Bonner Springs Government Services Center - City of Bonner Springs

3 downloads 348 Views 3MB Size Report
Oct 9, 2017 - ADMINISTRATION. CITY CLERK ... Concept 1 | Existing Site, Renovation + Addition. N. 1 ... Utilizes a singl
Bonner Springs Government Services Center Bonner Springs, Kansas October 9th, 2017

City Council Meeting

Planning Team

Bonner Springs Planning Team

SFS Architecture

Don Slone, City Planner, Project Leader

Kerry Newman, Principal in Charge

Carol Sharp, Human Resource Director

Kelly Stindt, Project Manager

Brian Hunt, Building Official Amber McCullough, City Clerk Billy Naff, Police Chief Justin Klaudt, City Engineer

Allison Vandever, Architectural Support

Planning Process Phase 1 KICK-OFF MEETING WITH PLANNING COMMITTEE

SPACE NEEDS PROGRAM

CONCEPT OPTIONS

PUBLIC OPEN HOUSE

DEVELOP PREFERRED CONCEPT

COUNCIL PRESENTATION

Space Needs Program CITY HALL

POLICE DEPARTMENT

APPROX. 11,500 SF

APPROX. 12,500 SF

MUNICIPAL COURT

RECORDS CLERK

COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT

ADMINISTRATION

FINANCE

OFFICERS

CITY CLERK

PROCESSING

ADMINISTRATION

EVIDENCE

SUPPORT / MEETING SPACES

SUPPORT / MEETING SPACES

Site Options

Concept Options

Concept 1 | Existing Site, Renovation + Addition

N

1

Concept 2 | Existing Site, New Construction

N

2

Concept 3 | Greenfield Site, New Construction

N

3

Anticipated Cost

N

$13,800,000

$11,000,000

$17,500,000

Pros/Cons

N PROS: • Maintains downtown location • Makes use of City owned property • Makes use of existing City owned historic building • Utilizes a single point of public entry for City Hall, Police and Municipal Court • Provides secure access from Police to Municipal Court • Provides flexible phasing during construction (City Hall may remain throughout construction) • Accommodates consolidated parking area on south • Provides possible historic tax credits CONS: • Reuse of existing historic building requires additional area due to configuration • Presents potential unforeseen conditions during construction

PROS: • Maintains downtown location • Makes use of City owned property • Utilizes a single point of public entry for City Hall, Police and Municipal Court • Provides secure access from Police to Municipal Court • Most economical project cost

PROS: • Provides high visibility site from K7 • Utilizes a single point of public entry for City Hall, Police and Municipal Court • Provides secure access from Police to Municipal Court • Does not require construction phasing • Allows most flexibility and future growth opportunities

CONS: • Leaves existing historic building unutilized • Requires construction phasing

CONS: • Removes government services center from downtown • Leaves existing city owned site unutilized • Most expensive project cost

Public Meeting Results

[13] [79] Preferred Concept

[51]

Preferred Concept Development

Preferred Concept Development | Site

Preferred Concept Development | City Hall

Preferred Concept Development | City Hall

Preferred Concept Development | City Hall

Preferred Concept Development | City Hall

Preferred Concept Development | Police

Preferred Concept Development | Police

Preferred Concept Cost Estimate