Sep 27, 2017 - MSDWT Enrollment Rebalancing. Community Meetings. January 18 â Spring Mill Elementary. January 22 â E
MSDWT Enrollment Rebalancing
Community Meetings January 18 – Spring Mill Elementary January 22 – Eastwood Middle School
19-20 Attendance Boundaries Presentation 9-27-17
Welcome
Dr. Nikki Woodson, Superintendent
Format for this evening… ¤ Present Enrollment Rebalancing Information; ¤ Present information regarding the transition to new attendance boundaries; ¤ Discuss your questions at tables with administrators; ¤ Present School Hours Information; ¤ Discuss your questions at tables with administrators; ¤ Administrator report out from table (if time); ¤ Administration will be available following the meeting.
Why Enrollment Rebalancing is Needed ¤ Additional elementary school capacity by opening an eighth elementary school (Willow Lake Elementary) in 2019-2020; ¤ Additional elementary school capacity with construction of Clearwater Elementary School; ¤ Result is new attendance boundaries for ALL elementary and middle schools; ¤ Need to better balance middle school student enrollment among our three middle schools.
Enrollment Rebalancing Considerations ¤ Need to improve transportation efficiencies. ¤ Minimize the number of families impacted. ¤ Attempt to send students to schools closest to home.* ¤ Maximize the utilization of facilities. ¤ Be mindful of the socioeconomic make-up of schools.* ¤ Improve the balance of student enrollment (Middle School). ¤ Attempt to keep neighborhoods together. * ¤ Maintain middle school “feeder” elementary schools to the degree possible
Enrollment Rebalancing Challenges ¤ Difficult to apply equal weight to each consideration when creating attendance boundaries. ¤ Communicating a complex process with a large stakeholder group. ¤ Family history, loyalty and familiarity with a particular school. ¤ Addressing multiple objectives: - Opening of new elementary schools; and - Middle School enrollment balance. ¤ Logistics involved with a major change. ¤ Change is difficult.
19-20 Attendance Boundaries Presentation 9-27-17
Change
Current Attendance Boundaries – Elementary
Current Elementary to Middle School Feeder Pattern and Percentages 2016-17 ES Boundary Allisonville Crooked Creek Crooked Creek Fox Hill Fox Hill Greenbriar Greenbriar John Strange Nora Nora Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill
2016-17 MS Boundary Eastwood MS Northview MS Westlane MS Northview MS Westlane MS Northview MS Westlane MS Eastwood MS Eastwood MS Northview MS Eastwood MS Northview MS Westlane MS
Total K-5 776 50 499 407 353 274 632 460 128 557 53 336 246
Percentage 100% 9% 91% 54% 46% 30% 70% 100% 19% 81% 8% 53% 39%
Elementary Option A Elementary Option A
Elementary Student Same School/ New School Numbers - Option A
2016-17 ES Zone Allisonville Allisonville Crooked Creek Crooked Creek Fox Hill Fox Hill Fox Hill Fox Hill Greenbriar Greenbriar Greenbriar Greenbriar John Strange John Strange Nora Nora Nora Nora Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill
ES Option A Zone
Total K-5 Students
Allisonville Clearwater Crooked Creek
583 193
Fox Hill Fox Hill Greenbriar Willow Lake Spring Mill Fox Hill Greenbriar Willow Lake Spring Mill Allisonville Clearwater Fox Hill Greenbriar Clearwater Nora Fox Hill Willow Lake Nora Spring Mill
85 229 9 284 238 42 456 255 153 66 394 132 72 56 425 172 135 133 195
464
The GRAY shaded rows indicate the projected number of students that would change schools and indicate the location of the new school if Option A is selected.
Option A - Elementary to Middle School Feeder Pattern and Percentages ES Option A Boundary
MS Option A Boundary
Total K-5
Percentages
Allisonville
Eastwood MS
649
100%
Clearwater
Eastwood MS
643
100%
Crooked Creek
Westlane MS
464
100%
Fox Hill
Westlane MS
660
100%
Greenbriar
Northview MS
537
100%
Nora
Eastwood MS
54
10%
Nora
Northview MS
504
90%
Spring Mill
Northview MS
586
100%
Willow Lake
Northview MS
186
28%
Willow Lake
Westlane MS
488
72%
19-20 Attendance Boundaries Presentation 9-27-17
Elementary – Option A Utilization School Allisonville Crooked Creek Fox Hill Greenbriar Willow Lake Clearwater Nora Spring Mill Total
Option A Estimated Utilization 96% 104% 94% 95% 95% 95% 86% 93% 93%
Elementary Option B
Elementary Student Same School/New School Numbers – Option B 2016-17 ES Zone
The BLUE shaded rows indicate the projected number of students that would stay at their current school if Option B is selected.
Allisonville Allisonville Crooked Creek Crooked Creek Fox Hill Fox Hill Fox Hill Fox Hill Greenbriar Greenbriar Greenbriar Greenbriar John Strange John Strange Nora Nora Nora Nora Nora Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill Spring Mill
ES Option B Zone Allisonville Clearwater Crooked Creek Fox Hill Fox Hill Greenbriar Spring Mill Willow Lake Fox Hill Greenbriar Spring Mill Willow Lake Allisonville Clearwater Clearwater Fox Hill Greenbriar Nora Spring Mill Fox Hill Greenbriar Nora Spring Mill Willow Lake
Total K-5 Students 583 193 464 85 340 73 127 220 42 369 153 342 66 394 56 100 72 425 32 102 62 133 252 86
The GRAY shaded rows indicate the projected number of students that would change schools and indicate the location of the new school if Option B is selected.
Elementary to Middle School Feeder Pattern and Percentages - Option B ES Option B Boundary
MS Option B Boundary
Total K-5
Percentages
Allisonville
Eastwood MS
649
100%
Clearwater
Eastwood MS
540
84%
Clearwater
Northview MS
103
16%
Crooked Creek
Westlane MS
464
100%
Fox Hill
Westlane MS
669
100%
Greenbriar
Northview MS
576
100%
Nora
Eastwood MS
379
68%
Nora
Northview MS
179
32%
Spring Mill
Northview MS
564
100%
Willow Lake
Northview MS
346
54%
Willow Lake
Westlane MS
302
46%
19-20 Attendance Boundaries Presentation 9-27-17
Elementary Option B Utilization School
Allisonville Crooked Creek Fox Hill Greenbriar Willow Lake Clearwater Nora Spring Mill Total
Option B Estimated Utilization
96% 104% 94% 95% 86% 95% 86% 91% 93%
Projected percentages of students qualifying for Free or Reduced Lunch - Elementary Elementary School Allisonville Elementary Crooked Creek Elementary Fox Hill Elementary Greenbriar Elementary Willow Lake Elementary John Strange (Closed) / Clearwater (New) Nora Elementary Spring Mill Elementary Total
16-17 Percent FR 41% 57% 78% 81% 49%
Option A Percent FR 40% 58% 73% 76% 77% 51%
Option B Percent FR 40% 58% 72% 81% 75% 51%
76% 68% 65%
77% 76% 65%
77% 74% 65%
Elementary COMPASS (High Ability)
Current
2019-2020 Recommended Locations
¤ Fox Hill
¤ Crooked Creek
¤ Crooked Creek
Hill
¤ Allisonville
Crooked Creek, Willow Lake, Fox
¤ Spring Mill Spring Mill, Greenbriar *Nora (depending on feeder MS and as enrollment dictates) ¤ Clearwater * Nora (depending on feeder MS and as enrollment dictates) ¤ Allisonville
Current Attendance Boundaries Middle School
Middle School Utilization - Current
Middle School
Percent Utilization
Eastwood Middle School
77%
Northview Middle School
83%
Westlane Middle School Total
90% 81%
Middle School – Option A Middle School Option A
Middle School Utilization Option A Middle School Eastwood Middle School Northview Middle School Westlane Middle School Total
2016-17 Enrolled Option A Option A Utilization Utilization Enrollment Estimate 88% 929 77% 73% 769 83% 82% 861 84% 81% 81% 2559
Middle School – Option B
Middle School Utilization Option B
Middle School Eastwood Middle School Northview Middle School Westlane Middle School Total
16-17 Enrolled Option A Option A Option B Option B Utilization Utilization Enrollment Utilization Enrollment Estimate Estimate 88% 929 84% 880 77% 73%
769
83%
869
82%
861
77%
810
81%
2559
81%
2559
83% 84% 81%
Projected percentages of students qualifying for Free or Reduced Lunch Middle School
Middle School Eastwood Middle School Northview Middle School Westlane Middle School Total
2016-17 Percent FR 44% 73% 60% 59%
Option A Percent FR 51%
Option B Percent FR 50%
64%
69%
64%
59%
59%
59%
Summary of Options ¤ Option A has “cleaner” boundary lines; ¤ Option B has a few more “pockets” or enclaves of attendance boundaries within other attendance boundaries; ¤ Both Option A and Option B provide more efficient transportation (bus routing) possibilities compared to our current boundaries; ¤ Greenbriar and Spring Mill have a substantial number of students moving to a new school in both options. This is due to the schools’ location within the district as their boundaries border multiple other attendance boundaries;
Summary of Options (Continued)
¤ Greenbriar has the most students changing schools in both options; ¤ Spring Mill has less students changing schools in Option B; ¤ There is a similar number of students staying in and moving from Allisonville and John Strange/Clearwater in both options; ¤ 90% of Nora would attend Northview and 10% would attend Eastwood in Option A;
Summary of Options (Continued)
¤ 68% of Nora would attend Eastwood and 32% would attend Northview in Option B; ¤ 84% of Clearwater would attend Eastwood and 16% would attend Northview in Option B; ¤ Option B is the best option when considering improvement of middle school balance.
19-20 Attendance Boundaries Presentation 9-27-17
Table Talk ¤ Time at your tables to discuss your questions and comments; ¤ Administrator will take notes; ¤ Notes from both Community Meetings will be compiled and shared with the Administration and School Board.
MSDWT – School Start Times 2019-2020 Community Presentation
Why is the District considering a change? Research supports later school start times for adolescent students. ¤ To put our students in the best position to be successful based on research ¤ Early research from Minnesota Supporting Later HS Start Times * ¤ American Association of Pediatric Medicine – Several Research Articles Supporting Later Start Times* ¤ Neuroscience and Brain Research – Ongoing Research to Support Later Start Times * *Articles available on District website under “Facilities Planning” tab.
Why 2019-2020 ¤ Bus transportation routing will need to change due to 2019-2020 Enrollment Rebalancing; ¤ Two major changes combined in one year (Enrollment Rebalancing /School Hours) rather than consecutive or multiple years of major changes; and ¤ Time needed to revise teacher before and after school meetings and responsibilities.
Requirements Through analysis of stakeholder feedback as well as before and after school requirements of our schools, we have developed the following guiding principals or requirements when developing school start/end times: ¤ Attempt to start the first school time at approximately 7:30 AM (Earliest pick up would be 6:20 AM or slightly earlier); ¤ Last school end time no later than 4:25 PM (Extra-curricular, Late Activity Bus, and Supervision requirements restrict the time from ending later); ¤ Minimum of fifty (50) minutes needed between start and end times of each busing tier (this will allow for safe and on-time arrival and delivery times.
Options to Consider Option 1 Current Hours
Option 2 Potential Hours for 2019-2020
Times are approximate. If adopted, final times may minimally vary from the times presented here.
High School – 7:20 am – 2:35 pm
Elementary - 7:30 am – 2:30 pm Earliest Pick- approximately 6:20 am – 6:30 am
Elementary – 8:30 am – 3:30 pm
Latest Drop Off approximately 3:30 pm – 3:40 pm
High School – 8:20 am – 3:35 pm Middle School – 9:20 am – 4:20 pm
Earliest Pick-Up approximately 7:10 am – 7:20 am Latest Drop Off approximately 4:35 pm – 4:45 pm
Middle School - 9:25 am – 4:25 pm Earliest Pick-Up approximately 8:15 am – 9:25 am Latest Drop Off approximately 5:25 pm – 5:35 pm
Feedback from Stakeholders Preferring Current School Times ¤ Concerns regarding early pick up times for elementary students; ¤ Concerns regarding childcare options; ¤ Concerns with HS athletes getting home an hour later; ¤ Questions about students holding after school jobs; ¤ Concerns about Middle School dismissing even later than the current dismissal time.
Feedback from Stakeholders Preferring New School Times ¤ Persuaded by the research; ¤ Option 2 allows for High School students to continue to hold jobs; ¤ Similar to neighboring districts’ High School times; ¤ Would like to have students start and end early (elementary teacher comment); ¤ Believe high school students will perform better academically.
Challenges and Considerations ¤ Pick up times for Elementary - (Darkness – Earliest stops could be 6:20 AM or earlier); ¤ Families’ Needs (childcare, activities, younger siblings arriving home without older siblings home); ¤ Emerging Research - (Regarding Elementary also benefiting from later times); ¤ Transportation Costs - (Prohibits the Middle School day from being placed in the middle Tier); ¤ Unable to move to a two-tier busing system - (Due to the required costs associated with increasing the bus fleet); ¤ The lengths of our student days vary by level, making the creation of transportation windows between tiers challenging;
Challenges and Considerations ¤ High School Activities (travel to away athletic and club competitions, availability of buses to transport students to away activities prohibits High School from being in the third tier); ¤ Late Activity Bus Schedules and Driver Availability – (Creates challenges with High School being in the third tier); ¤ Constraints of time needed between busing tiers (Minimum of fifty minutes needed between tiers to maintain on time arrival and pick up times) The lack of time between our current busing tiers is making on time arrival difficult; ¤ Very little margin for error with Elementary in the first tier (Especially in the morning - If HS is late in the AM, students are late for credit bearing classes. - All Drivers (in Option 2) would be needed first thing in the morning – Potentially no drivers available to cover routes if substitutes are needed;
Challenges and Considerations ¤ After School Child Care – (Unknown if the number of bus riders and parent car drop offs will increase or decrease – Unknown as to how a new school time will influence attendance at AYS; ¤ Our current times are not consistent with the research that supports later school start times for adolescent students (MS/HS); ¤ Change is difficult.
Information and Final Recommendation Date – Enrollment Rebalancing ¤ Information provided at the February 28th, March 14th, and April 11th School Board Meetings; ¤ Information and presentation of pending recommendation at the April 11th School Board Meeting.
Our goal is to present a recommendation to the School Board on May 9, 2018.
Information and Final Recommendation Date – School Hours ¤ Information provided at the February 28th, March 14th, and April 11th School Board Meetings; ¤ Continued review and use of consultant services as needed (spring/ summer 2018) ¤ Present pending recommendation to School Board (late summer)
Our goal is to present a recommendation to the School Board regarding School Hours and District Calendar(s) in early fall, 2018.
Ongoing Information and Contact ¤ Visit www.msdwt.k12.in.us and Click on the “Facilities Planning” tab and follow the links. ¤ Contact: Dr. Jon Milleman, Assistant Superintendent
[email protected]
Thank you.