R&D/Innovation and Product Development Overarching Challenges. Sample Solutions from GTM. Portfolio Management. R&am
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
global
Idea Generation and Portfolio Management 2012
r & d /innovation and product development priorities survey results
TWEET ABOUT THE SURVEYS
#2012priorities Co-Sponsor
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
1
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results
CONTENTS Executive Summary . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 INTRO
Survey Purpose and Respondents . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .4 What is the Growth Team Membership™ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .5 R&D/Innovation and Product Development Overarching Challenges . . . . . . . . . . .6
SECTION
1
SECTION
2
SECTION
3
SECTION
4
Key R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
R&D/Innovation and Product Development Resource Trends . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Special Interest Topic: Open Innovation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 17
Respondent Demographics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
2
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Introduction
3
R&D/Innovation and Product Development Executive Summary SECTION 1:
Key R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges
Key Internal Challenge
Key Internal Challenge Root Cause
Generating an accurate and relevant technology roadmap
Insufficient personnel
SECTION 2:
R&D/Innovation and Product Development Resource Trends
Budgets
Resources
Resource Allocation
R&D typically has an annual budget of $20 million or more
Budgets and staffing levels will increase moderately
More resources are being allocated to short‑term, incremental innovation projects
OI Team
Key OI Challenge
External OI Sources
Majority of companies have some form of OI team
Creating an effective open innovation collaboration framework
Customers are the primary source of OI ideas
SECTION 3:
Open Innovation (OI)
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Introduction
4
Survey Purpose and Respondents
353
survey respondents
Research Objective To understand the most pressing challenges shaping R&D/innovation and product development executives’ 2012 planning
Methodology Web-based survey platform
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Survey Population
Co-Sponsor
Manager-level and above R&D/innovation and product development executives from companies globally Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Introduction
5
What is the Growth Team Membership™? GTM is a subscription program that supports executives within the functions that report to the CEO CEO’s Growth Team™
GTM: Creating Client Value
R&D/ R&D/ Innovation Innovation
Marketing
GTM’s case-based best practices help executives: Sales Leadership
Corporate Strategy
CEO
Corporate Development
Market Research
Investors/ Finance
GTM provides best practices, events, and services that enable executives to address challenges within their companies
Competitive Intelligence
Speed the design and implementation of initiatives by not reinventing the wheel
Save money and reduce risk by avoiding mistakes made by other companies
Accelerate problem-solving with a cross‑industry perspective
Improve their functions’ and companies’ performance and productivity
[email protected]
www.gtm.frost.com
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
twitter.com/Frost_GTM
slideshare.net/FrostandSullivan Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Introduction
6
What’s Keeping R&D/Innovation and Product Development Executives Up at Night in 2012? R&D/Innovation and Product Development Overarching Challenges
Sample Solutions from GTM
Portfolio Management R&D/innovation executives need to develop a methodology that allows them to prioritize innovation projects based on their economic value and role in the portfolio.
Learn how ConvaTec developed a portfolio management process that makes efficient use of cross-functional governing teams and phase reviews.
Collaborative Innovation As open innovation continues to gain momentum, R&D executives need to identify methods for collaborating with customers, adjacent businesses, and suppliers.
Learn how IBM’s executive briefing centres bring together customers, business partners, and IBM industry experts and researchers to explore how leading-edge technologies can solve pressing business challenges.
Open Innovation and Partnerships As R&D executives apply open innovation to their product development processes they often struggle to evaluate and establish trust with strategic partners.
Learn how our Strategic Partnerships toolkit helps you screen and evaluate potential partners based on their degree of strategic alignment and willingness to collaborate.
Contact us at
[email protected]. The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results
7
INTRO
SECTION
1
Key R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges
SECTION
2
SECTION
3
SECTION
4
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 1
8
Top Five R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges
Challenge 1
Generating an accurate and relevant technology roadmap (16%)
Challenge 2
Prioritizing innovation ideas and projects (14%)
Challenge 3
Identifying breakthrough new product ideas (13%)
Challenge 4
Allocating portfolio spend across short-, medium-, and long- term projects (9%)
Challenge 5
Measuring the success rate of your innovation projects and portfolio (10%)
Note: The respondents were asked to rank their top five challenges. The percentage values indicate how many respondents listed that particular challenge as their first through fifth challenge.
SURVEY QUESTION:
What are the top five functional challenges shaping your R&D/innovation and product development strategy?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 1
9
R&D’s top challenges are largely the same across business models Top Five R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges (By Business Model)
B-to-B
B-to-C
Challenge 1
Generating an accurate and relevant technology roadmap (17%)
Generating an accurate and relevant technology roadmap (16%)
Challenge 2
Prioritizing innovation ideas and projects (15%)
Prioritizing innovation ideas and projects (14%)
Identifying breakthrough new product ideas (14%)
Maximizing portfolio value while mitigating portfolio risk (11%)
Challenge 4
Allocating portfolio spend across short-, medium-, and long- term projects (11%)
Embedding the voice of the customer into the innovation process (11%)
Challenge 5
Measuring the success rate of your innovation projects and portfolio (9%)
Measuring the success rate of your innovation projects and portfolio (10%)
Challenge 3
Note: The respondents were asked to rank their top five challenges. The percentage values indicate how many respondents listed that particular challenge as their first through fifth challenge. The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 1
10
R&D’s challenges are attributed to understaffing and ineffective or nonexistent processes Top Five R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges
Root Cause of Top Five R&D/Innovation and Product Development Challenges
Challenge 1
Generating an accurate and relevant technology roadmap
Staff: Limited resources (29%)
Challenge 2
Prioritizing innovation ideas and projects
Staff: Limited resources (45%)
Challenge 3
Identifying breakthrough new product ideas
Staff: Limited resources (23%)
Challenge 4
Allocating portfolio spend across short-, medium-, and long- term projects
Strategic Alignment: Lack of common objectives (26%)
Challenge 5
Measuring the success rate of your innovation projects and portfolio
Process: Lack of process (42%) Process: Ineffective process (42%)
Please indicate the root cause—staff, process, technology/systems, or strategic alignment—of your top five R&D/innovation and product development challenges.
SURVEY QUESTION:
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results
11
INTRO
SECTION
1
SECTION
2
R&D/Innovation and Product Development Resource Trends
SECTION
3
SECTION
4
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 2
12
Most R&D/innovation budgets are over $20 million 2012 R&D/Innovation and Product Development Budgets (By Business Model)
percentage of company revenue allocated to r&d
40%
Companies dedicated approximately 5% of their 2011 revenue to their 2012 R&D/innovation and product development budgets.
33%
31% 29%
30%
F
25%
The red percentages are for all respondents.
21%
F
20%
16% 10% 10% 7%
13%
15% 13% 13%
F
F
5% 5%
0%
Below $500,000
$500,000 to $999,999
$1 Million to $2.99 Million
All Companies
SURVEY QUESTION:
11% 10% F 9%
F
10% 11% 7%
F
5%
$3 Million to $4.99 Million
B-to-B Companies
$5 Million to $9.99 Million
$10 Million to $19.99 Million
$20 Million or more
B-to-C Companies
hich of the above ranges (in $USD) best describes your 2012 total R&D/innovation and product development budget (all expenditures W on R&D/innovation and product development activities and general & administrative—including staff)?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 2
13
R&D executives are increasing budget allocations to short- and medium-term innovation projects in 2012 Change in Portfolio Allocations (By Business Model)
All Companies
B-to-B Companies
B-to-C Companies
Short-Term, Incremental Innovation (adoption within 2 years)
Medium-Term Innovation (adoption in 2 to 4 years)
Long-Term Innovation (adoption in 4 to 10+ years)
Disruptive Technologies
INCREASE
57%
45%
25%
28%
STAY THE SAME
30%
40%
46%
48%
DECREASE
13%
15%
29%
24%
INCREASE
56%
44%
22%
28%
STAY THE SAME
31%
45%
55%
54%
DECREASE
13%
11%
23%
18%
INCREASE
58%
48%
31%
28%
STAY THE SAME
29%
32%
36%
41%
DECREASE
13%
20%
33%
31%
SURVEY QUESTION:
In comparison to 2011, your 2012 R&D/innovation and product development budget for each of the above project categories will…
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 2
14
R&D executives foresee additional staff in 2012 R&D/Innovation and Product Development Staffing Changes (By Business Model)
All Companies Decrease Substantially 3% Decrease Moderately
B-to-B Companies Decrease Substantially
Increase Substantially
Decrease Moderately
6% 13%
Increase Substantially
4% 6% 9%
40%
Increase Moderately
40%
Increase Moderately
41%
38% Stay the Same
Stay the Same
B-to-C Companies Decrease Substantially 1% Decrease Moderately
Increase Substantially 6%
18%
31%
44%
Increase Moderately
Stay the Same
SURVEY QUESTION:
In comparison to 2011, your 2012 R&D/innovation and product development staffing will…
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 2
15
R&D/innovation budgets are expected to increase in 2012 R&D/Innovation and Product Development Budget Changes (By Business Model)
All Companies Decrease Substantially 3% Decrease Moderately 11%
Stay the Same
32%
B-to-B Companies Decrease Substantially 2% Increase Substantially Decrease Moderately 5% 9%
Increase Substantially 7%
Stay the Same 47%
29% 55%
Increase Moderately
Increase Moderately
B-to-C Companies Decrease Substantially 2%
Increase Substantially
Decrease Moderately 16%
32%
11%
39%
Increase Moderately
Stay the Same
SURVEY QUESTION:
In comparison to 2011, your 2012 R&D/innovation and product development budget will…
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 2
16
Most respondents rate their R&D functions as “Above Average” R&D/Innovation and Product Development Effectiveness (By Business Model)
All Companies Exceptional 3%
Poor 2%
B-to-B Companies Exceptional 4%
Below Average
11%
12%
Above Average
Below Average
Above Average
45% 38%
42% 43%
Average
Average
B-to-C Companies Exceptional 1%
Poor 2% Below Average 13%
Above Average
51%
33% Average
SURVEY QUESTION:
How would you rate the performance or effectiveness of your function compared to others within your industry?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results
17
INTRO
SECTION
1
SECTION
2
SECTION
3
Special Interest Topic: Open Innovation
SECTION
4
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
18
2012 survey results Section 3
Respondents in B-to-B companies are more likely to have a dedicated OI team within R&D than their B-to-C peers OI Teams Within R&D (By Business Model)
All Companies
B-to-B Companies
B-to-C Companies
56%
53%
60%
Yes
Yes Yes
OI Team Structure Sub-group within R&D/product development (34%)
SURVEY QUESTION:
OI Team Structure Sub-group within R&D/product development (37%)
OI Team Structure Part-time technology scout(s) within R&D/ product development (35%)
Do you have staff dedicated to open innovation? If so, which of the above best describes your open innovation team structure?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 3
19
Companies tend to have a small number of staff assigned to open innovation (OI) Number of OI Staff (By Business Model)
6
This graph represents the median value for the number of OI staff. 4
Number of OI Staff
3
0
SURVEY QUESTION:
All Companies
3
3
B-to-B Companies
B-to-C Companies
Approximately how many people in your company are assigned to open innovation?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 3
20
R&D executives struggle to secure buy-in and develop a framework for open innovation Top Five Open Innovation Challenges (By Business Model)
All Companies Creating an effective open innovation collaboration framework (20%)
B-to-B Companies
B-to-C Companies
Creating an effective open innovation collaboration framework (17%)
Creating an effective open innovation collaboration framework (24%)
Fostering trust between your employees and strategic partners (13%)
Establishing buy-in internally for open innovation (12%)
Overcoming the fear of lost IP and competitive advantage (12%)
Assessing the viability of a potential partner (13%)
Overcoming the fear of lost IP and competitive advantage (14%)
Creating a shared understanding of the challenge(s) to be addressed through open innovation (16%)
Creating a shared understanding of the challenge(s) to be addressed through open innovation (15%) Creating mutually agreed-upon key performance indicators (15%)
Developing a process to assess innovation concepts’ feasibility (20%)
Assessing the viability of a potential partner (12%) Establishing buy-in internally for open innovation (12%)
Garnering the internal resources needed to test innovation concepts’ feasibility (17%)
SURVEY QUESTION:
Developing a process to assess innovation concepts’ feasibility (15%)
Garnering the internal resources needed to test innovation concepts’ feasibility (26%)
Rank the above open innovation challenges in order of importance.
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 3
21
Open innovation is primarily used to generate new ideas Use OI in the Product Development Cycle (By Business Model)
Idea generation
Idea screening
Concept testing and development
Product launch
All Companies
33%
24%
25%
5%
B-to-B Companies
35%
25%
23%
6%
B-to-C Companies
37%
28%
34%
6%
SURVEY QUESTION:
During which stage(s) of the product development process does your company use open innovation (check all that apply)?
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results Section 3
22
Customers are the primary source of open innovation submissions Top Three OI Sources (By Business Model)
All Companies
B-to-B Companies
B-to-C Companies
Customers (40%)
Customers (47%)
Customers (34%)
Adjacent businesses (24%)
Adjacent businesses (27%)
Academia (24%)
Academia (25%)
Suppliers (16%)
Adjacent businesses (16%)
SURVEY QUESTION:
Please rank your top three sources of open innovation ideas.
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
2012 survey results
23
INTRO
SECTION
1
SECTION
2
SECTION
3
SECTION
4
Respondent Demographics
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
24
2012 survey results Section 4
Respondent Demographics Enterprise Type
Business Model
Not for Profit 3% Government/Public Sector Venture Capital Hybrid 3%
6%
6%
The majority of the respondents come from B-to-B companies.
B-to-C Company (Indirect) 25%
Public 40% B-to-C Company (Direct)
42%
61%
14%
B-to-B Company
Private
Most of the respondents work in privately held companies.
N = 316
N = 308
Company Revenue 50%
32% 25%
25%
20%
16% 7%
0%
SURVEY QUESTION:
Below $100 Million
$100 Million to $499.99 Million
$500 Million to $999.99 Million
$1 Billion to $11 Billion
More than $11 Billion
N = 303
Please indicate the type of enterprise, business model, and revenue that best represents your company.
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.
growth team m e m b e r s h i p™
25
2012 survey results Section 4
Respondent Demographics: Region and Top Five Participating Industries Region Middle East 3%
Industries
3% Africa Information and Communication Technologies
Europe
18%
27% 46%
Americas
21%
Energy and Power Systems
19%
Aerospace and Defence
20%
Asia Pacific
N = 313
Chemicals, Materials, and Food
24%
Healthcare and Life Sciences
26%
0%
15%
30%
N = 313 SURVEY QUESTION:
Please indicate which region you are located in and which industry categories best describe your company (check all that apply).
The contents of these pages are copyright © 2012 Frost & Sullivan. All rights reserved.
Growth Team Membership™ research.