Jan 29, 2018 - The major banks, with the exception of NAB, have largely completed their capital builds. Furthermore, we
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Major Banks Enough to be excited about ■
We believe the major banks sector as a whole presents good value at current share prices and for this reason we have an Add recommendation on all four majors.
■
Some of the value in the major banks is attributable to a heightened regulatory risk premium in our view. This is particularly stemming from the announcement of a Royal Commission (RC). Our base case is that the RC will not ultimately result in capital raisings or dividend cuts. We are therefore of the view that RC-related share price weakness presents good opportunity to buy yield.
■
We believe there is strong potential for further divestments to be announced this year, which would increase the scope for return of capital to shareholders.
■
WBC remains our preferred major bank.
We see more upside risk than downside risk to consensus earnings forecasts We expect the asset quality environment to remain benign over the next 12 months, creating scope for upside risk to earnings forecasts despite the cost of risk (credit impairment charge as a percentage of the loan book) for three of the four major banks hovering at cyclically low levels. We expect net interest margins to generally expand from 2H17 to 1H18F, which together with recently improved consumer sentiment and with interest-only home loan flows having re-based, will be supportive of income growth. Investment spend is being increasingly focused on digitisation and automation, and is resulting in increased focus on headcount reduction, which places the sector in a good position to achieve positive jaws on an underlying basis.
Expect regulatory risk premium to subside over next year We expect the cost of equity capital (COEC) being factored into major bank share prices to reduce as a result of reduction in perceived RC-related regulatory risk over the next year. Our base case is that the RC will not ultimately result in customer redress large enough to warrant capital raisings or dividend cuts as the banks are now largely in comfortable CET1 capital positions. We are therefore of the view that share price weakness stemming from RC-related risk presents good opportunity to buy yield. There is also reason to believe that the RC marks the peak of regulatory risk for the Australian major banks, particularly with some members of the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR) reportedly suggesting to the Federal Treasurer that politicisation of the banking sector has now gone too far.
Strong capital positions are creating scope for return of capital The major banks, with the exception of NAB, have largely completed their capital builds. Furthermore, we are of the view that the Basel III reforms finalised last month do not pose a threat to the ‘unquestionably strong’ regulatory capital framework announced by APRA last year. These factors create scope for capital returns from ANZ, CBA and perhaps even WBC. We believe there is strong potential for further divestments to be announced this year, which would increase the scope for return of capital to shareholders.
WBC remains our preferred pick We believe the major banks sector as a whole presents good value at current share prices and for this reason we have an Add recommendation on all four majors. Based on our forecasts and DDM valuation methodology, the COEC being factored into WBC’s share price is the highest of the major banks. This is despite our view that WBC in overall terms has the lowest risk profile of the major banks. We expect the COEC factored into WBC’s share price to reduce over the next 12 months, which together with its dividend yield should result in the highest 12-month total shareholder return of the majors. Azib Khan T (61) 2 9043 7903 E
[email protected]
Figure 1: Recommendations and share price targets Ranking Recommendation
Share price at Target price ($) close of 29/1/18 ($)
Previous target price ($)
Forecast TSR
1. WBC ADD
31.11
36.00
37.00
24.4%
2. NAB
ADD
29.26
33.50
34.50
24.2%
3. ANZ
ADD
28.63
30.00
30.00
12.8%
4. CBA
ADD (previously Hold)
79.19
81.50
80.00
10.7%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
IMPORTANT DISCLOSURES REGARDING COMPANIES THAT ARE THE SUBJECT OF THIS REPORT AND AN EXPLANATION OF RECOMMENDATIONS CAN BE FOUND AT THE END OF THIS DOCUMENT. MORGANS FINANCIAL LIMITED (ABN 49 010 669 726) AFSL 235410 - A PARTICIPANT OF ASX GROUP
Powered by EFA
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Contents Sector view ...................................................................................................................... 3 Positives ........................................................................................................................ 3 Risks .............................................................................................................................. 4 Valuations ........................................................................................................................ 5 Cost of equity capital...................................................................................................... 6 Rankings .......................................................................................................................... 7 1. WBC (ADD)................................................................................................................ 7 2. NAB (ADD) ................................................................................................................ 7 3. ANZ (ADD) ................................................................................................................. 7 4. CBA (ADD) ................................................................................................................ 8 Margins............................................................................................................................. 9 Headwinds ..................................................................................................................... 9 Tailwinds ...................................................................................................................... 10 Summary of NIM forecasts .......................................................................................... 10 Credit growth ................................................................................................................. 11 Home lending growth has held up well ........................................................................ 11 Commercial lending growth outlook improving ............................................................ 12 Non-interest income ...................................................................................................... 13 Markets & treasury income .......................................................................................... 13 Fee income .................................................................................................................. 13 Expenses........................................................................................................................ 13 Asset quality .................................................................................................................. 14 Cost of risk at cyclically low levels but further reduction possible ................................ 14 Troublesome exposures .............................................................................................. 16 Housing........................................................................................................................ 16 Capital ............................................................................................................................ 17 Finalised Basel III reforms do not pose threat to ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark.. 17 Capital management potential ..................................................................................... 17 Royal Commission ........................................................................................................ 18 Base case is no capital raisings or dividend cuts ......................................................... 18 Potential impact on earnings ........................................................................................ 19 This may be the peak of regulatory risk for the sector ................................................. 19 Use of super funds may attract significant attention..................................................... 19 Appendix: Investment fundamentals ........................................................................... 20
2
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Sector view Positives
Credit growth o
The major banks all met APRA’s 30% limit on new interest only flow as a percentage of total new residential mortgage lending in the Sep-17 quarter. With new interest-only flows now re-based, the majors can choose to grow new interest-only flow in line with system new home loan flow growth.
o
The majors are competing aggressively for owner-occupier (OO) principal & interest (P&I) home loans. Improvement in new loan flow in this segment will provide the majors with more scope to grow interest-only home loans.
o
The Westpac Melbourne Institute Index of Consumer Sentiment has been increasing in recent months. The average reading for the Index in the Dec-17 quarter was 5% above the average for the Sep-17 quarter. The index has since increased 1.8% from 101.3 in December to 105.1 in January. This is the best monthly index read since late 2013 and the most positive start to a calendar year since 2010.
o
There are early signs that the phase of institutional loan book contraction for the major banks may be over. Comfortable capital positions mean the banks no longer need to contain loan growth to build capital positions.
o
Strong business conditions, together with talk of income and business tax cuts, are supportive of the outlook for SME loan growth.
Margins o
Full period impact of interest-only home loan repricings that took place last year will come through in 1H18.
o
The rollover of expensive 12-month term deposits locked in over the Aug-16 to Nov-16 period will support NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F.
o
While bank bears are highlighting that continued switching from interest-only to P&I home loans will be a drag on NIMs, it should be noted that the rate of monthly switching generally slowed over the 3 months ended 30/10/17 according to data disclosed by the majors. Also, we expect APRA to announce more granular mortgage risk weight floors such that interest-only home loans attract a higher risk weight than comparable P&I loans. If this materialises, then the impact of switching on ROE will be muted.
o
The marginal cost of term wholesale funding has been falling. We expect this to have a directly positive impact on NIMs as well as an indirectly positive impact through further reduction in term deposit competition.
o
The majors have recently reduced savings deposit rates which supports the near-term NIM outlook.
o
The major banks’ Net Stable Funding Ratios (NSFRs) are in comfortable positions, which means the terming out of wholesale funding is now coming to an end in our view.
3
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Asset quality o
The outlook for resource exposures and NZ dairy exposures has improved significantly compared to one year ago in our view.
o
If the environment for asset quality remains benign, then there is scope for write-backs and recoveries to remain strong while new impaired assets reduce. This can result in further declines in the cost of risk (credit impairment charge as a percentage of the loan book) for the major banks.
Capital and dividends o
In our view, capital builds for the major banks – with the exception of NAB – are now largely complete.
o
Basel III reforms were finalised by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (BCBS) last month and we do not see them as posing a threat to the ‘unquestionably strong’ regulatory capital framework set by APRA last year.
o
Not only do we not expect any cuts to nominal dividends for the majors over our forecast period, we believe there is scope for capital returns from some of the major banks. We are forecasting $6.4bn of share buybacks in the case of ANZ. We are forecasting CBA to have excess CET1 capital of ~$4bn by end-FY19 in the absence of an AUSTRAC-related fine. WBC’s CET1 capital ratio at Sep-17 was already above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark of 10.5%, and if WBC’s loan growth turns out to be less than 6% pa over our forecast period then we believe WBC may be in a position to return capital to shareholders in the form of special dividends.
Risks House prices
Housing affordability is increasingly a concern for the Australian public and it is therefore gaining in prominence on the political agenda at the federal level. We continue to see the biggest risk to the housing market as being from a sustained reduction in foreign investment in Australian housing. This can occur due to a change in policy on the part of Australian state and federal governments or due to improved effectiveness of capital controls in China. We believe there is greater risk of such policy change on the part of the Australian federal government taking place under a Labor government.
The Labor opposition has proposed negative gearing reforms aimed at improving housing affordability and home ownership. Labor has proposed to limit negative gearing to new housing and to halve the capital gains tax discount for investment properties held longer than 12 months from the current 50% to 25%. Existing investments will be fully grandfathered. If such reforms eventuate, then there will be an increased risk of house price softness although house price falls will not necessarily be the outcome.
Regulatory risk
There is a risk that the RC may uncover a material area of misconduct that ultimately leads to a material amount of customer redress. There is also the risk that the RC and other regulatory reviews will result in increased regulatory and compliance spend for the sector.
4
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Global macro risks
We see a risk of disruption to USD capital markets. We see the increasing prominence of the yuan in global trade as posing a threat to the dominant status of the USD. While this will likely be a gradual process, it creates scope for bouts of volatility in debt capital markets and creates the risk of significant widening in credit spreads for periods of time. Notable developments in this regard are as follows: o
China is expected to launch a yuan-denominated oil futures contract with the yuan fully convertible to gold. Media reports suggest these contracts may commence trading in Shanghai in the next month.
o
There is media speculation that the governor of China’s central bank has met the finance minister of Saudi Arabia to discuss a date when Saudi Arabia may begin to accept yuan for oil sales to China.
o
Earlier this month, the central bank of Pakistan allowed yuan to be used in bilateral trade with China. Other non-oil producing nations that are part of China’s One Belt One Road Initiative may follow suit.
Valuations Figure 2: Key valuation metrics ANZ ($28.63)
CBA ($79.19)
NAB ($29.26)
WBC ($31.11)
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
13%
13%
14%
19%
18%
18%
14%
15%
15%
17%
17%
17%
P/NTA multiple
1.6
1.6
1.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
1.8
1.7
1.6
2.0
1.9
1.8
Cash EPS growth
-2%
6%
4%
4%
1%
4%
-9%
13%
7%
6%
4%
5%
Cash RONTA
P/E multiple Dividend yield
12.4 5.6%
11.6 5.6%
11.2 5.9%
13.3
13.2
12.7
12.9
11.4
10.7
5.4%
5.5%
5.7%
6.8%
6.8%
6.8%
12.2 6.1%
11.7 6.3%
11.2 6.5%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
Figure 3: P/TE versus RoTE 4.0 3.5 3.0
End-2H17F P/TE
CBA
2.5
WBC NAB
2.0 ANZ 1.5
1.0 0.5 5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
30%
FY18F Cash RoTE SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
5
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 4: Recommendations and share price targets Ranking Recommendation
12 month prosective fully franked div yield
12 month Share price at Target price ($) Previous target Share price prospective close of 29/1/18 price ($) upside/downside gross div yield ($)
Forecast TSR
1. WBC ADD
6.1%
8.7%
31.11
36.00
37.00
15.7%
24.4%
2. NAB
ADD
6.8%
9.7%
29.26
33.50
34.50
14.5%
24.2%
3. ANZ
ADD
5.6%
8.0%
28.63
30.00
30.00
4.8%
12.8%
4. CBA
ADD (previously Hold)
5.4%
7.8%
79.19
81.50
80.00
2.9%
10.7%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
Cost of equity capital Our valuation for each major bank is based on a dividend discount model (DDM) valuation methodology. The cost of equity capital (COEC) we need to factor into our valuation models to arrive at current share prices ranges from 9.49%10.27% as shown in the following table. Historically, a COEC of 9-11% has generally been factored into major bank share prices. Our current Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) assumptions are a risk-free rate of 4% and equity risk premium of 6%. Figure 5: Cost of equity capital implied by current share prices Cost of equity capital
Corresponding beta
ANZ
10.01%
1.00
CBA
9.49%
0.92
NAB
10.27%
1.05
WBC
10.26%
1.04 SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
COECs for the sector increased materially after the announcement of the major bank levy as part of the Federal Budget in May 2017. We believe this was due to a higher regulatory risk premium being factored into share prices for the sector. We believe current share prices continue to factor in significant regulatory risk as a result of the announcement of the RC into the banking sector. There is the risk that a material area of misconduct will be uncovered by the RC, which ultimately leads to a material dollar amount of customer redress. However, the banks generally have strong regulatory capital positions at the moment, so our base case is that potential redress will not result in capital raisings or dividend cuts. Share price weakness stemming from RC concerns presents good opportunity to buy yield in our view. Our base case is that investor concern about the RC will abate over the next 12 months, and for this reason we expect COECs for the sector to decrease from current levels. The following table sets out the COEC we are factoring into our 12-month target price for each of the major banks. Figure 6: Cost of equity capital factored into our price targets Cost of equity capital
Corresponding beta
ANZ
9.80%
0.97
CBA
9.35%
0.89
NAB
9.60%
0.93
WBC
9.50%
0.92 SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
6
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Rankings 1. WBC (ADD) Positives
Strong capital position with CET1 capital ratio above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark at 30/9/17.
Good underlying earnings momentum with NIM expansion across all business divisions from 1H17 to 2H17.
NIM stands to benefit most, alongside CBA, from any increase in the RBA’s Official Cash Rate with all else constant.
Relatively low risk profile in terms of loan book positioning due to skew to Australian mortgages.
Relatively low reliance on treasury and markets income, which is a volatile income stream.
Negatives
Most exposed to interest-only home loans, which are generally higher risk than comparable P&I home loans.
Arguably exposed to more RC-related risk on the retail banking front than ANZ and NAB.
2. NAB (ADD) Positives
Well placed to benefit from any pick-up in SME loan growth.
NAB is in the process of closing technology gap with CBA and WBC through acceleration of investment spend.
Currently offering highest dividend yield of the major banks.
Negatives
Currently in weakest CET1 capital position in our view. We expect NAB’s capital build to continue through two more discounted DRPs.
Relatively low RoTE, resulting in relatively low organic capital generation capacity and relatively low sustainable dividend payout ratio.
Relatively high risk profile in terms of positioning of loan book.
There is a risk that the RC may uncover a material area of misconduct on the SME front. This risk applies to NAB more so than the other majors given that NAB has most SME market share.
3. ANZ (ADD) Positives
Very strong capital position. We are forecasting share buybacks totalling $6.4bn over our forecast period.
ANZ has recently increased reliance on mortgage brokers, which should assist home loan growth in Australia.
7
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Negatives
Capital release from announced divestments is not enough to make up for the corresponding earnings hole. That is, we expect the divestments announced to result in a negative impact on group cash EPS even after capital management initiatives are undertaken.
Performance of the institutional business remains underwhelming. We continue to believe that unintended loss of high value customers may be contributing to the poor NIM and ROE outcomes of this division.
4. CBA (ADD) Positives
Currently in comfortable capital position. We are forecasting ~$4bn of surplus CET1 capital by end-FY19 in the absence of an AUSTRACrelated fine.
Capital position may be further boosted by potential divestment of following businesses: CFSGAM; Australian general insurance business; and Indonesian life insurance business.
NIM stands to benefit most, alongside WBC, from any increase in the RBA’s Official Cash Rate with all else constant.
Highest return on tangible equity (RoTE) of the major banks, meaning it has the greatest organic capital generation capacity and highest sustainable dividend payout ratio of the major banks.
Relatively low risk profile in terms of loan book positioning.
Best placed on the technology front.
Negatives
Potential for AUSTRAC-related fine.
Risk of fine from an offshore regulator for AML breaches.
Risk of credit rating cut and/or increase in regulatory capital requirement for operational risk stemming from AML breaches and APRA’s prudential inquiry into CBA.
Arguably most exposed to RC-related risk on the retail banking and wealth management fronts.
8
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Margins Headwinds Major bank levy The full period impact of the major bank levy, which became effective on 1/7/2017, will be a drag on NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F. However, net interest margin momentum in the Sep-17 quarter was generally quite encouraging despite the Sep-17 quarter bearing the full impact of the levy. CBA’s Sep-17 quarter trading update showed that its NIM expanded from 2H17 to 1Q18. In WBC’s case, the 2H17 exit margin was higher than the 2H17 NIM.
Increased OO P&I competition Since the 30% new interest-only flow limit was announced by APRA in March, the banks have stepped up competition for owner-occupier (OO) P&I home loans particularly through increased front book discounting. We expect this to be a drag on NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F.
Switching from IO to P&I Interest-only (IO) home loans were repriced up significantly post the introduction of the 30% flow limit on new IO loans. While this provided a boost to NIMs in 2H17, some of the positive NIM impact will wear off going forward as some IO borrowers switch to P&I due to the interest rate difference. While such switching will be a drag on NIMs going forward, a couple of points are worth noting:
The rate of monthly switching slowed from Aug-17 to Oct-17 at least in the case of NAB and WBC. NAB provided the following chart showing the slowdown.
Figure 7: NAB’s interest only conversions to P&I
SOURCES: NAB
We expect APRA to announce a granular mortgage risk weight framework later this year such that riskier mortgages attract a higher risk weight. From this perspective, switchings will have less of an impact on the ROE of the mortgage book as we expect P&I home loans to attract lower risk weights than comparable IO home loans.
9
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Tailwinds Loan repricings The full period impact of loan repricings carried out last year will be a tailwind for NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F.
Term deposit spreads The major banks offered very attractive 12-month term deposit rates of ~3% in the Aug-16 to Oct-16 period. We expect NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F to benefit from these term deposits rolling over late last year onto lower rates.
Repricing of savings deposits The major banks have in recent months continued to cut base rates being offered on online savings accounts and we expect this to support NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F. The following chart, based on data provided by the RBA, shows how base rates offered by prominent providers, including the five largest banks, have changed since the last Official Cash Rate cut in August 2016. Figure 8: Online savings account rates 1.75 1.70 1.65
1.60 1.55 1.50 1.45 1.40
SOURCES: MORGANS, RBA
Summary of NIM forecasts The following table summarises our forecast NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F for each of the major banks. Figure 9: NIM movement from 2H17 to 1H18F (bps) ANZ
CBA
NAB
2.1
7.3
1.4
1.9
Front to back book and retention repricing
-1.1
-1.7
-1.1
-1.5
Switching from IO to P&I
Mortgage repricing
WBC
-0.4
-0.5
-0.4
-1.0
TD spreads
1.2
1.5
2.1
2.4
Online savings account spreads
0.3
0.5
0.4
0.5
Wholesale funds pricing and mix
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
-2.3
-5.4
-2.6
-2.4
Major bank levy Asset mix and other Total
-2
0
0
2
-1.7
2.3
0.4
2.4
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
The following chart shows our three-year NIM forecasts for each major bank.
10
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 10: Group net interest margin
2.50%
2.30%
2.10%
1.90%
1.70%
1.50% 1H05A
1H06A
1H07A
1H08A
1H09A
1H10A ANZ
1H11A
1H12A CBA
1H13A
1H14A
NAB
1H15A
1H16A
1H17A
1H18F
1H19F
1H20F
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
Credit growth Home lending growth has held up well System home loan growth for the 12 months ended 30 November 2017 was 6.4%. Growth has held up well since the introduction of the 30% cap on interestonly home loan flows in March 2017. As we had expected, investor home loan growth has slowed since Mar-17 and OO home loan growth has picked up. This dynamic is evident in the following chart. Price competition for OO P&I home loans remains intense and we expect this to continue to support OO home loan growth. On the IO front, the major banks reduced new IO flow to less than 30% of total new residential mortgage lending in the Sep-17 quarter. The major banks now have the option to grow new interest-only flow in line with system new home loan flow growth. Competing aggressively in the OO P&I space provides increased scope to grow new IO flow. The fact that there was general slowing in the monthly rate of switching from IO to P&I in the Sep-17 quarter, leads us to assume that the switching was driven by owner-occupiers and it also provides reason to believe that investors are generally still keen to hold on to interest-only home loans despite carrying higher rates than P&I loans. Thus despite IO rates being meaningfully higher than comparable P&I rates, there may continue to be demand for IO loans on the part of investors.
11
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 11: System home loan growth 12.0 10.0 8.0 6.0 4.0 2.0 0.0
System housing
System OO
System investor
SOURCES: MORGANS, RBA
Commercial lending growth outlook improving There are early signs that the phase of institutional loan book contraction for the major banks may be over. While the majors generally remain focussed on ROE in this space, we expect institutional lending to be less of a drag on overall loan growth going forward compared with the last couple of years. Comfortable capital positions mean that the banks no longer need to contain loan growth in order to build capital On the SME lending front, the growth outlook is supported by improving business conditions. However, improved business conditions will likely need to translate to improved business confidence before SME loan growth meaningfully picks up. The outlook for SME loan growth is also being supported by the following factors:
Simplified SME loan contracts;
Removal of non-monetary default clauses;
Signs of increased willingness on the part of the banks to provide unsecured loans to SMEs up to a certain limit; and
Talk of income tax and business tax cuts.
12
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Non-interest income Markets & treasury income Figure 12: Markets and treasury income ($m) 2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0 FY15
FY16 ANZ
CBA
FY17 NAB
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS Note: Data shown for CBA does not include treasury income
Treasury income and markets non-customer income outcomes were generally quite soft in 2H17. Markets customer income, on the other hand, held up quite well. A sceptic may suggest that the weakness in non-customer and treasury outcomes was due to the banks adopting conservative trading practices in light of the BBSW scandal. If such scepticism is true, then conservative trading practices may continue to be a drag on income growth in FY18. We expect treasury and markets income to be broadly flat from FY17 to FY18F for NAB and CBA. We expect to see growth for WBC over this period due to WBC experiencing exceptional weakness in 2H17. We expect to see ANZ’s treasury and markets income decrease from FY17 to FY18 due to a particularly strong outcome in FY17.
Fee income Downward pressure remains on fee income on the retail banking front and for this reason we expect fee income for the sector to generally be flat from FY17 to FY18F. However the earnings impact of a reduction in or abolishment of certain fees may be managed through the cost line. For example, the major banks may choose to manage the earnings impact of the abolishment of foreign ATM fees through the cost line by choosing to reduce the size of their respective ATM fleets.
Expenses With our forecast of 4-5% pa underlying income growth for the sector over our forecast period, we expect the major banks to continue to maintain cost discipline as they strive for positive jaws. Consequently, we expect the banks to increasingly focus on headcount reduction, particularly with investment spend being directed to digitisation and automation. The following charts show how the headcounts of the major banks have changed over the last five years.
13
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 13: Full-time equivalent employees
Figure 14: Change in FTEs from prior period Title: 3.7% Source:
5.0%
60,000
0.9%
1.1%
1.1%
50,000
0.0%
(1.4%) (1.8%)
(0.3%)
(1.4%)
(1.8%)
(2.5%)
(3.6%)
(5.0%)
0.3%
Please them entered in you CBAfill in the values NABabove to have WBC
ANZ 40,000
2.0%
(3.0%)
30,000
(7.2%) (10.0%)
20,000
10,000
(15.0%)
2013
2014 ANZ
2015 CBA
2016 NAB
2017
(18.2%)
(20.0%)
WBC
2014
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
2015
2016
2017
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
NAB has already significantly stepped up focus on headcount reduction with it targeting a net reduction of ~4,000 by the end of FY20. This would equate to a 12% reduction in headcount over the three-year period.
Asset quality Cost of risk at cyclically low levels but further reduction possible The cost of risk (credit impairment charge as a percentage of the loan book) for the major banks has been hovering at close to cyclically low levels for some time as can be seen from the following chart. While the cost of risk can be expected to increase at some point, the environment for asset quality continues to remain benign in our view and we consequently do not expect a general increase in the cost of risk for the major banks from FY17A to FY18F. Figure 15: Credit impairment charge / opening GLA 1.00%
0.80%
0.60%
0.40%
0.20%
0.00% 1H07A
1H08A
1H09A
1H10A
1H11A ANZ
1H12A CBA
1H13A NAB
1H14A
1H15A
1H16A
1H17A
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
One view in the investment community is that the cost of risk for the major banks is now as low as it gets and that it can only increase from here. This is not necessarily true. If a continued benign asset quality environment results in strong write-backs and recoveries and a continued downtrend in new impaired
14
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
assets, then the cost of risk for the sector will likely decline further, meaning that further boosts to earnings from improving asset quality are possible. The following chart shows the trend in write-backs and recoveries over the last six years. NAB is not shown as it historically has not separately disclosed writebacks. It can be seen from the chart that while there was a downtrend in writebacks and recoveries from FY12 to FY16, there was a significant increase from FY16 to FY17 for ANZ and WBC. Figure 16: Write-backs and recoveries ($m) 800 700 600 500 400 300 200 100 0 FY12A
FY13A
FY14A ANZ
FY15A CBA
FY16A
FY17A
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
It is difficult to conclude at this point that the increase from FY16 to FY17 marks the start of an uptrend or higher sustained level of write-backs and recoveries as the increase seen in FY17 may be related to provisions raised for large single name institutional exposures in FY16. The impact of these large single name exposures in FY16 can be seen from the following chart, which shows the credit impairment charge excluding write-backs and recoveries. Figure 17: Credit impairment charge excluding write-backs and recoveries ($m) 3000
2500
2000
1500
1000
500
0 FY12A
FY13A
FY14A ANZ
FY15A CBA
FY16A
FY17A
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
WBC did say that write-backs and recoveries were high in FY17 as it worked through some of the larger loans on better terms than assumed in provisioning.
15
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Troublesome exposures Resource exposures and New Zealand dairy exposures were areas of concern in FY16 from an asset quality perspective. However, the outlook for both of these areas has improved, allowing banks to reduce some of the overlay provisions held for such exposures. However, we will continue to closely monitor NZ dairy prices as dairy prices have dropped since August 2017. We note that last month Fonterra cut its forecast payout to farmers for the 2017-18 season from NZ$6.75 to NZ$6.40. At this level, most farmers should still be profitable this season and it is certainly still much better than Fonterra’s payout of NZ$3.90 in 2016. The most concerning area of exposure at this stage looks to be retail trade with the sector faced with structural challenges. The banks have consequently been monitoring such exposures carefully and in some cases have raised overlay provisions for the retail trade sector.
Housing We still do not expect to see material deterioration in the asset quality of housing exposures over our forecast period. The slowing in the rate of dwelling price growth in Sydney over the last few months is a welcome outcome as it reduces the risk of a future asset quality disaster and also means that macroprudential rules may not need to be tightened further. We believe it also reduces the chances of a macro-related credit rating cut for the major banks. In an environment of softening house prices, recently written loans generally carry more risk than the rest of the loan book as newly written loans generally have higher dynamic loan-to-valuation ratios (LVRs). From this perspective, it is comforting to note that general lending standards, including serviceability assessments, are becoming increasingly conservative. While our base case is one of no material deterioration in housing asset quality over our forecast period, we are mindful of the following risks:
Housing affordability is increasingly a concern for the Australian public and it is therefore gaining in prominence on the political agenda at the federal level. We continue to see the biggest risk to the housing market as coming from a sustained reduction in foreign investment in Australian housing. This can occur due to a change in policy on the part of the Australian state and federal governments or due to improved effectiveness of capital controls in China. We believe there is greater risk of such policy change on the part of the Australian federal government taking place under a Labor government.
The Labor opposition has proposed negative gearing reforms aimed at improving housing affordability and home ownership. Labor has proposed to limit negative gearing to new housing and to halve the capital gains tax discount for investment properties held longer than 12 months from the current 50% to 25%. Existing investments will be fully grandfathered. If such reforms eventuate, then there will be an increased risk of house price softness although house price falls will not necessarily be the outcome.
16
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Capital Finalised Basel III reforms do not pose threat to ‘unquestionably strong’ benchmark Basel III reforms were finalised last month, with one of the key outcomes being a 72.5% output floor that will be phased in over nine years. We believe this outcome does not pose a threat to the ‘unquestionably strong’ CET1 capital framework laid out by APRA last year. While we expect no changes to the aggregate level of required CET1 capital that has been indicated by APRA under the ‘unquestionably strong’ framework, we do expect APRA to propose a more granular mortgage risk weight framework later this year. If this results in a material increase in the average mortgage risk weight for the major banks, then we expect the 10.5% CET1 benchmark to be reduced commensurately such that the aggregate level of required CET1 capital remains unchanged. Finalisation of Basel III reforms and the output floor of 72.5% further improves the clarity of capital and dividend outlooks for the Australian major banks.
Capital management potential The following chart shows the APRA CET1 capital ratios of the majors at 30/9/2017. Figure 18: APRA CET1 capital ratio at Sep-17 10.7% 10.6% 10.5% 10.4% 10.3% 10.2% 10.1% 10.0%
9.9% 9.8% 9.7% ANZ
CBA
NAB
WBC
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
It can be seen from the chart that at 30/9/17, ANZ and WBC were already sitting above APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ CET1 benchmark of 10.5%, which the majors need to meet by 1/1/20. CBA’s APRA CET1 ratio was sitting at 10.1% at Sep-17, however, this was impacted by the payment of the 2017 final dividend. We are forecasting CBA’s CET1 ratio to be 10.6% at 31/12/17. We view NAB as being in the weakest CET1 capital position of the major banks with a ratio of 10.1% at Sep-17. It was no surprise that NAB offered a 1.5% discount to the dividend reinvestment plan (DRP) that accompanied the 2017 final dividend. We expect the next two NAB dividends to also be accompanied by a discounted DRP. In the case of the other major banks, we are not expecting discounted DRPs over our forecast period. In fact, there is potential for capital return from the other major banks.
17
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
ANZ We are forecasting ANZ to conduct share buybacks totalling $6.4bn over 1H18, 2H18 and 1H19. ANZ has already announced a $1.5bn on-market share buyback starting this month.
CBA We are forecasting CBA to have excess CET1 capital of ~$4bn relative to APRA’s ‘unquestionably strong’ CET1 benchmark of 10.5% by end-FY19. However, our forecasts do not allow for a potential AUSTRAC-related fine, and for this reason we are not forecasting any capital management at this stage. We expect every $1bn of excess CET1 capital at end-FY19 to carry potential for a special dividend of 57 cps to be paid. CBA’s CET1 capital position may receive a further boost from the following factors:
IPO or sale of CFSGAM;
Sale of Australian general insurance business;
Sale of Indonesian life insurance business.
WBC We expect WBC to continue to run a DRP over our forecast period with no discount applied and with no DRP neutralisation. This, combined with our forecast of ~6% pa loan growth over our forecast period, results in our forecast of WBC keeping its CET1 capital ratio at 10.6% over our forecast period. That is, we do not expect any capital returns in this scenario. However, if WBC’s loan growth turns out to be less than 6% pa then there is scope for capital returns. This brings us to the next point that not all is doom and gloom in the scenario of slowing credit growth.
Royal Commission On 30 November 2017, the Federal Government announced that it will establish a Royal Commission (RC) into misconduct in the financial services sector. The announcement is clearly not a positive development as it increases the regulatory risk for the sector. However, we believe there was enough regulatory risk priced into major bank share prices prior to the RC announcement.
Base case is no capital raisings or dividend cuts There is the risk that a material area of misconduct will be uncovered, which ultimately leads to a material dollar amount of customer redress. However, the banks generally have strong regulatory capital positions at the moment, so our base case is that potential redress will not result in capital raisings or dividend cuts. We believe share price weakness stemming from RC concerns presents good opportunity to buy yield. The reason this is our base case is because the sector has been under intense scrutiny from politicians, media, consumer protection groups and class action lawyers for the last few years and we believe this limits the scope for new areas of material misconduct to be uncovered and it also limits the scope for further redress relating to currently known areas of misconduct. As the major banks noted in their jointly-written letter to the Commonwealth Treasurer regarding an inquiry into the banking and finance sector, “together with the Government and regulators, since 2014 we have been taking action to fix issues, and improve what we do and how we do it. We have collectively appeared before, or taken part in 51 substantial reviews, investigations and inquiries since the global financial crisis, 12 of which are ongoing. We continue to demonstrate our 18
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
commitment to doing the right thing by our customers and seeking to ensure those genuinely affected by these mistakes are appropriately compensated.” We particularly note that on 29 November 2016, the Senate referred an inquiry into the regulatory framework for the protection of consumers, including small businesses, in the banking, insurance and financial services sector to the Senate Economics Reference Committee. The terms of reference for this inquiry focus on a range of matters relating to the protection of consumers against wrongdoing in the sector. They also require the inquiry to examine the availability and adequacy of redress and support for consumers that have been victims of wrongdoing. In our view, submissions made to date in relation to this inquiry do not reveal a new area of widespread misconduct, and this helps us in forming the base case that potential customer redress stemming from the RC will not result in capital raisings or dividend cuts.
Potential impact on earnings While our base case is that the RC will not ultimately result in capital raisings or dividend cuts for the major banks, there may still be a materially adverse impact on earnings if material amounts of redress need to be paid. However, we expect the market to view such redress as one-off significant items – that is, we expect the market to ultimately focus on earnings excluding these items. Having said the above, we acknowledge the risk that even if capital raisings or dividend cuts are not required, material amounts of redress would eat into organic capital generation and this can lead to share price weakness. However, again, if dividends are not cut then share price weakness will present good opportunity to buy yield and this factor will likely provide support to share prices. The regulatory/compliance spend run-rates of the major banks are already at elevated levels, meaning that if the RC results in tighter regulation of the banks, it will not necessarily result in higher regulatory/compliance spend run-rates.
This may be the peak of regulatory risk for the sector In announcing the establishment of a RC, Treasurer Scott Morrison reportedly said he had consulted with Treasury, the governor of the RBA and the chair of APRA and that they agreed it was a “regrettable but necessary course of action…given the uncertainty, disruption and damage being done by political events”. This supports our view that the Council of Financial Regulators (CFR) understands the importance of a sound and profitable banking sector to financial stability and economic growth and it appears the CFR is now expressing the view that politicisation of the banking sector has gone too far. This provides reason to believe that we are now at the peak of regulatory risk for the sector.
Use of super funds may attract significant attention The terms of reference for the RC include inquiring into “the use by a financial services entity of superannuation members’ retirement savings for any purpose that does not meet community standards and expectations or is otherwise not in the best interest of members”. We believe there is scope for significant concerns to arise on this front, and this may result in some focus shifting from banking misconduct to misconduct in the industry super funds sector.
19
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Appendix: Investment fundamentals Figure 19: Investment fundamentals ANZ ($28.63)
CBA ($79.19)
NAB ($29.26)
WBC ($31.11)
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
FY18F
FY19F
FY20F
6,681
6,756
6,970
10,373
10,500
10,942
6,141
7,126
7,697
8,670
9,077
9,546
Cash EPS ($)
2.32
2.46
2.57
5.95
6.00
6.26
2.26
2.57
2.74
2.55
2.65
2.77
DPS ($)
1.60
1.60
1.70
4.31
4.35
4.54
1.98
1.98
1.98
1.90
1.95
2.01
Cash RONTA
17%
Cash earnings ($m)
13%
13%
14%
19%
18%
18%
14%
15%
15%
17%
17%
P/NTA multiple (x)
1.6
1.6
1.5
2.4
2.3
2.2
1.8
1.7
1.6
2.0
1.9
1.8
Cash EPS growth
-2%
6%
4%
4%
1%
4%
-9%
13%
7%
6%
4%
5%
P/E multiple (x)
13.3
13.2
12.7
12.9
11.4
10.7
5.6%
5.6%
5.9%
5.4%
5.5%
5.7%
6.8%
6.8%
6.8%
6.1%
6.3%
6.5%
Net interest margin
1.95%
1.93%
1.92%
2.13%
2.12%
2.11%
1.87%
1.86%
1.85%
2.12%
2.10%
2.09%
Gross LUM growth
2%
5%
5%
3%
6%
6%
5%
6%
6%
6%
6%
6%
Income growth
(4%)
2%
3%
4%
4%
5%
4%
5%
5%
5%
5%
5%
Expense growth
(5%)
(2%)
2%
4%
3%
3%
8%
(0%)
0%
3%
3%
3%
43.2%
41.6%
41.1%
40.5%
48.1%
40.1%
41.2%
40.2%
39.3%
Dividend yield
Cost-to-income ratio
12.4
45.6%
11.6
43.8%
11.2
42.0%
12.2
11.7
11.2
Credit impairment charge / GLA
0.21%
0.23%
0.25%
0.13%
0.16%
0.19%
0.17%
0.20%
0.22%
0.13%
0.17%
0.20%
CET1 ratio
10.9%
10.6%
10.6%
10.7%
11.3%
11.3%
10.3%
10.5%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
20
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 20: ANZ financial summary FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Rep. NPAT ($M)
5,709
2,911
3,495
6,406
3,626
3,225
6,851
6,306
6,970
Cash NPAT ($M)
5,889
3,411
3,527
6,938
3,389
3,292
6,681
6,756
6,970
No. shares (M)
2,928
2,936
2,937
2,937
2,887
2,837
2,837
2,726
2,724
Avg # of shares (M) Cash EPS ($)
2,907
2,924
2,929
2,926
2,917
2,854
2,885
2,744
2,716
2.03
1.17
1.20
2.37
1.16
1.15
2.32
2.46
2.57
Cash EPS growth (%)
-22%
17%
-2%
6%
4%
PER (x)
14.1
12.1
12.4
11.6
11.2
DPS ($)
1.60
0.80
0.80
1.60
1.60
1.70
Payout ratio Div Yield (%)
79%
69%
66%
5.6%
Franking (%) NTA ($M) NTA per share ($) Price to NTA ps (x)
1.60
0.80
0.80
67%
69%
69%
5.6%
69%
65%
66%
5.6%
5.6%
5.9%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
50,146
50,738
51,989
51,989
51,765
51,191
51,191
49,638
52,112
17.13
17.28
17.70
17.70
17.93
18.04
18.04
18.22
19.13
1.7
1.6
1.6
1.6
1.5
Cash ROE (cash NPAT / open NTA)
12%
14%
13%
13%
14%
Book ROE (NPAT / avg ord equity)
10%
12%
11%
12%
12%
INCOME STATEMENT ($M)
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest income
15,095
7,416
7,456
14,872
7,417
7,484
14,901
15,414
16,065
Non interest income
5,499
2,887
2,730
5,617
2,453
2,342
4,795
4,685
4,695
20,594
10,303
10,186
20,489
9,871
9,826
19,696
20,100
20,760
Operating expenses
-10,439
-4,731
-4,717
-9,448
-4,527
-4,452
-8,980
-8,805
-8,966
Pre-provision profit
10,155
5,572
5,469
11,041
5,344
5,373
10,717
11,294
11,794
B&DD charge
-1,956
-720
-479
-1,199
-549
-656
-1,205
-1,348
-1,545
Pre-tax profit
8,199
4,852
4,990
9,842
4,795
4,718
9,512
9,947
10,249
-2,299
-1,433
-1,456
-2,889
-1,399
-1,396
-2,795
-2,947
-3,037
-11
-8
-7
-15
-7
-7
-14
-14
-14
Total income
Tax Minority interest Impact of sale of P&I, ADG and life business Morgans cash NPAT Specified items
0
0
0
0
0
-22
-22
-229
-229
5,889
3,411
3,527
6,938
3,389
3,292
6,681
6,756
6,970
0
226
0
226
0
0
0
0
0
5,889
3,637
3,527
7,164
3,389
3,292
6,681
6,756
6,970
-180
-726
-32
-758
238
-68
170
-450
0
5,709
2,911
3,495
6,406
3,626
3,225
6,851
6,306
6,970
KEY COMPONENTS
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest margin
2.07%
2.00%
1.98%
1.99%
1.96%
1.94%
1.95%
1.93%
1.92%
Gross LUM growth
1%
0%
1%
1%
1%
2%
2%
5%
5%
Morgans adjusted pro-forma cash NPAT Significant items and specified items Reported NPAT
Income growth Expense growth Cost-to-income ratio B&DD charge / opening gross LUM CET1 ratio - APRA basis
0.3%
0.3%
-1.1%
-0.5%
-3.1%
-0.5%
-3.9%
2.0%
3.3%
11.3%
-4.4%
-0.3%
-9.5%
-4.0%
-1.7%
-5.0%
-1.9%
1.8%
51%
46%
46%
46%
46%
45%
46%
44%
43%
0.34%
0.25%
0.17%
0.21%
0.19%
0.22%
0.21%
0.23%
0.25%
9.6%
10.1%
10.6%
10.6%
10.9%
10.9%
10.9%
10.6%
10.6%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
21
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 21: CBA financial summary
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Rep. NPAT ($M)
9,223
4,895
5,033
9,928
5,124
5,249
10,373
10,500
10,942
Cash NPAT ($M)
9,395
4,907
4,974
9,881
5,124
5,249
10,373
10,500
10,942
No. shares (M)
1,711
1,720
1,726
1,726
1,749
1,749
1,749
1,749
1,749
Avg # of shares (M) Cash EPS ($)
1,694
1,717
1,724
1,721
1,738
1,749
1,744
1,749
1,749
5.55
2.86
2.89
5.74
2.95
3.00
5.95
6.00
6.26
Cash EPS growth (%)
-1%
4%
4%
1%
4%
PER (x)
14.3
13.8
13.3
13.2
12.7
DPS ($)
4.20
1.99
2.30
4.31
4.35
4.54
Payout ratio Div Yield (%)
76%
70%
80%
5.3%
Franking (%) NTA ($M) NTA per share ($) Price to NTA ps (x)
4.29
2.06
2.25
75%
70%
75%
5.4%
73%
73%
73%
5.4%
5.5%
5.7%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
49,630
51,261
53,146
53,146
55,874
57,512
57,512
60,476
63,652
29.01
29.81
30.79
30.79
31.94
32.88
36.39
32.88
34.57
2.7
2.6
2.4
2.3
2.2
Cash ROE (cash NPAT / average NTA)
21%
19%
19%
18%
18%
Book ROE (NPAT / avg ord equity)
17%
16%
16%
15%
15%
INCOME STATEMENT ($M)
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest income
16,935
8,743
8,857
17,600
9,093
9,241
18,334
19,128
20,117
Underlying other banking income
4,860
2,589
2,534
5,123
2,537
2,607
5,144
5,316
5,471
Funds mgmt income
2,016
1,004
1,030
2,034
1,015
1,045
2,060
2,222
2,372
795
393
393
786
432
436
868
800
819
24,606
12,729
12,814
25,543
13,077
13,330
26,407
27,466
28,779
141
16
49
65
79
79
158
161
165
24,747
12,745
12,863
25,608
13,156
13,409
26,565
27,627
28,943 -11,735
Insurance income Total operating income Investment earnings pre tax Total income Underlying operating expenses
-10,434
-5,284
-5,401
-10,685
-5,516
-5,548
-11,064
-11,362
B&DD charge
-1,256
-599
-496
-1,095
-443
-491
-934
-1,231
-1,541
Net profit pre tax
13,057
6,862
6,966
13,828
7,197
7,371
14,568
15,035
15,667
Income tax
-3,592
-1,950
-1,977
-3,927
-2,057
-2,107
-4,165
-4,295
-4,475 -30
Minority interest
-20
-9
-15
-24
-15
-15
-30
-30
One-off items
0
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
Impact of expected sale of life business
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-210
-220
9,445
4,907
4,974
9,881
5,124
5,249
10,373
10,500
10,942
-50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
9,395
4,907
4,974
9,881
5,124
5,249
10,373
10,500
10,942
CBA cash NPAT Preference dividends Morgans Cash NPAT Preference dividends
50
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
-19
-4
-23
0
0
0
0
0
-199
8
65
73
0
0
0
0
0
-27
-1
-2
-3
0
0
0
0
0
9,223
4,895
5,033
9,928
5,124
5,249
10,373
10,500
10,942
KEY COMPONENTS
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest margin
2.14%
2.11%
2.11%
2.11%
2.13%
2.13%
2.13%
2.12%
2.11%
Gross LUM growth
9%
2%
2%
5%
1%
2%
3%
6%
6%
5.0%
3.4%
0.9%
3.5%
2.3%
1.9%
3.7%
4.0%
4.8%
Treasury shares Hedging and AIFRS volatility Other significant items Reported NPAT
Underlying income growth Underlying expense growth
4.4%
1.1%
2.2%
2.4%
2.1%
0.6%
3.5%
2.7%
3.3%
B&DD charge / opening gross LUM
0.19%
0.17%
0.14%
0.16%
0.12%
0.13%
0.13%
0.16%
0.19%
CET1 ratio - APRA basis
10.6%
9.9%
10.1%
10.1%
10.6%
10.7%
10.7%
11.3%
11.3%
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
22
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 22: NAB financial summary FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
352
2,545
2,740
5,285
2,845
3,393
6,239
7,224
7,795
Cash NPAT ($M)
6,483
3,294
3,348
6,642
2,796
3,344
6,141
7,126
7,697
No. shares (M)
2,657
2,675
2,686
2,686
2,724
2,757
2,757
2,805
2,822
Avg # of shares (M) Cash EPS ($)
2,657
2,668
2,681
2,674
2,705
2,740
2,723
2,788
2,815
2.45
1.24
1.25
2.49
1.04
1.22
2.26
2.57
2.74
Rep. NPAT ($M)
Cash EPS growth (%) PER (x)
-2%
2%
-9%
13%
7%
11.9
11.7
12.9
11.4
10.7
DPS ($)
1.98
0.99
0.99
1.98
0.99
0.99
1.98
1.98
1.98
Payout ratio Div Yield (%)
81%
80%
79%
79%
95%
81%
88%
77%
72%
6.8%
6.8%
6.8%
6.8%
Franking (%)
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
42,673
42,532
42,785
42,785
43,936
45,628
45,628
48,689
51,300
16.06
15.90
15.93
15.93
16.13
16.55
16.55
17.36
18.17
NTA ($M) NTA per share ($) Price to NTA ps (x)
6.8%
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
Cash ROE (cash NPAT / average NTA)
15%
16%
14%
15%
15%
Book ROE (NPAT / average ord equity)
13%
14%
12%
14%
14%
INCOME STATEMENT ($M)
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest income
12,930
6,393
6,773
13,166
6,927
7,055
13,982
14,652
15,368
Other operating income
4,503
2,476
2,253
4,729
2,312
2,366
4,679
4,912
5,179
Total income
17,433
8,869
9,026
17,895
9,240
9,421
18,661
19,565
20,547
Operating expenses
-7,438
-3,785
-3,850
-7,635
-4,800
-4,176
-8,977
-8,226
-8,233
B&DD charge
-800
-394
-416
-810
-455
-485
-940
-1,197
-1,372
Pre-tax profit
9,195
4,690
4,760
9,450
3,984
4,760
8,744
10,142
10,942
-2,588
-1,347
-1,363
-2,710
-1,139
-1,367
-2,505
-2,918
-3,147
-124
-49
-49
-98
-49
-49
-98
-98
-98
6,483
3,294
3,348
6,642
2,796
3,344
6,141
7,126
7,697
Tax Distributions Reported Cash NPAT Distributions
124
49
49
98
49
49
98
98
98
Significant items
-6,190
-345
-610
-893
0
0
0
0
0
Treasury shares
61
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-126
-453
-47
-500
0
0
0
0
0
352
2,545
2,740
5,285
2,845
3,393
6,239
7,224
7,795
KEY COMPONENTS
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest margin
1.88%
1.82%
1.88%
1.85%
1.88%
1.87%
1.87%
1.86%
1.85%
Gross LUM growth
Fair value and hedge ineffectiveness Reported NPAT
-7%
1%
3%
4%
3%
3%
5%
6%
6%
Income growth
3%
2%
2%
3%
2%
2%
4%
5%
5%
Expense growth (excld 1H18 restructuring provision)
2%
3%
2%
3%
5%
3%
8%
0%
0%
0.15%
0.14%
0.15%
0.15%
0.16%
0.17%
0.17%
0.20%
0.22%
9.8%
10.1%
10.1%
10.1%
10.1%
10.3%
10.3%
10.5%
10.6%
B&DD charge / opening gross LUM CET1 ratio - APRA basis
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
23
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Figure 23: WBC financial summary
FINANCIAL SUMMARY
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Rep. NPAT ($M)
7,445
3,907
4,083
7,990
4,250
4,420
8,670
9,077
9,546
Cash NPAT ($M)
7,822
4,017
4,045
8,062
4,250
4,420
8,670
9,077
9,546
No. shares (M)
3,347
3,357
3,394
3,394
3,404
3,414
3,414
3,433
3,452
Avg # of shares (M) Cash EPS ($)
3,322
3,352
3,375
3,364
3,399
3,409
3,404
3,424
3,442
2.35
1.20
1.20
2.40
1.25
1.30
2.55
2.65
2.77
Cash EPS growth (%)
-5%
2%
6%
4%
5%
PER (x)
13.2
13.0
12.2
11.7
11.2
DPS ($)
1.88
0.94
0.94
1.90
1.95
2.01
Payout ratio Div Yield (%)
80%
78%
78%
6.0%
Franking (%) NTA ($M) NTA per share ($) Price to NTA ps (x)
1.88
0.95
0.95
78%
76%
73%
6.0%
75%
74%
72%
6.1%
6.3%
6.5%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
46,600
47,877
49,636
49,636
51,005
52,515
52,515
55,684
59,103
13.93
14.26
14.62
14.62
14.98
15.38
17.12
15.38
16.22
2.2
2.1
2.0
1.9
1.8
Cash ROE (cash NPAT / average NTA)
18%
17%
17%
17%
17%
Book ROE (NPAT / avg ord equity)
14%
14%
14%
14%
14%
INCOME STATEMENT ($M)
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest income
15,348
7,693
8,011
15,704
8,218
8,421
16,639
17,527
18,514
Non interest income
5,855
3,068
2,784
5,852
2,982
3,067
6,050
6,371
6,647
Total income
21,203
10,761
10,795
21,556
11,201
11,488
22,689
23,898
25,161
Operating expenses
-8,898
-4,501
-4,604
-9,105
-4,647
-4,709
-9,356
-9,617
-9,888
B&DD charge
-1,124
-493
-360
-853
-454
-434
-888
-1,253
-1,571
Pre-tax profit
11,181
5,767
5,831
11,598
6,100
6,345
12,444
13,029
13,702
Tax
-3,344
-1,745
-1,784
-3,529
-1,848
-1,922
-3,771
-3,948
-4,152
Minority interests Cash NPAT
-15
-5
-2
-7
-2
-2
-4
-4
-4
7,822
4,017
4,045
8,062
4,250
4,420
8,670
9,077
9,546
Significant items
-377
-110
38
-72
0
0
0
0
0
Reported NPAT
7,445
3,907
4,083
7,990
4,250
4,420
8,670
9,077
9,546
KEY COMPONENTS
2016A
1H17A
2H17A
2017A
1H18F
2H18F
2018F
2019F
2020F
Net interest margin
2.13%
2.07%
2.10%
2.09%
2.12%
2.11%
2.12%
2.10%
2.09%
Gross LUM growth
6%
1%
3%
3%
3%
3%
6%
6%
6%
Income growth
3.2%
1.7%
0.3%
1.7%
3.8%
2.6%
5.3%
5.3%
5.3%
Expense growth
3.0%
0.5%
2.3%
2.3%
0.9%
1.3%
2.8%
2.8%
2.8%
0.18%
0.15%
0.11%
0.13%
0.13%
0.12%
0.13%
0.17%
0.20%
9.5%
10.0%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
10.6%
B&DD charge / opening gross LUM CET1 ratio - APRA basis
SOURCES: MORGANS, COMPANY REPORTS
24
Financial Services│Australia│Equity research│January 29, 2018
Queensland Brisbane
New South Wales +61 7 3334 4888
Stockbroking, Corporate Advice, Wealth Management
Sydney
Victoria +61 2 9043 7900
Stockbroking, Corporate Advice, Wealth Management
Melbourne
Western Australia +61 3 9947 4111
Stockbroking, Corporate Advice, Wealth Management
West Perth
+61 8 6160 8700
Stockbroking, Corporate Advice, Wealth Management
Brisbane: Edward St
+61 7 3121 5677
Armidale
+61 2 6770 3300
Brighton
+61 3 9519 3555
Brisbane: Tynan Partners
+61 7 3152 0600
Ballina
+61 2 6686 4144
Camberwell
+61 3 9813 2945
Perth
+61 8 6462 1999
Brisbane: North Quay
+61 7 3245 5466
Balmain
+61 2 8755 3333
Domain
+61 3 9066 3200
Adelaide
+61 8 8464 5000
Bundaberg
+61 7 4153 1050
Bowral
+61 2 4851 5555
Geelong
+61 3 5222 5128
Norwood
+61 8 8461 2800
Cairns
+61 7 4222 0555
Chatswood
+61 2 8116 1700
Richmond
+61 3 9916 4000
Caloundra
+61 7 5491 5422
Coffs Harbour
+61 2 6651 5700
South Yarra
+61 3 8762 1400
Gladstone
+61 7 4972 8000
Gosford
+61 2 4325 0884
Southbank
+61 3 9037 9444
Gold Coast
+61 7 5581 5777
Hurstville
+61 2 8215 5079
Traralgon
+61 3 5176 6055
Ipswich/Springfield
+61 7 3202 3995
Merimbula
+61 2 6495 2869
Warrnambool
+61 3 5559 1500
Kedron
+61 7 3350 9000
Mona Vale
+61 2 9998 4200
Mackay
+61 7 4957 3033
Neutral Bay
+61 2 8969 7500
Milton
+61 7 3114 8600
Newcastle
+61 2 4926 4044
Australian Capital Territory
Noosa
+61 7 5449 9511
Orange
+61 2 6361 9166
Canberra
Redcliffe
+61 7 3897 3999
Port Macquarie
+61 2 6583 1735
Rockhampton
+61 7 4922 5855
Scone
+61 2 6544 3144
Northern Territory
Spring Hill
+61 7 3833 9333
Sydney: Level 7 Currency House
+61 2 8216 5111
Darwin
Sunshine Coast
+61 7 5479 2757
Sydney: Grosvenor Place
+61 2 8215 5000
Tasmania
Toowoomba
+61 7 4639 1277
Sydney Reynolds Securities
+61 2 9373 4452
Townsville
+61 7 4725 5787
Wollongong
+61 2 4227 3022
South Australia
Hobart
+61 2 6232 4999
+61 8 8981 9555
+61 3 6236 9000
Disclaimer The information contained in this report is provided to you by Morgans Financial Limited as general advice only, and is made without consideration of an individual’s relevant personal circumstances. Morgans Financial Limited ABN 49 010 669 726, its related bodies corporate, directors and officers, employees, authorised representatives and agents (“Morgans”) do not accept any liability for any loss or damage arising from or in connection with any action taken or not taken on the basis of information contained in this report, or for any errors or omissions contained within. It is recommended that any persons who wish to act upon this report consult with their Morgans investment adviser before doing so. Those acting upon such information without advice do so entirely at their own risk. This report was prepared as private communication to clients of Morgans and is not intended for public circulation, publication or for use by any third party. The contents of this report may not be reproduced in whole or in part without the prior written consent of Morgans. While this report is based on information from sources which Morgans believes are reliable, its accuracy and completeness cannot be guaranteed. Any opinions expressed reflect Morgans judgement at this date and are subject to change. Morgans is under no obligation to provide revised assessments in the event of changed circumstances. This report does not constitute an offer or invitation to purchase any securities and should not be relied upon in connection with any contract or commitment whatsoever.
Disclosure of interest Morgans may from time to time hold an interest in any security referred to in this report and may, as principal or agent, sell such interests. Morgans may previously have acted as manager or co-manager of a public offering of any such securities. Morgans affiliates may provide or have provided banking services or corporate finance to the companies referred to in the report. The knowledge of affiliates concerning such services may not be reflected in this report. Morgans advises that it may earn brokerage, commissions, fees or other benefits and advantages, direct or indirect, in connection with the making of a recommendation or a dealing by a client in these securities. Some or all of Morgans Authorised Representatives may be remunerated wholly or partly by way of commission.
Regulatory disclosures Analyst owns shares in the following mentioned company(ies): -
Recommendation structure For a full explanation of the recommendation structure, refer to our website at http://www.morgans.com.au/research_disclaimer
Research team For analyst qualifications and experience, refer to our website at http://www.morgans.com.au/research-and-markets/our-research-team
Stocks under coverage For a full list of stocks under coverage, refer to our website at http://www.morgans.com.au/research-and-markets/company-analysis/ASX100-Companies-under-coverage and http://www.morgans.com.au/research-and-markets/company-analysis/EX-100-Companies-under-coverage
Stock selection process For an overview on the stock selection process, refer to our website at http://www.morgans.com.au/research-and-markets/company-analysis
www.morgans.com.au If you no longer wish to receive Morgans publications please contact your local Morgans branch or write to GPO Box 202 Brisbane QLD 4001 and include your account details.
25