National Gaps & Concerns - ReliefWeb

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

National Gaps & Concerns

Gaps

Funding



2017 total required: $ 17 M









A detailed gap analysis was carried out in June 2017 by the WASH cluster A total of 44,003 people are in sites with no WASH response/actor or are new displaced persons. Out of these, 7,047 are new displaced. There are 39 camps with no WASH response; 18 new displacement camps; 137 camps with a WASH actor/response that cannot fulfill the full minimum WASH package and 24 targeted villages with no WASH actor in Rakhine. A prioritization list was done based on a public health scoring and types of gaps. This informs cluster response, fundraising and funding allocation. More details on priority sites and townships can be found on our gap analysis.

Gap to date: $ 8.2 M A mid-year review is ongoing and an estimated additional $3.8 M is required to accommodate for needs of new IDPs displaced, cyclone Mora damage and revised WASH cost figures per beneficiary. $ 8,709,397

$ 8,250,603

Funding received 2017

Gap

Below is a breakdown of funding received by INGOs, LNGOs and UN.

Concerns 

People in need / targeted 

356,014 / 356,014 Hygiene

180,530

Sanitation

244,850

Water

175,484 111,164

321,478 -

34,536

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 Coverage

Gap

An additional 7,047 number of people are identified as in need due to new displacements

 

79%

9%

12%

In Central Rakhine, CMC misconduct and blockage of WASH service delivery in camps is a major concern for WASH including protection. 0% 50% 100% In northern Rakhine, fences were removed around INGO LNGO UN water ponds and compounds. The WASH cluster recommends fences to be put back to avoid livestock  New call for proposals and grants were signed in Q2 with HARP, MHF, SDC, ECHO, contamination of water ponds and to enable women BMZ, German Aid, OFDA and UNICEF. to use latrines. The WASH cluster also recommends  Cyclone Mora damage cost in central that WASH minimum standards are ensured for Rakhine amounted to 471,232 USD. model villages before people are relocated. Humanitarian access in all 3 cluster-activated states  The WASH Cluster fundraised for cyclone mora damage response in Rakhine and remain extremely limited, especially in NGCA and nRS managed to cover all damage costs through The lack of sector coordination and the new the support of existing donors and MHF. government coordination structure without WASH poses a challenge to bridge humanitarian and development efforts.

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017

National Strategic Progress

Localizing the response

Financing: Investing in humanity





New cluster services:  

 

 

Website: organize and make cluster standards and tools easily available Skype group: activated with 43 active members coordinating in real-time. Good example of coordination during cyclone Mora allowing the cluster to produce a damage assessment form with inputs in 2 hours and share with partners before travel to the field! Calendar of meetings and events: on the website Work plans and Action points from minutes consistently updated and shared publicly for accountability Activated TWGs: Preparedness, M&E, Social Behavioral Change in Rakhine Updated tech briefs/standards: hygiene kit, labor rates, MHM in progress, Protection priorities, latrine design, damage assessment

WASH Cluster Partners ADRA, HPA, KMSS, Metta, KBC, SI, WPN, Shalom (Nyein), ACF, ACTED, Arche Nova ,BAJ, CARE, CDN, CESVI, DRC, ICRC, IFRC, IOM, IRC, LWF, SP, Water Aid, WHH, Malteser, MAUK, MHDO, MedAir, MRCS, MSF, Oxfam, PLAN, SCI, Trocaire, RI, UNICEF + Donors

 

The WASH Cluster has delivered a WASH in Emergency ToT to 30 state level government staff from DRD, DoPH, RRD and LNGO/CSO counterparts from Rakhine, Kachin, Shan and Mandalay. Action Plans were developed for trainers who will train 2025 township and district level counterparts in August in their respective states with support from the cluster. Water Safety Plan training for the northern Shan Cluster delivered by the cluster team. IM training for state local partners

Leaving noone behind 











A practical Gender Mainsrteaming workshop for the Bhamo cluster delivered including field visits and an immediate and long term action plan MHM W.G.: In addition to DRC as voted protection focal point, 3 other partners (Oxfam, IFRC, SP) have volunteered to be focal points nationally to move the MHM agenda forward with the GBV working group. Separate Protection and IASC GBV Guidelines roll out trainings were delivered in Kachin, Rakhine and nationally with the protection cluster. Prioritized 8 protection mainstreaming issues to be tackled through better analysis and standards. Voting at state level followed with 4 final topics selected. Guidelines to address WASH needs of persons with disabilities and MHM guidance update are identified priorities which partners started working on. Inter-cluster coordination with the health cluster strenghtned with consistent epi week data shared





 

Scaling up of cash transfers for WASH response in first phase and protracted situations is a highlight in both Kachin and Rakhine. Examples are the Tanai emergency response included multi-sector cash grants by SI. In protracted sites, cash grants are given to committees for O&M in Kachin and vouchers for hygiene in Rakhine by Oxfam. An update of WASH Cluster Preparedness was carried out in Q2 including updates of contact list, mapping, contingency stocks, and compilation of preparedness forms all on the website. New preparedness efforts for Mandalay earthquake scenario with a WASH capacity assessment was conducted in Q2. The Preparedness TWG nationally was reactivated again with Unicef taking the lead A cyclone damage assessment form was developed and translated (tested/used during cyclone Mora)

Upcoming for Q3 

Kachin Mid-Year Review workshop with government to agree on a service/entry point by the government  Kachin Hygiene promotion strategy workshop  WiE follow on trainings after the ToT for district/township gov’t & LNGOs in 4 states  Hosting 4 CDC experts in Rakhine to carry out a ceramic filter post-distribution monitoring & water quality test training Cluster website: https://sites.google.com/view/washclustermyanmar

Factsheet #2: Myanmar WASH Cluster 2nd Qtr 2017 RESPONSE ANALYSIS

KACHIN













People in need / targeted

86,900 / 86,900 Hygiene

40,531

Sanitation

46,369

60,389

Water

26,511

71,544 -

15,356

40,000 Coverage

80,000 Gap

Approximately 82 water points are required to cover water needs in sites with an assigned WASH agency. 35% of those are in NGCA camps. This is the second quarter that the WASH Cluster collects water quality test results. For Q2, we’ve seen an increase in sites with reported water quality results from 11% to 69%. Out of those, 28% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Samples came from household and water source. There remais approximately 1,392 latrines to be constructred in targeted active camps. 69% of these are in NGCA. Out of the total target of 4,567 latrines, 6% have been handed over. Desludging of latrines and major repair needs are high even though it’s not reflected due to weak field-level monitoring systems. KBC, KDG and SI (NGCA), and KMSS, Shalom and SI through TDA (Gov’t) do most of the desluding services. The current number of hygiene promoters employed are insuficcient for appropriate community mobilization and behavior change. This is a key gap as we look at durable solutions in Kachin Approximately 4,928 households did not receive soap. About 11,310 households did not receive sanitary pads which is better than in Q1 (11,992 HHs) but a significant gap. This requires special attention and will be addressed by the new MHM working group and GBV colleagues

WASH PARTNERS

Funding

$ 3.9 M Total funding required

Kachin

2,089,152

-

1,810,848

2,000,000

4,000,000

Cummulative Funding received for 2017

Gap

GAPS / CHALLENGES  

  

 



New displacements in Q2 amounted to 6,596 new IDPs Lack of soap and sanitary pads is of high concern for the Kachin WASH response, especially pads Sumprabum is the townshop with the biggest gap in water and sanitation NGCA access continues very limited Tanai township in GCA is hosting 1,100 IDPs in 5 camps with no humanitarian access Large funding gap in Kachin affecting 3 main partners SI through the RRM is carrying out an assessment to respond in 5 IDP camps in Mai Ja Yung (NGCA) together with WPN HPA is implementing hygiene promotion with the local health department (KIO)

KMSS, Metta, KBC, SI, WPN, Shalom (Nyein), UNICEF,

Contact Us

Oxfam, Plan, Trocaire

Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): [email protected] Mee Mee Thaw (IM): [email protected] Aye Win (RWCC): [email protected] Noah (SWCC): [email protected]

KACHIN STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017) % of WASH coverage against HRP 2017 Targets in Kachin, 1st Qtr 2017 92%

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017 100%

* With Kachin WASH Cluster support, HPA organize to WASH actors in NGCA to prepare for AWD preparedness and response in 4 locations of NGCA where Liaza, Shait Yung, Hkau Shau and Mai Ja Yung. * SI prepare to response WASH in emergency activities in Tanai for 4 locations for newly arrival of IDPs from around Tanai Town surrounding villages * KMSS, Metta, SI and WFP conducted emergency rapid assessment in Tanai. * Kachin WASH activities meeting was conducted in 30th June 2017 at Myitkyina and discussed on overlapping WASH activities, WiE activities for newly arrival of IDPs, and WASH focal agency per camp *Government counterparts and LNGO attended WASH in Emergency Training (ToT) in Mandalary in May 2017

WASH focal agencies Metta, SI

Chipwi

KBC, KMSS, Shalom

Hpakant

70%

62% 51%

50%

9% 0% Camp

Effective drainage in active camps 2% 38%

Township Bhamo

81%

6%

% Water Coverage

Functional Non_Functional

54%

* Water coverage considers improved sources only. Water quality result data is not yet considered. * Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only. * Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population .

Not_inPlace

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Kachin, 1st Qtr 2017

NA

Effective solid waste management system in active camps 5% Functional 5% 5%

KBC, KMSS, Shalom

Camp_not registered

10

Gap

24 118 0

20

40

Not_inPlace NA

Gap in active camps / township

More info on gaps (click here)

1

Camp

Non_Functional

85%

Camp_not registered % Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

% Latrine Coverage

People targetted

60 80 Nb. of IDPs Sites

100

120

% Water Gap

Covered

140

% Sanitation Gap

% Hygiene Gap

Mansi

KBC, KMSS, Metta, SCI, WPN

Mogaung

KBC, KMSS

Bhamo

7,252 Metta, SI

2%

20%

82%

Mohnyin Momauk

KBC, KMSS KMSS, Metta, SI, KBC, WPN

Chipwi

2,683 KBC, KMSS, Shalom

60%

30%

44%

3%

21%

79%

Myitkyina

KBC, KMSS, Shalom

29%

44%

44%

Puta-O

KBC

0%

8%

0%

Shwegu

Metta

0%

0%

0%

Sumprabum

KBC

20%

35%

58%

Waingmaw

KBC, KMSS, Metta, Shalom

7,352 KBC, KMSS, Shalom

0%

23%

8%

1,072 KBC

0%

7%

0%

Hpakant

Mogaung

MoFA Lux LDS Samaritans' Purse German Gov/Welthungerhilfe DFATD- IHA Ireland Trocaire USAID WHH-BMZ GFFO UNICEF Oxfam Emergency Fund

Disclaimer: >> Data from hard to reach area is still challenging >>One new camp " Sha-It Yang" (HH:402 , Pop: 1,813 )in Waingmaw township is added. No WASH cover in that camp. >> SI WASH emergency intervention in Sa Daung and Maing Khaung KBC 2 camps is finished in Q1 2017. It is not included in Q2 2017 4W. >>WASH Cluster partners Metta (Bhamo) , SI (Bhamo), KBC (Bhamo & Myitkyina), Shalom and KMSS (Bhamo, Myitkyina) reported for the 4W Q2 2017.

Water Point Coverage in active camps

Puta-O Kachin

120

-

Shwegu

1,810,848

2,000,000

No

Waingmaw

100,000

200,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

700,000

2,500 Pass

Coverage

1,500

Gap

1,000

29

60

95 48

20

2,421

2,146

954 438

500

112

50

# water points in GCA (500:1)

# water pointsin NGCA (500:1)

“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual precision”

# latrines (target)

# latrines (gap)

# need urgent desludging

# in GCA (20:1)

# in NGCA (20:1)

KBC, KMSS, Metta, Shalom

86,459 (in active camps)

Grand Total

0%

0%

0%

100%

100%

0%

16%

26%

61%

17%

30%

53%

Hygiene Promoter & Kit Coverage in active camps

146

101

221

75

-

0

23,883

Latrine Coverage in active camps

2,000

80

432 KBC

Gap

3,000

Fail

515 Metta

4,000,000


28%

31%

53

100

40

2,089,152

Sumprabum

OFDA MHF HIDA ECHO

140

89 KBC, KMSS KMSS, Metta, SI, KBC, 26,522 WPN

Myitkyina

E.Coli presence/absence 41%

Mohnyin Momauk

0

160

3,428 KBC, KMSS, Shalom KBC, KMSS, Metta, SCI, 12,899 WPN 332 KBC, KMSS

Mansi

Kachin/Shan- Total 2017 Funding in USD as of Q2

Partners

# need repairs/maintenance

# handed over

18,000 16,000 14,000 12,000 10,000 8,000 6,000 4,000 2,000 -

7,369

4,928

7,472

11,310

9,134

11,574

9,031

5,193 # HHs covered by hygiene promoters (100 HHs : 1 promoter)

# HHs with access to hand washing station

Coverage

# HHs with access to soap

Gap

# HHs with access to sanitary pad


RAKHINE









People in need / targeted 

258,376 / 258,376 Hygiene

132,148

Sanitation

177,948

Water

126,228 80,428

242,574 -

15,802

100,000

200,000

Coverage

Gap

300,000

The Rakhine WASH Cluster is reviewing the target of water points to number of people served based on an average flowrate. Approximately 206 water points are required if assuming 500:1 ratio to cover water needs. 93% of those are in villages. In reality this need is likely higher due to low flowrates at water points. For Q2, we’ve seen a decrease in number of sites with reported water quality results. Out of 90% of sites with reported results, 63% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Those samples came from household and water source. The water treatment strategy will be revised in Q3 following the CDC mission hosted by the Rakhine WASH Cluster which will do a post-distribution review of ceramic filters and train cluster partners on WQ testing There remais approximately 20,598 latrines to be constructred in targeted camps and villages. A new cyclone proof latrine design standard has been endorsed. About 4,834 households do not have an assigned hygiene promoter. This is fundamental to ensure appropriate hygiene practice and handover of WASH facilities and O&M. A new hygiene kit strategy has been developed and endorsed by the Rakhine WASH Cluster. The strategy targets households based on income and access to markets. Approximately 1,296 households did not receive soap and 1,456 did not receive sanitary pads.

WASH PARTNERS ACF, CDN, DRC, SCI, RI, SI, Oxfam, CARE, Malteser, MHDO, MAUK, MedAir, Arche Nova, UNICEF

Funding


Rakhine

6,316,086

-

6,183,914

6,000,000 12,000,000 18,000,000


Gap

GAPS / CHALLENGES 







Nidin camp in Kyaw Taw has a large sanitation gap due to lack of space and authorization to construct latrines. MAUK is upgrading the existing latrines and desludging. SDC-Unicef-ACF conducted a WASH assessment in northern Rakhine State and presented results to the cluster. It did not target current HRP WASH sites. Medair carried out a WASH assessment in HRP gap sites in northern Rakhine at the end of Q2. CMCs continue to block WASH service delivery in camps requiring consistent WASH Cluster support & liaison with the government.

Contact Us Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): [email protected] Mee Mee Thaw (IM): [email protected] Mandie Alexander (interim RWCC): [email protected]

RAKHINE STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017) % WASH Coverage against HRP 2017 Targets in Rakhine 93%

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017 * Ward 6 Camp in Ramree is officially closed in June, 2017. Most of the IDPs (Kaman ethnics) were allowed to move to Yangon. A few # of families are still living in the Camp. * WASH Gap in Ni Din Camp , Ah Htet Nan Yar Camp and Zoom 1 & NRS Villages * GAD actions in Sittwe Camps led to solve the land issues and community complains for implementing WASH facilities development in Sittwe Camps *Technical Working Group organized in Rakhine about WASH Behavior Change, Hygiene kit Strategy and review Cluster latrine Design. * Water Quality Testing Monitoring by WASH agencies * AWD data compiling and response plan supported by Health Cluster *Government counterparts and MHDO attended WASH in Emergency Training (ToT) in Mandalary in May 2017

Township

WASH focal Agency

Ann

Arche Nova

Buthidaung

ACF, CARE, MHDO, CDN

Kyawtaw

MAUK

Kyaukpyu

Oxfam

95%

100% Effective drainage in active camps

77%

80%

62%

60% Functional

13% 13%

Non_Functional

40%

40% 20%

7%

54% Not_inPlace

20%

0% Camp % Water Coverage

NA

Effective solid waste management system in active camps 13%

* Water coverage considers improved sources, and unimproved sources combined with treatment (filters). Water quality result data is not yet considered. * Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only * Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population

Functional

3%

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Rakhine

Non_Functional

Village_Not HRP

20% 64%

Village % Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

% Latrine Coverage

50

Not_inPlace NA

More info on gaps (click here)

Village

Camp

8

Intervention Finished

40

29

211

Gap Covered

Maungdaw

ACF, CARE, Malteser, MHDO

Myebon

RI

Pauktaw

DRC, SCI, SI

Ramree

Oxfam

Rathedaung

CARE, SI, MHDO

Kyaukpyu

1,611 Oxfam

21%

21%

Sittwe

CDN, DRC, MA_UK, Oxfam, SCI, SI

Kyauktaw

531 MAUK ACF, CARE, Malteser, 1,959 MHDO 2,871 RI

0%

85%

0%

0%

0%

100%

0

30 50

People targetted

Maungdaw

Disclaimer: >> Arche Nova is implementing WASH activities in Ann Township. MA_UK is implementing WASH development activites in Sittwe.CDN is implementing WASH development activities in Buthidaung.They are not counted in HRP Q2 reporting. >>MHDO is implementing some WASH activites in Buthidaung, Maungdaw and Rathedaung. They are counted in HRP Q2 reporting as it is emergency response. >>Oxfam WASH activites in Nidin camp have been phased out since Q4 2016. MAU-UK is now implementing new latrines construction in Nidin camp in Kyawtaw. They have plans to do water supply and hygine kits districution in Nidin camp. ACF WASH activites in the villages in Sittwe have been phased out since 2016. >>in previous quaters, we assumed that returned/relocated camps are as camps.But in Q2 2017, we assumed as noncamps. >>WASH Cluster partners ACF, Oxfam, DRC, SI, SCI, Malteser, Care Int, CDN, RI , MHDO and MA-UK reported for the 4W Q2

Myebon

Rakhine - Total 2017 Funding as of Q2

GIZ ZOA MdP LIFT HIF2 HARP (DFID) BMZ USA (OFDA) USA UNICEF OFDA MHF GHA/German AA EU ECHO DFID

Rakhine

6,316,086

250

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

0%

0%

29%

38%

49%

Ramree

267 Oxfam

0%

0%

0%

0%

15%

0%

0.1%

21%

0%

Rathedaung

2,458 CARE, SI, MHDO

101,994

CDN, DRC, MA_UK, Oxfam, SCI, SI


5%

23%

7%

Hygiene Promoter & Kit Coverage in active camps 30,000

63% 30,000

Fail

0%

4,000,000

32,901

35,000

% Hygiene Gap

42%

Latrine Coverage in active camps & villages

27%

% Sanitation Gap

15,389 DRC, SCI, SI

Grand Total 500,000

% Water Gap

Partners

Pauktaw

Sittwe

Ecoli presence/absence per camps

10% 191

200

6,183,914

6,000,000 12,000,000 18,000,000 Cummulative Funding received for 2017 Gap

0

400

150

Nb. of IDPs Sites

Gap in active camps / township

Water Point Coverage in active camps & villages

100

No

Pass

25,000

1,456

23,134

22,974



20,000

19,579

300

1,296 4,834

25,000 20,000

15

Coverage

15,000

15,000

11,325

Gap

200 244

241

10,000 5,000

100 # water points in villages (500:1)

# water points in active camps (500:1)

“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual precision”

10,000 6,331 1,019

931

-

1,652

1,522

2,477

# latrines (target)

# latrines (gap)

# need urgent desludging

# in active camps (20:1)


# in villages (6:1)

# handed over

19,596

5,000 # HHs covered by hygiene promoters (100 HHs : 1 promoter)

Coverage

Gap


SHAN





 

 

Approximately 16 water points are required to cover water needs in targeted HRP sites with an assigned WASH agency assuming a 500:1 ratio. This is the second quarter that the WASH Cluster collects water quality test results. For Q2, we’ve seen a decrease in sites with reported water quality results, from 47% to 31%. Out of 31% of sites with reported results, 14% are contaminated with e-coli presence. Those samples came from household and water source. The cluster needs to identify the point of contamination. There remais approximately 56 latrines to be constructed in active camps. Partners report that communal handwashing stations operate well in this context, however there are 62% of households without communal handwashing facilities. On the plus side, the majority of households received soap in northern Shan with a gap of only 3%. Good job! 20% of households did not receive sanitary pads for women and girls Approximately 33% of households did not receive hygiene promotion services in northern Shan

People in need / targeted

10,738 / 10,738 Hygiene

7,851

Sanitation

6,513

Water

7,360 -

5,000 Coverage

Funding


Shan

-

WASH PARTNERS KMSS, Metta, KBC, SCI, UNICEF

4,225 3,378 10,000 Gap

15,000

200,000

255,841

400,000


600,000 Gap

GAPS / CHALLENGES  

 



 2,887

304,159

Access remains a challenge Due to clashes between the Tatmadaw and Ethnic Armed Groups, over 1,000 IDPs fled to urban areas and are scattered around There are 6 targeted HRP sites without a WASH actor/response Namtu township presents the highest gap with sanitation gap being most serious. Namkhan township has good water and hygiene coverage, but the sanitation gap is almost 50% The Shan WASH Cluster is being coordinated by Unicef and SCI is providing technical co-leadership while we recruit for the new WASH cluster coordinator. We were sorry to say goodbye to Noah Noah!

Contact Us Sunny Guidotti (NWCC): [email protected] Mee Mee Thaw (IM): [email protected] Tin Lay Naing (interim SWCC): [email protected]

NORTHERN SHAN STATE (2017-Qtr 2- 4W Analysis, as of 30 June 2017) % of WASH coverage against HRP 2017 Targets in Kachin

Highlight of the 2nd Qtr 2017 * A total of 8 participants from Government counterparts and NGO partners attended WASH in Emergency (ToT) training at Mandalay. * Water Safety Plan training conducted in 21-22 June 2017 at Kutkai and a total of 11 participants from different organizations attended to the training. * UNICEF and SCI conducted WASH assessment in new IDP camp at Poat-Ba-Yone monastery at Namtu. * Metta conducted WASH need assessment in Pin Tha Byay IDP camp in Namtu Township. * Clashes between the Tatmadaw and Ethnic Armed Groups were faced more and more and over 1000 IDPs fled to urban area. The IDP population is floating as well as conflict areas is scattering

14%

Not_inPlace

66%

Functional

48% 38%

NA

% Water Coverage

81%

80%

Non_Functional

3%

97%

91%

100%

10%

Functional

17%

120%

Effective drainage in active camps

Effective solid waste management system in active camps

4%

60%

Non_Functional

40%

Not_inPlace

20%

NA

% Latrine Coverage

% Hygiene promoter & kit coverage

0% Camp

* Water coverage considers improved sources only. Water quality result data is not yet considered. * Sanitation coverage considers number of latrines only * Hygiene coverage considers access to soap, sanitary pad and ratio of hygiene promoters to population

Number of WASH Coverage & Gap Sites in Shan (North)

Township

More Info on Gaps (click here)

WASH focal Agency

Hseni

Metta

Kutkai

Metta, KBC-HDD-NSS, KMSS, ICRC

Manton

KMSS, Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

Muse

KMSS, Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

1 Intervention Finished

Camp

6 Gap

29 Covered

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

Nb. of IDPs Sites

Namhkan

KMSS,SCI, Metta Gap in active camps / township

Kachin/Shan- Total 2017 Funding in USD as of Q2

Namtu

MoFA Lux LDS Samaritans' Purse German Gov/Welthungerhilfe DFATD- IHA Ireland Trocaire USAID WHH-BMZ GFFO UNICEF Oxfam Emergency Fund OFDA MHF HIDA ECHO

Metta,KBC-HDD-NSS

Disclaimer: >> WASH Cluster partners Metta, KMSS and SCI reported data for the 4W Q2 2017. >>New resettlement village, Pyi Htaung Su in Laukkai township facing water shortage and fetching water from the nearest village which is far away for 8 kilometres. About 1500 IDPs from 282 households facing water shortage problem

Shan

-

35

25

69%

20

Fail

No

Pass

Coverage

10 15

1

Gap

0

0 # water points in GCA (500:1)

100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000

300,000

400,000

500,000

600,000

Gap

# water points in NGCA (500:1)

“This gap tracking assumes 500 people per water point, however the WASH cluster is currently adapting the indicator considering an average flowrate for contextual

Hseni

196

Kutkai

4,711

Manton

320

Muse

369

Namhkan Namtu

700,000

Grand Total

1,737 755

% Water Gap

Partners

Metta Metta, KBC-HDDNSS, KMSS, ICRC KMSS, Metta,KBCHDD-NSS KMSS, Metta,KBCHDD-NSS KMSS,SCI, Metta Metta,KBC-HDDNSS


1,400

800

400

600

300

400

26

-

# in GCA (20:1)

# need urgent desludging # in NGCA (20:1)

2%

0%

0%

0%

44%

7%

12%

0%

44%

0%

11%

17%

11%

19%

3%


316

1,569

1,296

1,073 612

200

200

# latrines (gap)

0%

999

1,000

500

# latrines (target)

0% 14%

538

1,200

600

26

0%

42

1,600

100

% Hygiene Gap

10%

9%

1,800

693

56

% Sanitation Gap

Hygiene promoter & kit Coverage in active camps

Latrine Coverage in active camps 700

15

5

200,000

17% 14% 800

15

100,000

E. Coli presence/absence

30

255,841


0

Water Point Coverage in active camps

304,159

People targetted

-

# HHs covered by hygiene promoters (100 HHs : 1 promoter)

# HHs with access to hand washing station

Coverage


Gap
