E.D. Ky. (Federal) 08-379-GFVT Justia - RECAP H

H

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No

Epperly v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Alaska Div. of Elections (Gail Fenumiai, Director) Feb. 28, 2012) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot). REMOVED to Federal Court See below

---

---

No

Epperly v. Obama, No. IJU-12-694-CI (Alaska Superior Ct, filed June 25, 2012; removed to federal court July 27, 2012). DISMISSED AS FRIVOLOUS Motion for Reconsideration DENIED

---

---

No

Epperly v. Obama et al, No. 1:12-cv-00011-TMB (D. Alaska, Aug. 24, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not eligible to serve as President), recon. denied (Oct. 2, 2012). No DISMISSED H

H

Citation

Appeal(s)

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Essek v. Obama, No. 6:08-cv-00379 (E.D. Ky., Jan. 15, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility).

11

Note: This case was apparently filed as an original action in the Supreme Court in June 2009. However, it was never docketed. It was subsequently included as an exhibit in document #69, filed in Barnett v. Obama (C.D. Cal.) on September 21, 2009. We treat this case in the same manner as the various “grand jury presentments” (see supra, Note 5) - i.e., given that it was never officially docketed and considered by the court, it does not “count” as a case for purposes of the Scorecard. However, we include it here, with a link to the filing for reference purposes. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 13 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

41.

Fair et al v. Obama Tracy Fair Miltenberger, Mary Coffey

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Maryland Carroll County Circuit Court 06-C-12-060692

Citation

42.

Farrar v. Obama David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Judy, Thomas Malaren, Laurie Roth

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1215136-60-MALlHI Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

Finding Obama is NBC

Dismissal AFFIRMED Md. Ct. Sp. App. No. 2012-1287 Petition for Rehearing DENIED Petition for Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari. DENIED (No. 14-933)

“Obama Defense”

F

Not Yet Determined

Fair v. Obama, No. 06C12060692 (Md. Carroll Cty. Cir. Ct., Aug. 27, 2012 (dismissing case and relying on Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark to hold that Obama is a “natural born citizen” eligible to serve as President); aff’d, No. 2012-1287 (Md. Ct. Sp. App. Apr. 7, 2014), pet. for reh’g denied (May 14, 2014), pet. for writ.(?) denied (Md. Aug. 28, 2014), pet for reh’g denied (Nov. 20, 2014), cert denied, No. 14-933 (U.S. Apr. 6, 2015). Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC

Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

See below

See below

Farrar v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215136-60-MALlHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012).

Page 14 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Farrar et al. v. Obama, Sec’y of State David Farrar, Leah Lax, Cody Robert Judy, Thomas Malaren, Laurie Roth

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211398

Citation

43.

Fitzpatrick v. Obama 12 Walter Fitzpatrick III

North Carolina State Court Tennessee State Court

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

Georgia Supreme Court No. S12D1180 DENIED

Farrar App. for Stay No. 12A25 Denied by Justice Thomas

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Sup. Ct

Georgia Supreme Court No. S12D1584 Pending (Cody Judy only) Application Dismissed

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 12-5276)

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Sup. Ct

Farrar v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215136-60-MALlHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, Farrar et al v. Obama, No. 2012CV211398 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct. Mar. 2, 2012), recons. denied (Mar. 14, 2012), appeal denied, No. S12D1180 (Ga. Apr. 11, 2012); application dismissed, Cody v. Obama, No. S12D1584 (Ga. Jun. 21, 2012), cert denied, No. 12-5276 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2012), pet. for reh’g denied (U.S. Jan. 7, 2013). DISMISSED

---

---

No

F

Citation

Fitzpatrick v. Obama, No. 09R81 (N.C. Catawba Cty. Super. Ct. May 2009) (rejecting purported “indictment” issued against Obama on grounds that he was not a natural born citizen eligible to serve as President).

12

Note: According to some websites, Fitzpatrick has filed a few complaints against Obama, including, most recently, a “criminal complaint” reportedly filed with the Clerk of Court, Catawba County, NC, File #09R81 (see American Grand Jury (“AGJ”) Article). To date, no official record (docket, etc.) has been located; and court personnel could not confirm the accuracy of these reports. Jul 1, 2010 Update: While we did not find any official docket of this case, the subsequent prosecution of Fitzpatrick makes clear that he did, in fact, attempt to file a criminal complaint against Obama, but was rejected. See, e.g., Bill Poovey/AP, “Cases :involving attempted citizen’s arrest delayed,” as published online by the Washington Examiner (June 29, 2010). H

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

Page 15 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

44.

45.

Freeman v. Obama Benjamin C. Freeman

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Illinois Board of Elections Objection ID: 1229| Election ID: 32 12 SOEB GP 103

Freeman v. Obama Benjamin C. Freeman

Citation Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1306 Election ID: 33

Citation New Jersey Office of Secretary of State OAL No. STE 04588-12

46.

Galasso v. Obama Patrick Galasso Citation

47.

Garvey v. Obama Christopher Garvey

New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Challenge OVERRULED Finding Obama is NBC (Hearing Officer Recommendation)

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Unknown

Freeman v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 103 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (overruling objection to Obama’s placement on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Obama’s long form birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012). Challenge OVERRULED

---

---

No

Freeman v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 112 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision (12 SOEB GP 103) which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States). Challenge DENIED Finding Obama is NBC Initial Decision Adopted

---

---

Unknown

Galasso v Obama, No. STE 04588-12 (N.J. Adm. Apr. 10, 2012) (initial decision rejecting challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), decision adopted as final (NJ Secy of State Apr. 12, 2012). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

Unknown

In re Objection of Christopher Garvey, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid); petition for writ of mandamus denied, Garvey v. N.Y. Board of Elections, No. 12-002764 (N.Y. Supreme Ct., Nassau Cty, Mar. 6, 2012).

Page 16 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

48.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

New York Supreme Court – Nassau County Garvey v. N.Y. Bd. No. 12-002764 of Elections Christopher Garvey

49.

Greenberg v. Brunner Carol L. Greenberg

Citation Ohio State Court Wood Cty. Com. Pleas Ct 2008CV1024 H

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision

Appeal(s)

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Petition/Requested Order to Show Cause DENIED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No ---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Garvey v. N.Y. Bd. of Elections, No. 12-002764 (N.Y. Supreme Ct., Nassau Cty. Mar. 6, 2012) (rejecting petition for writ of mandamus and seeking show cause order, challenging New York Board of Elections rejection of plaintiff’s ballot challenge). DISMISSED (SOS Report, p. 15; Docket) H

H

H

H

Costs Assessed against Plaintiff H

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Greenberg v. Brunner, No. 2008CV1024 (Ohio Wood County Ct. Com. Pl. Jan. 14, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility; assessing costs against plaintiff).

Page 17 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

Petition for Writ of Mandamus (No. 13-70744)

E.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:2012-cv-02997 PACER | RECAP 50.

Motion for TRO DENIED 2nd Motion for TRO DENIED Case DISMISSED

Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al James Grinols; Keith Judd; Thomas MacLeran; Edward Noonan; Robert Odden

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

DENIED Appeal (re: Order denying motion for default judgment) Filed (No. 13-15627)

DISMISSED Appeal (re: Order dismissing case) No. 13-16359 Pending

Grinols et al v. Electoral College et al, No. 2:2012-cv-02997 (E.D. Cal., May 23, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not eligible for Presidency and stay of various election-related event), app. pending, No. 13-16359 (9th Cir.); See also Grinols v. Electoral Coll., No. 2:12-cv-02997, 2013 WL 211135 (E.D. Cal. Jan. 16, 2013) (denying motion for TRO seeking to prevent Obama from taking office; finding that “Plaintiffs failed to show that they are likely to succeed in the courts. Plaintiffs presented their case to the wrong branch of government. Plaintiffs have failed once again and not because there are “dishonest and corrupt judges” across the country, as Plaintiffs' counsel repeated during the hearing on the request for a temporary restraining order. Instead, Plaintiffs have failed in the Courts, and will undoubtedly continue to fail in the Courts, because they ask the Court to supplant the legislative branch and disregard the fundamental doctrine of separation of powers.”); Grinols v. Electoral Coll., No. 2:12-cv-02997, 2013 WL 950011 (E.D. Cal. Mar. 11, 2013) (denying motion for default judgment against Obama because Taitz failed to serve him properly).

Page 18 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

51.

52.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Guthrie v. Obama Paul A. Guthrie

54.

55.

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Dismissed sua sponte

Guthrie v. Obama, No. 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL (S.D. Ind. Jan 19, 2013) (dismissing case challenging Obama's eligibility to be President). S.D. Ind. (Federal) 1:13-cv-0234-SEB-DKL PACER | RECAP

Guthrie v. USA et al

Hackney v. Obama Patrick D. Hackney

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

S.D. Ind. (Federal) 1:13-cv-00080-JMS-DKL Justia | RECAP

Citation 53.

Original Decision

DISMISSED

Hamblin v Obama, (Obama & McCain) Clark Hamblin

Hamrick v. Fukino Don Hamrick

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

D. Ariz. (Federal) 2:09cv00410 Justia - RECAP H

H

---

Guthrie v. Obama, No. 1:13-cv-0234SEB-DKL (S.D. Ind. May 8, 2013) (dismissing case challenging Obama's eligibility to be President (among other things)).

Alaska Division of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

---

REJECTED

---

---

No

Hackney v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Alaska Div. of Elections (Gail Fenumiai, Director) May 29, 2012) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the 2012 ballot). 9th Circuit: 09-17014 APPEAL DISMISSED

DISMISSED H

---

H

No Gov. defended

H

Citation D. Haw. (Federal) 1:08-cv-00544-ACK-KSC Justia - RECAP Citation

Hamblin v. Obama, 2:09cv00410, 2009 WL 2513986 (D. Ariz. Aug. 14, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s and McCain’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, 09-17014 (9th Cir. Nov. 6, 2009). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Hamrick v. Fukino, No. 1:08-cv-00544 ACK-KSC, 2009 WL 1404535 (D. Haw. May 20, 2009) (dismissing case seeking copy of Obama’s certified birth certificate to determine whether he is natural born citizen).

Page 19 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

56.

57.

Hendershot v. Mark Kennedy Albert E. Hendershot

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Alabama Jefferson CountyBirmingham Cir. Ct. No. 01-CV-2011002321.0013

Herbert v. Obama et al Susan Herbert

Herbert v. The United States et al14 Susan Herbert

Citation

H

H

Herbert v. United States, et al Susan Herbert

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

---

H

H

H

---

---

H

HDISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

No Court dismissed sua sponte

Herbert v. US, No. 3:08-cv-00634-TJC-MCR (M.D. Fla. July 1, 2008) (dismissing case alleging, among other things, that U.S. Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts violated the Constitution in refusing to accept plaintiff’s case).

DISMISSED Recommendation & Order H

H

H

11th Circuit: 0910661 APPEAL DISMISSED (sua sponte as frivolous and wholly without merit) H

H

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 09-6777) H

No Court dismissed sua sponte

Herbert v. United States, et al, No. 3:08cv01201 (M.D. Fla. Jan. 20, 2009) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not natural born citizen), appeal dismissed, No. 09-10661 (11th Cir. Aug. 3, 2009) (dismissing appeal as frivolous and wholly without merit), cert. denied, 130 S. Ct. 562 (2009), reh’g denied, 130 S.Ct. 1169 (2010).

13

Payment required to access docket.

14

This case was initially listed as a birther case but upon review of the file, we have determined that it is not related to any birther claim.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

No Obama not a Defendant

Herbert v. Obama, et al, No. 3:08-cv-01164 (M.D. Fla. Dec. 30, 2008) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is not natural born citizen).

H

Citation

F

No

DISMISSED Recommendation & Order

M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08-cv-00634-TJC-MCR HJustiaH - HRECAP

M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08cv01201 Justia - RECAP

“Obama Defense”

Hendershot v. Kennedy, No. 01-CV-2011-002321.00 (Al. Jefferson Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 9, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot).

H

Citation

H

Appeal(s)

DISMISSED

M.D. Fla. (Federal) 3:08-cv-01164-HES-TEM Justia - RECAP

Citation

58.

Original Decision

Page 20 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 59.

60.

Herbert v. James et al. Susan Herbert

Hollander v. McCain Fred Hollander

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

M.D. Fla (Federal) 3:12-cv-00469-MMH-JBT Citation

H

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

DISMISSED 566 F.Supp.2d 63

---

H

Hollister v. Soetoro Gregory S. Hollister

Citation

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:2008cv02254 Justia - RECAP H

H

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Hollander v. McCain, 566 F. Supp. 2d 63 (D.N.H. 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility).

DISMISSED Sanctions Imposed H

H

09-5161 (Dismissal) DISMISSAL AFFIRMED 09-5080 (Sanctions) SANCTIONS AFFIRMED H

H

H

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

H

H

61.

US Supreme Court

Herbert v. James et al, No. 3:12-cv-00469-MMH-JBT (M.D. Fla. Apr. 30, 2012) (dismissing compliant with multiple claims, including Herbert’s “desire to vote and challenge the natural birth clause”).

D.N.H. (Federal) 1:08cv00099 Justia - RECAP H

Appeal(s)

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED

Yes

(No. 10-678)

Hollister v. Soetoro, 601 F. Supp. 2d 179 (D.D.C. 2009) (dismissing interpleader case challenging Obama’s eligibility), subsequent order, 258 F.R.D. 1 (Mar. 27, 2009) (imposing sanctions for filing claim that was not “warranted by existing law or by a nonfrivolous argument for extending, modifying, or reversing existing law or for establishing new law,” under Rule 11), aff’d, Nos. 09-5080 & 09-5161, 368 F. App’x. 154 (D.C. Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 1017 (2011), reh’g denied 131 S. Ct. 1627 (2011).

Page 21 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

62.

63.

House v. Obama et al Todd L. House

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Kentucky Commnw. Court (Franklin County) No. 12-CI-01048

Hunter v. US Supreme Court, et al Darrel Reece Hunter

Citation

N.D. Tex. (Federal) 2:08cv00232 Justia - RECAP H

H

Jackson v. Obama Michael Jackson

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No

House v. Obama, et al, No. 12-CI-01048 (Ky. Commonw. Ct., Oct. 1, 2012) (dismissing case seeking to prevent Obama from placement on 2012 general election ballot). 5th Circuit: No. 09-10246 APPEAL DISMISSED H

No. 10-10009 APPEAL DISMISSED

DISMISSED H

No ---

H

Court dismissed sua sponte

No. 10-10064 APPEAL DISMISSED H

Illinois Board of Elections Objection ID: 1230 | Election ID: 32 12 SOEB GP 104

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Appeal(s)

H

Citation

64.

Original Decision

Hunter v. U.S. Supreme Court, No. 2:08cv00232, 2009 WL 111683, (N.D. Tex., Jan. 16, 2009), (dismissing case alleging, among other things, that Obama is not eligible), appeal dismissed, No. 09-10246 (5th Cir. July 23, 2009), No. 10-10009 (Feb. 4, 2010), No. 10-100064 (Apr. 9, 2010). Challenge OVERRULED Finding Obama is NBC (Hearing Officer Recommendation)

---

---

Unknown

Jackson v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 104 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (overruling objection to Obama’s placement on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Obama’s long form birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012).

Page 22 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

65.

66.

67.

Jackson v. Obama Michael D. Jackson

In re John McCain’s Ineligibility to be on Presidential Primary Ballot in Pa. Carmon Elliott

Jones v. Obama Ruth Jones

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1307 Election ID: 33

Citation Pennsylvania Commw. Court 184 MD 2008 Citation C.D. Cal. (Federal) 2:10-cv-01075 Justia - RECAP Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

OVERRULED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No

Jackson v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 113 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision (12 SOEB GP 104) which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States). DISMISSED H

DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

In re McCain’s Ineligibility to Be on Presidential Primary Ballot in Pa., No. 184 MD 2008 (Pa. Commw. Ct. Mar. 13, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility), aff’d, 944 A.2d 75 (Pa. 2008). DISMISSED

---

---

No Gov. defended

Jones v. Obama, No. 2:10-cv-01075 (C.D. Cal. July 20, 2010) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). No. 878374

Wash. Super. Ct. Thurston County No. 12-2-01763-5 68.

Jordan v. Reed Linda Jordan Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

DISMISSED

Motion for Accelerated Review DENIED (9/25)

DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

(as frivolous) Jordon sanctioned

Jordan v. Secretary of State Sam Reed, No. 12-2-01763-5, 2012 WL 4739216 (Wash. Super. Ct. Aug. 27, 2012) (dismissing as frivolous plaintiff’s complaint seeking to prevent state from including Obama on 2012 ballot), appeal dismissed as frivolous, No. 878374 (Dec. 5, 2012) (dismissing appeal as frivolous and awarding reasonable attorneys’ fees in favor of respondent) (note that the parties thereafter settled the case without Jordan paying attorneys’ fees).

Page 23 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

69.

70.

71.

Judd v. State Sec’y of State of California et al15 Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Kentucky Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al Keith Russell Judd

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket C.D. Cal. (Federal) No. 2:2011-cv-05440 RECAP | PACER Citation E.D. Kentucky (Federal) No. 3:11-cv-00027-DCR RECAP | PACER

Citation E.D. Va. (Federal) No. 1:11-cv-00618 RECAP | PACER

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

RELIEF DENIED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

---

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 2:2011-cv-05440 (C.D. Cal. Aug. 25, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; referring to arguments as “insubstantial or frivolous”). RELIEF DENIED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Kentucky, No. 3:11-cv-00027-DCR (E.D. Ky. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; stating that “[a] cursory review of this document indicates that it is yet another frivolous filing from the plaintiff). RELIEF DENIED

4th Cir. No. 12-07438 DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, No. 1:11-cv-00618 (E.D. Va. 2011 Aug. 8, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds; finding that “Plaintiff’s Motion to remove President Barack Obama from the 2012 ballot and to award all delegates to plaintiff, which is predicted on allegations that Obama was not born in the United States and is not a United States citizen, will be denied as frivolous”).

Judd has filed more than 50 election cases and, in August 2012, filed motions for relief from prior judgments in which he alleged that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and sought to remove Obama from 2012 election ballot. We did not include all these cases in the scorecard because the vast majority of them were summarily dismissed given that Judd has been declared a vexatious litigant. For a complete listing of known Judd cases, however, see below. 15

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 24 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

C.D. Cal. 72.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd Orly Taitz16

No. 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN

74.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd Orly Taitz17

No. 8:12-cv-01888-DOC-AN RECAP

Citation

E.D. Cal. Judd v. Obama et No. 2:13-cv-00537-KJM-AC PACER | RECAP al Keith Russell Judd Citation

75.

---

---

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

E.D. Cal. 2:2013-cv-02180 PACER | RECAP Citation

DISMISSED

9th Circuit No. 12-57177 Dismissal AFFIRMED

No ---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv-01888-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Nov. 7, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit stating election fraud, RICO, and various other claims seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 general election ballot (among other things), aff’d, No. 12-57177 (9th Cir. Aug. 20, 2014). Docket not closed; however, docket states that documents necessary for service must have been filed in 2013 and, as of March 2015, such documents were not filed and no service of process has taken place. Therefore this case cannot fairely be considered “pending.”

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 2:13-cv-00537-KJM-AC (E.D. Cal., filed Mar. 18, 2013) (complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British Citizen and that Judd is a natural born citizen). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 2:2013-cv-02180 (E.D. Cal. April 19, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President).

16

Additional parties include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas G MacLeran, Larry Rappaport, Carol Vita, Lucien Vita.

17

Additional parties include David Farrar, Leah Lax, Thomas G MacLeran, Larry Rappaport, Carol Vita, Lucien Vita.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd et al v. Obama et al, No. 8:12-cv-01507-DOC-AN (C.D. Cal. Oct. 17, 2012) (dismissing lawsuit purportedly removed by plaintiffs from state court case, Taitz v. Obama, No. 30-2012 00582135, to federal court).

C.D. Cal. 73.

F

No DISMISSED H

RECAP Citation

“Obama Defense”

Page 25 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

76.

77.

78.

79.

80.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Colo. No. 1:13-cv-00559 PACER | RECAP Citation S.D. Ind. No. 1:13-cv-00351 PACER | RECAP Citation S.D. Miss. No. 3:13-cv-00305 PACER | RECAP Citation D. Neb. No. 4:13-cv-03045 PACER | RECAP Citation D. Or. No. 3:13-cv-00379 PACER | RECAP

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 1:13-cv-00559-LTB (D. Colo., Apr. 11, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President), app. dismissed No. 13-1186 (10th Cir. May 1, 2013). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 1:13-cv-00351 (S.D. Ind., Nov. 22, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:13-cv-00305(S.D. Miss. Aug. 12, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 4:13-cv-03045 (D. Neb. May 7, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:13-cv-00379 (Mar. 12, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President, stating that “[e]ven if Citation

plaintiff could establish a proper jurisdictional basis for his claims and standing to bring them to this court, I take judicial notice that the question of President Obama's citizenship and eligibility to serve as president has been litigated and resolved in other courts”) (emphasis added).

Page 26 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

81.

82.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.S.C. No. 3:2013-cv-00636 PACER | RECAP Citation N.D. Tex No. 3:2013-cv-01145 PACER | RECAP Citation D. Wis. No. 3:13-cv-00165 PACER | RECAP

83.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:2013-cv-00636 (D.S.C. Apr. 29, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:2013-cv-01145 (N.D. Tex. Mar. 22, 2013) (terminating case seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President on basis of prior sanction order). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:13-cv-00165 (D. Wis. Apr. 15, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President and stating, “I understand plaintiff to be arguing that despite President Obama’s birth certificate indicating that he was born in Hawaii, he is a Kenyan citizen because his father was a Kenyan citizen. That is not how United States citizenship works. Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, all persons born in the United States are citizens of this country.”).

Page 27 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

84.

85.

86.

87.

88.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. W.Va. No. 5:13-cv-00040 PACER | RECAP Citation E.D. Ky. No. 3:13-cv-00004 PACER | RECAP Citation D.N.H. No. 1:13-fp-00094 PACER | RECAP Citation D. Md. No. 1:13-cv-00636 PACER | RECAP Citation W.D. Mo.. 4:13-cv-00290 PACER | RECAP Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 5:13-cv-00040 (D. W. Va. Oct. 22, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 3:13-cv-00004 (E.D. Ky. May 8, 2013) (dismissing action seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 1:13-fp-00094 (D.N.H. May 21, 2013) (dismissing action seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 1:13-cv-00636 (D. Md. Mar. 29, 2013) (dismissing, as frivolous, complaint seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President). No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 4:13-cv-00290 (W.D. Mo. Mar. 29, 2013) (dismissing action seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President).

Page 28 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

89.

90.

Judd v. Obama et al Keith Russell Judd

Judy v. McCain Cody Robert Judy

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Justice v. Fuddy Dr. Robert V. Justice

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

D. Mont. No. 6:13-cv-00019 PACER | RECAP Citation

H

H

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No DISMISSED

DISMISSED

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Judd v. Obama et al, No. 6:13-cv-00019 (D.Mont. Mar. 18, 2013) (dismissing action seeking declaratory judgment that Obama was born a British citizen and is ineligible to be President), appeal dismissed, No. 0280025 (9th Cir., Apr. 28, 2013).

D. Nev. (Federal) 2:08cv01162 Justia - RECAP

DISMISSED H

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

91.

Original Decision

Judy v. McCain, No. 2:08cv01162 (D. Nev., Sept. 8, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility).

Hawaii State Circuit Court 1CC09-1-000783 Citation

DISMISSED

DISMISSAL AFFIRMED18

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Justice v. Fuddy, No. 1CC09-1-000783 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Oct. 9, 2009) (dismissing case seeking access to records allegedly relevant to Obama’s eligibility), aff’d 253 P.3d 665 (Haw. Ct. App. 2011), as corrected (Apr. 26, 2011). 3rd Circuit: 09-4209 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED H

92.

Kerchner et al v. Obama et al Charles F. Kerchner

D.N.J. (Federal) 1:09-cv-00253-JBS-JS Justia - RECAP H

H

H

Citation

18

DISMISSED H

Costs taxed against Kerchner Show Cause (Sanctions) Order Issued

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 10-446)

No Gov. defended

Kerchner v. Obama, 669 F. Supp. 2d 477 (D.N.J. 2009) aff’d, 612 F.3d 204 (3d Cir. 2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 663 (2010).

Note: Corrections to April 7, 2011 Opinion, issued on April 26, 2011 found here.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 29 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 93.

94.

Kerchner et al v. Obama et al Charles F. Kerchner Dale A. Laudenslager

Kesler v. Obama Edward R. Kesler

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Keyes v. Bowen Alan Keyes

Citation

CA State Court Sacramento Cty Sup. Ct Court 34-2008-80000096CUWMGDS

Lakin Article 138 Complaint Terrence Lakin

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

US Army Administrative Law Division No Number Assigned Citation

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED H

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

Kerchner v. Obama, No. 85 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot).

Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-162

Citation

96.

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Pennsylvania State Commonwealth Court No. 85 MD 2012

Citation

95.

Original Decision

Challenge DENIED

--But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

---

Unknown

Kesler v. Obama, No. 2012-162 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”).

DISMISSED Costs Assessed against Plaintiff H

CA Court of Appeals C06232 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs taxed against Keyes

H

CA Supreme Court S188724 Petition for Review DENIED

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 10-1351)

Yes

Keyes v. Bowen, 189 Cal. App. 4th 647 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (affirming dismissal of case challenging Obama’s eligibility), pet. for rev. denied, No. S188724 (Cal. Feb. 2, 2011), cert denied, 132 S. Ct. 99 (2011). Article 138 Complaint REJECTED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Lakin Complaint of Wrongs under Article 138, No Number Assigned (US Army Admin. Law Div. Dec 11, 2009).

Page 30 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

97.

Lakin v. Lind Terrence Lakin

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

99.

UCMJ Investigation MCAT-JA-SC

US v. LTC Terrence L. Lakin Terrence Lakin

Citation N.Y. State Board of Elections No Number Assigned

Laity v. Obama Robert Laity

Citation

100.

Laity v. State of New York Robert Laity

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

New York Court of Claims No. 2012-039-319 Claim No. 120982-81370

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Army Court of Criminal Petition for Writ of Mandamus Appeals DENIED No. ARMY MISC 20100778 Citation

98.

Original Decision

Not applicable (petition filed in appeals court)

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Lakin v. Lind, No. ARMY MISC 20100778 (A. Ct. Crim. App. Oct. 12, 2010) (order) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to compel discovery factual matters allegedly relating to Obama’s eligibility in court martial proceedings). Court Martial: GUILTY

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

United States v. Lakin, No. 20100995 (Mil. Dist. of Wash. DC Dec. 16, 2010) (court martial finding Lakin guilty of, among other things, failure to report to deploy; rejecting claim that his failure was based on legitimate questions as to Obama’s eligibility), appeal withdrawn, (A. Ct. Crim. App. July 28, 2011). OBJECTION OVERRULED

--But see below

---

No

Laity v. Obama, No Number Assigned (N.Y. State Bd. Of Elections Feb 12, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s presence on New York election ballot). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Laity v. State of New York, No. 2012-039-319, Claim No. 120982-81370 (N.Y. Ct. of Claims July 12, 2012) (dismissing claim brought against Board of Elections for rejecting plaintiff’s objections to placement of Obama on 2012 ballot).

Page 31 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

101.

Laity v. State of New York Robert Laity

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

New York Albany County Supreme (Trial) Court No. 005003/2012

Lamb v. Obama et al Thomas A. Lamb

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Request for Mandamus and Injunction DENIED

Appeal (No. 516176) DISMISSED NY Supr. Ct. App. Div. 3rd Dept

Writ DENIED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 13-875)

“Obama Defense”

F

No

NY Ct. App.

Citation

102.

Original Decision

Alaska Superior Court No. 3AN-12-09961CI

Laity v. State of New York, No. 005003-2012, Nov. 7, 2012 Order (N.Y. Albany County Supr. Ct.) (denying mandamus/motion for injunction in special election proceeding); Nov. 28, 2012 Order (denying motion for injunction), appeal dismissed, No. 516176 (N.Y. Supr. Ct. App. Div. 3rd Dept. Apr. 11, 2013), writ denied (N.Y. Ct. App. Nov. 19, 2013), writ denied No. 13-875 (U.S. Mar 21, 2014), pet. for reh’g denied (U.S. May 5, 2013). DISMISSED

Alaska Supreme Court Petition for Review No. S-14936

---

No

DENIED Citation

Lamb v. Obama et al, No. 3AN-12-09961CI (Alaska Super. Ct. Mar. 15, 2013) (dismissing complaint seeking, among other things, court order to release various records of Presidential candidates Barack Obama and Mitt Romney for purported purpose of proving eligibility to be President), pet. for review denied, No. S-14936 (Alaska Mar. 14, 2014). 9th Circuit No. 12-16729

103.

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of USA, et al

D. Ariz. (Federal) 2:11-cv-02089-SRB PACER - RECAP

John Dummett; Leonard Volodarsky; Creg Maroney

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

DISMISSED

Motion for Injunction pending appeal DENIED APPEAL Voluntarily DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of the USA, et al, No. 2:11-cv-02089-SRB (D Ariz. Jul. 11, 2011) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 ballot; warning plaintiff’s attorney that knowingly continuing to bring claims that have previously been dismissed may warrant sanctions in the future”), app. voluntarily dismissed, No. 12-16729 (9th Cir., Nov. 16, 2012).

Page 32 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

W.D. Tenn. Federal Court 2:12-cv-02143-STA-cgc Justia - RECAP19

104.

Liberty Legal Found. v. Nat’l Democratic Party of USA, et al John Dummett; Leonard Volodarsky; Creg Maroney

Citation

105.

19

Lightfoot v. Bowen Gail Lightfoot

CA Supreme Court No. 168690 H

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED Sanctions GRANTED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

6th Cir. Ct. of Appeals No. 12-6082 Appeal DISMISSED No. 12-6634 Appeal of Sanctions Award AFFIRMED

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Liberty Legal Found., v. Nat’l Democratic Party of the USA, et al, No. 2:12-cv-2143, 2012 WL 2368448 (W.D. Tenn. Jun. 21, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being on 2012 ballot); see also --- F. Supp. 2d ---, 2012 WL 1252484 (W.D. Tenn. Apr. 13, 2012) (denying motion to remand because issue of “natural born citizen” interpretation is a federal issue); appeal dismissed, No. 12-6082 (6th Cir. ____, 2012); see also 2012 WL 3683492 (Aug. 24, 2012) (granting sanctions pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1927: finding that “[C]ounsel for Plaintiff reasonably should have known that all Plaintiffs lacked standing to bring this suit, the Court holds that Plaintiffs' claims were frivolous and without any arguable basis in law. As such, counsel for Plaintiff has multiplied the proceedings in this case unreasonably and vexatiously and should therefore be required to satisfy personally the attorneys' fees reasonably incurred by Defendants because of such conduct.”), 2012 WL 6026856 (Dec. 4, 2012) (granting in part petition for attorneys’ fees); 2012 WL 6026496 (Dec. 4, 2012) (denying motion to reconsider order granting §1927 sanctions), aff’d, No. 12-6634 (Sept. 23, 2014), pet. for reh’g, denied (Nov. 6, 2014), pet for en banc reh’g denied, (Nov. 6, 2014). Action filed in Supreme Court

DISMISSED

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Application DENIED (08A524) H

No Obama not a Defendant

Lightfoot v. Bowen, No. S168690 (Cal. Dec. 5, 2008) (dismissing petition for writ of mandate and stay), application for stay denied, 129 S. Ct. 1053 No. 08A524 (Jan. 26, 2009).

Case removed from TN State Court - Chancery Court –Shelby - No. CH-11-1757 | Docket.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 33 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

106.

Maathai v. Obama Wangari Muta Maathi

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Mackay v. Obama Donald Francis Mackay, Jr.

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

M.D. Tenn. Federal Court No. 3:12-mc-00048; 3:12cv-00910 Justia | RECAP Citation

107.

Original Decision

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

DISMISSED

3rd Circuit: No. 11-3862 Voluntarily DISMISSED

Marquis v. Reed Steven Marquis

3rd Circuit: No. 11-3967 DISMISSED

No

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

109.

Martin v Lingle Andy Martin

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

DISMISSED

---

---

08-2-34955-1 SEA

Hawaii Supreme Court 29414

No

Mackay v. Obama, No. 2:11-CV-05458-JP (E.D. Pa. Oct. 6, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal voluntarily dismissed, No. 11- 3862 (3rd Cir. Nov. 2, 2011), appeal dismissed, No 113967 (Dec. 8, 2011).

King County Superior Ct.

Citation

F

---

WA State Court 108.

“Obama Defense”

Maathai v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00910 (M.D. Tenn., Sept. 4, 2012) (dismissing purported whistleblower case seeking ouster of President Obama on grounds that he does not qualify as “natural born citizen” due to alleged Kenyan birth and fact that he did not have two US citizen parents at birth).

E.D. Pa. (Federal Court) No. 2:11-cv-05458-JP Justia - RECAP

Citation

Appeal(s)

No Obama not a Defendant

Marquis v. Reed, No. 08-2-34955-1 SEA (Wash. King County Super. Ct. Oct. 27, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). Action filed in Supreme Court

APPLICATION DENIED H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Martin v. Lingle, No. 29414, 2008 WL 4684786 (Haw. Oct. 22, 2008) (rejecting petition seeking disclosure of Obama’s birth records allegedly related to his eligibility).

Page 34 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

110.

Martin v Lingle Andy Martin

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Hawaii State District Court 1CC08-1-002147

Citation

111.

Martin v. Bennett Andy Martin

Hawaii State District Court 1CC10-1-00096920 Citation

112.

Martin v. Obama Amanda Martin

Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1305 Election ID: 33

Citation

113.

McInnish v. Chapman Hugh McInnish

Alabama Supreme Court No. 1110664 Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED (Docket) H

Appeal(s)

H

Haw. Ct. Appeals APPEAL DISMISSED (Docket) Haw. Sup. Ct. Writ DENIED H

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Martin v. Lingle, No. 1CC08-1-002147 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Jan. 12, 2009) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of Obama’s birth records based on challenge to his eligibility), recons. denied, (Jan. 27, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 29643, 2009 WL 1669050 (Haw. Ct. App. June 9, 2009), cert. denied, No. 29643, 2009 WL 2372096 (Haw. Aug. 3, 2009). DISMISSED (Docket)21

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Martin v. Bennett, No. 1CC10-1-000969 (Haw. Cir. Ct. Sept. 7, 2010) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of Obama’s birth records based on challenge to his eligibility). OVERRULED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Martin v. Obama, No. 12 SOEB GE 111 (Ill. Bd. Elections, Sept. 17, 2012) (overruling objection filed seeking to keep Obama off general election ballot in 2012 on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”; relying on prior decision in Freeman and Jackson primary challenges (12 SOEB GP 103 and 12 SOEB GP 104), which held that Obama’s long form birth certificate sufficiently established birth in the United States). DENIED

Not Applicable (Filed in State Supreme Court)

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Mcinnish v. Chapman, No. 1110665 (Ala. Mar. 27, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to require secretary of state to order Obama to produce original birth certificate).

20

Actual case cannot be bookmarked, but can be located via search from this link.

21

Actual order cannot be bookmarked, but can be located in “case info” after searching for case from this link.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

US Supreme Court

Page 35 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

114.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Alabama Superior Court (Montgomery County) No. 3-CV-2012-001053

McInnish v. Chapman Hugh McInnish

Citation

115.

116.

117.

E.D. Wash. (Federal) 2:11-cv-00374-EFS Justia - RECAP

McLanahan v. Obama Tim McLanahan

Meroni et al v. McHenry County Grand Jury Foreman et al. Sharon A. Meroni

Citation Illinois 22nd Judicial Dist. McHenry County, IL, Case No 09mr399

Meroni et al v. Obama Sharon Meroni, Chris Cleveland, and Stephen Boulton

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation Ill. Bd. of Elections Objection ID: 1242 | Election ID: 32 Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

Ala. S.Ct. No. 1120465 AFFIRMED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 14-73)

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Mcinnish v. Chapman, No. 03-CV-2012-001053(Al. Cir. Ct. Dec. 7, 2012) (granting motion to dismiss complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot), aff’d, No. 1120465 (Ala. Mar. 21, 2014), cert denied, No. 14-73 (U.S. Oct. 6, 2014) No DISMISSED

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

McLanahan v. Obama, No. 2:11-CV-00374-EFS (E.D. Wash. Oct. 13, 2011) (dismissing complaint challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility).

DENIED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Meroni v. McHenry Cty. Grand Jury Foreman, No. 09mr339 (Ill. Cir. Ct. (22nd Dist.) Jan. 20, 2010) (dismissing case seeking to compel grand jury investigation into Obama’s eligibility). Voluntarily Withdrawn But still OVERRULED

---

---

No

Meroni et al v. Obama, 12 SOEB GP 104 (Ill. Bd. of Elections Hearing Officer Recommendation Jan. 27, 2012) (Obama’s birth certificate “clearly establishes” his eligibility for office as a “Natural Born Citizen”), objection overruled (Ill. State Bd. of Elections, Feb. 3, 2012).

Page 36 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

118.

119.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Citation

H

H

Neal v. Brunner David M. Neal

Ohio State Court Warren Cty. Com. Pleas Ct 2008CV72726

Neely v. Obama Gerald Lee Neely

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

Montgomery v. Obama, No. _______ (Kansas Bd. Of Elections, Sept __, 2012) (ballot challenge seeking to keep Obama of 2012 general election ballot on grounds he is not “natural born citizen”). DISMISSED

---

H

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Morrow v. Barak Humane Obama, No. 1:08-cv-22345 (S.D. Fla. Mar. 9, 2009) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED (SOS Report, p. 15; Docket) H

H

H

---

---

H

No Obama not a Defendant

H

E.D. Mich. (Federal) 2:08-cv-15243 Justia - RECAP H

H

Neal v. Brunner, No. 2008CV72726 (Ohio Ct. Com. Pl. Warren County Nov. 17, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED Sua Sponte H

H

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

---

US Supreme Court

H

Citation

121.

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Voluntarily Withdrawn

S.D. Fla. (Federal) 1:08-cv-22345 Justia - RECAP

Morrow v. Obama Susan A. Morrow

Appeal(s)

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Kansas. Bd. Elections No. ___________

Montgomery v. Obama Joe Montgomery

Citation

120.

Original Decision

No ---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Neely v. Obama, 2:08-cv-15243 (E.D. Mich. Feb. 4, 2009) (dismissing case challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility).

Page 37 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

122.

Noonan et al v. Bowen & Obama

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Superior Court of Ca. Sacramento County 2012-80001048

Edward C. Noonan, Pamela Barnett, Sharon Chickering, George Miller, Tony Dolz, Neil Turner, Gary Wilmott

Noonan et al v. Bowen Edward Noonan Thomas MacLeran Keith Judd Orly Taitz

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Writ of Mandate DISMISSED Costs assessed against Plaintiff

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Cal. Third Appellate Dist. Certiorari No. C071764 DENIED (No. 14-826 - Dummet) AFFIRMED Pet. for Rev, Petition for Writ of Cal. Sup. Ct. Certiorari DENIED DENIED

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

(No. 14-930 - Barnett)

Citation

123.

Original Decision

California Supreme Court No. S207078 Citation

Noonan v. Bowen et al, No. 2012-80001048 (Cal. Sacramento Cty. Super. Ct., July 5, 2012) (dismissing case seeking to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot), judgment aff’d, No. C071764 (Ca. App. (3rd. Dist) Aug. 27, 2014), pet. for reh’g denied (Sept. 18, 2014), pet. for rev. denied, No. S221700 (Cal. Oct. 29, 2014), cert denied (as to Dummett) No. 14-826 (U.S. Mar. 23, 2015), cert denied (as to Barnett), No. 14-930 (U.S. Apr. 6, 2015). PETITION DENIED

N/A – originally filed in CA Supreme Court

Application for Stay No. 12A606 DENIED

Noonan et al v. Bowen, No. S207078 (Cal. Dec. 6, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandate/prohibition challenging 2012 election of Obama as President).

Page 38 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Vermont Superior Court Washington County No. 611-8-12 Wncv

124.

Paige v. Obama H. Brooke Paige Citation

125.

126.

Patriot’s Heart Media Network v. Illinois Board of Elections Sharon Meroni

Patriot’s Heart Network v Soetoro Sharon Meroni

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:09-mc-00442-RCL Justia - RECAP H

H

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Motion for TRO DENIED Finding Obama is NBC DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

DISMISSED

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 13-1076) Petition for Rehearing DENIED

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Patriot’s Heart Media Network v. Ill. Bd. of Elections, No. 10CH000605 (Ill. McHenry Cty. Chancery. Ct. Mar. 8, 2010) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on ballot). No DISMISSED H

H

Citation

APPEAL DISMISSED Petition for Rehearing DENIED

US Supreme Court

Paige v. Obama, No. 611-8-12 WNCV (Vt. Super. Ct. Nov. 14, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from being placed in 2012 general election ballot; relying in Ankeny (916 N.E.2d 678) to find that persons born in U.S. is “are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents); see also Order Denying Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (Sept. 21, 2012) (“[t]he common law of England, the American colonies, and later the United States, all support one interpretation only: "that persons born within the borders of the United States are 'natural born Citizens' for Article II, Section 1 purposes, regardless of the citizenship of their parents”) (citing Ankeny), app. dismissed, 2013 VT 105 (Vt. Oct. 18, 2013), pet for reh’d denied (Dec. 6, 2013), cert denied, No. 13-1076 (U.S. May 19, 2014), pet. for reh’g denied (Aug. 11, 2014).

Illinois State Court, McHenry County No. 10CH000605 Docket Citation

Appeal(s)

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Patriot’s Heart Media Network, Inc. v. Soetoro, No. 1:09-mc-00442-RCL (D.D.C. Sept. 10, 2009) (rejecting request to convene grand jury to investigate Obama’s eligibility; dismissing petition for lack of jurisdiction).

Page 39 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

3rd Circuit 127.

In re Paul Andrew Mitchell 22 Paul Andrew Mitchell F

E.D. Pa. (Federal) 2:08-cv-04083-RBS Justia - RECAP H

H

H

Citation

128.

Powell v. Obama Kevin Richard Powell

Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1216823-60-MALIHI Citation

Powell v. Obama Kevin Richard Powell

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211528

Citation

Writ of Mandamus (08-4443) (Original Proceeding)

Writ DENIED H

Not applicable (original proceeding in 3rd Cir.)

No ---

304 Fed.Appx. 113, 2008 WL 5381436

Court dismissed sua sponte

In Re Paul Andrew Mitchell, 304 F. App’x. 113 (3rd Cir., Dec. 22, 2008) (denying petition for writ of mandamus regarding challenge to Obama’s eligibility). Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC

Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

See below

See below

Powell v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216823-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012).

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

Ga. Supreme Court. No. S12D1077 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED

---

Yes in trial court No in GA. Sup. Ct

Powell v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216823-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, No. 2012CV211528 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1077 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012).

22

Note: Paul Andrew Mitchell has sought to intervene in multiple birther cases of which this is just one. Because he filed “substantive” briefs with this case/appeal, it is included as a separate case. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 40 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

129.

Purpura v. Sebelius23 Nicholas E. Purpura, Donald R Laster Jr

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

D.N.J. (Federal) 3:10-cv-04814-FLW-DEA Justia - RECAP

Citation

130.

Purpura et al v. Obama Nicholas E. Purpura Theodore T.Moran

Purpura et al v. Obama

New Jersey Office of Secretary of State OAL No. STE 04534-12

Citation

N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. No. A-004478-11-T03

Nicholas E. Purpura Theodore T. Moran

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

No. 11-2303 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED Costs Taxed against Appellants

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 11-7275) Petition for Reh’g DENIED

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Purpura v. Sebelius, No. 3:10-CV-04814, 2011 WL 1547768, (D. N.J. Apr. 21, 2011) (dismissing case challenging Patient Protection and Affordable Care on various grounds, including that was not signed into law by a person eligible to be President of the United States), aff’d, 446 F. App’x 496 (3d Cir. 2011) cert. denied, 132 S. Ct. 1037 (U.S. 2012) reh’g denied, No. 11-7275, 2012 WL 538800 (U.S. Feb. 21, 2012). Challenge DENIED Finding Obama is NBC Initial Decision Adopted

See below

---

Yes

Purpura v Obama, No. STE 04534-12, 2012 WL 1369003 (N.J. Adm. Apr. 10, 2012) (initial decision rejecting challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), decision adopted as final (NJ Secy of State Apr. 12, 2012), aff’d, No. A-004478-11-T03, 2012 WL 1949041 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 31, 2012) (per curiam). AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC24

Petition for Cert DENIED N.J. Sup. Ct. No. 071052

---

TBD

Purpura v Obama, No. A-004478-11-T03, 2012 WL 1949041 (N.J. Super. Ct. App. Div. May 31, 2012) (per curiam) (affirming N.J. Secy of State decision rejecting ballot challenge to Obama's 2012 nominating position and finding that, assuming Obama was born in Hawaii, he is a "natural born citizen" eligible for the presidency per Ankeny and Wong Kim Ark), cert denied, No. 071052 (N.J. Sept. 7, 2012).

23

Note: This case challenges the Patients Affordable Health Care Act on multiple grounds, including the charge that because Obama is not a “natural born citizen” his signing of the bill into law violated the Constitution. 24

The Appellate Court affirmed the Secretary of State’s Decision: “We affirm substantially for the reasons set forthin ALJ Jeff S. Masin's thorough and thoughtful written opinion of April 10, 2012, as adopted by the Secretary on April 12,2012.” Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 41 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

131.

Reade v. Galvin, et al William F. Reade

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Rhodes v. Gates Connie Rhodes

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

D. Mass (Federal) No. 1:12-cv-11492 Justia | RECAP

Citation

132.

Original Decision

H

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

1st Cir. No. 12-2406 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

DISMISSED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

-----

F

No Obama not a defendants

No

TRO DENIED; DISMISSED H

---

H

---

H

H

Citation

“Obama Defense”

Reade v. Galvin, No. 1:12-cv-11492, 2012 WL 5385683 (D. Mass. Oct. 30, 2012) (dismissing complaint filed against Massachusetts Secretary of State for allegedly refusing to consider plaintiff’s challenge to Obama’s eligibility to be included on 2012 primary ballot; finding that Reade does not have standing to challenge eligibility in court), aff’d, No. 12-2406 (1st Cir. June 11, 2013).

W.D. Tex. (Federal) 5:09-cv-00703-XR Justia - RECAP H

Appeal(s)

Court dismissed sua sponte

Rhodes v. Gates, 5:09-cv-00703-XR (W.D.Tex., Aug. 28, 2009) (denying TRO seeking to stay military orders due to challenge to Obama’s eligibility). TRO DENIED & CASE DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED H

---

---

H

M.D. Ga. (Federal) 4:09-cv-00106-CDL Justia - RECAP H

133.

H

Sanctions Imposed Final Sanctions Order 670 F.Supp.2d 1363 H

H

Rhodes v. MacDonald Connie Rhodes H

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

th

11 Circuit Appeal of Sanctions Only Sanctions AFFIRMED Petition for Rehearing DENIED

Application DENIED (No. 10A56)

No Gov. defended

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 10-541)

Rhodes v. MacDonald, No. 409-CV-106CDL, 2009 WL 2997605 (M.D. Ga. Sept. 16, 2009) (denying TRO seeking to stay military orders due to challenge to Obama’s eligibility; criticizing complaint as frivolous), recons. denied, 2009 WL 3111834 (Sept. 18, 2009), subsequent order, 670 F. Supp. 2d 1363 (M.D. Ga. 2009) (imposing $20,000 sanction for violating Rule 11), aff’d, 368 Fed.Appx. 949, (11th Cir. 2010), reh’g denied, No. 09-15418-BB (11th Cir. May 14, 2010), app. for stay denied, 131 S.Ct. 44 (2010), cert. denied, 131 S. Ct. 918 (2011).

Page 42 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

134.

135.

25

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Alabama Annamarie Riethmiller25

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Arizona Annamarie Riethmiller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket M.D. Ala. (Federal Court) No. 2:12-cv-00823-SRW PACER| RECAP

Citation

D. Ariz. (Federal Court) No. 2:12-cv-02034 PACER | RECAP

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Alabama, 2012 WL 5042026 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 2, 2012) report and recommendation adopted, 2:12-CV-823-WKW, 2012 WL 5045219 (M.D. Ala. Oct. 18, 2012) (dismissing claim seeking, among other things, injunction preventing defendants from placing candidate Obama on the ballot for the November 2012 election and declaration that Obama is ineligible to hold office of President as he is not a “natural born” citizen). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Arizona, No. 2:2012-cv-02034 (D. Ariz., Sept. 29, 2012) (order denying declaratory judgment and complaint “seeking to enjoin the electors for the state of Arizona from casting a vote for President Obama because he is not a natural born citizen” on grounds that complaint fails to meet FRCP Rule 8; granting plaintiff 30 days to file amended complaint); see also 2012 WL 5416603 (D. Ariz. Nov. 6, 2012) (order dismissing amended complaint).

Multiple cases remain pending. For a complete list of the Riethmiller cases located to date, see below.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 43 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 136.

137.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Delaware Annamarie Riethmiller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

D. Del.

No. 1:12cv1197-UNA RECAP | PACER Citation

DISMISSED

---

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v.. Electors for the State of Delaware, No. 1:12cv1197-UNA (D. Del., Oct. 9, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”).

C.D. Ill. (Federal Court) Annamarie Last No No. 1:12-cv-01373-JES-JAG DISMISSED ----Name Uncertain Obama not a Defendant PACER | RECAP [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Reithmiller) v. Electors for State of Illinois, No. 1:12-cv-01373-JES-JAG Illinois (C.D. Ill. Oct. 1, 2012) (dismissing and finding that birther-related complaint “is frivolous, fails to state a Citation Annamarie legal claim over which this Court would have proper jurisdiction, and fails to even minimally comply with 26 Riethmiller [FRCP 8]”).

138.

26

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Indiana Annamarie Riethmiller

N.D. Ind. (Federal) No. 1:12-cv-00335 PACER | RECAP

Citation

DISMISSED

7th Circuit No. 12-3361 DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Indiana, No.1:2012-cv-00335 (N.D. Ind. Sept. 24, 2012) (order sua sponte dismissing, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i), frivolous complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen” and imposing filing restrictions on plaintiff for filing frivolous actions), appeal dismissed, No. 12-3361 (7th Cir. Nov. 8, 2012).

For more information on the Riethmiller cases, see below.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 44 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 139.

140.

141.

Annamarie [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Kentucky Annamarie Riethmiller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket W.D. Ky (Federal) No. 3:12-cv-00602 PACER | RECAP

Citation

Annamarie [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Louisiana Annamarie Riethmiller

M.D. La. (Federal) No. 1:12-cv-601 PACER | RECAP

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Maine Annamarie Riethmiller

D. Me. (Federal Court) No. 1-12-cv-00293-DBH PACER | RECAP

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie ? Last Name Uncertain v. Electors for Kentucky, 3:12-cv--602-H, 2012 WL 5398565 (W.D. La. Nov. 5, 2012) (relying on Berg v. Obama, 586 F.3d 234, 239 (3d Cir. 2009) to dismiss complaint on standing grounds, which sought (among other things) to prevent Obama’s placement on 2012 general election ballot). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie v. Electors ex rel. Louisiana, 1:2012-cv-601-BAJ, 2012 WL 5878153 (M.D. La. Oct. 15, 2012) (recommending dismissal of complaint which included birther claims, as “both fanciful and delusional,” which “fail as a matter of law”) Order Adopting Recommendations and Dismissing Case (Nov. 21, 2012). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain v Electors for the State of Maine, No. 1-12-cv-00293-DBH (D. Me. Sep 27, 2012) (magistrate recommendation to dismiss case sua sponte pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (e)(2)(B) because the action is frivolous and fails to state a claim) Sept. 27, 2012 (order adopting recommendation and dismissing case with prejudice).

Page 45 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

142.

143.

144.

145.

146.

Annamarie v. 619 Others Annamarie Riethmiller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Md. (Federal Court) No. 1-12-cv-2934-JKB PACER | RECAP Citation

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Michigan Annamarie Riethmiller

D. Mich. (Federal Court) No. 1:12-cv-01043 RECAP | PACER

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain [Reithmiller] v. Electors for State of Mississippi Annamarie Riethmiller

S.D. Miss. (Federal Court) No. 3:12-cv-00671 RECAP | PACER

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Missouri Annamarie Riethmiller

E.D. Mo. (Federal Court) No. 4:12-cv-01739-CAS RECAP | PACER

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation

Citation

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

---

Annamarie v. 619 Others, 1-12-cv-2934-JKB, 2013 WL 363778 (D. Md. Jan. 29, 2013) (dismissing complaint which included birther claims as “the product of fantasy or delusional thinking that cannot be addressed by this court.”). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Michigan No. 1:12-cv-01043 (W.D. Mich., Oct. 12, 2012) (magistrate report and recommendation that complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen” be dismissed), Order Dismissing Case (Nov. 1, 2012). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

[Reithmiller] Annamarie LNU v. Electors for State of Mississippi, No. 3:12-cv-00671-TSL-MTP (S.D. Miss. Oct. 10, 2012) (magistrate’s order recommending dismissal of birther compliant), Order (Oct. 30. 2012) adopting recommendation and dismissing case as frivolous). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v. Electors for State of Missouri, No. 4:12-cv-01739-CAS (E.D. Mo. Sept. 27, 2012) (sua sponte and summarily dismissing, as frivolous, case seeking, among other things, declaration that Obama is not a “natural born citizen” and finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith).

Page 46 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 147.

148.

149.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Montana Annamarie Riethmiller

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Nebraska Annamarie Riethmiller

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of New York Annamarie Riethmiller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Mont. (Federal Court) No. 9:12-cv-00164

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

RECAP | PACER Citation D. Neb. (Federal Court) No. 8:12-cv-00348 RECAP | PACER

Citation

W.D.N.Y. No. 1:12-cv-906-RJA RECAP | PACER

Citation

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain v. Electors ex rel. Montana, No. 9:12-cv-00164-DLC-JCL, 2012 WL 5879607 (D. Mont. Oct. 17, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen,” as frivolous). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Nebraska , No. 8:12-cv-00348RGK-PRSE, 2012 WL 5874371 (D. Neb., docketed Sept. 27, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency; “The 52-page Complaint submitted by Plaintiff consists of, at best, nonsensical and rambling statements regarding President Barack Obama’s citizenship and his eligibility to be President of the United States on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of New York, No. 1:12-cv-906 (W.D.N.Y. Oct. 3, 2012) (order sua sponte and summarily dismissing, as frivolous, complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”; finding that appeal cannot be taken in good faith) .

N.D. Ohio 150.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Ohio Annamarie Riethmiller

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

No. 5:2012-mc-00122 RECAP | PACER

Citation

DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Last Name Uncertain v. Electors for Ohio, No. 5:2012-mc-00122, 2012 WL 5304734 (N.D. Ohio Oct. 25, 2012) (dismissing complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”).

Page 47 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

E.D. Pa. (Federal Court) 151.

152.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Pennsylvania Annamarie Riethmiller

No. 2:12-cv-05767-ER

DISMISSED

---

---

RECAP | PACER

Citation

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Pennsylvania, No. 2:12-cv05767-ER (E.D. Pa. Oct. 17, 2012) (“The complaint, which asserts that President Obama is not a suitable presidential candidate and seeks his removal from the ballot in the 2012 presidential election, is dismissed as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(i)”).

W.D. Va. (Federal Court) Annamarie LNU No No. 1:12-cv-00058-JPJ-PMS DISMISSED ----[Riethmiller] v. Obama not a Defendant PACER | RECAP Electors for State of Virginia Annamarie Last Name Uncertain (Riethmiller) v. Electors for the State of Virginia, No. 1:12-cv-00058-JPJAnnamarie PMS, 2012 WL 4742363 (W.D. Va. Oct 4, 2012) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility for the Citation Riethmiller presidency as frivolous and finding that plaintiff lacks standing).

153.

154.

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Washington Annamarie Riethmiller

Annamarie LNU [Riethmiller] v. Electors for State of Wisconsin Annamarie Riethmiller

E.D. Washington (Federal) No. 2:12-cv-00548-TOR RECAP | PACER.

Citation W.D. Wis. (Federal Court) No. 1:12-cv-00977-WCG PACER | RECAP

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Citation

DISMISSED

9th Cir. No. 12-35851 DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Riethmiller v Electors for the State of Washington, No. 2:12-cv-00548-TOR (E.D. Wash. Sept. 26, 2012) (sua sponte order dismissing birther complaint as frivolous pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)); appeal dismissed, No. 12-35851 (9th Cir. April 5, 2013); see also Feb. 27, 2013 Order (denying motion to proceed in forma pauperis because “we find that the appeal is frivolous”). DISMISSED

7th Cir. No. 12-3364 DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Annamarie LNU v. Electors for the State of Wisconsin, No. 1:12-cv-00977-WCG (E.D. Wis. Sept. 27, 2012) (sua sponte dismissing, for failure to comply with FRCP 8, complaint alleging, among other things, that Obama is ineligible for presidency on grounds he is not a “natural born citizen”); appeal dismissed , No. 123364 (7th Cir. Nov.8, 2012).

Page 48 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

155.

Ripley v. Obama Valeria I. Ripley

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

157.

Robinson v. Bowen (McCain) Markham Robinson Roy v. Fed. Election Comm., (Obama & McCain) Kamal K. Roy 27

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-163 Citation

156.

Original Decision

H

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

--But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

---

No

Ripley v. Obama, No. 2012-163 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”). DISMISSED

---

H

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Robinson v. Bowen, 567 F. Supp. 2d 1144 (N.D. Cal. 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s eligibility).

W.D. Wash. (Federal) 2:08cv01519 Justia - RECAP H

No

DISMISSED Recommendation & Order H

H

H

H

Citation

F

US Supreme Court

H

Citation

H

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Challenge DENIED

N.D. Cal. (Federal) 3:08cv03836 Justia - RECAP H

Appeal(s)

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Roy v. Fed. Election Comm’n, 2:08cv01519, 2008 WL 4921263 (W.D. Wash. Nov. 14, 2008) (dismissing case challenging eligibility of Obama and McCain).

27

Note: Kamal Kama Roy has filed well over a dozen lawsuits, many naming Obama. Although the pleadings are utterly unintelligible, at least a few of his pleadings have included references to various birther claims. The courts always dismiss these cases, typically sua sponte, a frivolous and unintelligible, shortly after he files them. H

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

Page 49 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 158.

159.

Scheveck v. Obama Thomas Scheveck

Schneller v. Cortes James D. Schneller

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Schneller v. Obama et al James D. Schneller

Citation

Pennsylvania Supreme Court 199 MM 2008

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

OBJECTION DISMISSED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Unknown

---

Scheveck v. Obama, No Number Assigned (S.D. Bd. of Elections May 11, 2011) (dismissing HAVA complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to appear on ballot).

Action filed in Supreme Court

Application DENIED H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

Application (08A592) DENIED Petition for Writ of Certiorari DISMISSED with comments (No. 08-9797) H

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 75 MD 2012 Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

South Dakota Board of Elections

Citation

160.

Original Decision

Schneller v. Cortes, No. 199 MM 2008 (Pa. Jan. 8, 2009) (denying emergency application challenging Obama’s eligibility), pet. for cert. dismissed, 129 S. Ct. 2830 (2009) (finding that Schneller has “repeatedly abused this Court's process” and directing Clerk to reject any further petitions in noncriminal matters from Schneller unless he docketing fee is paid and petition is submitted in compliance with Court rules). DISMISSED

DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED

---

Yes

See Note in 212 MD 2012

Schneller v. Obama, No. 75 MD 2012 (Pa. Commw. Ct., Mar. 2. 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot), appeal dismissed, No. 24 MAP 2012 (Pa. Mar. 23, 2012), recons. denied (Pa. Apr. 26, 2012).

Page 50 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

PA S. Ct. 55 MAP 2012

161.

Schneller v. Corbett, et al James D. Schneller

Pennsylvania Commonwealth Court 212 MD 2012

Citation

DISMISSED

Application for TRO DENIED Emergency Stay and Injunction

162.

ex rel Sibley v. Obama Montgomery Blair Sibley (Quo Warranto) Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

No Obama not a Defendant

DENIED Dismissal AFFIRMED Schneller v. Corbett et al, No. 212 MD 201 (Pa. Commw. Ct., May 25, 2012) (dismissing multiple claims relating to “natural born citizen” issue, including purported “quo warranto” action on grounds that Obama is ineligible to be President and action to compel state election board to hold hearing on Obama’s eligibility), app. for temporary restraining order and injunction stay denied, No. 55 MAP 2012 (Pa. Nov. 9, 2013), application for emergency stay and injunction denied (Dec. 27, 2012), aff’d, (Jul. 16, 2013). Petition for Writ of Mandamus

D.D.C. (Federal) 1:12-cv-00001-JDB Justia - RECAP

---

No. 12-5040 DENIED DISMISSED Dismissal AFFIRMED No. 12-5198

Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 11-1185) Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 12-736)

No Government Defended

Sibley v. Obama, 866 F.Supp.2d 17 (D.D.C. Jun. 6, 2012) (dismissing complaint containing, among other things, a “petition for writs “quo warranto” to remove President Obama from his current office and, also or alternatively, to bar him from running for the office of president again in the upcoming November election”), affirmed per curiam, No. 12-5198, 2012 WL 6603088 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 6, 2012) (granting summary affirmance and stating that Sibley’s claims are without merit), cert denied, No. 12–736, 2013 WL 598531 (U.S. Feb. 19, 2013); see also Sibley v. Obama, No. 12-5040 (D.C. Cir. Mar. 6, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to compel district court to rule on complaint and various motions), reh’g and reh’g en bank denied (May 4, 2012), cert denied, No. 11-1185 (U.S. Jun. 4, 2012).

Page 51 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 163.

164.

165.

166.

Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley

Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley

Sibley v. Obama Montgomery Sibley

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12 AA 516 Citation D.C. Superior Court No. 2012 CA 004892 Citation D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12 AA 1498

Citation D.C. Cir. (Federal) 1:12-cv-01832 Justia | RECAP Citation

Original Decision

Appeal(s)

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

n/a – case brought in Court of Appeals

DISMISSED

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, No. 12 AA 516 (D.C. Ct. App. May 29, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 primary ballot), cert denied, 133 S.Ct. 851 (2013). DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, No. 2012 CA 004892 B (D.C. Super. Ct., Sept. 7, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking to prevent Obama from appearing on 2012 general election ballot).

DISMISSED

1.

2. Petition for Writ of Certiorari DENIED (No. 12-467)

n/a – case brought in Court of Appeals

No Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, No. 12 AA 1498 (D.C. Ct. App., Sept. 18, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 general election ballot); reh’g denied (Oct. 2, 2012), cert denied, 133 S.Ct. 851 (2013). DISMISSED

D.C. Cir No. 13-5017 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

---

Yes

Sibley v. Obama, No. 1:12-cv-01832, 2012 WL 6625813 (D.D.C. Dec. 19, 2012) (dismissing purported quo warranto suit asking court to compel Obama to demonstrate that he is a “natural born citizen”), aff’d, No. 13-5017 (D.C. Cir. June 5, 2013).

Page 52 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name 167.

168.

169.

170.

28

Sibley v. Alexander et al Montgomery Sibley

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Sorensen v. Riley (Obama & McCain) Harold Sorenson

US Supreme Court

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Motion for TRO Denied DISMISSED

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

DISMISSED TRO DENIED

D.C. Cir. (Federal) 1:12-cv-01984-JDB28 Justia | RECAP

F

---

---

Cause remanded to D.C. court

---

No Obama not a Defendant

2012-CA-008644 B Sibley v. Alexander et al, No. 12-cv-01984, 2013 WL 76286, --- F.Supp.2d ---- (D.D.C. Jan. 8, 2013) (dismissing purported quo warranto suit attempting to compel Obama to demonstrate that he is a “natural born citizen” dismissed on jurisdictional grounds; case remanded to District of Columbia courts).

Citation D.C. Court of Appeals No. 12-AA-1906B

DISMISSED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Sibley v. D.C. Board of Elections & Ethics, 12-AA-1906B (D.C. Ct. App., Sept. 18, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s 2012 election without issuing opinion)29.

Citation Alabama State Court Montgomery County CV-2008-001906.00 30

No DISMISSED

---

H

---

HF

Citation

“Obama Defense”

Sibley v. Alexander, et al, No. 2012-CA-008644 B (D.C. Super. Ct., Mar. 5, 2013) (denying motion for preliminary injunction and dismissing purported quo warranto suit attempting to compel Obama to demonstrate that he is a “natural born citizen”).

Citation

H

Appeal(s)

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

D.C. Superior Court No. 2012-CA-008644 B

Sibley v. Alexander et al Montgomery Sibley

Sibley v. DC Bd. of Elections Montgomery Sibley

Original Decision

State defended; No Obama atty appeared

Sorenson v. Riley, No. CV-2008-001906.00 (Ala. Montgomery Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 1, 2009) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s and McCain’s eligibility).

Removed to federal court; case originally filed in D.C. Superior Court (No. 2012-CA-008644 B).

29

While docket is unavailable, Sibley has sued this court in federal court for dismissing this case without an opinion. See Sibley v. Macaluso et al, No. 1:13-cv-00319-JDB (D.C. Cir. filed Mar. 12, 2013) 30

Note: Requires paid subscription to access court documents: Complaint; Motion to Dismiss; Motion to Dismiss Granted. H

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

H

H

H

Page 53 of 84

H

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

171.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Sorenson v. Kennedy Harold Sorenson

Spuck v. Secretary of State

Ohio State Court Erie County C.P. 2008CV1116 Citation

173.

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Alabama State Court Jefferson-Birmingham County 01-CV-2011-0023.00 Citation

172.

Original Decision

Stamper v. US Gordon Allen Stamper

N.D. Ohio (Federal) 1:08-cv-02593-JG Justia - RECAP H

H

H

Citation New York King County Supreme (Trial) Court 029641/2008

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

Strunk v. Patterson Christopher Earl Strunk

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Sorenson v. Kennedy, No. 01-CV-2011-0023.00 (Ala. Montgomery Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 19, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot). DISMISSED (SOS Report, p. 15) H

---

---

H

No Obama not a Defendant

Spuck v. Secretary of State, No. 2008CV1116 (Ohio Erie County Ct. Com. Pl. ____, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED

No

H

“Appeal from this decision could not be taken in good faith”

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Stamper v. United States, No. 1:08 CV 2593, 2008 WL 4838073 (N.D. Ohio Nov. 4, 2008) (dismissing case challenging McCain’s and Obama’s eligibility, finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith).

H

174.

“Obama Defense”

DISMISSED H

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

Strunk v. Patterson, No. 029641/2008 (N.Y. King County Supr. Ct. Nov. 3, 2008) (dismissing case seeking to stay 2008 election on various grounds).

Page 54 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

New York King County Supreme (Trial) Court 029642/2008

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

H

175.

Strunk v. Patterson Christopher Earl Strunk

Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections Christopher Earl Strunk

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

CASE DISMISSED

H

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Consolidated app. for appeal (w/ 2011 case below) N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) Case No. 2011-11561

“Obama Defense”

F

No

DISMISSED Appeal # 2014-10459

Obama not a Defendant

N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept)

PENDING

Citation

176.

Appeal(s)

E.D.N.Y. (Federal Court) 1:08cv04289 Justia - RECAP Citation

Strunk v. Patterson, No. 029642/2008 (N.Y. King County Supr. Ct. July 8, 2015) (dismissing case); see also Order, Nov. 24, 2009 (denying motion for subpoenas to multiple government agencies for documents allegedly relating to Obama’s eligibility and denying motion for protective order), appeal dismissed, Strunk v. Paterson, 18 N.Y.3d 945, 967 N.E.2d 693 (2012) (“Appeal dismissed without costs, by the Court of Appeals, sua sponte, upon the ground that it does not lie (see CPLR 5601)”). DISMISSED

2d Cir. No. 08-5422 APPEAL DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Strunk v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, No. 1:08-cv-04289-ARR-LB (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 30, 2008) (dismissing case challenging, among other things, Obama’s eligibility, as irrational and frivolous and finding that appeal could not be taken in good faith), appeal dismissed, No. 08-5422 (2d Cir. Nov. 14, 2008).

Page 55 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

PARTIALLY DISMISSED as to all Obama records PARTIALLY DISMISSED

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:08cv02234 Justia - RECAP H

H

H

as to all requests to State Dept. (related to Dunham records only)

PARTIALLY DISMISSED as to requests to Customs & Border Patrol (related to Dunham records only)

DISMISSED as to all remaining claims 177.

Appeal(s)

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Pre-Trial Disposition DC Circuit: 08-5503 HWrit DISMISSED HReconsideration DENIED DC Circuit: 09-5322 Writ of Mandamus DENIED

D.C. Circuit: No. 10-5092 APPEAL DISMISSED Motion to Reconsider DENIED D.C. Circuit: No.12-5414 DISMISSED

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Strunk v. U.S. Dept. of State, 693 F. Supp. 2d 112 (D.D.C. Cir. 2010) (FOIA case seeking records from various agencies relating to Obama and his mother) (granting motion to dismiss to extent Strunk sought information relating to Obama; denying Strunk’s request for mandamus relief and for quo warranto action; granting stay of discovery), mandamus denied, No. 08-5503 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 8, 2009), mandamus denied, No. 09-5322 (D.C. Cir. Nov. 25, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. 10-5092, (D.C. Cir. Aug. 26, 2010); see also Strunk v. U.S. Dept. of State, 770 F.Supp.2d 10 (D.D.C. 2011) (granting summary judgment as to Department of State; finding that agency had “demonstrated full compliance with the FOIA”; determining that CBP had not yet demonstrated that its search for responsive records was adequate); 845 F. Supp. 2d 38, 47 (D.D.C. 2012) (finding that CBP demonstrated its search for responsive records was adequate and reasonable and that it properly withheld information under FOIA Exemption 6; however, CBP had not demonstrated that it properly withheld information under Exemption 7(E)); 2012 WL 577763 (D.D.C. Feb. 15, 2012) (ordering CPB to file renewed motion for summary judgment with respect to the information withheld under Exemption 7(E)); --- F. Supp. ----, 2012 WL 5875653 (D.D.C. Nov. 21, 2012) (finding that CBP properly has withheld information from the one-page document containing travel information about Stanley Ann Dunham and granting summary judgment on that issue; further finding that since all agencies had demonstrated compliance with the FOIA and entitlement to judgment as a matter of law, final judgment in favor of defendants was proper).

Strunk v U.S. Dept. of State (FOIA) Christopher Earl Strunk 31 F

Citation

31

Note: Strunk has filed multiple additional “nonbirther” cases against Obama and/or the Federal Government, including, but not limited to the following: 1:2008cv01196; 1:2009cv01249; and 1:2009cv01295. H

H

H

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

H

H

H

Page 56 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

D.D.C. Federal Court No. 1:10-cv-00486-RCL 178.

Strunk v. Obama Christopher Earl Strunk

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

D.C. Cir. No. 12-5289 DISMISSED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

No ---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Strunk v. Obama, No. 1:10-cv-00486-RCL (Jan. 1, 2011) (dismissing purported quo warrranto and qui tam action which alleged that Obama was not eligible to be President), 2012 WL 3113947 (D.D.C. Aug. 1, 2012) (denying as frivolous motion for leave to amend to reassert claims and supplement claims); No. 125289, Apr. 2, 2013 Order (D.C. Cir.) (order denying motion or leave to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis be denied on grounds that “[t]he district court correctly determined that the appeal is not taken in good faith.”). N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) No. 2011-11561 Appeal as of Right

DISMISSED

179.

Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections Christopher Earl Strunk

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

New York Kings County Supreme (Trial) Court 006500/2011

N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) Consolidated app. for appeal DISMISSED (w/ 2008 case above) Rejecting Birther “2-Parent” No. 2011-11561

NBC Argument OSC re Sanctions Issued SANCTIONS IMPOSED ($177,707.88)

Page 57 of 84

DISMISSED N.Y. App. Ct. (2nd Dept) (No. 2012-05515) Dismissal of Case AFFIRMED (No. 2014-00297) Denial of Leave to Amend AFFIRMED (No. 2013-0635) Sanctions AFFIRMED as MODIFIED

Yes

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Citation

180.

Strunk v. Obama Christopher-Earl: Strunk

New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

181.

182.

Strunk v. NY State Board of Elections Christopher Earl Strunk

Strunk et al v. Dept. of State et al Christopher Strunk Harold W. Van Allen

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

New York Kings County Supreme (Trial) Court 021948/2012 Citation D.D.C. No. 1:14-cv-00995 PACER | RECAP

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

Strunk v. NY Bd. of Elections et al, 35 Misc. 3d 1208(A), 2012 WL 1205117, 2012 N.Y. Slip Op. 50614 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 11, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging, among other things, President Obama’s eligibility to his office; expressly rejecting the birther claim that Obama is ineligible on the basis of his father’s citizenship as frivolous, and issuing a show cause order as to why sanctions should not be imposed upon plaintiff), aff’d, No. 2012-05515 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 2nd Dist. Mar. 11, 2015); See also Strunk v. New York State Bd. of Elections, No. 6500/11, 2013 NY Slip Op 50445(U), 2013 WL 1285886 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Mar. 29, 2013) (imposing $177,707.88 in sanctions ($167.7K in defendant attorneys’ fees, plus $10K in sanctions to be paid to state fund), aff’d as modified, No. 2013-06335 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. App. Div. 2nd Dist. Mar. 11, 2015), pet. for reh’g denied (June 25, 2015). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

In re Objection of Christopher-Earl: Strunk, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2012) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid). NY Electors DISMISSED Case DISMISSED Strunk v. NY Bd. of Elections et al, No. 021948/2012 (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Apr. 3, 2013) (dismissing case as to New York electors); Order (Mar. 26, 2015) (dismissing case in its entirety).

DISMISSED

Appeal (D.C. Cir.) No. 14-5327 District Court AFFIRMED

No Court dismissed case sua sponte

Strunk et al v. Dept. of State, et al, No. 1:14-cv-00995 (D.D.C. June 16, 2014) (denying petition for writ of mandamus and preliminary injunction and dismissing complaint that alleged, among other things, that President Obama is not eligible to be president and that various government entities were preventing witnesses from testifying as to eligibility status), aff’d No. 14-5327 (D.C. Cir. Aug. 11, 2015) .

Page 58 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

183.

In re Christopher Strunk Christopher Earl Strunk

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Citation

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

D.C. Cir. No. 13-5005 DISMISSED

D.C. Cir. (Appeals) No. 13-5005

Appeal(s)

n/a filed in Appellate Court

185.

186.

Stumpo v. Gov. of Michigan Paul Joseph Stumpo, John Carlos Cruz

Sullivan v. Secretary of State Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan

Sullivan v. Marshall 32 Lt. Col. Donald Sullivan F

32

30th Dist. Court (Ingham County)

Michigan App. Ct. No. 291681 Appeal DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED

DISMISSED H

No. 08-140-MM

Citation North Carolina Superior Court 08-cv-1076 Citizen Wells

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

“Obama Defense”

F

---

In re: Christopher Strunk, No. 13-5005 (D.C. Cir. Sept. 20, 2013) (dismissing original proceeding/petition for writ of mandamus relating to, among other things, birther challenge), pet. for reh’g denied (Nov. 13, 2013).

Michigan State Court 184.

US Supreme Court

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Stumpo v. Gov. of Michigan, No. 08-140-MM (Mich. Dist. Ct. (30th) Mar. 31, 2009) (granting summary disposition in case filed challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, No. 291681 (Mich. Ct. App. June 3, 2009), recons. denied (Oct. 1, 2009). DISMISSED (per Citizen Wells) H

---

---

H

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation North Carolina Superior Court 08-cvs-021393 RSOL

Sullivan v. N.C. Sec’y of State, No. 08CV-1076 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 29, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED (per RSOL & NBC) H

H

H

---

---

H

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

Sullivan v. Marshall, No. 08CVS-021393 (N.C. Super. Ct. Mar. 16, 2009) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility).

Note: There appears to have been one other case filed by Sullivan, Sullivan v. Secretary of State for North Carolina (class action), No. #08CV1153.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 59 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

187.

Sunahara v. Haw. Dept. of Health Duncan Sunahara33

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

189.

Super American Grand Jury Carl Swensson

Swensson v. Obama Carl Swensson

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:09-mc-00346-RCL Justia - RECAP H

H

H

Citation Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1216218-60-MALIHI Citation

Swensson v. Obama Carl Swensson

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Hawaii State District Court 1st Circuit No. 1cc12-1-000006 Citation

188.

Original Decision

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211527

Citation

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

No. CAAP-12-0000501 Haw. Ct. App. Dismissal AFFIRMED

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Not a defendant

Sunahara v. Haw. Dept. of Health, No. 1cc12-1-000006 (Haw. 1st Dist. Ct., Mar. 8, 2012) (complaint seeking access to birth/death records of Sunahara based on alleged connection to Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED Motion for Reconsideration Order DENIED

No

H

H

---

---

Court dismissed sua sponte

In re Super Am. Grand Jury, No. 1:09-mc-00346-RCL (D.D.C. July 2, 2009) (denying leave to file grand jury presentment challenging Obama’s eligibility). Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC

Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

See below

Yes (in papers; not at hearing)

Swensson v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216218-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012).

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

Ga. Supreme Court. No. S12D1076 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED

No ---

Dismissed before Attorney entered appearance

Swensson v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1216218-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012)., appeal dismissed, Swensson v. Obama, No. 2012CV211527 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1076 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012).

33

This is classified as a “birther” case because plaintiffs believe that the birth certificate of Virginia Sunahara – who died shortly after birth – was used for Obama’s birth certificate. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 60 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

190.

Swihart v. Obama Karl Swihart

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-176 Citation

191.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:10-cv-00151 Justia - RECAP

Citation

192.

Taitz v. Astrue (FOIA)

Orly Taitz

193.

Taitz v. Ruemmler (FOIA)

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-00402 Justia - RECAP Citation

D.D.C. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-01421 Justia - RECAP

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Challenge DENIED

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

--But see Taitz v. Obama, below

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No

Swihart v. Obama, No. 2012-176 (Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”). DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED Reconsideration (2nd) DENIED

---

---

No Gov. defended

Taitz v. Obama, 707 F. Supp. 2d 1 (D.D.C. 2010) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied, No. 1:10-cv-00151 (D.D.C. June 18, 2010), 2d mot. for recons. denied, 754 F.Supp.2d 57 (D.D.C. 2010); DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED H

D.C. Cir. No. 11-5304 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Astrue, 806 F. Supp. 2d 214 (D.D.C. 2011) (dismissing FOIA complaint seeking documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied (Oct. 17, 2011), aff’d, No. 11- 5304, 2012 WL 1930959 (D.C. Cir. May 25, 2012, rehearing en banc denied Aug. 9, 2012). D.C. Cir. No. 11-5306 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED DISMISSED

Orly Taitz Citation

Appeal(s)

D.C. Cir. No. 11-5329 Petition for Writ of Mandamus DISMISSED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Ruemmler, No. 1:11- CV-01421, 2011 WL 4916936 (D.D.C. Oct. 17, 2011) (dismissing FOIA complaint seeking documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), mandamus dismissed, No. 11-5329 (D.C. Cir. Jan. 23, 2012), aff’d, No. 11-5306, 2012 WL 1922284 (D.C. Cir. May 25, 2012).

Page 61 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

194.

Taitz v. Astrue (Companion to DC FOIA)

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket D. Haw. (Federal Court) 1:11-cv-00519-SOM -RLP34 Justia - RECAP

Orly Taitz

195.

Citation

Hawaii State District Court 1st Circuit 1CC11-1-001731

Taitz v. Fuddy (FOIA) Orly Taitz

Citation

196.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

New Hampshire Ballot Law Commission Case No. BLC 2011-4 Citation

197.

34

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

Hawaii Office of Elections Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED (Motion Denied)

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Astrue, No. 1:11-cv-00519-SOM -RLP (D. Haw. Oct. 26, 2011) (rejecting ex parte application to compel discovery regarding Obama’s eligibility in related case pending in the District of Columbia). DISMISSED Rehearing DENIED Motion [for] Reciprocal Subpoena Enforcement DENIED Ex Parte Amended Motion for Reconsideration DENIED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Fuddy, No. 1CC11-1-001731 (Haw. 1st Cir. Ct. Nov. 10, 2011) (dismissing appeal of agency refusal to grant access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility), recons. denied (Jan. 6, 2012), recons. denied (Feb. 7, 2012). PETITION DISMISSED Reconsideration DENIED

--But see Taitz v. Gardner, below

---

No

Taitz v. Obama, No. BLC 2011-4 (N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n Nov. 18, 2011) (dismissing petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot), recons. denied (Nov. 28, 2011); appeal denied, Taitz v. Gardner, No. 2011-0880 (N.H. Dec. 27, 2011). PETITION REJECTED

---

---

No Petition Rejected

Taitz v. Obama, No. Number Assigned (Haw. Office of Elections Dec. 2, 2011) (rejecting petition seeking to challenge Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and demand for emergency hearing re: same).

Case originally filed as 1:11-mc-00158.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 62 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

198.

199.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New Hampshire Supreme Court Case No. 2011-0880

Taitz v. Gardner (NH Ballot Commission)35 Orly Taitz

Citation

Taitz v. Nishimura Orly Taitz

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

Taitz et al v. Democrat (sic) Party of Mississippi, Secretary of State, et al Orly Taitz

S.D. Miss (Federal Court)36 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA Justia | RECAP Citation

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Gardner, No. 2011-0880 (N.H. Dec. 27, 2011) (denying petition for original jurisdiction and/or appeal challenging order entered by N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n in Taitz v. Obama, No. BLC 2011-4 (N.H. Ballot Law Comm’n Nov. 18, 2011)). DENIED

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Nishimura, No. SPCW-12-000014, 2012 WL 120367 (Haw. Jan. 12, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to force circuit court judge to issue order forcing Dept. of Health to grant access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility). Challenge DENIED

--But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, below

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz v. Obama, No Number Assigned (Ind. Election Div. Feb. 16, 2012) (notice to Taitz that her election challenge could not be accepted due to failure to follow appropriate procedures). DISMISSED Removed to Fed Court 4/25/12

Writ of Mandamus DENIED 5th Cir. No. 13-60024

No Obama named as Defendant but not (yet) served

Taitz et al v. Democrat Party of Miss. et al, No. 3:12-cv-00280-HTW-LRA (S.D. Miss. Mar. 31, 2015) (dismissing case bringing RICO charges and challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot).

35

This is a court challenge of the N.H. Ballot Decision referenced below.

36

Originally filed Mississippi Circuit Court (1st Judicial District), No. 251-12-107CIV.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Application DENIED

Indiana Election Commission No Number Assigned Citation

201.

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Hawaii Supreme Court SPCW-12-000014 Citation

200.

Original Decision

Page 63 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

202.

Taitz et al v. Indiana Elections Comm’n et al Orly Taitz Karl Swihart, Edward Kesler, Frank Weyl, Bob Kern

203.

204.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Indiana Marion County Superior Court #49D141203MI012046

Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Motion for Injunction DENIED Case DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Taitz et al v. Ind. Elec. Commn. et al, No. 49D0103MI012046 (Ind. Marion County Super. Ct. June 12, 2012) (dismissing election contest bought by multiple plaintiffs challenging election board’s rejection of challenges seeking to exclude Obama from 2012 ballot and seeking to prohibit Indiana Secretary of State from including Obama on ballot; permitting Taitz to amend complaint to allege other causes of action); Order dismissing amended complaint in its entirety (Nov. 5, 2012) (dismissing amended complaint stating claims for declaratory and injunctive relief regarding Obama’s eligibility to be on the ballot).

C.D. Cal. No. 8:12-cv-01092-DMG-JC ----DISMISSED No Taitz v. Sebelius et RECAP al Taitz v. Sebelius, No. 12-cv-01092-DMG-JC (C.D. Cal. Aug. 16, 2012) (dismissing, on lack of venue Orly Taitz grounds, complaint seeking, among other things, to invalidate the Affordable Health Care Act’s validity, on Citation grounds that Obama was not eligible to serve as President when he signed it).

Taitz v. Sebelius et al Orly Taitz

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

N.D. Tex. No. 3:12-cv-03251-P RECAP

Citation

DISMISSED

---

---

No

Taitz v. Sebelius, No. 3:12-cv-03251-P (N.D. Tex. Nov. 20, 2012) (complaint seeking, among other things, to invalidate the Affordable Health Care Act’s validity, on grounds that Obama was not eligible to serve as President when he signed it), Judgment (Nov. 26, 2012) (dismissing case with prejudice and assessing costs against Plaintiff).

Page 64 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

205.

Taitz v. Obama Orly Taitz

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Cal. Superior Court Orange County No. 30-2012 00582135

Citation

206.

Taitz et al v. Kobach et al

Kansas District Court Shawnee County No. 12C 001027 Citation

207.

Taitz v. Colvin

Maryland District Court No. 1:13-cv-01878-ELH PACER | RECAP Citation

208.

Taitz v. Donahue, et al

D.C. District Court No. 1:13-cv-01020 PACER | RECAP Citation

In re: Taitz Litigation

J.P.M.L. No. 2417 Citation

37

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

App for Emergency Stay DENIED37 Case DISMISSED Sanctions Imposed

Dismissal & Sanctions’ AFFIRMED No. G047746

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No

Taitz v. Obama, No. 30-2012 00582135 (Cal. Super. Ct. July 13, 2012) (denying “emergency” motion to stay certification of primary election results on grounds that Obama not eligible to serve as President (among others)); Order (Nov. 7, 2012) (dismissing case with prejudice). DISMISSED

---

---

No

Taitz et al v. Kobach, No. 12CI027 (Kan. Dist. Ct., Nov. 5, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking, among other things, to prevent placement of Obama on the 2012 general election ballot). DISMISSED

Dismissal AFFIRMED

---

No

Taitz v. Colvin, No. 1:13-cv-01878 (D. Md., May 13, 2014) (dismissing FOIA complaint seeking social security records allegedly related to President Obama’s eligibility), aff’d, No. 14-1773 (4th Cir. Nov. 25, 2014). DISMISSED

---

---

No

Taitz v. Donahue, et al, No. 1:13-cv-01020 (D.D.C. Sept. 4, 2014) (dismissing FOIA action seeking documents allegedly related to President Obama’s eligibility). DISMISSED

---

---

No

In re Orley [sic] Taitz Litigation, No. 2417 (JPML Oct. 31, 2012) (order striking motion to transfer and closing case).

Taitz attempted to remove this case to federal court, apparently abandoning the state claims. See Judd v. Obama et al, supra. However, the federal court dismissed that lawsuit.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 65 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

209.

Taitz v. Koskinen, et al

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

S.D. Texas District Court No. 1:15-cv-00054 PACER | RECAP Citation

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Terry v. Handel Bryan Thomas Terry, Sr

212.

Thomas v. Hosemann38 Daniel Scott Thomas Thomas v. Hosemann Daniel Scott Thomas

“Obama Defense”

F

TBD

Taitz v. Koskinen et al, No. 1:15-cv-00054 (S.D. Tex, filed Mar. 25, 2015) (case alleging, among many other things, that President Obama is using forged ID documents and false identity and is not eligible to be President).

Georgia Fulton County Superior Ct # 2008CV158774

GA Supreme Court No. S09D0284 DISMISSED; Reconsideration DENIED No. S09A1373 DISMISSED

DISMISSED (Docket) H

H

H

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

211.

Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Pending

H

210.

US Supreme Court

Terry v. Handel, No. 2008cv158774 (Ga,. Super. Ct. (Fulton County), Oct. 24, 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), appeal dismissed, No. S09D0284 (Ga. Dec. 3, 2008), recons. denied, (Ga. Jan. 12, 2009), appeal dismissed, No. S09A1373 (Ga. May 18, 2009).

D. Haw. (Federal Court) 1:08mc00280 Justia - RECAP H

H

---

---

H

Citation D. Miss. (Federal Court) 2:08-cv-00241-KS-MTP Justia - RECAP H

No DISMISSED H

H

Voluntarily dismissed

Thomas v. Hosemann, No. 1:08-mc-00280 (D. Haw. Dec. 18, 2008) (dismissing action seeking to compel Hawaii Dept. of Health to provide access to documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility). Voluntarily DISMISSED H

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

H

Citation

Thomas v. Hosemann, No. 2:08-cv-00241-KS-MTP (S.D. Miss. Dec. 18, 2008) (voluntarily dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility; case dismissed with prejudice).

38

Note: This case was actually an ancillary case to the Mississippi case noted below. After filing the Mississippi case, Thomas filed a subpoena duces tecum seeking to compel discovery in Hawaii. When the Mississippi case was dismissed, the ancillary Hawaii case was likewise dismissed. Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 66 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

213.

214.

215.

Thompson v. Kennedy Tommy Thompson

Thompson v. Obama Julianne Thompson

Tisdale v. Obama Charles Tisdale

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Alabama St. Clair-Pell County Cir. Ct. 75-CV-2012-000003.00 Citation New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation E.D. Va. (Federal Court) 3:12-cv-00036-JAG

Citation

216.

39

Van Allen v. Obama H. William Van Allen

New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Thompson v. Kennedy, No. 75-CV-2012-000003.00 (Ala. St. Clair-Pell Cty. Cir. Ct. Jan. 13, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

No

In re Objection of Julianne Thompson, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid). DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

AFFIRMED Finding Obama is NBC39 No. 12-1124

No ---

Court dismissed sua sponte

Tisdale v. Obama, No. 3:12-cv-00036-JAG (E.D. Va. Jan. 23, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility; finding that Obama is “natural born citizen” because he was born in Hawaii), aff’d, No. 12-1124 (4th Cir. Jun 5, 2012) (per curiam). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

No

In re Objection of H. William Van Allen, No Number Assigned, (N.Y. Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid).

The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court’s decision “for the reasons stated by the district court”).

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 67 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

217.

218.

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket New York State Supreme Court, Albany County No. 1787–12

Van Allen v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections H. William Van Allen

Citation North Carolina Board of Elections No Number Assigned

Vestal v. Obama

Citation

219.

Voeltz v. Obama et al Michael C. Voeltz

Florida Leon County Circuit Court 37 2012 CA 000467

Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED 36 Misc. 3d 1212(A)

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Van Allen v. N.Y. State Bd. of Elections, 36 Misc. 3d 1212(A) (N.Y. Sup. Ct. Jul. 9, 2012) (dismissing petition for writ of mandamus, emergency injunctive relief and declaratory relief regarding definition of “natural born citizen). No Petition Rejected

---

---

Petition rejected sua sponte

Vestal v. Obama, No Number Assigned (N.C. Bd. of Elections Dec. 13, 2011) (rejecting attempt to file election challenge petition and obtain emergency hearing to challenge Obama’s eligibity to be on the 2012 ballot).

DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

DISMISSED Fla. 1st DCA No. 1D12-3489 Petition for Writ of Mandamus Fla. No. SC13-560 DENIED

---

Yes

Voeltz v. Obama (“Voeltz I”), No. 37 2012 CA 000467, 2012 WL 2524874 (Fla. Cir. Ct. June 29, 2012) (dismissing complaint challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot; finding that persons born in US are “natural born citizens” per Wong Kim Ark and Ankeny, regardless of parentage and rejecting birther argument to the contrary), app. dismissed as moot, Voeltz v. Obama, 1D12-3489, 2013 WL 469979 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2013) (per curiam), petition for writ denied, SC13-560 (Sept. 27, 2013).

Page 68 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

220.

Voeltz v. Obama et al Michael C. Voeltz

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Florida Leon County Circuit Court 37 2012 CA 002063

Citation

Florida Leon County Circuit Court 37 2012 CA 003857

221.

Voeltz v. Obama et al Michael C. Voeltz Citation

222.

Volodarsky v. Obama Leonard Volodarsky

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

New York Board of Elections No Number Assigned Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

DISMISSED Finding Obama is NBC

---

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

Voeltz v. Obama (“Voeltz II”), No. 37 2012 CA 002063, 2012 WL 4117478 (Fla. Cir. Ct. Sept. 6, 2012) (dismissing complaint seeking declaration that Obama is not eligible for presidency because he was not born in US and was not born to two US citizen parents; finding that persons born in US are “natural born citizens” per Wong Kim Ark and Ankeny, regardless of parentage and rejecting birther argument to the contrary; reserving for later ruling motion for sanctions).

DISMISSED Rehearing DENIED

Fla. 1st DCA No. 1D13-83 AFFIRMED Florida Supreme Court No. SC14-715 Appeal DISMISSED

Petition for Writ of Mandamus DENIED (No. 14-145)

Yes

Voeltz v. Obama (“Voeltz III”), 37 2012 CA 003857, 2012 WL 6967837 (Fla. Cir. Ct., Dec. 21, 2012) (dismissing third birther compliant filed by Voeltz: “President Obama lives in the White House. He flies on Air Force One. He has appeared before Congress, delivered State of the Union addresses, and meets with Congressional leaders on a regular basis. He has appointed countless ambassadors to represent the interests of the United States throughout the world. …. The Electoral College has recently done its work and elected Mr. Obama to be President once again. As this matter has come before the Court at this time of the year it seems only appropriate to paraphrase the ruling rendered by the fictional Judge Henry X. Harper from New York in open court in the classic holiday film Miracle on 34th St. "Since the United States Government declares this man to be President, this Court will not dispute it. Case dismissed."); reh’g denied (Jan. 4, 2015), aff’d, No. 1D13-83 (Fla. App. Ct. 1st Dist. Mar. 30, 2014), appeal dismissed, No. SC14-715 (Fla. Apr. 14, 2014), pet. for writ of mandamus denied, No. 14-145 (U.S. Oct. 14, 2014). Objection OVERRULED

---

---

No Obama not a Defendant

In re Objection of Leonard Volodarsky, No Number Assigned, (N.Y Board of Elections Determination Feb. 28, 2011) (rejecting petition challenging Obama’s eligibility to be on 2012 ballot and finding that petition designating Obama as candidate is valid).

Page 69 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

223.

Welden v. Obama David P. Welden

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Georgia Office of State Administrative Hearings OSAH-SECSTATE-CE1215137-60-MALIHI Citation

Georgia State Court Fulton County Superior Ct 2012CV211527 Welden v. Obama David P. Welden Citation

224.

Weyl v. Obama Franklin D. Weyl

Indiana Election Commission No. 2012-161 Citation

225.

Wolf v. Fuddy William Wolf

Hawaii State Court 1st Circuit 1CC11-1-002276 Citation

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Decision

Appeal(s)

Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Objection DENIED - Obama Eligible (ALJ) Finding Obama is NBC

Secretary of State Final Decision Finding Obama is NBC (Adopting ALJ Decision)

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

---

“Obama Defense”

F

Yes

Welden v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215137-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012).

Appeal of SOS Decision DISMISSED

Ga. Supreme Court No. S12D1059 DENIED Emergency Motion for Injunction DENIED

Petition for Writ of Certiorari

DENIED (No. 12-5)

Yes in Trial Court No in GA Supreme Court

Welden v. Obama, No. OSAH-SECSTATE-CE-1215137-60-MALIHI (Ga. Office of St. Admin. Hrg. Feb. 3, 2012) (rejecting challenge to Obama’s eligibility to appear on 2012 ballot; finding that Obama was born in U.S. and is a “natural born citizen), decision adopted as final (Ga. Sec’y State Feb. 7, 2012), appeal dismissed, No. 2012CV211527 (Ga. Fulton Cty. Super. Ct., Mar. 2, 2012), motion for injunction denied, No. S12D1059 (Ga. Mar. 13, 2012), appeal denied (Ga. Apr. 4, 2012) , cert denied, No. 12-5 (U.S. Sept. 24, 2012). --Challenge DENIED

But see Taitz v. Indiana Election Commission, above

---

No

Weyl v. Obama, No. 2012-161(Ind. Election Comm’n Feb. 24, 2012) (denying objection seeking to keep Obama off 2012 ballot on grounds that he is not a “natural born citizen”) (written decision unavailable but video of hearing is available at http://www.in.gov/sos/022412_Video_3.html (last visited April 11, 2012)).

DISMISSED

Haw. Ct. App. CAAP-12-0000499 DISMISSAL AFFIRMED

---

No Obama not a Defendant

Wolf v. Fuddy, No. 1CC11-1-002276 (Haw. 1st Cir. Ct. Sept. 30, 2011) (dismissing case seeking to compel disclosure of documents allegedly related to Obama’s eligibility).

Page 70 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

BIRTHER SCORECARD CLICK HERE FOR BIRTHER STRING CITE (but note that it has not been updated for more than a year). Court: Blue Agency: Green Case Caption Plaintiff’s full name

226.

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz Cort Wrotnowski

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Original Tribunal Case No. Docket Connecticut Supreme Court SC 18264 Citation

Original Decision Total Actions: 226 Pending Cases: 1 Birthers win: 0

Appeal(s) Total Appellate Court Rulings: >120+ Birthers win: 0

Action filed in Supreme Court

DISMISSED H

N/A: Original filing in Supreme Court

US Supreme Court Total Supreme Court Rulings: 35+ Birthers win: 0

Application DENIED (No. 08A469) H

“Obama Defense”

F

No Obama not a Defendant

Wrotnowski v. Bysiewicz, 958 A.2d 709 (Conn. 2008) (dismissing case challenging Obama’s eligibility), application for stay denied, 129 S.Ct. 775 (2008).

Page 71 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Additional Judd Cases Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Secy of State of Alabama, No 2:11-cv-00437 (M.D. Ala. Aug 10, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds );

Alabama RECAP | PACER

“It is ORDERED that the motion for relief from judgment, etc. (doc. no. 19) is denied.”

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Alabama, No. 2:11-cv-00333 (M.D. Ala.)

RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. State of Alabama, No. 1:11-cv-00282-KD-M (S.D. Ala. Sept. 13, 2012 order)

RECAP | PACER

[Noting that Judd had previously been declared vexatious litigant] …”In this circumstance, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed without prejudice on procedural grounds. His complaint would not have been dismissed if he had shown that he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury. He did not do so at that time and does not do so now. Instead, plaintiff raises arguments which may have been appropriate had his complaint been dismissed on the merits. Thus, he has failed to “demonstrate a justification for relief so compelling that the district court was required to grant [the] motion.” Id. at 806. Accordingly, his motion is DENIED.”

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Alabama, No. 2:11-cv-01753KOB-TMP (N.D. Ala. Nov. 20, 2012) (denying motion);

RECAP | PACER

The court dismissed this pro se § 1983 action without prejudice pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) on June 6, 2011. (Doc. The Eleventh Circuit dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal on October 18, 2011. (Doc. 10). The Court DENIES the motion. (Doc. 13).

4.

Judd v. Office of the Lieutenant Governor of Alaska, Elections Division et al, No. 3:11-cv-00123-JWS (D. Alaska Aug. 24, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Alaska RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff Judd did not pay the filing fee required to proceed with a civil action in federal court. His application for leave to proceed without prepayment of fees was denied. Judd appealed that decision, but his appeal was dismissed as frivolous. This case is closed. The motions filed by Judd at dockets 14, 15, and 16 are therefore DENIED. The court will not entertain any further motions, letters or other documents from Judd. If Judd sends further papers relating to this case, the Clerk of Court shall not file them, but instead shall mail them back to Judd.”

5.

Judd v. Arizona Secy of State, No. 2:2011-cv-01058 (D. Ariz. , motion filed Aug. 2, 2012 order)

Arizona RECAP | PACER

Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd, who is confined in the Federal Correctional InstitutionTexarkana in Texarkana, Texas, filed a pro se civil rights Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. On July 13, 2011, the Court dismissed this action under the “three strikes” provision of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal. On October 24, 2011, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a mandate dismissing the appeal and stating “because the appeal is so insubstantial as to not warrant further review, it shall not be permitted to proceed.” On August 2, 2012, Plaintiff filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 15). The Court has reviewed the pleadings, its orders, and the order of the Ninth Circuit and finds no reason to reconsider dismissal of this action. IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff’s August 2, 2012 Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. 15) is denied. This case must remain closed.

1.

2.

3.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 72 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Arkansas Sec’y of State, No. 4:11-cv-00447BRW (E.D. Ark. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Arkansas RECAP | PACER

“Pending is Plaintiff’s pro se Motion for Relief from Judgment and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register all Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in all Federal Elections and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary (Doc. No. 19). The Motion is DENIED.”

Judd v. Secretary of State of Arkansas et al, No. 4:2011-cv-04049 (W.D. Ark.)

Arkansas RECAP | PACER

TEXT ONLY ORDER denying 23 Motion for Leave to File, as the proposed motion does not allege that movant is in imminent danger of serious physical injury, is procedurally improper, and substantively without merit. Signed by Honorable P. K. Holmes, III on August 31, 2012. (jlg) (Entered: 08/31/2012)

7.

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 2:2011-cv-01557 (E.D. Cal., docketed Aug. 2, 2012, after case was closed; no action taken on motion)

California RECAP | PACER

No action taken on Aug. motion

8.

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 3:2011-cv-02805 (N.D. Cal. Aug. 27,. 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

California RECAP | PACER

“…Petitioner now moves for relief from judgment under the Twenty-Fourth Amendment, to amend the court order to register all convicted and incarcerated felons, and for an order to remove Barack Obama from the State’s 2012 presidential primary election ballot/caucus and award all delegated to himself, a Democratic presidential candidate. *** The Court finds nothing in Plaintiff’s allegations in his motion to reconsider that merits reconsideration. Plaintiff’s arguments regarding a convicted felon’s right to vote were previously addressed in the order of dismissal. Plaintiff’s request that the Court order that he be awarded presidential delegates is not the subject of this action and do not justify reconsideration of the Court’s Order of Dismissal. Similarly, President Obama’s citizenship status is not at issue in this case.”

9.

Judd v. Cal. Secy of State et al, No. 3:2011-cv-01287 (S.D. Cal. Aug. 17, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

California RECAP | PACER

"...The Court has reviewed its previous order, the Ninth Circuit’s order, Plaintiff’s present motion, and the other filings in this case. (Doc. Nos. 3, 6 & 9.) The Court concludes that Plaintiff has failed to demonstrate that relief from judgment is warranted. For example, Plaintiff fails to articulate any mistake made by this Court, Plaintiff fails to provide any newly discovered evidence, Plaintiff fails to identify any fraud by an opposing party, and Plaintiff fails to provide any other reason that justifies relief. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 60(b). Plaintiff’s motion does not address[] the Court’s previous basis for dismissing this action. Furthermore, Plaintiff is not entitled to proceed in this matter without payment of the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). ..."

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Colorado, Civil Case No.1:11-cv-01399-LTB (D. Colo. Aug 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Colorado RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 17) is DENIED because Plaintiff fails to present any argument that addresses the basis for the order dismissing this action.”

6.

10.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 73 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status 11.

12.

14.

15.

16.

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Conn. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv-00879MRK (D. Conn. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Connecticut RECAP | PACER

Docket Entry Only: “The Court dismissed Mr. Judd's suit because he did not pay the required filing fee, but Mr. Judd's motion does not address this issue, much less provide a valid reason for relief from judgment under Rule 60(b).”

Judd v. Secretary of State of Delaware et al, No. 1:11cv-00512-GMS (D. Del. Aug 6, 2012 order) (remark rejecting attempt to file motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds, because case closed and appeal terminated)

Delaware RECAP | [PACER

Docket Entry Only: “Not Accepted: ECF #13: “Document titled "Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment" - (docketed, but not set up as a pending Motion since case is closed and appeal has been terminated)”

No case found 13.

Jurisdiction

D.C.

No case found

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Florida, Civil Case No. 4:11cv-00234-SPM-WCS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);;

Florida RECAP | PACER

“Upon consideration, Plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (doc. 22) is denied. Plaintiff is not under imminent danger of serious physical injury and he is not entitled to proceed without payment of the filing fee. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Any appeal of this matter is not taken in good faith. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3).”

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Florida, Civil Case No. 6:11cv-00867-ACC-KRS (N.D. Fla. Aug. 7, 2012 order) (denying, as frivolous, motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Florida RECAP | PACER

Docket Entry only: “ORDER denying 17 Motion as frivolous. Signed by Chief Judge Anne C. Conway on 8/7/2012. (Conway, Anne) (Entered: 08/07/2012 order).”

Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00089LGW-JEG (S.D. Ga. Aug. 10, 2012 order) (dismissing motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Georgia RECAP | PACER

“By Order dated June 1, 2011, this case was transferred to [N.D. Ga.]. As this case is closed in this court, Plaintiff's motion(s) are dismissed.”

Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 1:11-cv-01797WSD (N.D. Ga. Sept. 26, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Georgia RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is untimely and inappropriate. The Court entered its order on the Magistrate Judge’s Final R&R more than a year before Plaintiff filed his Motion for Reconsideration. Plaintiff does not present any coherent explanation or legal basis for reconsideration based on the existence of newly discovered evidence, an intervening development or change in controlling law, or a need to correct a clear error of law or fact. Justice does not here require granting Plaintiff relief from the Court’s Order, and Plaintiff’s Motion for Reconsideration is denied.”

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 74 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status 17.

18.

19.

20.

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Ga. Sec’y of State. et al, No. 5:11-cv-00233CAR-CHW (M.D. Ga. Sept. 25, 2012 order) (denying, as “patently frivolous,” motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Georgia RECAP | PACER

Docket Entry: “This is a text only entry; no document issued. ORDER denying as patently frivolous 18 Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment, etc. On June 16, 2011, this Court denied Plaintiff motion to proceed in forma pauperis and dismissed his case without prejudice. Should Plaintiff wish to proceed on his claims, he must submit a new complaint, together with the required filing fee. Ordered by Judge C. Ashley Royal on 9/25/2012. (ssh) (Entered: 09/25/2012 order)”

Judd v. Office of Elections of Hawaii, No. 11-cv00365 (D. Hi.)

Hawaii RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. Idaho, 1:11-cv-00277-EJL (D. Idaho Oct 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Idaho RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff, a Texas inmate, has accumulated three strikes, and was ordered to pay the filing fee if he wished to proceed with his suit. (Dkt. 12.) Plaintiff failed to pay the filing fee, and his case was dismissed. (Dkt. 15, 16.) Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment. (Dkt. 19.) While Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60 outlines several bases for relief from judgment, Plaintiff’s Motion fails to set forth any factual basis that would support relief from judgment in this instance. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment (Dkt. 19) is DENIED.”

No case found

Illinois

No case found

No case found

Indiana

No case found

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Iowa, No. 5:11-cv-04050MWB (N.D. Iowa Aug. 27, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Iowa RECAP | PACER

“This matter is before the court on the plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (docket no. 19). The plaintiff filed such motion on August 1, 2012. The court dismissed this case over a year ago. Moreover, given the fact that the plaintiff never properly commenced a civil action, there is no reason to address the plaintiff’s reasserted claims; the fact that the plaintiff is not entitled to the advantages of proceeding in forma pauperis has not changed. Accordingly, the plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment (docket no. 19) is denied.

Judd v. State of Iowa, Civil Case No. 4:11-cv-00253JAJ (S.D. Iowa Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Iowa RECAP | PACER

“Plaintiff is an inmate of the Federal Correctional Institution in Texarkana, Texas. He brought this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, requesting injunctive relief to have his name added to the 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot as a Democratic Candidate for President of the United States of America. The Court determined Plaintiff had three or more civil actions or appeals dismissed as frivolous, and as such, was barred from bringing a civil action without prepayment of fees “unless the prisoner is under imminent danger of serious physical injury.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). Plaintiff did not show he was in imminent danger of serious physical injury, and the case was dismissed. His appeal was dismissed for failure to prosecute. . . . Plaintiff now moves for relief from judgment, requesting the restoration of the right to vote for felons (released or incarcerated) and to remove President Barack Obama from the 2012 Presidential ballot. Under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b), the court may relieve a party from a final judgment for mistake, inadvertence, newly discovered evidence, fraud, void judgment, satisfaction of judgment, or any other reason that justifies relief. Plaintiff does not specify the reason for seeking relief from judgment, and neither is the court able to identify any meritorious basis for granting relief from judgment.

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 75 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion The motion [ECF No. 16] is denied.“

21.

Judd v. Kansas, State of et al, No. 5:2011-cv-03104 (S.D. Kan. Sept. 18, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Kansas RECAP | PACER

“This action was dismissed and all relief was denied by order entered July 15, 2011, on account of plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee. Mr. Judd is a three-strikes litigant and made no showing of imminent danger. Plaintiff filed a Notice of Appeal, and on October 4, 2011, his appeal was dismissed. This matter is currently before the court upon another post-judgment motion filed by plaintiff, which generally re-argues his claims and argues new claims. He has also filed a second notice of appeal purportedly to the Supreme Court with respect to the pending post-judgment motion. The court finds that the post-judgment motion contains no valid ground for relief from judgment or for any of the other orders sought therein. * * *”

22.

23.

24.

Judd v. Ky. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv-00346-JGH (W.D. Ky. Aug. 20, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Kentucky RECAP | PACER

“…Plaintiff has now filed a motion for relief from judgment under the 24th Amendment (DN 22). He does not address his failure to pay the filing fee or comply with the Orders of this Court. He simply discusses the Democratic primary and posits his theory that President Obama is not a citizen of the United States. As such, Plaintiff offers no reason that he should be entitled to relief from the prior judgment of this Court…”

Judd v. La. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-01501-KDEJCW (E.D. La Aug. 24, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Louisiana *Judd prohibited from filing here.40 RECAP | PACER

"It is ordered that Petitioner's Motion for Relief from Judgment is denied as petitioner has presented no legal grounds for relief."

Judd v. La. Secy’ of St. et al, No. 3:11-cv-00870-RGJKLH (W.D. La. Aug. 10, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Louisiana *Judd prohibited from filing here. RECAP | PACER

“IT IS ORDERED that Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd’s “Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; And Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and For Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate” [Doc. No. 21] is DENIED. As of this date, Judd has not provided the Court with evidence that he paid the sanctions ordered by the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. Further, his case is now on appeal to that court.”

40

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”) Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 76 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

25.

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Secretary of State of Louisiana et al, No. 3:2011-cv-00393 (M.D. La.)

Louisiana *Judd prohibited from filing here. RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. Sec’y of State of Maine, No. 11-cv-00212 (D. Me. Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Maine RECAP | PACER

“On June 30, 2011, I adopted the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge and Ordered this lawsuit dismissed for lack of prosecution. Judgment entered against the plaintiff on July 1, 2011. On July 12, 2011, I denied his motion to reopen the case and his motion to stay. The plaintiff appealed and on January 10, 2012, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissed his appeal as untimely. Now on August 2, 2012, he has filed a “Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate.” (ECF No. 23). The motion is DENIED. Final judgment has already been entered in the case and his appeal was dismissed. The Twenty-fourth Amendment provides no basis for opening a case that has already been closed.”

26.

27.

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Maryland, No. 11cv-01447-RDB (D. Maryland Aug. 3, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Maryland RECAP | PACER

Docket Text Only: “ORDER Denying 15 Motion for Relief From Judgment. Signed by Judge Richard D Bennett on 08/03/2012. (Entered: 08/03/2012)”

Judd v. Sec’y of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, No. 4:11-mc-009407 (D. Mass.) (dismissed as frivolous)

Massachusetts RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

No case found

Michigan

No case found

No case found

Minnesota

No case found

Judd v. Missouri et al, No. 2:11-cv-04146-ODS (W.D. Mo. Aug 27, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Missouri RECAP | PACER

Plaintiff has filed a Motion for Relief from Judgment and other various motions. Defendant has not responded and the time for doing so has passed. Plaintiff’s motions raise arguments that have been repeatedly rejected and offers no reason justifying a different outcome. Plaintiff’s motions are denied.

Page 77 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

28.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al, No. 3:2011-cv-00351 (S.D. Miss. Aug.23, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Mississippi *Judd prohibited from filing here.41 RECAP | PACER

“It is hereby ordered that plaintiff’s motion for relief from judgment is denied as patently frivolous.”

29.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Mississippi et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00138 (N.D. Miss., Motion filed Aug. 6, 2012)

Mississippi *Judd prohibited from filing here. RECAP | PACER

Docket does not reflect an order addressing motion, but appeal – apparently re: pending motion – has been filed – and subsequently dismissed for want of prosecution.

30.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Montana et al, No. 11-cv00080 (D. Mont. Aug. 2, 2012 order) (striking motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Montana RECAP | PACER

“On May 27, 2011, this Court issued an Order denying Mr. Judd's Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis based upon the three strikes provision of28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). This Order provided that no motions for reconsideration or rehearing would be entertained. Dkt.4. Judgment was entered on May 27, 2011. Dkt. 5. Mr. Judd filed a Notice of Appeal on September 21,2011. Dkt. 9. On October 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit issued an Order finding that the appeal was so insubstantial as to not warrant further review and no motions for reconsideration would be considered. Dkt. 10. This matter is has been closed for over a year and this Court and the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals have indicated that no motions for reconsideration would be considered.”

No case found 31.

32.

Nebraska

No case found

Judd v. Nev. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00853-JCM –PAL (D. Nev. Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Nevada RECAP | PACER

“Mr. Judd has failed to establish any of the three factors for reconsideration. Instead, approximately eight months after this court entered its order, Mr. Judd has filed a motion seeking to reinstate the lawsuit on the same grounds, and arguing the same theories 42, that were previously dismissed as frivolous. The court conducted a de novo review of Mr. Judd’s contentions at the time it affirmed the magistrate’s report and recommendation, has done so again, and continues to find Mr. Judd’s contentions lacking ‘an arguable basis in law and fact.’”

Judd v. N.H. Sec’y of St. et al, No. 1:11-fp-00259 (D.N.H., motion filed Aug. 6, 2012)

New Hampshire RECAP | PACER

Motion Denied (Jan. 9, 2013); Recommendation and Order re: dismissal (Dec. 14, 2012)

No case found

New Jersey

No case found

41

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”) 42

Note that prior order did not address any claim regarding Obama’s status as “natural born citizen,”

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 78 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

33.

34.

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

Judd v. Lappin et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00400 (D.N.M.)

New Mexico RECAP | PACER

Motion not reflected on docket.

Judd v. Lappin et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00290 (D.N.M.)

New Mexico RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 1:11-cv-00571-DNH-RFT (N.D.N.Y., motion filed Aug. 2, 2012) RECAP | PACER

New York

No action taken on Aug. motion Appeal of apparent rejection (No. 12-3602) denied and mandate issued Dec. 14, 2012

Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 1:2011-cv-04242 (S.D.N.Y.)

New York RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. State Election Board of New York et al, No. 6:2011-cv-06286 (W.D.N.Y.)

New York RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. State Bd. Of Elections of N. Carolina, No. 1:2011-cv-00488 (M.D.N.C.)

North Carolina RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Judd v. Secretary of State of North Dakota et al, No. 1:2011-cv-00053 (D.N.D. Aug. 13, 2012 recommendation and order) (recommendation to deny motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds), order adopting Recommendation (Sept. 4, 2012)

North Dakota) RECAP | PACER

Recommendation: “…On August 6, 2012, Judd filed a document with the court captioned “Motion for Relief from Judgement or Order Under Twenty Fourth Amendment; and Motion to Amend for Court Order to Register All Convicted and Incarcerated Felons to Vote in All Federal Elections and Caucuses and Democratic National Convention; and for Order to Remove Barack Obama from State’s 2012 Presidential Primary Election Ballot/Caucus and Award All Delegates to Keith Judd, Democratic Presidential Candidate.” *** In his motion, Judd does not assert any of above enumerated grounds for granting him relief or otherwise show exceptional circumstances warranting such relief. Rather, he reasserts the claims set forth in his proposed complaint and further asserts a challenge to President Obama’s citizenship. Rule 60(b) is “not a vehicle for simple reargument on the merits.” Broadway v. Norris, 193 F.3d 987, 990 (8th Cir. 1999). Given Judd’s failure to demonstrate the existence of any exceptional circumstances, the undersigned finds no basis for granting Judd the relief he seeks. Accordingly, the undersigned recommends that his motion (Docket No. 19) be DENIED.”

35.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Ohio et al, No. 1:11-cv01200-SL (D. Ohio Aug. 6, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Ohio RECAP | PACER

Order summarized in docket: “Order Plaintiff's Motion for Relief from Judgment (Doc. No. 14 ) is denied. Further, the Clerk is directed to return, unfiled, any additional filings tendered by Plaintiff in this case. Finally, Plaintiff is hereby forewarned that the filing of any new frivolous actions in this Court may, without further notice, result in an order enjoining him from filing cases here without obtaining leave of court.”

Page 79 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

36.

Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 5:11-cv-00624 (W.D. Okla, Oct. 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

The August 3, 2012 Motion [Doc. No. 32] is denied. The judgment [Doc. No. 33] from which Plaintiff purports to seek relief is a judgment dismissing this action without prejudice because Plaintiff failed to respond to the Court’s Order denying his motion to proceed in forma pauperis and directing payment of the filing fee required to proceed with this action. In the current motion, Plaintiff fails to address any of the bases for the Order and the subsequent Judgment. Instead, he asserts arguments having nothing to do with the requirements for in forma pauperis status or the findings set out in the July 30, 2012 Order and subsequent Judgment. The August 23, 2012 Motion [Doc. No. 38] is stricken, as it is merely a duplicate of the August 3, 2012 Motion.

37.

Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 4:11-cv-00331-GKF-PJC (N.D. Okla. Aug. 29, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

On August 8, 2012, or more than ten (10) months after dismissal of the appeal, Plaintiff filed a “motion for relief from judgment or order under Twenty Fourth Amendment” (Dkt. # 16). He requests the Court to order, inter alia, that all convicted and incarcerated felons be registered to vote, that President Barack Obama be removed from the 2012 presidential ballot, and that all delegates be award to Plaintiff. Plaintiff never paid the $350 filing fee for this action. This Court has determined, on numerous occasions, that Plaintiff is subject to the three-strikes rule of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). He has not provided any relevant legal authority to support a claim that the statute is unconstitutional or does not apply to him. For all the reasons discussed in prior Orders (Dkt. #s 3 and 7), the Court finds that Plaintiff’s arguments asserted in his motion for relief from judgment under the Twenty Fourth Amendment are frivolous and without merit. His motion shall be denied.”

38.

Judd v. Oklahoma State Election Board et al, No. 11cv-00183 (E.D. Okla. Aug. 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Oklahoma RECAP | PACER

Docket Entry: “MINUTE ORDER by Judge Ronald A. White denying 17 Motion for Relief (dma, Deputy Clerk) (Entered: 08/07/2012)”

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 80 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status 39.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Oregon et al, No. 6:11-cv06176-HO (D. Or. Sept. 7, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds)

Jurisdiction Oregon RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “Plaintiff initiated this suit on May 25, 2011, seeking an injunction forcing his placement on Oregon's 2012 presidential primary election ballot and a declaration that convicted felons have a right to vote in the primary. Plaintiff also sought in forma pauperis (IFP) status which the court denied without prejudice due to a failure to provide the correct form. After the court provided plaintiff with the correct form, plaintiff refused to complete the application and the court dismissed the case on July 15, 2011. On September 16, 2011, plaintiff appealed. On October 18, 2011, the Ninth Circuit found the appeal "so insubstantial as to not warrant further review." On October 20, 2011, plaintiff sought leave to appeal IFP. The court denied the motion in light of the previous orders in the case. Plaintiff now seeks relief from the judgment and an order to register all convicted/incarcerated felons to vote in all 2012 elections and to remove Barack Obama from Oregon's presidential ballot. To date, plaintiff has not paid a filing fee or obtained IFP status. However, in anticipation of a denial of the motion, plaintiff has already filed a notice of appeal to the Supreme Court. To the extent this court still has jurisdiction to rule on the motion, the motion is denied.”

40.

Judd v. Pa. Dept. of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-00773-JFCCRE (W.D. Pa. Sept. 10, 2012 Order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Pennsylvania RECAP | PACER

Text only entry in docket: “ORDER denying as moot 17 Motion to Amend/Correct for the reasons stated in this Court's Order of December 21, 2011. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cynthia Reed Eddy on September 10, 2012. Text-only entry; no PDF document will issue. This text-only entry constitutes the Order of the Court or Notice on the matter. (Eddy, Cynthia) (Entered: 09/10/2012)”

41.

Judd v. Pa. Dept. of St. et al, No. 2:11-cv-03849-CMR (E.D. Pa. Aug. 1, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Pennsylvania RECAP | PACER

“AND NOW, this 1st day of August 2012, upon receipt of Plaintiff’s Motion for Relief from Judgment or Order Under the Twenty-Fourth Amendment [Doc. No. 11], and upon review of the Docket in this case, the Court finds it is without jurisdiction to rule on Plaintiff’s Motion as Plaintiff has not filed a Complaint, and thus has not properly raised a case and controversy upon which the Court can grant relief. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion is DENIED.” [1] The case was closed on June 21, 2011, as Plaintiff had failed to pay the filing fee or properly request in forma pauperis status. On November 17, 2011, Plaintiff’s Motion to Reopen and Stay proceedings was also denied for failure to pay the filing fee or properly request in forma pauperis status. This deficiency was never corrected, and no complaint has ever been filed.”

No case found

Puerto Rico

No case found

No case found

Rhode Island

No case found

No case found

South Carolina

No case found

Judd v. Secretary of State of South Dakota et al, No. 4:2011-cv-04080 (D.S.D.)

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

South Dakota RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

Page 81 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status 42.

Judd v. Dept. of State of Tennessee et al, No. 3:2011cv-00555 (M.D. Tenn. Aug. 8, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

Jurisdiction Tennessee RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion “Plaintiff Keith Russell Judd is an inmate at the Federal Correctional Institute in Texarkana, Texas. After the court denied the plaintiff’s motion to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), and the plaintiff failed to submit the $350 filing fee, this matter was dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed the plaintiff’s appeal for want of prosecution on January 20, 2012. Now before the court is a motion for relief from judgment (ECF No. 25). The plaintiff does not specify under which rule of civil procedure the motion was filed, but the court construes the motion as filed pursuant to Rule 60(b). *** The present motion does not present any basis for reconsideration of the judgment previously entered against the plaintiff, and certainly does not address any of the grounds recognized by Rule 60 as providing a legitimate reason for relief from judgment. The plaintiff’s motion is utterly frivolous, and the court declines to consider it. The motion (ECF No. 25) is hereby DENIED. Further, the plaintiff is given notice that this case is CLOSED and he SHALL NOT submit any more filings in this action. The Clerk of Court is is DIRECTED not to accept any additional filings in this action.”

43.

Judd v. Dept. of State of Tennessee et al, No. 11-cv00244 (E.D. Tenn. Motion filed Aug. 6, 2012) Judd v. Secretary of State for the State of Texas, No. 3:2012-cv-01113 (N.D. Tex.)

44.

Tennessee RECAP | PACER Texas *Judd prohibited from filing in TXt.43 RECAP | PACER

In re Judd, No. 03-12-00617-CV, 2012 WL 6097294 (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2012)

Motion denied (Mar. 4, 2013) No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file. But see: In re Judd, No. 03-12-00617-CV, 2012 WL 6097294 (Tex. App. Dec. 7, 2012) (denying petition for writ of mandamus to appellate court which asserted same birther claims as presented in the various August 2012 “motions for reconsideration” filed in federal courts)

No case found

Utah

No case found

No case found

Vermont

No case found

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, No. 1:2011-cv-01325 (E.D. Va.)

Virginia RECAP | PACER

No motion re: Obama/NBC issue currently on file.

43

See Judd v. Sec'y of State of Louisiana, No. 11–30920, 461 F. App'x 399, 401 (5th Cir. 2012) (“Judd is ORDERED to pay a sanction in the amount of $500 to the clerk of this court. Even after satisfaction of all sanction orders, Judd may not file any civil action in a district court of this circuit, or any pleading or notice of appeal with this court, without first obtaining leave of the court in which he seeks to file such action, pleading, or notice. When seeking leave of court, Judd must certify that the claim he wishes to present is a new one that has never before either been raised and disposed of on the merits or remains pending in any federal court. Upon failure thus to certify or upon false certification, Judd may be sanctioned and punished accordingly.”) Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Page 82 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status

Jurisdiction

Court Decision on Motion

45.

Judd v. State Board of Elections of Virginia et al, Civil Case No. 7:11-cv-00258-JCT (W.D. Va., motion filed Aug. 2, 2012)

Virginia RECAP | PACER

The court summarily dismissed this civil action without prejudice because plaintiff, a prisoner, has three strikes against him under U.S.C. §1915(g) and did not pay the $350.00 filing fee or establish an exception to the “three strikes” provision. Plaintiff’s appeal of that dismissal has also been dismissed. Plaintiff has since brought two frivolous motions, seeking reconsideration of his claims in this action. Because the motions are frivolous and offer no ground upon which this court finds relief to be warranted, it is now ORDERED that plaintiff’s motions (ECF Nos. 17 & 18) are DENIED. (Feb. 7, 2013 Order)

46.

Judd v. Secretary of State of Washington et al, 2:11-cv00214-WFN (E.D. Wash., motion filed Aug. 1, 2012, more than a year after case was closed – no action taken on motion )

Washington RECAP | PACER

No action taken on Aug. motion

47.

Judd v. Secretary of State of West Virginia et al, No. 1:11-cv-00093-IMK –JES (N.D. W. Va., Oct. 5, 2012 order) (denying motion for relief from judgment seeking, among other things, removal of Obama from 2012 general election ballot on “natural born citizen” grounds);

West Virginia RECAP | PACER

On January 18, 2012, the Court entered an Order and Judgment adopting the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge James E. Seibert, and dismissing without prejudice the pro se petitioner Keith Russell Judd’s (“Judd”) 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint (dkt. no. 14). More than six months later, on August 2, 2012, Judd filed the pending motion seeking, inter alia, relief from judgment. (Dkt. No. 18). Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) provides that a court may, upon motion or upon such terms as are just, relieve a party from a final judgment, order, or proceeding … *** Here, Judd has failed to specify what provision of Rule 60(b), if any, he relies upon for his motion. Instead, he simply reiterates the same frivolous arguments the Court rejected over six months ago. Accordingly, the Court DENIES his motion (dkt. no. 18).”

48.

Judd v. Secretary of State of West Virginia et al, No. 2:2011-cv-00369 (S.D. W.Va. motion filed Aug. 2, 2012);

49.

Judd v. Obama, No. 5:2013-cv-00040

West Virginia RECAP | PACER

Plaintiff does not allege any basis for relief under 60(b)’s subparts. Though his renewed argument that the Twenty-Fourth Amendment trumps the PLRA’s application in this case could perhaps be interpreted as alleging legal error in the Court’s previous Memorandum Opinion, legal error is not a ground for relief under Rule 60(b). See Russell v. Delco Remy Div. of Gen. Motors Corp., 51 F.3d 746, 749 (7th Cir. 1995). Further, this argument is as utterly meritless now as it was when the Court issued its earlier Memorandum Opinion. Having previously held that Plaintiff cannot proceed in this action without paying the requisite filing fee, the Court will not revisit its September 6, 2011 Memorandum Opinion or its accompanying Judgment Order.

West Virginia

50.

No case found 51.

Judd v. Wyoming Sec’y of State, No. 11-cv-00202 (D. Wyo. Nov. 26, 2012) (denying motion as patently frivolous)

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Wisconsin Wyoming RECAP | PACER

No case found The motion by Plaintiff is, on it's face, patently frivolous. … The motion by Plaintiff is thus not only utterly frivolous, it is, after the November 6, 2012, general election, clearly moot.

Page 83 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf

KEITH JUDD 2012 FILINGS RAISING BIRTHER ISSUE Case Citation / Status 52.

Judd v. St. Bd. of Elections, No. 3:11-cv-00063-CVGRM (D. Virgin Islands, motion filed Aug. 6, 2012);

Last Updated: August 11, 2015

Jurisdiction Virgin Islands RECAP | PACER

Court Decision on Motion

Motion denied (Feb. 23, 2013)

Page 84 of 84

www.tesibria.typepad.com/whats_your_evidence/BIRTHERCASELIST.pdf