Municipal Buildings - San Francisco Public Utilities Commission

1 downloads 269 Views 2MB Size Report
Junipero Serra Annex CDC ..... Rosa Parks Elementary / Raphael Weill CDC ...... 1,700. 20.4%. 14.7. N/A. 0.25. Alice Cha
2013 ENERGY BENCHMARKING REPORT San Francisco Municipal Buildings September 2014

Cover Photo: Sanchez Elementary. Built in 1927. (Owner: SFUSD) Sanchez Elementary’s Energy Use Intensity in 2013 was 32.5 kBtu/sq.ft., a 30% improvement from the previous calendar year. Sanchez earned a preliminary ENERGY STAR rating of 90, indicating that in 2013 it performed better than 90 percent of similar schools nationwide. As of the end of 2013, the school had reduced its overall utility costs (electricity, gas, water, sewer) by more than 18% thanks to its participation in SFUSD’s Shared Savings program. For more information about SFUSD’s sustainability and ecoliteracy efforts, visit http://greenthenextgen.org. (Photo by Sharon Danks, Bay Tree Design)

2

Acknowledgements Thanks to the Climate Liaisons and other staff of the departments and agencies represented in this report. Gathering the information necessary to complete this report involved contributions of time and expertise by numerous people at 26 different departments and agencies. This is the third annual report publicly disclosing the energy consumption of San Francisco’s municipal buildings, and includes additional facilities that were not part of previous reports. Continued care went into ensuring that data is as complete and accurate as possible. SFPUC Power Enterprise staff: Elizabeth Bessman Hina Dave Darryl Dunn Anna Fedman Dan Heffernan Angie Lee Terry O’Sullivan Thanks to: Pansy Gee, Barry Hooper, Calla Ostrander, Mark Palmer, and Sachiko Tanikawa (SF Environment); John Updike (Real Estate Division); Amy Chan and Nik Kaestner (SFUSD); Rhab Boughn (Fire Department); Ronald Gerhard and Scott Cline (City College)

SFPUC Project Manager: Jonathan Cherry Please email any questions about this report to: [email protected]

Department abbreviations used in the report are indicated at the right. Animal Care and Control

ACC

Arts Commission Asian Art Museum

SFAC AAM

California Academy of Sciences City College of San Francisco

CAS CCSF

Convention Facilities Department / Moscone Center District Attorney

CFD DA

Department of Emergency Management Department of Public Health

DEM DPH

Department of Public Works Department of Technology

DPW DT

Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco

FAMSF

Fire Department Human Services Agency

SFFD HSA

Juvenile Probation Municipal Transportation Agency

JUV SFMTA

Office of City Administrator (Central Shops) Police Department

GSA SFPD

Public Library Real Estate Division

SFPL RED

Recreation & Park Department San Francisco International Airport

RPD SFO

San Francisco Public Utilities Commission San Francisco Unified School District

SFPUC SFUSD

Sheriff’s Department War Memorial and Performing Arts Center

SHF WMPAC

3

Table of Contents

Executive Summary

5

Introduction

7

San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking

8

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings

10

2013 Energy Benchmarking Results

14

Putting the Results in Context

33

Appendix A: Key to Benchmarking Notes

34

Appendix B: EUI Normalized by Hours of Operation

35

4

Executive Summary Background This third annual report details the energy performance of 471 of San Francisco’s municipal facilities during calendar year 2013, including almost 49 million square feet of building area. In 2011, the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance was approved by the Board of Supervisors and signed by Mayor Edwin M. Lee. The ordinance requires owners of nonresidential buildings over 10,000 square feet to annually benchmark and disclose the energy performance of their buildings, using the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool to obtain ENERGY STAR ratings when possible.

ENERGY STAR Ratings: The ENERGY STAR rating system is designed for commercial buildings, so only some municipal facility types are eligible for a 1-100 rating. Of the municipal facilities eligible for a rating, over 80% outperformed the national median for similar buildings. Only 4 out of 135 rating-eligible facilities ranked in the bottom 25% compared to their national peers. 55 K-12 schools and twelve other City facilities performed in the top 25% nationwide (the threshold for the ENERGY STAR label) in 2013. Comparison to Prior Years: The improving energy use trend noted in the 2011 and 2012 reports continued this year. The overall EUI of benchmarked facilities1 improved 2.8% from 2012 and 7.4% compared to 2009. The average 2013 carbon footprint of benchmarked facilities improved 6.0% from 2012 and 12.7% compared to 2009.2 Although numerous factors may influence this trend, estimated savings from energy efficiency projects completed between 2009 and 20133 equal approximately 2/3 of the EUI reduction illustrated in Figure 1.

As the owner and occupant of hundreds of buildings, the City and County of San Francisco has chosen to lead by example and provide transparency about its own operations. The report also includes data on over 130 San Francisco Unified School District facilities and (new for this report) ten City College of San Francisco facilities.

Energy Use Intensity ‐ EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 7.00

81.55

78.37

90.00 75.26

6.00

By distributing this report on behalf of 26 different agencies, the SFPUC hopes to provide a fresh perspective on these public facilities, highlighting energy performance successes and focusing attention and resources on buildings that may benefit from energy improvements.

5.00

5.68

5.90

73.12

5.28

4.96

GHG Emissions  Intensity (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

3.00 2.00

80.00 70.00

5.56

4.00

Key Findings Comparison by Building Type: The detailed charts in this report give a rich amount of information about each location. For each facility type, the reader can see the individual facilities ranked in descending order of on-site Energy Use Intensity (EUI), plus an indication of each facility’s annual carbon footprint and a profile of what times of year are most (and least) energy intensive. Summary charts provide insights into the energy use of each municipal facility type.

78.97

60.00 50.00 40.00 30.00 20.00

1.00

10.00

0.00

0.00 2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

Figure 1: The EUI of benchmarked facilities improved 7.4% from 2009-2013 and the average carbon footprint improved 12.7% over the same period.

                                                            

Includes 470 facilities; excludes Airport. See page 8 for details on on-site EUI. See page 14 for details on carbon footprint calculation. The same (most current) emissions factors are used for all years, for consistency. 3 SFPUC energy efficiency projects in benchmarked municipal facilities.  1 2

5

Making Use of the Results The findings suggest that San Francisco’s municipal buildings performed well in 2013. However, the results in this report are just a first step. The wide variation in energy performance within most facility types suggests there are many opportunities for improvement. This Energy Benchmarking Report forms one part of efforts by the SFPUC and other departments to track and improve the energy efficiency of municipal buildings. This annual report is one of the tools guiding the SFPUC Power Enterprise’s ongoing energy efficiency program. The Power Enterprise offers a range of energy efficiency services such as energy audits and green building commissioning that can identify technical deficiencies and recommend operations and maintenance improvements. The role of building occupants in using energy wisely is also crucial. Developing this annual report continues to be a major undertaking supported by numerous departments. Each department can look in more detail at facilities that appear as outliers in the data and provide data improvements where necessary to improve the benchmarking process in future years. The SFPUC is hopeful that the format of this report provides value to municipal building owners, managers, occupants, and the general public, and welcomes suggestions about how to improve this report in future years. Please email any questions or suggestions to: [email protected].

Calendar Year 2013 Highlights:  Benchmarking results are provided for 471 municipal facilities across 30 facility types, including the addition of City College of San Francisco buildings.  For each facility type, buildings are ranked in order of Energy Use Intensity (EUI, or energy use per square foot).    The overall EUI of municipal buildings has improved 7.4% over the past four years, and the average carbon footprint has decreased 12.7% over the same period.  Over 80% of San Francisco facilities in ENERGY STAR building types performed equal to or better than the national average.  Of facilities in ENERGY STAR building types, only four locations ranked in the bottom 25% compared to the national average.

6

decades. Combined with the efforts of individual departments, these energy improvements in existing buildings save the City millions of dollars per year in energy costs while also improving the indoor environment for building occupants. Additionally, as public facilities are built or undergo major renovations, they must meet the energy performance and LEED Gold standards of the City’s Green Building Ordinance and Environment Code Chapter 7. To most effectively take action, building owners and occupants need to be informed of cost-effective opportunities for energy savings. With this in mind, the Board of Supervisors approved the San Francisco Existing Commercial Buildings Energy Performance Ordinance in February 2011, amending the Environment Code. The ordinance requires owners of nonresidential buildings larger than 10,000 square feet (both privately and municipally owned) to annually disclose their buildings’ energy performance by benchmarking against similar facilities.

Introduction The City and County of San Francisco is strongly committed to reducing its impact on the environment and its contributions to climate change. Through key policy documents including the Climate Action Plan and the 2011 Updated Electricity Resource Plan, the City has laid out strategies to achieve its ambitious greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction goals. One of the actions San Francisco is taking in support of those commitments is to reduce the energy consumption of public buildings. San Francisco’s public buildings obtain their electricity from the City’s GHG-free Hetch Hetchy Power system, and stewardship of this public resource demands that the City make the most efficient use of energy. These buildings also consume natural gas and steam, contributing to climate change. The San Francisco Public Utilities Commission (SFPUC) has offered energy efficiency services to its power customers for the past three

With support from 25 other departments and agencies that own or lease full buildings, the SFPUC has issued this report to provide San Francisco’s agencies and the general public a better understanding of how the City’s municipal facilities perform. This report identifies high performing buildings as well as opportunities for improvement, and is an attempt by the City to lead by example and provide transparency related to government operations. The information in this report is just a first step. Together with the more detailed information gained from energy audits and the in-depth knowledge of building owners and occupants, this report will help City departments target resources to locations that could benefit the most from energy-related improvements. Photo: Solar panels lowered onto Davies Symphony Hall (November 2013) Energy use at Davies Symphony Hall has decreased 7% since 2009, when the SFPUC undertook retrofits of the building’s lighting and HVAC systems. In addition, the SFPUC recently completed a 139 kW solar installation that will produce approximately 10% of the electricity needed at Davies and the adjacent Zellerbach Rehearsal Hall. (Owner: WMPAC) 7

San Francisco’s Approach to Benchmarking

peers. Eligible buildings can receive a 1-100 score (with 50 being the median and 100 the best) that compares a structure’s energy performance to similar buildings nationwide.

In 2011, San Francisco joined a growing number of cities that had adopted ordinances requiring building owners to benchmark and publicly disclose the energy performance of their facilities each year. Energy benchmarking is simply a way to track the performance of a building over time and compare that building to other similar structures, in order to help identify opportunities for improvement.

Although some facility types in this report are eligible for a 1-100 rating (see Figure 2), the bulk of the City’s municipal buildings—the libraries, fire stations, museums, recreation centers, etc.—are benchmarked on the basis of on-site Energy Use Intensity (EUI), a measure of annual energy use per square foot of building area. The resulting EUI for each facility is then compared to the EUI of other San Francisco municipal buildings of a similar type. While national average EUI figures are published for a variety of building types, these figures are not normalized for climate and thus are not an ideal method of understanding how well a building in San Francisco performs. A building in San Francisco’s mild climate would tend to perform relatively well compared to its national peers on the basis of EUI, without revealing much about the building’s actual efficiency.

While the concept of energy benchmarking is simple, the undertaking of accurately performing this process for San Francisco’s hundreds of municipal buildings continues to be relatively complex. As the City’s public electricity provider, the SFPUC has opted to coordinate the required data gathering effort and publish a consolidated annual report for all City departments. This third annual report builds upon the previous two years’ efforts, while continuing to expand the number of benchmarked municipal buildings. Over the past three years, SFPUC staff has worked with representatives of 26 different departments to gather, verify, and update the facility data necessary for this report. This report includes more facilities than required by the ordinance. Although the ordinance only requires benchmarking buildings larger than 10,000 square feet, this municipal report includes buildings of smaller size where a meaningful benchmark could be established. The smallest buildings—park restrooms and kiosks, for example—are excluded. Also, this report includes numerous buildings owned by the City outside of the geographic boundaries of San Francisco, as well as some privately owned buildings that are occupied in full by City departments. San Francisco’s ordinance, like those in other cities, identifies the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Portfolio Manager tool as the preferred method of benchmarking for private-sector buildings. As a wellrecognized national rating tool that draws on the best available energy use data, Portfolio Manager (and the associated ENERGY STAR rating system) is a widely accepted way for owners and occupants of eligible facilities to see how their buildings stack up against local and national

Another decision is the use of “on-site” rather than “source” EUI as the primary metric in this report, due to the City’s source of electricity. To derive source EUI, the EPA’s Portfolio Manager tool uses national averages to convert electricity used in a facility to the total energy required to supply this electricity. In most cases, electricity delivery involves substantial conversion losses through the burning of fossil fuel, plus some losses due to transmission and distribution of the resulting power.4 However, the SFPUC’s Hetch Hetchy Power system and some local distributed generation provide nearly all of the electricity needed by San Francisco’s municipal buildings. Since these power sources do not involve converting fossil fuels to electricity, use of a national average sitesource ratio would be misleading. Therefore, all comparisons in this report (with the exception of ENERGY STAR ratings) are based on site energy use. While this benchmarking report is one tool to identify energy efficiency opportunities, there are other efforts to track and report the energy efficiency of the City’s buildings. Some City departments (e.g. the Real                                                             

Portfolio Manager uses an average site-source ratio of 3.34 to estimate these losses.

4

8

Estate Division and the California Academy of Sciences) were already using Portfolio Manager to benchmark specific facilities prior to the requirements of the new ordinance. Also, the SFPUC has distributed quarterly Energy Usage Reports to every department for several years, giving its electricity customers information about fluctuations in energy use for each of their sites. The SFPUC and other departments have also annually contributed energy data for every City facility as part of the Climate Action Plan process coordinated by the Department of the Environment. It is the SFPUC’s hope that the format of this report is helpful to City departments and other readers as a way to supplement and improve upon other information sources about San Francisco’s municipal sustainability performance. As changes are made to the EPA’s ENERGY STAR system, and as San Francisco’s private sector buildings begin to release their own energy performance data, the SFPUC will look for ways to further refine its benchmarking methods to improve the accuracy and relevancy of its reporting and to help lead the way in improving access to energy data in San Francisco and the nation.

Figure 2: ENERGY STAR eligibility of facility types San Francisco municipal facility types eligible for ENERGY STAR rating: K-12 School Mental Health Center (Medical Office) Hospital General Office Courthouse Warehouse Wastewater Treatment Plant San Francisco municipal facility types not eligible for rating: Convention Center Performance Hall Art/Cultural Center Museum Childcare / Teen Center College / Adult Education Library Homeless Service Medical Clinic Veterinarian Parking Garage Fire Station Police Station Emergency Center Jail / Correctional Clubhouse Recreation Center Swimming Pool Camp Other Recreational Building Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair Other Shop Transit Station Airport 9

In some cases, facilities contain more than one space type. For instance, the Hall of Justice is a mixed-use facility that contains offices, a courthouse, and jail areas. Where this would affect the ENERGY STAR rating, multiple space types were entered into EPA’s Portfolio Manager.

Energy Use in San Francisco’s Municipal Buildings Information Sources and Assumptions

Departments also supplied the SFPUC with the size of parking garages and parking lots. Where attached parking would affect the ENERGY STAR rating of a facility, this data was entered into Portfolio Manager as an additional space type. The EUI calculations in this report include parking garage area as part of a facility’s square footage, which in most cases decreases the reported EUI of a building due to the lower energy intensity of a typical parking garage. However, the area of parking lots is not included in the EUI calculations.

Creating an accurate energy performance benchmark of San Francisco’s municipal buildings requires information from numerous sources. Energy data: Electricity, natural gas, and steam data is stored in the SFPUC’s energy accounting database, which contains metered monthly usage for all utility meters where billing is managed by the SFPUC. Some additional natural gas data was obtained from other sources, in cases where the site pays PG&E directly for natural gas and the meter information was provided by the individual department to the SFPUC. Natural gas data for SFUSD facilities was provided by SFUSD. There are 12 facilities where some energy use data is missing (see page 32).5 Facility data: Accurate facility data is needed to reliably benchmark a building. As part of the initial report (calendar year 2011), the SFPUC and other departments engaged in a thorough verification process to review available building and operations data and supply additional detail for the benchmarking effort. Similar verification occurred for facilities added to the 2012 and 2013 reports, and departments were also asked to provide any updates for locations that were previously included. For a description of this process, see the inset on page 13. This report generally refers to “facilities” rather than “buildings”, because in many cases energy meters are shared by multiple buildings. These locations are benchmarked as campuses. For instance, the Airport is listed as one facility, but contains 70 individual buildings. San Francisco General Hospital is benchmarked as one facility but is a campus of more than 15 individual buildings. Similarly, Moscone Center North and South are considered a campus with shared mechanical systems, as are the War Memorial Veterans Building and Opera House.                                                              Excluded are any amounts of fuel oil that may be burned in several dual-fuel boilers, to ensure readiness in case of a natural gas curtailment event.

5

Civic Center steam loop: Two historic Civic Center buildings obtain steam from the NRG Energy Center steam loop but do not have individual steam meters: Bill Graham Civic Auditorium and the DPH Central Office at 101 Grove. To estimate the EUI of these buildings, the unmetered portion of Civic Center steam use was apportioned to the two buildings based on their square footage. These buildings are not eligible for an ENERGY STAR rating due to the absence of accurate steam meter data.

Snapshot of Energy Use Intensity In calendar year 2013, the overall Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of the 470 benchmarked facilities (excluding the Airport)6 was 73.12 kBtu of on-site energy per square foot of building area.7 This was an improvement of 2.8% from the 2012 EUI of 75.268 and an improvement of7.4% since 2009.

                                                            

6

 The overall EUI comparisons provided in the report exclude the Airport, due to its large size and lack of building-level meter detail. Additionally, some Airport natural gas data prior to 2011 is not available to the SFPUC.  7  The site EUI figures in this report are not weather normalized to account for year-to-year fluctuations in the number of heating and cooling degree days. The ENERGY STAR ratings, where available, are weather normalized.  8 The 2012 EUI figure differs somewhat from the number cited in the 2012 report, since the number of buildings included in this report has increased. 10

Figure 3: Energy Use in Municipal Facilities, Calendar Year 2013 The buildings benchmarked in this report represent almost 74% of the electricity, natural gas, and district steam used in San Francisco’s municipal facilities in calendar year 2013. Shown in dark green, these 471 facilities (including San Francisco International Airport) used a total of 3,948,816 MMBtu of on-site energy. This report also provides partial benchmark results for an additional 5% of municipal facility energy use, though these facilities cannot be accurately benchmarked on a per-square-foot basis. 21% of the on-site energy used in municipal facilities is excluded from this report, as indicated. [Note that the figure for the Port is a partial total that excludes natural gas.]

Departments Not Covered by Ordinance 6.0% of energy use

Excluded (Non building or inactive) 12.0% of energy use

SFMTA Non-Building 5.1% SFPUC Non-Building 3.7% Streetlights 1.8% Other Non-Building 0.9%

SF Housing Authority (Includes estimated gas use) 5.3% Other 0.8%

Inactive Buildings or Not Covered by Ordinance 0.5%

Benchmarked Facilities (Including Airport) 3,948,816 MMBtu 73.7% of energy use

Reporting Independently: Port of San Francisco 3.4% of energy use (Includes electricity only)

Benchmarked with ENERGY STAR Benchmarked by EUI Partial Benchmark 4.8% of energy use Buildings of Unknown Size 0.04% Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data 0.5% Water and Wastewater Treatment Buildings 4.2%

Benchmarked by EUI

(335 facilities) 1,993,891 MMBtu 37.2% of energy use

(135 facilities) 437,572 MMBtu 8.2% of energy use

(Airport) 1,517,353 MMBtu 28.3% of energy use

11

Figure 4: Benchmarked facilities, by building category Performance Halls 68,870 MMBtu 1.7% Museums and Art 197,356 MMBtu 5.0%

Libraries 41,559 MMBtu 1.1%

Health & Human Services 43,966 MMBtu 1.1% Transit Stations 20,987 MMBtu 0.5%

Recreation Facilities 117,399 MMBtu 3.0%

Performance Halls 1,061,450 sq.ft. 2.2% Museums and Art 1,223,551 sq.ft. 2.5%

Libraries 594,065 sq.ft. 1.2%

Health & Human Services 376,519 sq.ft. 0.8% Transit Stations 363,000 sq.ft. 0.7%

Recreation Facilities 1,327,566 sq.ft. 2.7% Public Safety 1,655,653 sq.ft. 3.4%

Public Safety 148,709 MMBtu 3.8% Convention Centers 133,105 MMBtu 3.4%

Airport 1,517,353 MMBtu 38.4% Hospitals 673,464 MMBtu 17.1%

Service, Repair, and Storage 164,642 MMBtu 4.2% Offices 271,723 MMBtu 6.9% Parking Garages 42,903 MMBtu 1.1%

Convention Centers 2,071,000 sq.ft. 4.2% Hospitals 2,088,030 sq.ft. 4.3% Service, Repair, and Storage 2,808,091 sq.ft. 5.7%

Education 506,779 MMBtu 12.8%

Benchmarked Energy Use, by Building Category (Calendar Year 2013 Benchmarked Energy Use = 3,948,816 MMBtu)

Comparing the two charts above (Figure 4), some building types consume energy out of proportion to their size. For instance, the two hospitals comprise only 4.3% of the benchmarked square footage, but consumed 17.1% of benchmarked energy in 2013 (EUI of 322.5). This is largely due to the hospitals’ operating hours and intensity of use, as well as ongoing construction at SF General Hospital. On the other hand, parking garages (which are unheated) make up 10.8% of benchmarked square footage but used only 1.1% of the year’s benchmarked energy use (EUI of only 8.1). Museums have a higher than average EUI (likely due to unique

Airport 15,579,508 sq.ft. 31.9%

Offices 4,122,568 sq.ft. 8.4% Parking Garages 5,285,430 sq.ft. 10.8%

Education 10,288,584 sq.ft. 21.1%

Benchmarked Square Footage, by Building Category (Total Benchmarked Building Area = 48,845,015 sq ft)

climate control needs), while schools on average are less energy intensive (partly because they are closed in the summer). The average EUI figure for each building type is found in the next section of the report. Municipal facilities use GHG-free SFPUC electricity, natural gas supplied by PG&E or an aggregator (either the California Department of General Services or SPURR), and steam supplied by NRG. To compare these forms of on-site energy use, units have been converted throughout this

12

report to British thermal units (Btu) of energy.9 The charts below (Figure 5) show the different energy sources used at the 470 benchmarked facilities plus the Airport, as well as the total associated greenhouse gas emissions.10

District Steam

District Steam

64,990,000 lbs 77,598 MMBtu 2% of energy use

Electricity

6,467 tons CO2 6% of emissions

0 tons CO2 0% of emissions

Natural Gas 16,891,298 therms 1,689,130 MMBtu 43% of energy use

Electricity 639,507 MWh 2,182,088 MMBtu 55% of energy use

Natural Gas 98,814 tons CO2 94% of emissions

Figure 5

Energy Use and GHG Emissions, by Fuel Type (Calendar Year 2013 Benchmarked Energy Use = 3,948,816 MMBtu)

                                                            

Conversion factors are those referenced by EPA’s ENERGY STAR Portfolio Manager: (3.412 kBtu per kWh of electricity; 100 kBtu per therm of natural gas; 1.194 kBtu per lb of district steam). 1 MMBtu = 1,000 kBtu = 1,000,000 Btu. 10 GHG emissions from SFPUC electricity are zero for 2013. Natural gas emissions use national averages cited by ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per therm of natural gas). Steam emissions provided by NRG (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

Sources and Verification of Facility Data To develop a list of facilities, SFPUC staff began with a list of over 1,000 individually metered municipal facilities in the Power Enterprise energy accounting database, and cross-referenced this data with databases of owned and leased facilities maintained by the City’s Real Estate Division and Capital Planning Committee. Next, the SFPUC screened out facilities owned by agencies not covered by the ordinance, such as the Housing Authority. The Port of San Francisco, which maintains its own facility records and natural gas use data, will independently report its energy performance data. Of the 90 facility categories in the database, those that did not meet the definition of “building” were also screened out. These included bridges, bus stops, fire pumps, sirens, street lights, traffic signals, water pumps, etc. While extremely small buildings such as park restrooms and kiosks were excluded from the report, numerous other buildings smaller than the ordinance’s 10,000 square foot threshold were included where they   provided a meaningful comparison to other buildings. To maximize the accuracy of the facility list used in the initial 2011 report, the SFPUC displayed all known facility data in a web-based survey tool and asked each department to verify its list of facilities and the associated data. The SFPUC supplied a list of meters associated with each facility, for each department to correct meter matchups if necessary. Representatives from all 26 affected departments have verified the data and provided corrections and missing information. Data verified includes building square footage, number of building occupants, operating hours, year built (and renovated), and other ENERGY STAR facility characteristics depending on building type.

9

The SFPUC and other Departments were able to verify most facility data. Square footage information and partial meter data from a small fraction of relevant facilities is still unknown. A “partial benchmark” of those facilities is included in the report, and an effort will be made to obtain the missing data in future years.

13

perfect—it is not adjusted to account for fluctuations in weather or changes in occupancy or operations—but does provide informative results. In cases where the SFPUC was aware that a facility was vacant or under construction for an extended period of time during 2012 or 2013, a note (4) is included after the facility name.

2013 Energy Benchmarking Results Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for all Facilities As described previously, the primary method of benchmarking the facilities in this report is to compare the on-site annual Energy Use Intensity (EUI) of each facility to other San Francisco municipal facilities of the same type. By listing the facilities of each type in descending order of EUI, the reader can quickly see which facilities consumed the most energy per square foot, and which consumed the least. While the charts on the far right-hand side of pages 17-32 show the total energy use for each facility, the primary comparison is on a per-square-foot basis. This EUI comparison is helpful, but not perfect. The wide variation in energy performance within many facility types indicates the potential for energy efficiency retrofit projects at the most energy intense locations. However, each department should look in more detail at the list of its buildings to help interpret the results. For example, some facilities have energy meter arrangements that do not correspond to discrete buildings (e.g. locations in Golden Gate Park and other Recreation & Park clubhouses and playgrounds), which means the EUI for some facilities includes energy use from adjacent areas as well.

San Francisco Facilities in ENERGY STAR Categories: Comparison to National Median Rating General Office

Top 25% (75-100 rating) 2nd Quarter (50-74 rating) 3rd Quarter (25-49 rating) Bottom 25% (0-24 rating) TOTAL

Since the ENERGY STAR rating system was developed primarily for commercial buildings, the majority of municipal buildings in San Francisco are building types that are not eligible for a 1-100 rating. However, of the 471 municipal facilities benchmarked in this report, 135 of them do have building characteristics and available data that make them eligible for an ENERGY STAR 1-100 rating. For these buildings, the SFPUC used the EPA’s Portfolio Manager system to generate ratings that allow a comparison to national averages. Unlike the EUI data, these ratings take into account local climate and weather conditions, as well as building characteristics such as weekly operating hours and number of occupants. In general, seven types of San Francisco municipal facilities fall into a category eligible for an ENERGY STAR rating: Office buildings, Courthouses, Mental Health Centers (Medical Office), Hospitals, Warehouses, K-12 Schools, and Wastewater Treatment Plants. Of the facilities in appropriate categories, some did not qualify for a rating because they did not meet ENERGY STAR’s minimum operating thresholds (for instance, the buildings were too small or did not have any

To help track changes in energy use over time, a comparison to calendar year 2012 EUI is included for each site. This comparison is also not Figure 6:

ENERGY STAR Ratings

Courthouse 9 8 4 1 22

1

1

Medical Office

Warehouse K-12 School 2 3

5

1 1 1

55 33 13 3

3

104

# of Rated Facilities

% of Rated Facilities

67

49.6%

46

34.1%

18

13.3%

4 135

3.0% 100% 14

full-time occupants). The ratings for these non-qualifying facilities are listed as “N.Q.” along with explanations. Several other locations are qualifying building types but the SFPUC did not have adequate data to generate an accurate rating. As shown in Figure 6, almost half of rating-eligible facilities (67 out of 135) achieved a preliminary score in the top 25% of similar buildings nationwide, and therefore appear qualified to receive the ENERGY STAR label for calendar year 2013.11 84% of rating-eligible San Francisco facilities performed equal to or better than the national median for similar buildings. Only four facilities rated in the bottom 25% compared to similar buildings nationwide. Individual ratings for these facilities can be seen in the charts on the following pages, grouped by facility type. The top 12 (non-school12) facilities are listed individually in Figure 7.

Carbon Footprint The GHG emissions of each facility (on a per square foot basis) is provided to help integrate this benchmarking report with the City’s annual Climate Action Plan reporting. The average 2013 carbon footprint of the benchmarked facilities (4.96 pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot) improved 6.0% from 2012 and 12.7% compared to 2009. One key difference between the buildings in this report and their national counterparts is that electricity in San Francisco municipal buildings is GHG-free electricity from the SFPUC’s Hetch Hetchy Power system. This difference is not taken into account by the ENERGY STAR ratings, thus

becomes an additional lens with which to view the relative performance of the facilities in this report. Emissions factors used in this report are explained on the next page.

Data Uncertainties and Exceptions As described in the previous section of this report, a small number of facilities received a “partial benchmark” due to missing square footage or meter information. These facilities are listed separately (see page 32). In addition to these partially benchmarked buildings, there are notes (#) beside the names of some facilities. These notes clarify situations where energy or facility data is treated as a special case, or where facilities need further investigation in future years. Among these are facilities that are in eligible ENERGY STAR categories, but do not meet the EPA’s thresholds for ratings. For a key to these notes, see Appendix A. Figure 7: Facilities qualified for the ENERGY STAR label for calendar year 2013 (subject to validation) (*) Indicates facility benefited from SFPUC energy efficiency programs

Department of Public Health: Chinatown Child Development Center Mission Mental Health Services Department of Public Works: 1680 Mission St * Human Services Agency:

MediCal -- 1440 Harrison * Social Services -- 1235 Mission

Real Estate Division:

25 Van Ness Ave * City Hall * One South Van Ness Public Defender's Office *

                                                            

Ratings for calendar year 2013 were obtained in June 2014. To obtain the ENERGY STAR label, the building owner must have the results validated by a licensed engineer or architect, and submit a formal application to the EPA. 12 Although preliminary ENERGY STAR ratings are provided for elementary and middle schools on the following pages, further site investigations are needed for the scores to be validated. Some operating characteristics (number of personal computers and number of walk-in freezer/refrigeration units) were estimated at each school based on national per-square-foot averages. ENERGY STAR quartile results for high schools are included in the overall totals in this report, but the 1-100 scores for individual high schools are not listed due to unexpectedly positive scores. A more detailed assessment of the ENERGY STAR ratings for high schools in San Francisco’s climate may be warranted. 11

San Francisco Public Library: Library Support Services Building * SFPUC:

525 Golden Gate Ave * 651 Bryant – Power Utility Services * 15

How to Interpret Data on the Following Pages

Each facility’s preliminary 2013 ENERGY STAR rating is shown here. Facilities in the top 25% of similar buildings nationwide are indicated with a green dot. Facilities in the bottom 25% are indicated with a red dot. “N/A” indicates a facility type not eligible for a rating, or that inadequate information is available. “N.Q.” indicates the facility is an eligible category but does not qualify for a rating based on EPA’s operating thresholds.

The 2013 Energy Benchmarking results are grouped by facility type, and provide key data points about each facility, as well as the facility’s energy performance in calendar year 2013. General category of building, corresponding to energy use snapshot in previous chapter Specific facility type, allowing a comparison of similar facilities to each other See Page 3 for a list of department acronyms.

Each facility’s estimated 2013 carbon footprint is shown here as pounds of CO2 emissions per square foot of building area. For electricity in 2013, GHG emissions associated with SFPUC electricity were zero. Natural gas emissions are derived from national averages cited by ENERGY STAR (11.7 lbs CO2 per therm of natural gas). GHG emissions from steam provided by NRG Energy Center (0.199 lbs CO2 per pound of steam).

For each general building category, the average 2013 EUI of San Francisco municipal facilities is provided here.

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Year Building Area Renov. (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Health & Human Services

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

116.8

Medical Clinic - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

0.7%

111.5

0

100

200

300

400

0

DPH

1930

2006

11,195

-5.6%

88.7

N/A

Potrero Hill Health Center

DPH

1976

2012

8,000

-27.0%

69.7

N/A

3.2%

32.9

J F M A M J J A S O N D

South of Market Mental Health Services

DPH

1956

1998

13,000

11.1%

47.9

Mission Mental Health Services

DPH

1943

2002

32,000

-9.4%

23.0

2,500

5,000

7,500

8.59

Curry Senior Service Center Mental Health Center - San Francisco Average

Annual Site MMBtu

7.38 4.47 1.37

53 93

1.31 0.77

District steam shown in dark blue This section includes facility characteristics for each location—facility owner, year built, year renovated, and total building area in square feet. The fluctuation in monthly EUI is shown throughout the calendar year, to provide a sense of the times of year with highest and lowest energy use. The change in annual EUI from 2012 to 2013 is shown in this column for each facility. An improvement of more than 10% is shown in green. An EUI increase of more than 10% is shown in red. Facilities that were unoccupied for prolonged periods during either 2012 or 2013 are indicated with a note (4) next to the facility name.

Natural gas use shown in light blue Electricity use shown in yellow 2013 Energy Use Intensity (EUI) for each facility, in kBtu of total on-site energy, per square foot of building area For each facility type, the average 2013 EUI of San Francisco municipal buildings is provided on the top row, for comparison to individual facilities of that type. Bars shown in this area indicate total 2013 energy use for each facility, in MMBtu of on-site energy. Note: Chart scales vary for different facility types. 16

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Convention Centers

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

64.3

Convention Center - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Moscone Center West

CFD

2002

Moscone Center North & South (1)

CFD

1981

1992

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

0

25

50

75

100

8.5%

64.3

775,000

0.6%

74.3

N/A

4.27

1,296,000

15.4%

58.3

N/A

2.94

Performance Halls

64.9

Performance Hall - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-12.8%

64.9

0

25

50

75

100

RED

1915

302,250

-19.3%

67.8

N/A

8.82

WMPAC

1932

529,700

-12.6%

67.1

N/A

4.80

Davies Symphony Hall / Zellerbach Rehearsal Hall (1)

WMPAC

1980

229,500

-0.6%

55.9

N/A

2.88

161.3

Art/Cultural Center - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-7.6%

38.3

0

100

200

300

400

GGP -- Sharon Arts Studio (3)

RPD

1888

11,376

-16.9%

77.1

N/A

8.95

RPD

1951

32,030

-3.7%

72.3

N/A

6.18

SOMArts Cultural Center

SFAC

1906

17,844

-0.1%

32.2

N/A

1.05

Harvey Milk Center for the Arts

RPD

1950

23,125

-3.6%

28.9

N/A

1.56

Mission Cultural Center for Latino Arts

SFAC

1948

32,230

-19.0%

28.3

N/A

1.85

African American Art & Culture Complex

SFAC

1935

34,031

-1.3%

27.9

N/A

2.01

Bayview Opera House

SFAC

1888

14,000

-10.1%

8.8

N/A

0.00

Arts Commission Window Site / Gallery

SFAC

1914

4,163

5.3%

8.7

N/A

-2.2%

181.0

2009

Museum - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

80,000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

0

20,000

40,000

60,000

80,000

0.23

FAMSF

1924

1995

117,665

-6.6%

282.7

N/A

19.68

RPD

1879

2003

27,900

-2.9%

212.2

N/A

24.83

Asian Art Museum

AAM

1917

2003

185,000

3.6%

194.0

N/A

8.82

De Young Museum

FAMSF

2005

292,500

-2.1%

180.1

N/A

9.67

California Academy of Sciences

CAS

2008

426,000

-2.8%

147.5

N/A

5.20

Coit Tower (4)

RPD

1933

5,687

2.5%

54.1

N/A

0.00

2012

60,000

9.18

GGP -- Conservatory of Flowers (3)

California Palace of the Legion of Honor

40,000

2.87

Randall Museum

1992

20,000

5.53

War Memorial Veterans Building & Opera House (4)

Museums and Art

0 3.44

Bill Graham Civic Auditorium (steam unmetered) (2)

1989

Annual Site MMBtu

17

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Education

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

49.3

Childcare / Teen Center / Family Center - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

-21.5%

34.0

0

50

100

150

200

SFUSD

2001

2,500

-7.2%

106.0

N/A

8.14

Zaida T Rodriguez Early Education

SFUSD

1976

1,800

4.8%

104.4

N/A

9.05

HSA

1971

15,000

2.8%

61.0

N/A

5.09

Noriega CDC

SFUSD

1951

14,700

-25.5%

49.4

N/A

4.11

Junipero Serra Annex CDC

SFUSD

1970

5,800

23.6%

50.0

N/A

2.15

Commodore Stockton CDC

SFUSD

1924

21,255

-18.7%

48.8

N/A

2.61

Jefferson Early Education

SFUSD

1960

2,400

-2.4%

43.9

N/A

3.35

John McLaren CDC

SFUSD

1954

57,885

27.6%

42.7

N/A

4.18

HSA

1971

5,184

-1.2%

38.2

N/A

3.55

Playmates Nursery

SFUSD

1954

3,000

23.8%

34.8

N/A

2.23

Leola M Havard Early Education

SFUSD

1969

74,100

23.3%

32.3

N/A

3.09

Theresa Mahler CDC

SFUSD

1943

5,339

26.6%

31.7

N/A

2.10

Mission CDC

SFUSD

1976

4,100

-1.9%

29.9

N/A

1.65

HSA

1971

7,409

-11.5%

24.8

N/A

2.35

Tule Elk Park CDC

SFUSD

1923

32,000

-24.4%

26.3

N/A

2.38

San Miguel CDC (4)

SFUSD

1929

52,545

-75.2%

22.2

N/A

2.16

SFUSD -- SPEd Medical Therapy Unit (Laguna)

SFUSD

1972

12,400

-0.2%

15.2

N/A

0.72

Shorey Childrens Center

HSA

1971

9,700

-23.2%

7.7

N/A

0.40

Visitacion Valley Family Resource Center

RED

1940

12,000

6.4

N/A

Sojourner Truth Child Center

MLK Child Care Center

1953

College / Adult Education - San Francisco Average SFPD Academy

N/A J F M A M J J A S O N D

SFPD

1966

19,332

92.8

6.90

-11.2%

159.0

N/A

13.42 12.86

RPD

1930

5,940

-0.5%

141.7

N/A

CCSF -- Ocean Campus

CCSF

1940

931,000

15.0%

127.9

N/A

9.52

Southeast Community Facility and Greenhouses (5)

SFPUC

1986

193,400

3.9%

99.8

N/A

10.28

CCSF -- Mission Center

CCSF

1939

138,129

-3.0%

81.5

N/A

5.29

CCSF -- Downtown Center

CCSF

1978

86,038

-5.9%

61.5

N/A

2.13

Sheriff Community Programs / Five Keys Adult School

SHF

1959

10,842

-2.5%

59.7

N/A

2.37

CCSF -- Chinatown / North Beach Center

CCSF

2012

157,353

15.6%

37.6

N/A

1.91

CCSF -- Airport Campus

CCSF

1975

27,753

0.2%

31.4

N/A

2.77

CCSF -- Alemany Campus

CCSF

1911

26,400

-30.1%

24.7

N/A

1.73

CCSF -- John Adams Center

CCSF

1911

151,397

-8.9%

24.3

N/A

1.82

CCSF -- Evans Center

CCSF

1984

90,000

-9.7%

21.9

N/A

0.65

CCSF -- Chinatown / North Beach Annex

CCSF

2012

29,411

-4.0%

20.7

N/A

-14.7%

40.0

62,840

7.3%

62.7

(13)

5.54

2004

2009

High School - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

1,250

2,500

3,750

5,000

0

30,000

60,000

90,000

120,000

0

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

0.46

9.6%

GGP -- Senior Center

2005

0 2.92

Argonne CDC Earl P Mills Community Center

Annual Site MMBtu

0.00 3.18

Raoul Wallenberg High

SFUSD

1952

Ida B Wells High

SFUSD

1910

34,300

-35.6%

57.7

(13)

5.26

School of the Arts / Academy of Arts and Sciences

SFUSD

1970

209,500

-7.5%

55.1

(13)

3.58

Hilltop County Community High / Sunshine Building

SFUSD

1937

61,442

9.4%

55.1

(13)

4.86

George Washington High

SFUSD

1936

228,800

3.1%

53.0

(13)

4.81

18

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 0

International Studies Academy at Enola Maxwell

SFUSD

1971

108,400

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

50

100

150

0

200

-27.6%

48.6

(13)

3.59

SF International High

SFUSD

1980

33,100

-3.4%

45.3

(13)

2.78

Philip and Sala Burton High

SFUSD

1963

230,000

-21.9%

44.5

(13)

3.64

Gateway High / KIPP San Francisco Bay Academy (16)

SFUSD

1913

143,237

-58.2%

42.0

N/A

3.61

John O'Connell High

SFUSD

1999

130,091

-12.3%

40.1

(13)

2.34

Galileo High

SFUSD

1924

242,400

-10.7%

39.2

(13)

3.25

Independence High (Old Laguna Honda)

SFUSD

1908

30,114

63.1%

37.2

(13)

2.75

Downtown High

SFUSD

1936

58,760

9.6%

36.9

(13)

3.40

Thurgood Marshall High

SFUSD

1957

149,796

0.6%

34.9

(13)

2.70

Mission High

SFUSD

1922

225,000

-18.3%

32.7

(13)

2.47

June Jordan High / City Arts and Tech High

SFUSD

1957

151,600

-6.2%

32.6

(13)

2.73

Abraham Lincoln High (16)

SFUSD

1940

330,200

-9.6%

31.6

N/A

2.53

Balboa High

SFUSD

1928

261,700

-5.5%

30.5

(13)

2.60

Lowell High

SFUSD

1962

245,000

-12.1%

30.2

(13)

-7.2%

39.8

Elementary / Middle School - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

2.30 3.28

Mission Education Center Elementary

SFUSD

1911

27,000

20.2%

113.1

12

11.91

El Dorado Elementary

SFUSD

1953

30,300

34.6%

99.3

8

9.79

Claire Lilienthal (K-2 Madison Campus)

SFUSD

1910

20,855

2.5%

76.0

29

7.14

Visitacion Valley Middle

SFUSD

1971

113,600

3.5%

75.8

4

6.68

Jose Ortega Elementary

SFUSD

1953

35,180

-5.0%

69.6

33

6.66

Sunset Elementary

SFUSD

1951

40,150

15.2%

69.5

31

6.75

Robert Louis Stevenson Elementary

SFUSD

1953

47,500

-14.8%

64.3

59

6.37

George Peabody Elementary

SFUSD

1976

16,229

-4.1%

61.7

28

4.08

Paul Revere Elementary

SFUSD

1928

56,400

-4.5%

57.3

34

4.64

Francis Scott Key Elementary

SFUSD

1936

52,000

26.5%

55.5

53

4.98

Lafayette Elementary

SFUSD

1927

54,283

-2.2%

54.8

68

5.24

Dr George Washington Carver Elementary

SFUSD

1974

45,500

28.1%

54.5

26

3.20

Redding Elementary

SFUSD

1917

26,100

12.3%

51.9

75

4.38

Sunnyside Elementary

SFUSD

1927

30,900

-8.8%

51.8

80

4.98

Ulloa Elementary

SFUSD

1952

53,000

-22.0%

51.7

Buena Vista / Horace Mann

SFUSD

1924

68,000

-19.2%

50.3

Hillcrest Elementary

SFUSD

1951

60,280

-3.5%

49.9

43

4.88

Malcolm X Elementary

SFUSD

1957

50,800

23.9%

49.6

64

4.49

Rooftop Alternative (5-8 Mayeda Campus)

SFUSD

1997

21,000

24.9%

49.1

26

2.06

Alamo Elementary

SFUSD

1924

50,420

-9.8%

47.4

34

2.71

Clarendon Elementary

SFUSD

1962

39,500

-3.6%

47.1

Claire Lilienthal (3-8 Winfield Scott Campus)

SFUSD

1930

34,000

38.1%

47.0

71

4.26

Presidio Middle

SFUSD

1930

140,000

-13.4%

46.6

71

4.46

Civic Center Secondary at John Swett Campus

SFUSD

1912

29,060

104.4%

46.2

34

2.55

New Traditions Elementary

SFUSD

1924

26,300

0.6%

45.9

George Moscone Elementary

SFUSD

1997

45,108

-13.7%

45.0

A P Giannini Middle (16)

SFUSD

1954

136,392

5.3%

44.6

1968

Annual Site MMBtu

70 84

80

95 35 N/A

4.52 4.44

3.81

3.93 2.89 4.29

19

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 0

50

100

150

0

200

48.3%

43.9

77

4.08

40,500

-2.8%

43.3

75

3.64

42,434

15.7%

43.2

61

3.52

36,246

-11.4%

42.6

62

3.32

1934

64,940

-19.3%

42.2

74

3.87

SFUSD

1928

53,500

-2.7%

42.1

75

3.63

Harvey Milk Civil Rights Academy

SFUSD

1952

30,560

9.6%

40.9

78

3.57

Bryant Elementary and CDC

SFUSD

1969

32,500

-5.1%

40.5

Leonard R Flynn Elementary

SFUSD

1926

52,700

-19.9%

40.3

Bessie Carmichael Elementary

SFUSD

2000

56,358

-13.1%

40.2

E R Taylor Elementary

SFUSD

1923

56,113

-26.9%

40.1

80

3.63

Rosa Parks Elementary / Raphael Weill CDC

SFUSD

1927

66,900

0.2%

39.6

75

3.13

Everett Middle

SFUSD

1926

155,370

-7.2%

39.6

57

3.59

Argonne Elementary

SFUSD

1997

52,000

-4.0%

39.5

74

3.08

Sutro Elementary

SFUSD

1976

32,860

-4.5%

39.3

64

2.74

Sheridan Elementary

SFUSD

1975

46,335

-16.3%

39.2

74

2.89

Alice Fong Yu Elementary

SFUSD

1914

59,650

-23.5%

38.8

Marina Middle

SFUSD

1936

152,900

-11.9%

38.7

James Lick Middle

SFUSD

1932

116,000

-5.2%

37.9

Commodore Sloat Elementary

SFUSD

1977

59,200

4.1%

37.8

73

2.96

Roosevelt Middle

SFUSD

1930

121,000

-18.0%

37.4

65

3.36

Chinese Education Center

SFUSD

1976

10,580

-1.8%

37.1

95

1.65

Alvarado Elementary

SFUSD

1926

51,700

-7.8%

37.1

96

3.04

John Yehall Chin Elementary

SFUSD

1914

23,100

37.5%

37.0

76

2.30

Cleveland Elementary

SFUSD

1911

34,000

-17.6%

36.5

79

2.91

Monroe Elementary

SFUSD

1977

53,400

-4.8%

36.5

67

2.16

Dr Martin Luther King Middle

SFUSD

1940

72,210

-15.4%

36.3

65

2.63

Herbert Hoover Middle

SFUSD

1956

132,400

-4.4%

35.9

70

2.93

Dr Charles R Drew Elementary

SFUSD

1971

55,234

-2.9%

35.2

72

2.26

Tenderloin Elementary

SFUSD

1998

61,569

-2.3%

34.6

60

1.88

Glen Park Elementary

SFUSD

1936

45,200

-18.5%

34.3

93

2.93

Starr King Elementary

SFUSD

1955

49,900

-19.9%

34.1

90

3.03

James Denman Middle / Leadership High

SFUSD

1940

150,900

-21.8%

33.8

Lakeshore Elementary

SFUSD

1954

56,101

-16.7%

33.3

85

2.76

Rooftop Alternative (K-4 Burnett Campus)

SFUSD

1952

23,300

-11.2%

33.3

93

2.94

Aptos Middle

SFUSD

1931

168,000

1.6%

33.2

Bret Harte Elementary

SFUSD

1954

79,000

-21.2%

32.7

84

2.88

Sanchez Elementary

SFUSD

1927

50,500

-30.5%

32.5

90

2.81

Bessie Carmichael / Filipino Education Ctr (6-8)

SFUSD

1975

13,654

6.0%

32.3

85

1.94

Chinese Immersion Elementary at DeAvila

SFUSD

1926

58,582

-36.3%

32.1

91

2.74

Cesar Chavez Elementary

SFUSD

1926

49,100

-11.2%

32.1

88

2.49

Daniel Webster Elementary

SFUSD

1924

42,800

20.1%

32.1

Gateway Middle

SFUSD

1908

Longfellow Elementary

SFUSD

1960

Jefferson Elementary

SFUSD

1923

Dr William Cobb Elementary

SFUSD

1923

Lawton Elementary

SFUSD

John Muir Elementary

31,121

1964

Annual Site MMBtu

54 77 44

94 66 78

55

71

28

5,000

10,000

15,000

20,000

2.56 3.42 2.10

3.28 3.71 3.81

2.50

3.02

0.26

20

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 0

Creative Arts Charter

SFUSD

1962

33,117

121.8%

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

31.3

50

100

150

0

200

94 61

10,000

15,000

20,000

1.29

SFUSD

1979

33,800

10.4%

31.3

Spring Valley Elementary

SFUSD

1912

50,400

-8.8%

31.1

94

2.38

SFUSD -- 940 Filbert St (Yick Wo Elementary) (16)

SFUSD

1900

37,500

-74.5%

30.7

N/A

2.72

Jean Parker Elementary

SFUSD

1996

46,000

-6.7%

30.3

89

2.21

Miraloma Elementary

SFUSD

1952

51,900

0.7%

30.2

94

2.61

Visitacion Valley Elementary

SFUSD

1936

51,400

-13.1%

29.9

97

2.68

SF Community School

SFUSD

1911

66,900

-5.9%

29.6

96

2.80

Francisco Middle

SFUSD

1926

104,897

-1.2%

29.2

81

2.30

West Portal Elementary

SFUSD

1927

44,700

-26.6%

29.0

84

2.00

SF Public Montessori Elementary

SFUSD

1924

64,500

-15.6%

28.8

96

2.74

Sherman Elementary

SFUSD

1928

56,200

-14.0%

28.5

95

2.54

Edison Charter Academy Elementary

SFUSD

1927

59,200

-11.6%

27.5

90

1.99

Grattan Elementary

SFUSD

1971

55,420

-2.3%

27.5

96

2.19

Dianne Feinstein Elementary

SFUSD

2003

62,087

14.5%

26.4

92

1.36

Marshall Elementary

SFUSD

1977

34,300

16.8%

24.5

87

1.23

Frank McCoppin Elementary

SFUSD

1976

32,700

-16.3%

24.3

77

0.64

Fairmount Elementary

SFUSD

1976

60,960

-2.0%

22.3

96

1.12

Junipero Serra Elementary

SFUSD

1977

34,200

-9.6%

21.7

90

1.16

Yick Wo Elementary (under modernization) (4)

SFUSD

1983

26,000

-30.9%

20.7

N/A

1.30

Gordon J Lau Elementary (16)

SFUSD

1914

63,800

-10.3%

19.2

N/A

1.53

McKinley Elementary

SFUSD

1977

45,160

5.2%

19.1

95

0.84

Guadalupe Elementary (16)

SFUSD

1922

40,777

-28.2%

17.7

N/A

0.02

1956

5,000

2.45

Garfield Elementary

1925

Annual Site MMBtu

(Read more about SFUSD's sustainability and ecoliteracy efforts, including more details about energy use at public schools, at greenthenextgen.org.)

21

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Libraries

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

69.9

Library - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

2.2%

69.9

0

50

100

150

200

0

SFPL

2000

4,794

-8.1%

157.5

N/A

4.12

Chinatown Him Mark Lai Branch Library

SFPL

1921

1996

17,858

35.4%

111.8

N/A

6.26

Western Addition Branch Library

SFPL

1966

2008

8,000

-1.0%

89.2

N/A

6.66

West Portal Branch Library

SFPL

1939

2007

8,010

20.3%

77.0

N/A

5.17

Richmond/Milton Marks Branch Library

SFPL

1914

2009

13,900

-3.8%

74.6

N/A

2.72

Main Library

SFPL

1996

376,000

0.7%

73.6

N/A

3.38

Marina Branch Library

SFPL

1954

2007

7,633

-14.3%

64.7

N/A

3.16

Presidio Branch Library

SFPL

1921

2011

10,205

-8.0%

64.6

N/A

4.95

Bayview/Anna E. Waden Branch Library (4)

SFPL

2012

64.4

N/A

4.76

Park Branch Library

SFPL

1909

2011

8,060

-14.4%

62.7

N/A

4.42

Potrero Branch Library

SFPL

1951

2010

5,428

-4.6%

62.3

N/A

2.66

Ortega Branch Library

SFPL

2011

9,300

21.7%

60.1

N/A

3.36

Noe Valley/Sally Brunn Branch Library

SFPL

1916

6,096

-7.0%

58.7

N/A

3.04

Ingleside Branch Library

SFPL

2009

6,100

-12.4%

58.2

N/A

3.21

Portola Branch Library

SFPL

2009

6,427

-1.2%

58.1

N/A

2.79

Mission Branch Library

SFPL

1916

1999

10,479

14.7%

56.6

N/A

1.57

Sunset Branch Library

SFPL

1918

2007

9,434

0.9%

54.6

N/A

1.57

Anza Branch Library

SFPL

1932

2011

8,222

-15.8%

52.8

N/A

2.65

Bernal Heights Branch Library

SFPL

1940

2010

8,777

-7.4%

52.2

N/A

2.69

Visitacion Valley Branch Library

SFPL

2011

9,945

-3.5%

52.1

N/A

3.06

Merced Branch Library

SFPL

1958

2011

5,832

-2.0%

47.5

N/A

2.09

Parkside Branch Library

SFPL

1951

2010

6,822

4.5%

41.9

N/A

1.97

Excelsior Branch Library

SFPL

1967

2005

8,322

-11.5%

40.6

N/A

2.47

North Beach Branch Library (Old Location)

SFPL

1959

8,455

-14.6%

40.4

N/A

2.78

Glen Park Branch Library

SFPL

2007

7,185

5.3%

39.9

N/A

1.14

Eureka Valley/Harvey Milk Branch Library

SFPL

1961

2009

6,465

-8.3%

35.6

N/A

0.70

Golden Gate Valley Branch Library

SFPL

1917

2011

7,432

-6.8%

33.3

N/A

1.06

2008

N/A

7,500

15,000

22,500

30,000

3.35

Ocean View Branch Library

9,527

Annual Site MMBtu

(Read more about the Branch Library Improvement Program and see Green Branch Report Cards at sfpl.org.)

22

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Health & Human Services

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

116.8

Homeless Service - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

-2.7%

156.1

0

100

200

300

400

0

HSA

1924

25,600

-3.1%

278.0

N/A

26.16

Multi-Service Center North

HSA

1913

37,125

-0.4%

177.3

N/A

16.22

Mission Neighborhood Resource Center

HSA

1922

6,500

3.5%

135.9

N/A

8.52

Hamilton Family Shelter

HSA

1966

50,000

-7.0%

80.6

N/A

0.7%

111.5

16,247

43.5%

169.9

N/A

14.97

8,000

-5.8%

148.9

N/A

12.28

J F M A M J J A S O N D

2009

DPH

1967

DPH

1930

Southeast Health Center

DPH

1979

2012

14,604

0.6%

140.4

N/A

9.46

Castro Mission Health Center (Health Center #1)

DPH

1965

2008

15,258

-8.0%

112.2

N/A

8.37

Silver Avenue Health Center (Health Center #3)

DPH

1967

2005

22,950

-3.8%

96.4

N/A

7.26

Chinatown Public Health Center (Health Center #4)

DPH

1967

2010

22,500

-4.2%

94.5

N/A

6.26

Maxine Hall Health Center (Health Center #2)

DPH

1966

2006

20,590

-3.4%

93.5

N/A

8.00

Curry Senior Service Center

DPH

1930

2006

11,195

-5.6%

88.7

N/A

7.38

Potrero Hill Health Center

DPH

1976

2012

8,000

-27.0%

69.7

N/A

3.2%

32.9

4.47 1.37

5,500

93.5%

63.1

55

4.68

14,700

-0.1%

48.9

62

2.57

1998

13,000

11.1%

47.9

53

1.31

1939

1998

3,000

9.1%

32.1

N.Q.

2.25

DPH

1950

1985

9,250

-12.9%

30.0

81

0.97

Mission Mental Health Services

DPH

1943

2002

32,000

-9.4%

23.0

93

0.77

Redwood Center (7)

DPH

1939

11,000

-19.4%

10.6

N.Q.

-21.6%

234.2

-21.6%

234.2

Sunset Mental Health Services (4)

DPH

1949

S Van Ness Mental Health / Mission Family Center

DPH

1958

South of Market Mental Health Services

DPH

1956

SE Child/Family Therapy Center (6)

DPH

Chinatown Child Development Center

1972

Veterinarian - San Francisco Average Animal Shelter

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ACC

1931

1989

29,500

Hospitals

322.5

Hospital - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

2.0%

7,500

7.20

San Francisco City Clinic

J F M A M J J A S O N D

5,000

8.59

Ocean Park Health Center (Health Center #5)

Mental Health Center - San Francisco Average

2,500

14.15

Multi-Service Center South

Medical Clinic - San Francisco Average

Annual Site MMBtu

0.00 20.82

N/A

0

100

200

300

20.82

0

400

322.5

150,000

300,000

450,000

600,000

27.27

San Francisco General Hospital (4)

DPH

1915

1976

1,370,904

2.1%

376.6

N/A

32.15

Laguna Honda Hospital (8)

DPH

1926

2010

717,126

1.9%

219.1

N.Q.

17.94

23

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Offices

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

65.9 0

General Office - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-5.0%

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

75

150

225

300

0

65.9

2000

2,500

1.4%

149.8

N.Q.

0.00

RED

1959

700,000

-12.6%

126.2

N.Q.

9.08

SFUSD -- Administration - Franklin (10)

SFUSD

1976

78,028

12.6%

125.2

N/A

4.56

Moccasin Administration Building (11)

SFPUC

12,241

18.7%

113.1

66

0.00

17,252

-8.5%

101.7

53

6.29

38

3.61

GGP -- McLaren Lodge and Annex

RPD

1896

Enforcement Division

SFMTA

1920

8,000

4.9%

99.1

SFUSD -- 3045 Santiago Admin Building

SFUSD

1954

15,334

-17.3%

94.2

N/A

9.43

DPH

1932

119,000

-2.6%

90.6

N.Q.

10.40

60,000

-8.7%

85.3

55

5.36

23,400

-7.8%

82.2

N/A

4.13

19,057

-36.1%

75.7

24

3.72

90,619

-6.2%

74.5

48

2.88

2,733

-25.8%

74.1

N.Q.

5.41

30

4.91

DPH Central Office (steam unmetered) (2) CHN Headquarters

1950

DPH

1923

SFUSD

1973

Sheriff Training Facility

SHF

1963

1660 Mission St

RED

1990

GGP -- Park Aid Station / Natural Areas Program (4) (6)

RPD

1902

Women's Resource Center

SHF

1959

5,920

2.8%

69.2

1680 Mission St

DPW

1923

41,200

-2.0%

69.0

30 Van Ness Ave

RED

1965

180,939

17.5%

67.8

SFUSD -- Children's Center Administration Building (10)

SFUSD

1930

20,000

-8.7%

66.6

N/A

6.59

SFUSD -- Student Nutrition Services (10)

SFUSD

1932

9,900

81.0%

66.6

N/A

5.43

Human Services Agency Headquarters

HSA

1979

171,385

-4.6%

64.0

74

2.39

Investigations -- 160 South Van Ness

HSA

1936

2002

14,219

-6.4%

63.7

61

1.44

SFFD - Headquarters

SFFD

1912

1999

50,000

2.8%

61.4

71

2.10

SFUSD

1950

13,900

-1.2%

58.7

N/A

3.51

Social Services -- 1235 Mission

HSA

1935

124,219

-11.2%

56.6

85

1.74

Library Support Services Building

SFPL

1925

43,182

2.9%

55.5

82

3.26

SFPUC -- 525 Golden Gate Ave (4)

SFPUC

2012

277,511

3.6%

53.7

90

1.28

Former Gloria R Davis Middle

SFUSD

1976

60,700

17.1%

52.9

N/A

4.12

25 Van Ness Ave

RED

1913

1985

130,000

-1.0%

51.0

77

0.32

One South Van Ness (OSVN)

RED

1959

1989

655,000

6.0%

46.1

86

1.28

CCSF -- Administrative Offices (10)

CCSF

1949

1971

50,521

-1.1%

45.7

N/A

3.29

City Hall

RED

1915

2000

516,484

-3.8%

44.2

91

1.77

MediCal -- 1440 Harrison

HSA

1921

52,200

-9.2%

43.1

94

1.80

1155 Market St (4)

RED

1983

158,998

-26.6%

42.4

N/A

1.37

SFUSD

1895

12,300

16.8%

40.8

N/A

3.51

Seneca First Stop Visit Cntr/Workforce Development

HSA

1947

8,100

-11.2%

40.6

72

2.02

Airport Reprographics

SFO

1967

6,000

6.1%

39.6

41

0.88

Public Defender's Office

RED

1985

52,000

0.6%

32.3

90

0.35

SFUSD -- Administration - Van Ness (10)

SFUSD

1927

241,956

0.8%

22.7

N/A

1.98

Bayside Office Space and Warehouse

SFPUC

1978

50,593

11.0

N.Q.

0.06

DPH

1928

-87.7%

6.0

N.Q.

2.5%

59.7

2.5%

59.7

SFUSD -- Academics and Professional Development (10)

SFUSD -- School Health Programs (10)

SFUSD -- Irving M Scott Building

35/45 Onondaga Building (4) (12)

1993 2002 2012

2001

1932

8,747

Courthouse - San Francisco Average Community Justice Center

N/A J F M A M J J A S O N D

DPH

1913

18,430

25,000

50,000

75,000

100,000

3.44

SFPUC

Temp Sewer Operations Office (6) Hall of Justice (9)

Annual Site MMBtu

79 63

4.11 1.91

0.39 4.26

67

4.26

24

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Public Safety

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

89.8

Fire Station - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

0

75

150

225

0

300

-2.8%

62.2

Fire Station 35 (Fire Boat House)

SFFD

1908

1994

4,712

-3.3%

198.4

N/A

9.97

Fire Station 34

SFFD

1929

1998

4,400

-1.6%

140.4

N/A

11.76

SFFD

1962

5,900

-4.5%

130.4

N/A

12.12

Fire Station 20

SFFD

1963

1997

10,300

-3.8%

109.9

N/A

10.28

Fire Station 43

SFFD

1970

1995

10,800

31.6%

108.3

N/A

8.81

Fire Station 29

SFFD

1956

1996

8,300

4.5%

104.7

N/A

9.79

Fire Station 31

SFFD

1913

8,500

-2.9%

103.2

N/A

8.40

Fire Fighting Training Center - Treasure Island

SFFD

5,040

-6.0%

101.8

N/A

0.00

Fire Station 16

SFFD

1938

1998

14,000

17.3%

97.3

N/A

9.87

Fire Station 19

SFFD

1951

1998

11,500

36.0%

97.1

N/A

9.35

Fire Station 11

SFFD

1956

1996

14,000

25.1%

93.9

N/A

8.85

Fire Station 05

SFFD

1954

1984

12,600

-3.7%

93.6

N/A

8.59

Fire Station 15

SFFD

1957

1997

12,138

-5.0%

91.9

N/A

6.35

Fire Station 06

SFFD

1948

1998

13,500

-8.1%

90.6

N/A

8.44

Fire Station 21

SFFD

1958

1988

8,000

2.3%

90.5

N/A

8.83

Fire Station 13

SFFD

1974

1999

18,790

12.1%

88.3

N/A

5.79

Fire Station 10

SFFD

1956

14,300

-1.2%

84.3

N/A

8.26

Fire Station 17

SFFD

1955

12,100

-15.9%

81.0

N/A

6.88

Fire Station 38

SFFD

1960

13,400

-2.9%

78.7

N/A

7.29

Fire Station 07 / Division of Training

SFFD

1953

2003

33,600

3.6%

73.5

N/A

6.28

Fire Station 40

SFFD

1931

1995

7,350

1.4%

73.3

N/A

4.51

Fire Station 12

SFFD

1955

11,300

-1.3%

71.8

N/A

6.15

Fire Station 37

SFFD

1915

1990

6,950

-10.5%

68.0

N/A

5.49

Fire Station 39

SFFD

1923

1998

8,450

-10.9%

66.7

N/A

5.65

Fire Station 08

SFFD

1940

1994

8,000

-5.2%

63.1

N/A

3.74

Fire Station 33

SFFD

1973

1998

5,900

18.5%

62.6

N/A

3.77

Fire Station 32

SFFD

1941

1991

10,900

1.6%

62.3

N/A

5.83

Fire Station 41

SFFD

1956

9,600

-6.4%

59.3

N/A

5.37

Fire Station 03

SFFD

1973

8,000

4.6%

53.2

N/A

2.97

Fire Station 24

SFFD

1914

1997

7,600

-11.8%

51.7

N/A

3.63

Fire Station 26

SFFD

1968

1997

15,000

-15.5%

51.2

N/A

4.27

Fire Station 23

SFFD

1959

1996

12,000

-8.5%

50.9

N/A

4.69

Fire Station 44 (4)

SFFD

1915

1998

8,450

-7.0%

50.3

N/A

4.03

Fire Station 25

SFFD

1916

11,420

0.6%

50.3

N/A

3.49

Fire Station 36 (4)

SFFD

1961

1996

16,100

-10.2%

44.7

N/A

3.79

Fire Station 09

SFFD

1972

1995

21,400

-13.4%

42.4

N/A

3.07

Fire Station 02

SFFD

1994

16,920

0.0%

42.0

N/A

2.30

Fire Station 42

SFFD

1979

9,300

4.9%

41.4

N/A

2.74

Fire Station 01 (4) (16)

SFFD

2013

37.4

N/A

0.00

1998

15,136

N/A

1,250

2,500

3,750

5,000

4.86

Fire Station 22

1996

Annual Site MMBtu

25

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 0

Fire Station 14

SFFD

1973

Fire Station 18 (16)

SFFD

1951

Fire Station 48 - Treasure Island

SFFD

Old Fire Station 01 (4)

SFFD

1953

Fire Station 49

SFFD

1958

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

75

150

225

300

15,900

1.9%

35.8

N/A

1.90

15,900

-63.7%

31.1

N/A

1.66

15,000

5.3%

30.4

N/A

1.53

1992

14,100

-69.1%

29.3

N/A

2.46

2002

75,000

-0.7%

12.7

N/A

0.47

1997

0 Police Station - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

3.8%

81.0

75

150

225

300

SFPD

1970

8,000

-3.3%

130.5

N/A

1.90

Ingleside Police Station

SFPD

1910

1990

18,500

11.3%

122.7

N/A

9.62

Park Police Station

SFPD

1910

1993

13,700

23.4%

112.2

N/A

8.79

Bayview Police Station

SFPD

1996

16,000

-21.7%

90.7

N/A

2.40

SFPD Tactical Company

SFPD

1941

52,125

8.4%

79.4

N/A

4.30

Mission Police Station

SFPD

1994

25,000

15.4%

76.8

N/A

3.85

Northern Police Station

SFPD

1988

1987

18,000

-4.8%

74.3

N/A

3.67

Taraval Police Station

SFPD

1929

1994

18,070

-4.8%

71.1

N/A

4.32

Richmond Police Station

SFPD

1910

1993

13,000

2.7%

60.5

N/A

2.87

Tenderloin Police Station

SFPD

2000

27,500

5.6%

44.8

N/A

8.7%

210.1

8.7%

210.1

Emergency Center - San Francisco Average Emergency Operations Center

J F M A M J J A S O N D

DEM

1998

2010

56,000

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-10.2%

1,250

2,500

3,750

5,000

0

3,750

7,500

11,250

15,000

0

15,000

30,000

45,000

60,000

1.86 9.28

N/A 0

Jail / Correctional - San Francisco Average

0

4.31

Central Police Station

2009

Annual Site MMBtu

75

150

225

9.28

300

103.7

7.44

San Francisco County Jail, San Bruno Facility

SHF

1934

2006

348,202

-12.2%

133.6

N/A

10.11

Youth Guidance Center

JUV

1950

2006

210,000

-10.6%

128.0

N/A

11.13

County Jail #1 & #2

SHF

1994

250,000

0.6%

41.4

N/A

0.62

26

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Recreation Facilities

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

88.0

Clubhouse - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-0.3%

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

0

75

150

225

300

0

53.2

South Sunset Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1949

1,500

-7.3%

232.3

N/A

6.86

RPD

2005

20,000

-5.9%

195.4

N/A

13.33

Youngblood Coleman Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1960

2,135

-10.2%

147.8

N/A

1.10

Laurel Hill Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1953

1,134

17.0%

147.1

N/A

15.74

James Rolph Jr Clubhouse

RPD

1921

2,730

-21.4%

120.5

N/A

3.20

Visitacion Valley Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

2003

2,600

89.8%

98.7

N/A

9.35

Merced Heights Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1950

1,136

-19.0%

96.9

N/A

3.66

GGP -- Golf Course Clubhouse

RPD

1951

2,470

-11.6%

92.3

N/A

0.00

Helen Wills Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

2005

3,082

18.8%

91.5

N/A

7.68

Lincoln Park Golf Course

RPD

1936

6,329

2.9%

85.8

N/A

2.16

Jose Coronado Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1995

933

-23.1%

79.4

N/A

0.11

GGP -- Stow Lake Boathouse (4)

RPD

1945

4,647

238.8%

78.4

N/A

5.06

Argonne Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

2006

1,000

-1.8%

75.5

N/A

3.47

Hayes Valley Clubhouse

RPD

2011

2,500

18.1%

71.8

N/A

3.53

Fulton Clubhouse and Playground (4)

RPD

1955

1,420

1348.1%

71.7

N/A

5.08

Silver Terrace Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1953

7,842

0.7%

61.4

N/A

0.71

Mccoppin Square Clubhouse

RPD

1955

2,000

3.4%

54.7

N/A

2.68

Jackson Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1912

8,060

-6.4%

51.4

N/A

3.32

Midtown Terrace Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1961

2,176

-21.8%

50.4

N/A

4.83

Parque Ninos Unidos Clubhouse

RPD

2004

2,414

2.5%

50.1

N/A

4.11

Gilman Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1969

1,578

-16.1%

50.0

N/A

0.00

Margaret S Hayward Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1922

6,717

5.1%

48.0

N/A

0.94

Christopher Clubhouse

RPD

1971

2,337

-20.0%

41.2

N/A

0.00

Wawona Clubhouse (Project Insight)

RPD

1950

1,830

18.7%

39.3

N/A

3.06

Cayuga Clubhouse (4)

RPD

2013

2,500

38.6

N/A

1.67

Peixotto Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1955

2,000

-0.7%

30.0

N/A

2.47

Excelsior Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1928

2,255

48.2%

28.7

N/A

2.09

Sunnyside Conservatory

RPD

1900

1,536

21.6%

27.0

N/A

0.00

Richmond Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1916

1,200

11.4%

26.2

N/A

2.10

Sunnyside Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1969

4,412

55.0%

25.5

N/A

1.59

Cow Hollow Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1950

675

-20.0%

23.4

N/A

1.54

J. P. Murphy Clubhouse

RPD

1950

2008

1,820

-36.1%

23.0

N/A

1.45

Sigmund Stern Grove / Trocadero Clubhouse

RPD

1930

2005

12,832

-3.3%

22.6

N/A

0.00

Rochambeau Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

2004

1,482

-5.3%

22.1

N/A

1.07

Douglas Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1926

1,072

-15.3%

22.1

N/A

0.98

Grattan Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1949

1,854

6.3%

20.6

N/A

1.49

West Portal Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

2004

2,728

-26.3%

20.2

N/A

0.44

Julius Kahn Clubhouse

RPD

1922

1,105

-3.2%

20.1

N/A

1.32

Woh Hei Yuen Clubhouse

RPD

1997

5,000

-49.8%

19.3

N/A

0.42

Miraloma Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1949

1,352

-26.6%

17.4

N/A

1.15

2012

2009

N/A

1,250

2,500

3,750

5,000

2.67

Sandy Tatum Clubhouse

2008

Annual Site MMBtu

27

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 0

75

150

225

300

1,420

222.4%

17.1

N/A

0.40

3,740

-74.6%

14.7

N/A

0.06

1,700

20.4%

14.7

N/A

0.25

1951

2,505

0.4%

11.7

N/A

0.00

RPD

1910

958

109.4%

11.7

N/A

0.77

Willie Woo Woo Wong Clubhouse

RPD

1927

6,000

-7.1%

11.5

N/A

0.00

West Sunset Clubhouse

RPD

1953

13,530

11.6%

9.7

N/A

0.00

Lake Merced Boathouse (4)

RPD

1958

15,200

97.5%

7.9

N/A

0.33

Pine Lake Park Clubhouse

RPD

1950

1,242

2.5%

7.4

N/A

0.00

Crocker Amazon Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1955

24,040

-6.8%

7.1

N/A

-2.0%

51.7

Cabrillo Clubhouse (4)

RPD

1931

Boeddeker Park and Clubhouse (4)

RPD

1989

Junipero Serra Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1955

Alice Chalmers Clubhouse

RPD

Presidio Heights Clubhouse and Playground

2013 2008

2013 1982

Recreation Center - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

RPD

1924

2008

9,650

0.3%

131.5

N/A

7.98

RPD

1951

2004

17,880

7.9%

106.9

N/A

10.55

2007

16,383

-21.1%

91.4

N/A

8.05

18,805

1.9%

77.5

N/A

7.44

19,461

-4.0%

70.2

N/A

5.74

2000

18,470

38.5%

67.2

N/A

4.10

RPD

1949

23,307

-12.4%

59.6

N/A

4.81

GGP -- County Fair Building/Hall Of Flowers

RPD

1961

1969

23,477

-11.8%

58.8

N/A

5.00

Upper Noe Rec Center

RPD

1950

2006

16,447

13.8%

58.5

N/A

3.99

Tenderloin Rec Center

RPD

1995

10,133

11.4%

48.6

N/A

3.29

Sunset Rec Center (4)

RPD

1940

16,424

551.8%

48.0

N/A

2.29

Bernal Heights Rec Center

RPD

1932

5,008

-21.9%

42.0

N/A

3.23

Mission Rec Center / Mission Arts Center

RPD

1984

2012

30,850

-10.9%

40.3

N/A

2.05

Betty Ann Ong Chinese Rec Center (4)

RPD

1951

2012

24,234

6.8%

34.5

N/A

1.87

GGP -- Model Yacht Clubhouse (3)

RPD

1938

3,168

-13.1%

32.4

N/A

3.79

Gene Friend Rec Center @ SOMA

RPD

1989

16,354

-7.7%

19.6

N/A

0.54

GGP -- Kezar Pavilion

RPD

1925

24,254

19.0%

16.8

N/A

0.00

Glen Park Rec Center / Glenridge Nursery School

RPD

1934

22,301

-20.0%

14.0

N/A

0.32

Palega Rec Center (4)

RPD

1928

18,397

-82.3%

7.5

N/A

0.39

RPD

1950

RPD

1950

Minnie & Lovie Ward Rec Center

RPD

2007

Richmond Rec Center

RPD

St. Mary's Rec Center and Playground

2008

2012

2012

0 Swimming Pool - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Rossi Swimming Pool and Playground

RPD

1958

Charlie Sava Swimming Pool / Larsen Park

RPD

1957

Coffman Pool / Herz Clubhouse and Playground

RPD

1957

Garfield Pool and Garfield Square Clubhouse

RPD

1958

North Beach Swimming Pool/Joe DiMaggio Playground

RPD

2004

Martin Luther King Jr Swimming Pool

RPD

2001

Mission Community Pool / Clubhouse (4)

RPD

1916

Hamilton Rec Center and Pool

RPD

1953

Balboa Swimming Pool (16)

RPD

1962

150

300

450

600

-9.8%

240.6

15,162

0.1%

433.3

N/A

45.11

2008

12,900

5.3%

433.1

N/A

39.70

2008

12,289

-17.4%

378.2

N/A

34.53

21,160

6.4%

247.0

N/A

24.58

16,384

0.3%

240.5

N/A

20.02

23,851

8.0%

222.4

N/A

15.11

2012

8,500

832.3%

143.6

N/A

13.19

2010

16,988

-70.4%

122.4

N/A

0.17

19,000

0.6%

32.4

N/A

0.00

2006

1,250

2,500

3,750

5,000

0

2,500

5,000

7,500

10,000

0.41

Moscone Rec Center

Potrero Hill Rec Center

0

3.73

Eureka Valley Rec Center Joseph Lee Rec Center

Annual Site MMBtu

20.13

28

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

0 Other Recreational Buildings - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

GGP -- Murphy Millwright's Cottage

RPD

1904

SF Zoo

RPD

1930

2011

-0.1%

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

150

300

450

600

0

83.3

2,960

18.3%

617.9

N/A

1.31

65,799

-8.2%

356.4

N/A

21.76

5,000

23.5%

280.1

N/A

23.14

2.3%

236.4

N/A

25.86

1900

5,095

-1.2%

125.7

N/A

0.00

SFPD

1935

11,800

-12.3%

72.8

N/A

7.25

GGP -- Dutch Windmill

RPD

1902

2,500

392.2%

54.8

N/A

0.00

SFPD Pistol Range

SFPD

1942

10,000

1.5%

53.9

N/A

0.94

Candlestick Park Stadium

RPD

1960

500,000

7.5%

41.3

N/A

1.30

GGP -- Pioneer Log Cabin

RPD

1911

2,256

-2.3%

36.1

N/A

0.00

1,200

-66.0%

11.5

N/A

0.00

RPD

1924

GGP -- Beach Chalet and Visitor Center

RPD

1925

GGP -- Music Concourse

RPD

SFPD Stables

Camp Ida Smith

SFPUC

1996

1989 1931

5,000

10,000 15,000 20,000 25,000

4.25

18,045

GGP -- Kezar Stadium

Annual Site MMBtu

GGP -- Bercut Equitation Field

RPD

1930

20,632

-2.9%

11.3

N/A

0.00

Fay House

RPD

1912

4,536

-2.5%

1.2

N/A

0.00

29

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Service, Repair, and Storage

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

59.1

Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

-1.3%

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

0

75

150

225

300

0

72.4

-5.9%

223.2

N/A

21.51

1,835

9.3%

216.1

N/A

0.00

9,352

5.4%

166.1

N/A

5.67

83,741

0.2%

160.8

N/A

0.23

180,000

-3.4%

144.1

N/A

4.07

SFPUC

60,045

2.3%

129.8

N/A

6.38

City Distribution Division

SFPUC

67,500

-5.7%

119.6

N/A

7.77

Cameron Beach (Geneva) Yard - LRV and Streetcar

SFMTA

1984

31,514

-3.6%

117.1

N/A

4.43

Woods Division - Motor Coach

SFMTA

1976

161,719

-8.6%

100.3

N/A

5.26

Green Division and Annex - LRV

SFMTA

1977

208,371

-7.4%

66.7

N/A

2.30

Islais Creek - Motor Coach (4)

SFMTA

2013

66.5

N/A

0.00

Potrero Division - Trolley Coach

SFMTA

1914

1990

101,510

-3.7%

63.9

N/A

3.59

Flynn Division - Motor Coach

SFMTA

1941

1989

268,947

2.8%

57.5

N/A

2.88

Old DT Corporation Yard (4)

DT

1950

45,000

-25.5%

54.7

N/A

2.80

GSA

1959

4,360

-4.7%

54.2

N/A

2.64

2,900

8.7%

52.5

N/A

0.00

RPD

1957

SFPUC

Kirkland Division - Motor Coach

SFMTA

1949

Cable Car Barn and Power House

SFMTA

1906

Metro East Facility - LRV

SFMTA

2008

Millbrae Yard

Hall of Justice Gas Station

1984

1983

16,200

N/A

South Forks Maintenance Yard

SFPUC

1399 Marin - Maintenance Facility

SFMTA

1972

25,100

1.3%

51.7

N/A

0.00

Presidio Division - Trolley Coach

SFMTA

1912

158,381

-3.2%

49.2

N/A

3.06

GSA

1959

80,577

-11.7%

48.6

N/A

3.41

12,095

69.4%

44.6

N/A

2.85

Central Shops Sunol Yard

SFPUC

DPW -- Corporation Yard

DPW

1949

102,764

1.6%

40.8

N/A

2.12

GGP -- San Francisco Botanical Garden (3)

RPD

1955

29,763

106.1%

35.6

N/A

4.15

Scott Division

SFMTA

1990

116,144

9.1%

16.7

N/A

0.42

Bayshore Yard and Shop (4)

SFMTA

8.9

N/A

255,420

Other Shops - San Francisco Average

N/A J F M A M J J A S O N D

27.1

-7.3%

65.3

N/A

4.20

55.8

N/A

0.54

SFFD

1918

7,000

ReproMail

RED

1935

10,469

SFUSD -- Buildings and Grounds

SFUSD

1968

40,000

-1.5%

50.5

N/A

3.40

700 Pennsylvania - Maintenance of Way

SFMTA

1947

99,383

6.8%

35.5

N/A

1.48

Sustainable Streets Division

SFMTA

1999

90,000

16.8%

17.1

N/A

0.64

1401 Bryant - Overhead Lines

SFMTA

1897

46,000

1.0%

13.6

N/A

0.09

Paint Shop and Vehicle Parking

SFMTA

1958

35,021

42.7%

4.2

N/A

-14.7%

15.4

1979

Warehouses - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

30,000

0.00 0.27

SFUSD -- Warehouse/Transportation (10)

SFUSD

1946

132,000

-21.2%

22.4

N/A

0.65

651 Bryant - Power Utility Services

SFPUC

1954

14,000

-35.3%

19.6

83

0.74

Streetlight Warehouse (12)

SFPUC

1988

6,400

-1.3%

14.4

N.Q.

0.00

RED

1956

90,000

-1.0%

13.3

N.Q.

0.00

Burke Avenue Facility - Central Warehouse

SFMTA

1969

103,231

-4.0%

12.5

42

0.09

Fine Arts Warehouse

FAMSF

1983

27,440

-11.1%

6.2

73

0.00

Oakdale Office/Warehouse (12)

SFPUC

7,800

-10.1%

5.8

N.Q.

0.08

SFPD Storage Facility (12)

SFPD

11,000

25.5%

1.3

N.Q.

0.00

Brooks Hall (12)

22,500

1.16

SFFD - Bureau of Equipment

2000

15,000

0.25

12.8% N/A

7,500

3.22

43,947

GGP -- Maintenance Yard and Nursery H. Hetchy-Warnerville Substation/Switchyard

Annual Site MMBtu

30

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Parking Garages

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

8.1

Parking Garage - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

3.2%

8.1

0

25

50

75

100

RPD

1958

355,674

4.0%

13.0

N/A

0.00

Union Square Garage

RPD

1941

423,780

-0.1%

11.9

N/A

0.00

Portsmouth Square Garage

RPD

1962

225,480

0.5%

9.6

N/A

0.00

Vallejo Street Garage

SFMTA

1969

62,760

-2.7%

9.6

N/A

0.00

Sixteenth & Hoff Garage

SFMTA

1996

17,284

4.2%

9.2

N/A

0.00

Music Concourse Garage

SFMTA

2005

300,000

-12.4%

8.4

N/A

0.00

Golden Gateway Garage

SFMTA

1965

226,800

0.6%

8.3

N/A

0.00

SF General Hospital Garage

SFMTA

1996

300,000

2.6%

8.1

N/A

0.00

Polk Bush Garage

SFMTA

1993

70,160

11.3%

7.8

N/A

0.00

Sutter Stockton Garage

SFMTA

1959

717,970

2.9%

7.6

N/A

0.00

Fifth & Mission Garage

SFMTA

1957

992,600

4.2%

7.3

N/A

0.00

Moscone Center Garage

SFMTA

1984

255,444

29.6%

7.2

N/A

0.00

RPD

1952

245,445

12.5%

7.0

N/A

0.00

Ellis O'Farrell Garage

SFMTA

1964

304,520

10.3%

7.0

N/A

0.00

Mission Bartlett Garage

SFMTA

1983

113,759

-1.2%

6.6

N/A

0.00

Performing Arts Garage

SFMTA

1983

209,896

6.3%

6.3

N/A

0.00

Japan Center Garage - Fillmore Street Annex

SFMTA

1965

59,308

-4.2%

6.2

N/A

0.00

North Beach Garage

SFMTA

2002

82,405

2.7%

5.5

N/A

0.00

SFUSD -- 1340 Bush Garage

SFUSD

1969

13,316

3.8%

5.1

N/A

0.00

Lombard Street Garage

SFMTA

1988

71,263

14.9%

5.0

N/A

0.00

Japan Center Main Garage

SFMTA

1965

237,566

1.9%

4.9

N/A

0.00

-1.1%

57.8

31,000

0.2%

77.3

N/A

0.00

26,000

-4.8%

69.8

N/A

0.00

Transportation

0

Transit Station - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

25

50

75

100

Castro Station

SFMTA

1972

Forest Hill Station

SFMTA

1918

Embarcadero Station (14)

SFMTA

1972

56,000

5.7%

66.3

N/A

0.00

Church Station

SFMTA

1972

39,000

-2.1%

56.1

N/A

0.00

Powell Station (14)

SFMTA

1972

59,000

-3.5%

53.6

N/A

0.00

Civic Center Station (14)

SFMTA

1972

53,000

-2.7%

52.1

N/A

0.00

Van Ness Station

SFMTA

1972

42,000

-1.5%

51.1

N/A

0.00

Montgomery Station (14)

SFMTA

1972

57,000

-2.9%

49.2

N/A

0.00

N/A

2.93

1986

Airport - San Francisco Average San Francisco International Airport (18)

J F M A M J J A S O N D

SFO

1954

15,579,508

97.4 1.3%

97.4

0

2,500

5,000

7,500

10,000

0

2,500

5,000

7,500

10,000

0

375,000

750,000

0.00

Civic Center Garage

St Mary's Square Parking Garage

Annual Site MMBtu

1,125,000 1,500,000

31

Calendar Year 2013 Facility

Dpt.

Year Built

Building Year Renov. Area (sq. ft.)

Monthly Site Energy Use Intensity (EUI)

EUI Change Since 2012

Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.)

Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data

0

Buildings with Incomplete Meter Data - San Francisco Average

J F M A M J J A S O N D

ENERGY Carbon STAR Footprint (lbs CO2 / sq.ft.)

-3.5%

50.2

50

100

150

200

SFPD Building 606 Crime Lab (15)

SFPD

1986

56,325

0.6%

129.5

N/A

?

Mental Health Services -- 1380 Howard (16)

DPH

1927

84,000

-2.0%

93.7

N/A

?

Mission Bay Branch Library (16)

SFPL

2006

7,500

-2.9%

53.8

N/A

?

Fire Station 28 (17)

SFFD

1967

9,350

2.5%

46.3

N/A

5.42

Western Addition Community Technology Center (16)

RPD

1991

4,500

2.5%

44.2

N/A

?

DA

1906

17,625

-1.9%

36.1

N/A

?

1650 Mission St (16)

RED

1983

216,712

13.0%

31.6

N/A

?

Ella Hill Hutch Community Center (16)

MOH

1980

22,300

-1.2%

31.1

N/A

?

Chinatown/North Beach Mental Health Services (16)

DPH

1953

11,067

-3.5%

30.0

N/A

?

Visitacion Valley CDC (16)

RPD

1998

1,753

-7.5%

29.7

N/A

?

Palace of Fine Arts (4) (16)

RPD

1915

2003

140,000

-29.7%

28.5

N/A

?

Workforce Development Service Center (16)

HSA

1947

2010

2,465

-6.2%

24.6

N/A

?

District Attorney's Office (16)

1997

1988

Buildings of Unknown Size Camp

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Camp Mather

RPD

Log Cabin Ranch Youth Guidance

JUV

1953

1966

Annual Site MMBtu

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

0

3,000

6,000

9,000

12,000

-7.5%

0

-15.5%

N/A

N/A

0.00

80,758

0.5%

N/A

N/A

0.00

Water and Wastewater Treatment Buildings

0

50,000

100,000

150,000

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Wastewater Treatment North Point Wet Weather Facility (10)

SFPUC

1951

89,600

27.1%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant (10)

SFPUC

1993

0

4.2%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Southeast Water Pollution Control Plant (10)

SFPUC

1951

524,593

-4.1%

N/A

N/A

N/A

1982

J F M A M J J A S O N D

Water Treatment Harry Tracy Water Filtration

SFPUC

38,870

-9.8%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Pulgas Dechloramination Facility

SFPUC

8,000

1.5%

N/A

N/A

N/A

Rock River Lime Facility

SFPUC

2,040

2.7%

N/A

N/A

N/A

San Antonio Pump Station / Sunol WTP (4)

SFPUC

51,202

88.3%

N/A

N/A

N/A

32

Putting the Results in Context The data in this report provides a snapshot of energy performance in San Francisco’s municipal buildings during calendar year 2013. The report is intended primarily to help inform building owners and other decision makers about where to target public resources. It also provides information to energy efficiency researchers and the general public. As described below, energy benchmarking should be seen as part of a wider array of energy efficiency strategies to reduce the City’s energy use and improve the operations and comfort of its public facilities. Limitations of report data: To make the most out of this report, City departments should look in more detail at facilities that appear as outliers in the data or the have unexpected results. For instance, a poorly functioning HVAC system can result in large amounts of wasted energy and cause an unexpectedly poor rating. On the other hand, a facility with a history of comfort problems may appear on paper as an energy efficient building because the HVAC systems are not functioning. Additionally, while the SFPUC made every effort to accurately match meters to facilities and also to indicate where a facility was vacant for a significant period of time, readers should be aware that incomplete meter matchups or changes in occupancy may skew the results for a particular facility. As described elsewhere in this report, some types of facilities (e.g. park and recreational buildings) may be particularly susceptible to such meter and occupancy uncertainties. Report improvements in future years: This is the third year that this Energy Benchmarking Report has been issued for San Francisco’s municipal buildings. The content of each year’s report has been improved by the suggestions and contributions of a variety of people and departments. Still, there is room for further improvement. For the small number of buildings with incomplete meter information, the SFPUC will continue to encourage City departments to fill these gaps. The SFPUC will also continue to work with departments to improve the accuracy of meter matchups, as described above. As the EPA’s ENERGY

STAR program and other national energy databases evolve, the City will seek opportunities to obtain ENERGY STAR ratings or other meaningful climate-adjusted national comparisons for additional building types such as libraries, fire stations, and museums. The role of benchmarking: Benchmarking the energy use of a portfolio of buildings can help identify which buildings are outliers among their peers, and can be useful for tracking changes in energy use from year to year. Once outliers are identified, on-site energy audits can be performed to identify cost-effective retrofit opportunities in a particular building. This Energy Benchmarking Report is one tool used by the SFPUC to target facilities for energy efficiency improvements. The SFPUC also offers a green building commissioning program to City departments, which can assist with new building projects and major renovations. In addition, retro-commissioning of existing buildings can identify equipment deficiencies and recommend operations and maintenance improvements to save energy and improve building performance. The role of building occupants in using energy wisely is also crucial, and the SFPUC is interested to work with City departments to share the results of this report with employees and other building users to help reinforce positive changes in occupant behavior. Readers are encouraged to suggest improvements to the format of the report for future years. The findings of this report suggest that San Francisco’s public buildings performed well in 2013, contributing toward the City’s goals of reducing energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. The SFPUC hopes that City departments and others will find this data useful in better understanding the energy use of municipal facilities, and that this knowledge will encourage further actions to improve that performance.

33

APPENDIX A:

(11) The ENERGY STAR rating of the Moccasin Administration

Key to Benchmarking Notes (1) (2)

(3) (4) (5)

(6) (7) (8)

(9) (10)

Adjacent facilities combined for benchmarking, due to shared mechanical systems. Bill Graham Civic Auditorium and DPH Central Office receive steam from the Civic Center steam loop that is unmetered at individual facility level. For purposes of this report, the metered use at the steam loop is apportioned based on each building’s square footage, but may be over reported here due to leaks and other losses in the steam loop itself. A steam meter was installed at City Hall at the beginning of 2012. Facilities in Golden Gate Park, in cases where electrical meters specific to the facility cannot be located. This location was under construction or vacant for an extended period of time during a portion of calendar years 2012 or 2013. The metering arrangement at the SECF needs further investigation. Electricity and natural gas use data for the nursery and greenhouses may be incomplete. Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to small size. Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating for dormitories, due to inadequate number of rooms. Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating for hospitals. As a longterm care facility, Laguna Honda Hospital is not eligible for the hospital category. The square footage listed includes the new hospital buildings as of 2010 plus the square footage of old wings A, B, C, and H. The total excludes 120,000 square feet under remodel in buildings K, L, M, and O, which will be reoccupied in future years. Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to more than 10% of the mixed-use facility being classified as “Other” space type. Facility operations data required for ENERGY STAR rating is unavailable at time of report publication.

(12) (13)

(14) (15) (16) (17)

(18)

Building assumes on-site energy generation. Located at the site of the SFPUC’s Moccasin Powerhouse in Moccasin, California, the all-electric facility obtains its energy from hydropower resources in the immediate vicinity. Therefore, the conversion and transmission losses of a typical building are not applicable. Not qualified for ENERGY STAR rating, due to lack of full-time occupants. High schools that appear to be eligible for the ENERGY STAR rating are indicated with green dots, and ENERGY STAR quartile results for high schools are included in the overall totals shown on page 14 of this report. However, the 1-100 scores for individual high schools are not listed due to unexpectedly positive scores. More detailed site surveys, as well as a more detailed assessment of the ENERGY STAR ratings for high schools in San Francisco’s climate may be warranted. The square footage and energy use listed for these shared stations represents the Muni portion only, excluding BART. Annual propane use at this site unknown. Irregular natural gas use. Some or all natural gas use data is unknown, missing, or gas meter readings may be inaccurate. Irregular electricity use. Some or all electricity use data is unknown, missing, or electrical meter readings may be inaccurate. A significant portion of the Airport is in operation 24 hours per day. For EUI comparisons among facility types based on average hours of operation, see Appendix B.

34

APPENDIX B: EUI Normalized by Hours of Operation

Facility Type (in order as listed on pages 17-32)

Convention Center Performance Hall Art/Cultural Center Museum Childcare / Teen Center College / Adult Education High School *** Elementary / Middle School *** Library Homeless Service Medical Clinic Mental Health Center Veterinarian Hospital General Office Courthouse Fire Station Police Station Emergency Center Jail / Correctional Clubhouse Recreation Center Swimming Pool Other Recreational Buildings Corporation Yard / Vehicle Repair Other Shops Warehouses Parking Garage Transit Station Airport

2013 Annual Site EUI (kBtu/sq.ft.) 64.27 64.88 38.26 180.99 33.97 92.76 39.96 39.78 69.88 156.10 111.46 32.95 234.22 322.54 65.94 59.69 62.19 80.99 210.06 103.66 53.17 51.70 240.65 83.27 72.42 27.13 15.42 8.12 57.82 97.39

Assumed # of Weekly Operating Hours * 112 75 57 55 ? ** 50 50 50 47 143 53 51 168 168 56 50 166 168 168 149 ? ** 62 65 ? ** 82 ? ** 43 132 148 157

Assumed # of Annual Operating Hours 5824 3900 2964 2860 ? 2600 1950 1950 2444 7436 2756 2652 8736 8736 2912 2600 8632 8736 8736 7748 ? 3224 3380 ? 4264 ? 2236 6864 7696 8164

Annual EUI Normalized to 40 hours per week (kBtu/sq.ft.) 22.95 34.60 26.85 131.63 ? 74.21 42.63 42.43 59.47 43.66 84.12 25.84 55.77 76.79 47.10 47.75 14.99 19.28 50.01 27.83 ? 33.36 148.09 ? 35.33 ? 14.34 2.46 15.63 24.81

* Based on average weekly operating hours reported in departmental survey for each facility type ** Typical operating hours not obtained in departmental survey *** K-12 schools annual total assumes nine months of operation per year

35

Photos: San Francisco Animal Shelter (Owner: Animal Care and Control) Originally built 1931, Remodeled 1989. Due to its constant operation and mix of uses (including kennels, medical facilities, administrative offices, adoption areas, warehouse, and garage), the Animal Shelter has a high energy intensity and was a good candidate for energy efficiency savings. In summer 2013, Animal Care and Control and the SFPUC completed a retrofit of the building’s HVAC systems. The project replaced the building’s existing space heating and domestic hot water boilers, air handling units, and energy management system. Pictured to the right is one of the existing space heating boilers, which was beyond its expected useful life, along with the replacement 88% efficient boiler. With the completion of these improvements, the Animal Shelter used 22% less energy in calendar year 2013 than the previous year, due to decreases in both natural gas and electricity use. The project’s estimated GHG reductions are equivalent to eliminating the GHG emissions from 49 average San Francisco homes. 36

For more information about the clean energy programs of the San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, please visit our website: www.sfwater.org