Firms in International Trade

they trade -- are central to understanding the well-known role of distance in dampening aggregate trade flows. Andrew B. Bernard. Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth. 100 Tuck Hall. Hanover, NH 03755 and NBER. J. Bradford Jensen. Peterson Institute for International Economics.
175KB Sizes 1 Downloads 130 Views

FIRMS IN INTERNATIONAL TRADE Andrew B. Bernard J. Bradford Jensen Stephen J. Redding Peter K. Schott Working Paper 13054

NATIONAL BUREAU OF ECONOMIC RESEARCH 1050 Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138 April 2007

Bernard, Jensen, and Schott thank the National Science Foundation (SES-0241474, SES-0552029 and SES-0550190) and Redding thanks Princeton University and the Centre for Economic Performance (CEP) for research support. We are grateful to Jim Davis of the Census Bureau for timely disclosure of our data analysis and to Jim Tybout, Jim Hines and the JEP editorial board for extremely helpful comments and suggestions. The research in this paper was conducted while Bernard, Jensen and Schott were Special Sworn Status researchers of the U.S. Census Bureau at the Boston Research Data Center, New York Research Data Center, and Center for Economic Studies. We thank the NSF for infrastructure grants that support Census Research Data Centers (SES-0550190 and ITR-0427889). Research results and conclusions expressed are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Census Bureau, the NBER, or any other institution to which the authors are affiliated. © 2007 by Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott. All rights reserved. Short sections of text, not to exceed two paragraphs, may be quoted without explicit permission provided that full credit, including © notice, is given to the source.

Firms in International Trade Andrew B. Bernard, J. Bradford Jensen, Stephen J. Redding, and Peter K. Schott NBER Working Paper No. 13054 April 2007 JEL No. F1,F2,L1,L2,L6 ABSTRACT Despite the fact that importing and exporting are extremely rare firm activities, economists generally devote little attention to the role of firms when discussing international trade. This paper summarizes key differences between trading and non-trading firms, demonstrates how these differences present a challenge to standard trade models and shows how recent "heterogeneous-firm" models of international trade address these challenges. We then make use of transaction-level U.S. trade data to introduce a number of new stylized facts about firms and trade. These facts reveal that the extensive margins of trade -- that is, the number of products firms trade as well as the number of countries with which they trade -- are central to understanding the well-known role of distance in dampening aggregate trade flows. Andrew B. Bernard Tuck School of Business at Dartmouth 100 Tuck Hall Hanover, NH 03755 and NBER [email protected]

Stephen J. Redding London School of Economics Department of Economics Houghton Street London WC2A 2AE, England [email protected]

J. Bradford Jensen Peterson Institute for International Economics 1750 Massachusetts Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20036 [email protected]

Peter K. Schott Yale School of Management 135 Prospect Street New Haven, CT 06520-8200 and NBER [email protected]

Firms in International Trade

In discussing the origins and implications of international trade, economists emphasize comparative advantage, increasing returns to scale and consumer love of variety but pay relatively little attention to the firms that actually drive trade flows. Yet engaging in international trade is an exceedingly rare activity: of the 5.5 million firms operating in the United States in 2000, just 4 percent were exporters. Among these exporting firms, the top 10 percent accounted for 96 percent of total U.S. exports. Since the mid-1990s, a large number of empirical studies have provided a wealth of information about the important role that firms play in mediating countries’ imports and exports. This research, based on micro datasets that track countries’ production and trade at the firm level, demonstrates that trading firms differ substantially from firms that solely serve the domestic market. Acr