South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal - REACH Resource Centre

2 downloads 148 Views 2MB Size Report
RAGA. Assessed settlements. 0%. Settlement. 0.1 - 4.9%1. 10.1 - 20%. 20.1 - 50%. > 50%. Cover percentage of assessed
South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal

South Sudan Displacement Crisis July 2017

Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan Overview

Assessment coverage

Since June 2016, Western Bahr el Ghazal has experienced multiple incidents of intense conflict in areas of Wau town, and the surrounding areas of Jur river, Wau and Raja counties. Many areas in Western Bahr el Ghazal are largely inaccessible to humanitarian actors due to insecurity and logistical constraints. As a result, only limited information is available on the humanitarian situation outside major displacement sites in Wau town. In order to fill such information gaps and facilitate humanitarian planning, in late 2015, REACH piloted its Area of Origin (AoO) methodology, which takes a territorybased approach that may cover several bomas, to collect data in hard-to-reach areas of Unity State.

In December 2016, REACH decided to refine the methodology, moving from the AoO to the Area of Knowledge (AoK) methodology, an approach collecting information at the settlement level. The most recent OCHA Common Operational Dataset (COD) released in February 2016 has been used as the reference for settlement names and locations. Through AoK, REACH collects data from a network of Key Informants (KIs) who have sector-specific knowledge and gain information from regular direct or indirect contact, or recent displacement.

Data collected is aggregated to the settlement level and all percentiles presented in this factsheet, unless otherwise specified, represent percent of settlements within Western Bahr el Ghazal with that specific response. The displacement section on page 2 refers to the proportion of assessed KIs arrived within the previous month (newly arrived IDPs). Although current AoK coverage is still limited and its findings not statistically significant, it provides an indicative understanding of the needs and current humanitarian situation in assessed areas of Western Bahr el Ghazal State.

Using this new methodology, in April 2017, REACH has collected information on Western Bahr el Ghazal through KIs in Wau PoC site as well as Wau informal settlements.

SUDAN

284 101

Key Informants interviewed Settlements assessed

Contact with Area of Knowledge

100% 64% 36%

KIs reported to be newly arrived IDPs. KIs reported to have visited the AoK within the last month. KIs reported to be in contact with someone living in the AoK within the last month.

Assessment coverage Assessed settlements

Reached settlements

Settlement

County

Assessed settlements

OCHA (COD) settlements

Cover percentage

Jur River

25

809

3%

0.1 - 4.9%1

Raga

25

340

7%

5 - 10%

Wau

51

336

15%

Total

101

1,485

7%

Cover percentage of assessed settlements relative to the OCHA (COD) total dataset: 0%

10.1 - 20% 20.1 - 50% > 50%

RAGA JUR RIVER

WAU

1

Counties with under 5% of settlement coverage are not disaggregated to the county level, but are included in state-level analysis.

1

South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal

South Sudan Displacement Crisis July 2017

Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan New arrivals Push factors

Pull factors

Previous location

Displacement

Top three reported reasons newly arrived IDPs left their previous location:2

Top three reported reasons newly arrived IDPs came to their current location:2

Top three reported most recent long-term locations for newly arrived IDPs:

Reported time of first displacement for newly arrived IDPs:

1 Insecurity

94%

1 Security

94%

1 Wau County

65%

2 Lack of food

90%

2 Access to food

93%

2 Jur River County

20%

3 Lack of shelter

31%

3 Access to health

41%

3 Raga County

15%

Displacement

Local community

All/almost all women

33%



●● ●●●● ●● ●●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ●









More men than women

7%

● ●

● ●







● ●

WAU

● ● ● ● ●

RAGA ●● ●●●●●●●●●



All/almost all adults

Percent of settlements reporting presence of IDPs:

2

38%

About equal

19%

More children than adults

19%

All/almost all elderly

13%

More adults than children

13%



2

7%



No answer

1%

● ●



● ●

● ●

●●●





●●

● ●●●● ●● ●●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ● ●







● ●

JUR RIVER ●













● ●







● ●

WAU

● ● ● ● ●



Percent of settlements reporting local community remaining:

Key informants could choose up to three answers.

All/almost all men ●

Reported age ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements:



14%

All/almost all women





16%

7%







21%

7%



JUR RIVER

About equal

About equal



● ●

41%

More men than women

● ●

More women than men

All/almost all men







Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

41+21+16+14+7+1 44+21+15+12+8

47%





47+33+7+6+6 38+19+19+13+13

More women than men





April 2017 or before

Reported gender ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements:



●●●

May 2017

Reported gender ratio of IDPs in assessed settlements:

●● ●●●●●●●●●



June 2017

Demographic composition

RAGA



July 2017

Demographic composition



Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

5+11+3252A

5% 11% 32% 52%

Reported age ratio of local community remaining in assessed settlements: All/almost all adults

44%

More adults than children

21%

About equal

15%

All/almost all elderly

12%

More children than adults

8%

South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal

South Sudan Displacement Crisis July 2017

Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan Health

Shelter/NFI Health concerns Most commonly reported heath concerns in the assessed settlements:3



RAGA ●● ●●●●●●●●●

68%

3 Typhoid

50%

4 Malnutrition

12%

5 Stomach pain

11%





● ●



● ●



Healthcare distance



● ●●●



●●

● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ● ●







● ●

JUR RIVER ●













● ●







● ●

WAU

● ● ● ● ●

100%

2 Diarrhoea





100+68+50+12+11 27+43+23+5+2

1 Malaria





RAGA

RAGA

●● ●●●●●●●●●

●● ●●●●●●●●●









Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

Under 30 minutes

27%

30 minutes to under 1 hour

43%

1 hour to under half a day

23%

Half a day

5%

More than half a day

2%









● ●





●●

● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ● ●

● ●









●●●









●●

● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ●



JUR RIVER ●





● ● ●























Percent of settlements reporting tukuls as a primary shelter type for IDPs:

Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

Reported number of people sharing a shelter in assessed settlements:

Reported proportion of the local community sharing shelters with IDPs:

63 59 30

50+48+2A

3

Facilities are too distant

30%

48% Available 2% Don’t know

Key informants could choose up to three answers. 4 Key informants could choose up to two answers. 3

3

6+17+28+39+11

Reported availability of feeding programmes that provide Plumpy Sup, CSB++ or other nutrition supplements in the assessed settlements:

60+34+6

Top three reported reasons why healthcare facilities are not available from the assessed settlements:4

59%





Sheltering IDPs

Facilites destroyed by violence



● ●



Shelter sharing

2









11 to 15





WAU

● ●

Percent of settlements reporting tukuls as a primary shelter type for local community:

50% Not available







6 to 10

● ●





WAU

1 to 5















JUR RIVER ●





Feeding programmes

63%

● ●





● ●●●

Healthcare unavailability

1 Area is too insecure





Reported distance of the nearest healthcare facilities from the assessed settlements:

Percent of settlements reporting access to health care:





60%

All

34%

More than half

17%

Around half

28%

Less than half

39%

None

11%

6%

6%

South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal

South Sudan Displacement Crisis July 2017

Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan Food Security

WASH Water distance

Reported distance of the nearest market from the assessed settlements:

Reported distance of the nearest safe water source from the assessed settlements:

Under 30 minutes

22%

30 minutes to under 1 hour

38%

1 hour to under half a day

35%

Half a day



39+35+25+1

22+38+35+5



Market distance

Under 30 minutes

39%

30 minutes to under 1 hour

35%

1 hour to under half a day

25%

Half a day

5%

RAGA

1%

RAGA

●● ●●●●●●●●●

●● ●●●●●●●●●

















Food unavailability

● ●

● ●

● ●

●●●





●●

● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ● ●







● ●

JUR RIVER ●







● ●







● ●

WAU

● ● ● ● ●

● ●● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●● ● ● ●

Percent of settlements reporting access to adequate amounts of food:

Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

Crops destroyed by fighting

3 High prices

44%

● ●







● ●





● ●

WAU

● ● ● ● ●



55%









73%

Crops have been 2 stolen





JUR RIVER ●



73 55 44

1

Water availability



● ●



Top three reported reasons why people cannot access enough food in the assessed settlements:5



● ●

● ● ●









● ● ●●●

Percent of settlements reporting access to clean drinking water:

Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

Reported availability of a safe water source accessible from the assessed settlements:

98+2+A

98%

Available 2% Not available

Coping strategies

Land availability

Market availability

Sanitation

Water sources

The average number of reported coping strategies used in the assessed settlements:

Reported availability of land for agriculture in the assessed settlements:

Reported availability of a functioning market accessible from the assessed settlements:

Reported use of sanitation facilities over open defecation in assessed settlements:

Reported primary safe water source available from the assessed settlements:

Key informants could choose up to three answers.

Not available

1%

No answer

76+24+A

Available 24% Not available

Borehole

76% 12%

More than half

20%

Protected well

Around half

12%

Donkey cart

9%

Less than half

23%

Water yard

2%

None

33%

Water truck

1%

No answer

4

7%

76+12+9+2+1

5

53+46+1A

46%

All

76%

7+20+12+23+33+4

1.3

coping strategies reported on average

53%

Available

4%

South Sudan - Western Bahr El Ghazal

South Sudan Displacement Crisis July 2017

Assessment of Hard-to-Reach Areas in South Sudan Education

Protection Women

Men

Children

Reported available education services in the assessed settlements:6

Reported primary protection concerns for women in the assessed settlements:

Reported primary protection concerns for men in the assessed settlements:

Reported primary protection concerns for children in the assessed settlements:

None

29%

Pre-primary

42%

Primary

64%

Secondary

22%

ALP7

RAGA ●● ●●●●●●●●●

2%

University



1%







● ●



● ●



Education attendance and availability



● ●●●



●●

● ●●●● ● ●● ●●●●●●●●●● ● ●●●●●

● ● ● ● ●







● ●

JUR RIVER ●













● ●



Top two reported reasons why children are not attending school in the assessed settlements:





● ●

WAU

29+42+64+22+2+1 88 40 48 33



Education availability

● ● ● ● ●



1 High fees

Percent of settlements reporting access to education:

2 Area is too dangerous

School attendance

1

Killing/injury by other community

51%

1 Looting

2 Sexual violence

28%

2

Killing/injury by same community

18%

2

16%

3 Abduction

15% 14%

18%

3 Looting

4

Killing/injury by same community

16%

4 Forced recruitment

6%

4 Sexual violence

5 Abduction

2%

5 Family separation

5 Domestic violence

Reported relationships between IDPs, returnees and local community in the assessed settlements:

Cannot access due to security concerns

33%

12+22+18+44+2 7

4%

44%

Less than half

31%

18%

Half

33%

22%

More than half

18%

12%

All

12%

4%

Very Good

21%

Good

79%

Reported presence of disputes over land ownership in the assessed settlements:

66+30+4A

66% No 30% Yes 3% Don’t know

Local community displaced and returned home, reported in 55% of assessed settlements. 7

4+31+33+18+12

6

None

17%

Land disputes 8

Reported proportion of settlements where 6-17 years old boys and girls attend school respectively: 2%

3%

40%

48%

Killing/injury by other community

Killing/injury by other community

Community relations

Facilities destroyed by 1 conflict

35%

3

88%

Top two reported reasons why education services are not available in the assessed settlements:

2

28%

21+79

Insufficient data 0 - 25% 26 - 50% 51 - 75% 76 - 100%

1 Looting

About REACH REACH facilitates the development of information tools and products that enhance the capacity of aid actors to make evidence-based decisions in emergency, recovery and development contexts. All REACH activities are conducted through inter-agency aid coordination mechanisms. For more information, you can write to our in-country office: [email protected] or to our global office: [email protected]. Visit www.reach-initiative.org and follow us @REACH_info.

Key informants could choose more than one answer. Accelerated learning programmes.

5