this is covariance not beta this is covariance not beta this is weighted average of covariance not weighted average of b
You could have saved 11 marks in total with small care.
You attempted for around 64 marks and received 42. this is fair . Plus you could have saved 11 marks and thats 42+11=53 Marks out of 64. You are good at all the points. Just try to solve the entire paper and you will easily score exemption. Plus don’t ignore Theory Portion of SFM.
CA Final (Nov. 2016) Paper-2 With Full Analysis
Strategic Financial Management (SFM)
This answer is clear
This Answer is Clean - Got Full Marks
The presentation part in this answer is totally rough. Still the methods and answer is correct. Got Full Marks.
The answer is clean , got full marks
ICAI Mistake - Same answer for another student , but he got 2 marks for it.
ICAI Mistake - Gave around 2 less marks
this is covariance not beta
this is covariance not beta
this is weighted average of covariance not weighted average of beta
There is no such formula for BETA calculation. Lack of Conceptual Clarity
4.8 and 4.25 are the variances, the same here has been used as Standard Deviation , which is wrong
There are lot of conceptual mistakes in the answers.
You could have saved 6 marks here
Similar problem is there in the study material , lack of practice in such questions has resulted into loss of marks here.Lost 6 marks because one mistake in how to adjust Inflation.
Clean answer, got full marks. well done
You totally ignored the financials of the new product in this question. other wise all other calculations are correct. Could have saved 5 marks by adding profit of 24 lakhs from new product sales in 143 Lakhs of existing profit. You could have saved 5 marks here
