helpdesk report - Evidence on Demand

21 downloads 209 Views 388KB Size Report
This Helpdesk Report has been produced by Evidence on Demand with the .... Macqueen, D (2008) Supporting Small Forest En
HELPDESK REPORT: Key Reference Material for Social & Gender Issues linked to tackling deforestation

Sarah Selby March 2013

This Helpdesk Report has been produced by Evidence on Demand with the assistance of the UK Department for International Development (DFID) contracted through the Climate, Environment, Infrastructure and Livelihoods Professional Evidence and Applied Knowledge Services (CEIL PEAKS) programme, jointly managed by HTSPE Limited and IMC Worldwide Limited. The views expressed in the Helpdesk Report are entirely those of the author and do not necessarily represent DFID’s own views or policies, or those of Evidence on Demand. Comments and discussion on items related to content and opinion should be addressed to the author, via [email protected].

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12774/eod_hd044.Mar2013.selby

i

Report summary This reference list has been collated as part of a helpdesk enquiry that was undertaken to peer review social and gender issues in a business case relating to forests and climate change. Whilst this list is not exhaustive it may act as a useful resource in the development of future business cases.

ii

Gender Issues and Forestry Gender Participation, Empowerment and Forests Argawal, B. (2002) ‘Participatory Exclusions, Community Forestry and Gender: An Analysis for South Asia and a Conceptual Framework’ World Development 29 (10), pp1623-1648 Argawal, B. (2009) ‘Gender and Forest Conservation: The Impact of Women’s Participation in Community Forest Governance’ Ecological Economics, 68, September, pp 2785-279. Available at: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0921800909001852 Tripathi, R. et al. (2012) What Works for Women: Proven approaches for empowering women smallholders and achieving food security. Research report, UK: Oxfam

Gender Research and Sustainable Forestry CIFOR (2013) Africa: Gender Analysis in Forestry Research – What Policymakers Should Know. Available at: allafrica.com/stories/201303111200.html CIFOR (2013b) Gender in the CGIAR Research Program on Forests, Trees and Agroforestry: A Summary of the Strategy for Research and Action, Indonesia: CIFOR. Available at: http://www.cifor.org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/4056.html IUCN (2011) ‘Attending to Gender, the IUCN Conservation Programme Newsletter, 43. Available at: www.iucn.org/forest/av Manfre, C., and Rubin, D (2013) Integrating Gender into Forestry Research: A Guide for CIFOR Scientists and Programme Administrators, Indonesia: Centre for International Forestry Research (CIFOR). Available at: http://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/Books/BCIFOR1203.pdf McDougall, C (2001) Gender and Diversity in Assessing Sustainable Forest Management and Human Well-being: Reflections on Assessment methods Tests Conducted in Bulungan, East Kalimantan, Indonesia, and Washington: Resources for the Future and CIFOR. Available at: http://www.cifor.org/online-library/browse/view-publication/publication/667.html Moss, C., and Swan, A. (2013) Gender Analysis in Forestry Research: What Policymakers Should Know. Available at: http://blog.cifor.org/14176/gender-analysis-in-forestry-researchwhat-policymakers-should-know/#.UT8t_9a56Ag World Bank (2009) Gender and Forestry, Module 14. Available at: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTGENAGRLIVSOUBOOK/Resources/Module15.pdf Gender and Forestry, Module 14 World Bank

Gender Mainstreaming DFID (2008) Guidance Note on Gender Mainstreaming and Social Exclusion in Research. Available at: www.dfid.gov.uk/r4d/PDF/Publications/GuidanceNote_Gender&SE.pdf

3

Dolan, C.S. (2001) ‘The ‘good wife’: struggles over resources in the Kenyan horticulture sector’. J of Development Studies 37(3): 39-70. ERM (2003) Gender, Environment and Poverty: Environment Keysheet, UK: DFID RECOFTC (2012) Reducing the Gender Gap. Available at: http://recoftc.wordpress.com/2012/08/31/reducing-the-gender-gap/ UN-REDD (2011) Business Case for Mainstreaming Gender in REDD+, UNDP, UNEP & FAO Available at: http://www.undp.org/content/dam/undp/library/gender/Gender%20and%20Environment/Low _Res_Bus_Case_Mainstreaming%20Gender_REDD+.pdf

Gender and Agriculture FAO, IFAD and ILO (2010) Agricultural value chain development: Threat or opportunity for women's employment? Gender and Rural Employment Policy Brief # 4. FAO (2011) The State of Food and Agriculture: Women in Agriculture – Closing the gender gap for development, Rome: FAO ILO (2009) Global Employment Trends for Women, Geneva: ILO

Gender, Climate Change and Forests Bathge, S. (2010) Climate Change and Gender: Economic Empowerment of Women through Climate Mitigation and Adaptation, Germany: GTZ IUCN (n.d) Reforestation, Afforestation, Deforestation, Climate Change and Gender. Available at: cmsdata.iucn.org/downloads/gender_factsheet_forestry.pdf USAID (2012) Getting REDD+ Right for Women. UNDP, UNEP & FAO. Available at: http://transition.usaid.gov/our_work/crosscutting_programs/wid/pubs/Gender_REDD+_Asia_Regional_Analysis.pdf

4

Social Issues and Forestry Community Forestry Community Forestry Investment Organisation (2008) Feasibility Study, Elson, D. Deutsche Bank, DFID and the Rainforest Foundation Cronkleton, P., Barton, Bray. D., and Medina, G (2011) Community Forest Management and the Emergence of Multi-scale governance institutions: Lessons for Redd+ Development from Mexico, Brazil and Bolivia, Open Access Forests. Elson Glasmeier, A.K. and Farrigan, T. (2005) ‘Understanding Community Forestry: a Qualitative Metastudy of the Concept, the Process, and its Potential for Poverty Alleviation in the United States Case’. The Geographical Journal 171(1): 56-69. Macqueen, D (2008) Supporting Small Forest Enterprises: A Cross-sectoral Review of Best practice, UK: IIED. Available at: pubs.iied.org/pdfs/13548IIED.pdf Viana, V.M. et al. (2012) REDD+ and Community Forestry: Lessons learned from an exchange of Brazilian experiences with Africa, Brazil: The World Bank/Amazonas Sustainable Foundation. World Bank (2012) REDD+ and Community Forestry: Lessons Learned from an Exchange of Brazilian Experiences with Africa. Washington: World Bank. Available from: http://siteresources.worldbank.org/EXTSDNET/Resources/REDD+_and_Community_Forestr y.pdf

Forests and Indigenous People Colchester, M. and Ferrari, M.F. (2007) Making FPIC Work: Challenges and Prospects for Indigenous Peoples, UK: Forest Peoples Programme Colchester, M. and Chao, S. (Eds) (2011). Oil Palm Expansion in South East Asia: Trends and implications for local communities and indigenous peoples, UK: Forest Peoples Programme FCPF and UN-REDD (2011) DRAFT Guidelines on Stakeholder Engagement in REDD+ Readiness with a focus on the Participation of Indigenous Peoples and other ForestDependent Communities

Land Tenure Donovan, J., Stoian, D., and Poole, N. (2008) Global Review of Rural Community Enterprises: The Long and Winding road for Creating Viable Businesses and Potential shortcuts. Report to the Ford Foundation. HLPE (2011) Land Tenure and International Investments in Agriculture: A report by the High Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome

5

Persha, L., Agrawal, A. and Chhatre, A. (2011) ‘Social and Ecological Synergy: Local Rulemaking, Forest Livelihoods, and Biodiversity Conservation’. Science 331: 1606-1608. RECOFTC, IIED and REDD-net. (2011) REDD+, Governance, and Community Forestry. Bangkok: RECOFTC Xu, J., White, A. and Lele, U. (2010) China’s Forest Land Tenure Reform: Impacts and Implications for Choice, Conservation and Climate Change, Washington DC: Rights and Resources Initiative

Forests and Poverty Angelsen, A., and Wunder, A. (2003) Exploring the Forest-Poverty Link: Key Concepts, Issues and Research Implications. Available at: www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/OccPapers/OP-40.pdf Deininger, K. (2011) ‘Challenges Posed by the New Wave of Farmland Investment’. J of Peasant Studies 38(2): 217-247. FAO (1997) ‘Numbers of Forest ‘Dependent’ Peoples and Types of People Forest Relationships’ in Asia-Pacific Forestry Sector Outlook study: People and Forests in Asia and the Pacific: Situation and Prospects. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/w7732e/w7732e04.htm Kostka, G. and Scharrer, J. (2011) Ethiopia’s Sesame Sector: The Contribution of Different Farming Models to Poverty Alleviation, Climate Resilience and Women’s Empowerment. Oxfam Research Reports, Oxford: Oxfam Norton-Griffith, M. (2008) Revitalizing African Agriculture, PERC Reports 26(3): 32-36. Wiggins, S. (2009) Can the Smallholder Model Deliver Poverty Reduction and Food Security for a Rapidly Growing Population in Africa? Background paper produced for the Expert Meeting on ‘How to feed the World in 2050’, Rome: FAO World Bank (2008) Poverty and Forest Linkages: A Synthesis and Six Case Studies, Washington: World Bank. Available from: http://www.profor.info/Documents/pdf/livelihoods/PovertyForestsLinkagesCaseStudiesSynth esis.pdf WSFS (2009) Feeding the World, eradicating hunger. Background paper Inf/2. World Summit on Food Security

Equity and Forests McDermott, M.H. and Schreckenberg, K. (2009) ‘Equity in Community Forestry – Insights from North and South’ International Forestry Review 11(2): 157-170. Pascual, U. et al. (2010) ‘Exploring the Links between Equity and Efficiency in Payments for Environmental Services: A Conceptual Approach’ Ecological Economics 69: 1237-1244.

6

Forests, Certification and Fair Trade Blackman, A. and Rivera, J. (2011) ‘Producer-level Benefits of Sustainability Certification’ Conservation Biology 25(6): 1176-1185. FOE Europe (2008) Sustainability as a Smokescreen - the Inadequacy of Certifying Fuels and Feeds, Brussels: Friends of the Earth Europe Forest Initiative (2011) Poverty and Certification, Sweden: WWF. Available at: www.wwf.se/nyhetsbrev/source.php/1468561/FC and Poverty Report_web.pdf IIED (2008) Distinguishing Community Forest Products in the Market: Industrial Demand for a Mechanism that Brings Together Forest Certification and Fair Trade, UK: IIED Karman, M. and Smith, A. (2009) FSC Reflected in Scientific and Professional Literature: Literature Study on the Outcomes and Impacts of FSC certification, 1–244. Nelson, V. and Pound, B. (2009) The Last Ten years: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature on the Impact of Fairtrade, 1–48. Smith, S. (2010) Fairtrade Bananas: a Global Assessment of Impact, Brighton: IDS Vagneron, I. and S. Roquigny, (2010) What do We Really Know about the Impact of Fair Trade? A synthesis, Paris: PFCE, 25 p.

Supply chains and Forests Coles, C. (2011). ‘Going for Win-win – Upgrading Through Vertical Coordination.’ In Mitchell, J. and Coles, C. (Eds). Markets and rural poverty: upgrading in value chains, London: ODI, pp163-178. Hardcastle, P.D. et al. (2005) Improving the Investment Environment for Private Sector Plantation Forestry Development in Uganda, SPGS Minten, B., Randrianarison, L. and Swinnen, J.F.M. (2009) ‘Global Retail Chains and Poor Farmers: Evidence from Madagascar’. World Development 37(11): 1728-1741. USAID (2003) Public-Private Partnerships in Forestry, Washington: USAID Forestry Program. Available at: pdf.usaid.gov/pdf_docs/PNACY534.pdf

Forests and working conditions ILO (n.d) Encyclopaedia of Occupational Health and Safety, Fourth Edition, Volume III, Part X, Industries Based On Biological Resources, Available at: http://www.ilocis.org/en/contilo10.htmlForestry. WWF (2013) Despair in the Soy Plantations. Available at: wwf.panda.org/about_our_earth/about_forests/deforestation/forest_conversion_agriculture/s oy_deforestation_social/

7

Forests and Social Standards and Safeguards Anderson, P. 2011. Free, Prior, and Informed Consent in REDD+: Principles and Approaches for Policy and Project Development, RECOFTC and GIZ, Bangkok. Equator Principles (June 2006). A financial industry benchmark for determining, assessing and managing social and environmental risk in project financing. Available at: http://www.equator-principles.com/resources/equator_principles.pdf CCBA and CARE International (2010) REDD+ Social & Environmental Standards, Version 1. June 2010. Climate, Community & Biodiversity Alliance (CCBA) and CARE International. GoodCorporation (2010) The GoodCorporation Standard. Available at: http://www.goodcorporation.com/documents/Standard_000.pdf IFC (2012) IFC Performance Standards on Environmental and Social Sustainability, Washington DC: World Bank Group Macintyre, M. (2007) ‘Informed Consent and Mining Projects: A View from Papua New Guinea’. Pacific Affairs 80(1): 49-65. SA8000 (2008) Social Accountability 8000. Available at: http://www.saintl.org/_data/n_0001/resources/live/2008StdEnglishFinal.pdf UN-REDD+ (2012) REDD+ Social and Environmental Standards. Available from: www.reddstandards.org/files/pdf/redd-docs/Standards/REDDSES draft Version 2 revised 06-22-12.pdf UN-REDD (2012b) UN-REDD Programme Social and Environmental Principles and Criteria. Available at: http://www.un-redd.org/Multiple_Benefits_SEPC/tabid/54130/Default.aspx

Forests, Climate Change and Adaptation Bernier, P., and Schoene, D. (2008) Adapting Forests and their Management to Climate Change: An Overview, FAO. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docrep/011/i0670e/i0670e02.htm Canadell, J.G. and Raupach, M.R. (2008) ‘Managing Forests for Climate Change Mitigation’ Science 320: 1456-1457. FAO (2012) Forests and Climate Change Working Paper 10: Forest Management and Climate Change – a Literature Review, Rome: FAO. Available at: www.fao.org/docrep/015/md012e/md012e00.pdf Kaimonwitz, A (2008) The Prospects for Reduce Emissions from Deforestation and Degradation (REDD) In Mesoamerica. Available at: AIMOWITZhttp://www.cifor.org/publications/pdf_files/articles/AKaimowitz0801.pdf

8