RRRR - Eric

RAPID RESPONSE RAPID RESPONSE


Are  Residents  Losing  Their  Edge  in  
  Public  University  Admissions?    
The  Case  at  the  University  of  Washington 
 
 Grant Blume and Marguerite Roza 

 

 

December  2012 
 
 
A  longstanding  implicit  bargain  that  comes  with  state-­‐supported  higher  education  is  now  in  jeop-­‐ Marguerite Roza and Sarah Yatsko ardy.  An  obvious  part  of  the  bargain  is  price:  state  support  brings  subsidized  prices  for  in-­‐state   February 4, 2010 students.  But  it  has  also  been  understood  that  state  dollars  produce  a  second   value—namely,   pref-­‐
erence   in   the   admissions   process.   After   all,   lower   prices   are   not   any   good   if   you   are   not   allowed  
–‘’ƒ›–Š‡Ǥ”‹‰‹ƒŽŽ›–Š‡’—„Ž‹…—‹˜‡”•‹–›™ƒ•–Š‡”‡–‘•‡”˜‡•–ƒ–‡”‡•‹†‡–•ϐ‹”•–Ǥ ‘”‘”‡•‹-­‐
dents,  not  only  was  tuition  higher,  but  admissions  standards  were  more  rigorous,  meaning  that  
‘”‡•‹†‡–• ‡‡†‡† Š‹‰Š‡” “—ƒŽ‹ϐ‹…ƒ–‹‘• –‘ ‰ƒ‹ ƒ……‡••Ǥ Š‡ –™‘Ǧ–‹‡”‡† ƒ†‹••‹‘ •–ƒ†ƒ”†•

*
™‡”‡–Š‘—‰Š––‘„‡‡ϐ‹–‹Ǧ•–ƒ–‡•–—†‡–•˜‹ƒ’‡‡”‡ˆˆ‡…–•ǡ‹–Šƒ––Š‡‡Šƒ…‡†ƒ…ƒ†‡‹…ƒ„‹Ž-­‐ )
-""
!$%-$
**
$)
$("/
""
"(
)%%"
)*(*)2
*
#%)*
.&($
$
ity  from  tougher  out-­‐of-­‐state  admissions  standards  worked  to  raise  the  academic  caliber  of  the   "/
&
*()
%$(*
$
*
#%(
"+$*
)%%")4

%&&%)*
*!)
&"
$
student  body  (and  the  university)  as  a  whole.     *
&%%((
)%%")2
-(
*()
*$
*%

#%(
+$%(
$
"%-(
&2
$
*(


*+($%,(
)
(4
$$""/2
*)
#")*(+*%$
#$)
**

"((
)(
%
*
)*(*6)
)"(/
%""()
(
)&$*
*
#%(
"+$*
$
%$,()"/2
*
News  reports   now   suggest   that   public  %$
universities   across   the  c)%%")2
ountry,  including   the  Universities   @ of  Michigan,   Oregon,   outh  Carolina,   Colorado,   re  shifting   ore  s&+&"4 pots  to   nonresidents   (who  

&(%"#2
%
&%%((
)%%")
-*
S"%-(
)"()
and   (-
%-$
a"))
+$)
m&(
pay  higher  tuitions)  in  order  to  plug  budget  gaps,  prompting  critics  to  worry  that  residents  are   %+()2
)
**
*
()+"*$
%""(
""%*%$
&**($)
-%(!
*%
%"#%
,#$*
losing  their  advantage  in  the  admissions  process.  In  fact,  the  California  State  University  system   A

&)2
$%*
())
*#4 announced  this  summer  that  its  schools  should  reject  all  in-­‐state  graduate  students  for  spring  
2013,  admitting  only  out-­‐of-­‐state  students.1    In  this  instance,  it  is  clear  the  residents  have  lost   "
)*(*)
,
$
)"%-
*%
*!"
*)
&(%"#2
*
*+($)
%+*
**
*
("
*"

their  advantage  for  graduate  school,  but  otherwise,  the  effect  on  admissions  standards  for  resi-­‐ &(%(#
%+"
,
)%#
",(4
*"
2
-
",()
+$)
*%
5&%,(*/
)%%")2
†‡–• ˜‡”•—• ‘”‡•‹†‡–• ‹• ”ƒ”‡Ž› “—ƒ–‹ϐ‹‡†Ǥ2     Do   residents   still   have   an   advantage,   or   are   )

7%#&("*/8
&(%,)%$
**
('+()
)*(*)
*%
,$"/
)*(+*
*(
)**
admissions  standards  leveling  for  the  two  groups?  Or,  are  admissions  actually  now  favoring  B out-­‐ $
"%"
+$)
(%))
)%%")
%(
*"

+$)
(
(%+*
$*%
*
#.4

‘ˆǦ•–ƒ–‡ ƒ’’Ž‹…ƒ–•ǫ Š‹• •–—†› ‡š’Ž‘”‡• –Š‘•‡ “—‡•–‹‘• „› ‡šƒ‹‹‰ ƒ†‹••‹‘• †ƒ–ƒ ƒ– ‘‡ 7"%%&%"8
$
*
('+(#$*2
%-,(2
&(#*)
)*(*)
*%
.#&*
)"(/
($*")
’—„Ž‹… —‹˜‡”•‹–›ǡ –Š‡ •‡–• –Š‡ ϐ‹†‹‰• ‹ ƒ †‹•…—••‹‘ ƒ„‘—– Š‘™ „‡•– –‘ …Ž‘•‡ ’—„Ž‹… Š‹‰Š‡” $
%#&("*/
*(#$*%$)4

‡†—…ƒ–‹‘„—†‰‡–‰ƒ’•‹–Š‡…‘–‡š–‘ˆ–Šƒ–‹’Ž‹…‹–„ƒ”‰ƒ‹™‹–Š•–ƒ–‡”‡•‹†‡–•Ǥ
!2
%(
.#&"2
A??C:?D
*
(%#
*
+)*$
$&$$*
%%"
)*(*4
)
+(
Š‹•…ƒ•‡•–—†›‡šƒ‹‡•–Š‡‹˜‡”•‹–›‘ˆƒ•Š‹‰–‘ȋŠ‡”‡ƒˆ–‡”Ȍ™Š‡”‡‡™•”‡’‘”–•”‡ϐŽ‡…– @
#%$)*(*)2
*
)*(*
)&$)
-(
)**
$
"%"
+$)
%$
*
&%%()*
)%%")
ƒ ™‘””› –Šƒ– ƒ•Š‹‰–‘‹ƒ• ƒ”‡ Ž‘•‹‰ ‘—– –‘ ‘”‡•‹†‡–• ™Š‡ ‹– …‘‡• –‘ —†‡”‰”ƒ†—ƒ–‡ -(
*(
)"()
(
"%-(4
("
*"

+$)