STB UPDATE JANUARY 30, 2018

1 downloads 211 Views 884KB Size Report
Jan 30, 2018 - Note: Dwell and velocity displayed according to CSX methodology; explanation of ... efficiency and networ
STB UPDATE

JANUARY 30, 2018

Network continued to perform at high levels         

Velocity, dwell, originations and arrivals all further improved this week Right Car Right Train improved week-over-week Crew and power resource levels well matched to demand Hump yard performance steady Western terminals performing well Car fulfillment settled higher, averaging 99% year-to-date Local pull and place performance higher Customer problem logs at normal levels Interchange volumes current and gateways fluid

Dwell achieved new record low of 9.8 hours, and is 13% improved from 2017 average dwell

2

All measures improved this week On Time Originations (%)

On Time Arrivals (%)

80%

60%

60%

40%

40%

20%

20%

3

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

2017

1

2

3

9.2

16.0 14.0

6.0

12.0

79%

79%

15.1

10.0

2017

1

2 Weeks

3

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

2017

1

2

3

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

Weeks

Note: Dwell and velocity displayed according to CSX methodology; explanation of CSX methodology can be found at csx.com/servicemetrics. 2017 dwell and velocity exclude the Hurricane Irma-impacted period for terminals that held cars and specific trains held through storm, respectively.

17.5

17.7

18.0

18.7

18.2

18.0

18.0

8.0

4.0

3

9.5

10.0

9.9

10.7

10.3

10.8

10.7

20.0

9.5

14.0 9.6

22.0 18.6

Velocity (mph)

16.0

12.0

80%

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

Weeks

Dwell (hours)

11.5

83%

+2 hrs

Weeks

11.3

+2 hrs On-Time

18.6

2

68%

18.5

1

73%

18.2

2017

69%

On-Time 71%

80%

78%

80%

100%

78%

79%

83%

80%

83%

84%

85%

80%

81%

89%

100%

83%

90%

Weekly Average

Right Car Right Train improved week-over-week  Right Car Right Train is no longer a measure that CSX uses to manage its operation

Right Car Right Train1 Weekly Average

― In scheduled railroading, if a car can be advanced on another train to speed transit or ensure its on-time arrival, there is not one “right train”

90%

75%

71%

76%

 Car priority is to move cars quickly, on next available train ― Asset utilization a key tenet of scheduled railroading

70% 65%

 Train priority is blocking integrity and departing all available, relevant cars from the yard

60% 55% 50%

2017

1

4

76%

78%

77%

70%

75%

72%

79% 74%

80%

77%

85%

1

2 3 Weeks

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

― Blocking integrity certifies that a train is built correctly and shipments are headed to the correct location ― Managed through field supervision

‘Right Car Right Train’ is defined as the percentage of cars that departed from a yard in accordance with their car scheduling trip plan

Resourcing appropriately to meet business needs Train & Engine Headcount and Re-crew Rate1

Active Locomotives 3,800

3,400

9,800 9,400

3,368

12% 9,365 10%

9,000 3,025 3,000

8,760

2,979 2,881

2,857

8,680

8,612

8,600

8% 8,558 6%

8,200

2,600

4%

7,800 2,200

2%

7,400 1,800

0%

7,000 2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

2017

1

2

Locomotive level coming down in concert with network velocity improvement

4



5

6

Headcount decline driven by train staffing efficiency and network velocity improvement

Power and crew availability steady at approximately 99% and 95%, respectively 1

5

2018 Weeks

2018 Weeks



3

Re-crew rate is re-crew people starts as a percent of total measured people starts, and represents incidences of replacing a crew on the same train ID (generally due to hours of service)

Hump yard performance steady CSX Hump Terminal Overview



Key hump productivity and efficiency measures performing well



Total hump yard volumes remain at normal levels, well below capacity of yards

Transitioned to flat-switching operations Hump terminals

Selkirk, NY Toledo, OH Avon, IN

Willard, OH

Dwell at Hump Terminals1

Cumberland, MD Cincinnati, OH

Weekly Average

Louisville, KY

19.2

1

2 Weeks

18.0 14.0 10.0

Absolute number of humps not “good” or “bad”; goal is best mix of hump and flat yards for processing efficiency

6

1 Dwell

6.0 2017

3

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

displayed according to CSX methodology; explanation of CSX methodology can be found at csx.com/servicemetrics. 2017 dwell excludes the Hurricane Irma-impacted period for terminals that held cars through the storm.

18.5

Waycross, GA

22.1 19.6

19.9

20.9

19.5

22.0

22.9

26.0

19.4

Birmingham, AL

Atlanta, GA

19.9

Nashville, TN

20.4

30.0 Hamlet, NC

Western terminals performing well Western Corridor Key Terminals



Key terminal productivity and performance measures healthy, dwell remains well below 2017

Avon, IN

Nashville, TN

Dwell at Western Terminals1 Weekly Average

22.0 Birmingham, AL

1

2 Weeks

13.2

10.0 6.0

Key Western terminals

1

7

2017

3

Jan. 20 – Jan. 27

Dwell displayed according to CSX methodology; explanation of CSX methodology can be found at csx.com/servicemetrics. 2017 dwell excludes the Hurricane Irma-impacted period for terminals that held cars through the storm.

10.8

11.0

11.0

11.5

10.8

Mobile, AL

11.6

13.7

14.0

12.2

14.9

Montgomery, AL

13.1

18.0

Car fulfillment settled higher, averaging 99% year-to-date Weekly Car Orders, Customer Empty Idles, and Fill Rate1 Order Fill Rates

Cars Ordered/Idle 6,000

110%

5,000

100%

4,000

90%

3,000

80%

2,000

70%

1,000

60%

 Over 340 orders filled in week 4 against week 3 open orders, increasing fill to 102% ― Delivered strong initial fill rate in week 4 despite rising order levels

 Empty car dwell remains elevated at customer locations ― Empty idle cars at a given customer held >24 hours considered available to fill that customer’s orders

50%

0 2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

2018 Weeks Weekly Orders

Customer Empty Idles (> 24 hours)

2017 Blended Fill %

Order Fill %

1

8

2017 orders and fill rate normalized for Weeks 14-44 against historical/expected order levels (Q1 2017), as orders were disconnected with demand; starting week 45, improved process leaves orders open for two weeks, counts empty idle cars > 24 hours at a customer location as a filled order for that day

Last mile performance measure higher

 Local Service Measurement (LSM) is not a primary metric that CSX uses to manage its operation

Local Service Measurement1 100% 90%

87%

80%

86%

86%

88%

― In scheduled railroading, focus on end-to-end transit and customer expectations

74%

70% 60%

 However, reliable pull and place expected as part of service to customers

50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0%

2017

1

9

1

2

3 4 2018 Weeks

5

6

‘Local Service Measurement’ is defined as the percentage of cars that were pulled or placed at a customer location based upon daily customer request, the local service plan and available inventory at the local serving yard

Customer problem logs remained at normal levels  Improved communication allowing for faster, more local resolution

Customer Problem Logs Daily Average Volume

― Accountability for resolution of customer issues resides with field responsibility ― Escalating and resolving critical issues with senior leadership

570 Total Logs in Week 30 2017 at height of service challenges

284

271 223

2017

1

2

Delayed Cars

10

252

3 4 2018 Weeks Bad Order

 Enhancing key customer tools and aligning workstreams to allow for easier, more direct connections and self-service

219

5

Switching Issues

6

Interchanges current and performing to expectations Chicago

East St. Louis 800

Daily Average Interchange Volume

Daily Average Interchange Volume

2,000 1,600

600

1,200

400

800 200

400

0

0 2017

1

2

3

4

5

6

2017

1

2

2018 Weeks

5

6

Memphis

Daily Average Interchange Volume

Daily Average Interchange Volume

300

400

200

200

100

0

0 2017

1

2

3

4

2018 Weeks

11

4

2018 Weeks

New Orleans 600

3

5

6

2017

1

2

3

4

2018 Weeks

5

6

Scheduled railroading producing service improvement Service Improvements & Productivity Improvements

Operational Focus Balanced Train Plan

Improved Frequency

Better Reliability

Rolling Stock Utilization

People Efficiency

Terminal Fluidity

Faster Transit

Quicker Turnaround

Fuel Optimization

Train Density

Improve Service

Operate Safely

Control Costs

Drive Asset Utilization

Develop People

 Accomplishments in 2017: realigned service frequency, balanced train plan, improved terminal efficiency

 Improved execution on this foundation to drive long-term service and productivity improvements

12