the fdot source book - Florida Department of Transportation

THE FDOT S OURCE BOOK produced by

Florida Department of Transportation Forecasting and Trends Office

2017

FLORIDA TRANSPORTATION FAST FACTS GENERAL 20.5 M people

112 M visitors

53,625 square miles of land

TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM

MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE

122,736 centerline miles of public roads

322.1 M daily vehicle miles traveled on the SHS

12,106 centerline miles of State Highway System (SHS)

77% reliable peak hour/peak period travel on freeways

4,300 centerline miles of Strategic Intermodal System (SIS)

5% of the SHS centerline miles are heavily congested during peak hour

12,267 bridges, 6,858 maintained by FDOT

637 M truck tons transported in Florida

18.2 M registered motor vehicles

5.6 B annual combination truck miles traveled on the SHS TRANSIT

31 urban transit systems

250.6 M annual transit passenger trips

18 rural transit systems

56% of Florida’s population lives within a half-mile of fixed route transit

BICYCLE AND PEDESTRIAN 7,438 miles of bicycle facilities on non-freeway SHS 75% of non-freeway SHS have bike lanes, paved shoulders, or shared-use paths 3,417 miles of pedestrian facilities on urban non-freeway SHS

67% of non-freeway SHS in urban areas have sidewalks or shared-use paths 42% of Florida’s population lives within one mile of FDOT-monitored bike lanes and shared-use paths

PORTS (SEA/AIR/SPACE) 20 commercial airports

78.1 M annual aircraft passenger boardings

15 seaports

83% of aircraft trips depart on time, annually

2 spaceports

15.5 M annual cruise passengers RAIL

2,743

miles of mainline railroad track

63 M annual rail passengers

Dedicated to Doug McLeod, who served the people of Florida for over three decades.

THIS PAGE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK

OVERVIEW

TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION

INTRODUCTION This section presents an overview of the Source Book, the four dimensions of mobility, and a list of performance measures and trends affecting transportation.

This section presents transportation-related trends that have a direct or indirect effect on transportation performance.

SECTION I

SECTION II

MULTIMODAL MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

APPENDIX This section presents detailed tabular data with historical and current year information. It also includes a glossary and useful links.

This section presents mobility performance measures for auto, truck, transit, pedestrian, bicycle, aviation, rail, and seaport modes of travel. Safety measures are also included.

SECTION IV

SECTION III I

TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION I – INTRODUCTION...............................................................................1

Vehicle Hours of Delay........................................................................................................................... 31 Person Hours of Delay.......................................................................................................................... 32

Introduction...................................................................................................................................................2

Average Travel Speed............................................................................................................................ 33

Trends Affecting Transportation.........................................................................................................3

Number of Fatalities..............................................................................................................................34

Dimensions of Mobility.............................................................................................................................4

Number of Serious Injuries................................................................................................................. 35

Multimodal Mobility Performance Measures Matrix..................................................................5

Rate of Fatalities...................................................................................................................................... 36 Rate of Serious Injuries.........................................................................................................................37

SECTION II – TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION................................ 7

Time Spent Commuting........................................................................................................................ 38

Demographics.............................................................................................................................................8

Job Accessibility – Auto....................................................................................................................... 39

Visitors.......................................................................................................................................................... 10

% Travel Heavily Congested................................................................................................................40

Roadway Inventory................................................................................................................................... 11

% Miles Heavily Congested................................................................................................................... 41

Use Characteristics................................................................................................................................. 14

Hours Heavily Congested.................................................................................................................... 42

Interactions ................................................................................................................................................ 16

Vehicles Per Lane Mile..........................................................................................................................43 Transit

SECTION III – MULTIMODAL MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES..... 19

Transit Passenger Trips........................................................................................................................44

2016 State Highway System Performance Summary............................................................20

Transit Revenue Miles...........................................................................................................................45

2016 Modal Performance Summary .............................................................................................. 21

Transit Revenue Miles Between Failures....................................................................................46

Area Types ................................................................................................................................................. 22

Transit Weekday Span of Service.................................................................................................... 47 Resident Access to Transit..................................................................................................................48

PEOPLE-RELATED MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES.................................. 23

Job Accessibility – Transit...................................................................................................................49 Transit Passenger Trips Per Revenue Mile..................................................................................50

Auto/Truck Vehicle Miles Traveled........................................................................................................................... 24

Bicycle/Pedestrian

Person Miles Traveled........................................................................................................................... 25

Pedestrian Level of Service................................................................................................................. 51

% Non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel...................................................................................... 26

Pedestrian and Bicycle – Fatalities and Serious Injuries....................................................... 52

% Travel Meeting Level of Service Criteria.....................................................................................27

% Pedestrian Facility Coverage......................................................................................................... 53

% Miles Meeting Level of Service Criteria..................................................................................... 28

Bicycle Level of Service........................................................................................................................54

Travel Time Reliability: On-Time Arrival......................................................................................... 29

% Bicycle Facility Coverage................................................................................................................. 55

Travel Time Reliability: Variability......................................................................................................30

% Population within one mile of Bike Lane and Shared-Use Paths...................................56

II

TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED Aviation

Aviation

Aviation Passenger Boardings.......................................................................................................... 57

Aviation Tonnage......................................................................................................................................77

Aviation Departure Reliability.............................................................................................................58

Aviation Value of Freight...................................................................................................................... 78

Aviation Demand to Capacity Ratio.................................................................................................59

Rail

Rail

Rail Tonnage.............................................................................................................................................. 79

Rail Passengers.......................................................................................................................................60

Active Rail Access...................................................................................................................................80

Rail Departure Reliability....................................................................................................................... 61

Seaport

Seaport

Seaport Tonnage...................................................................................................................................... 81

Seaport Passengers.............................................................................................................................. 62

Seaport Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units.......................................................................................... 82 Seaport Value of Freight...................................................................................................................... 83

FREIGHT-RELATED MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES.................................63

Seaport Rail Access...............................................................................................................................84

Truck

SECTION IV – APPENDIX...................................................................................85

Combination Truck Miles Traveled...................................................................................................64 Truck Miles Traveled..............................................................................................................................65

ACRONYMS......................................................................................................................... 87

Truck Tonnage..........................................................................................................................................66 Combination Truck Ton Miles Traveled.......................................................................................... 67

GLOSSARY..........................................................................................................................89

Truck Value of Freight...........................................................................................................................68 Combination Truck Travel Time Reliability: On-Time Arrival.................................................69

TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION....................................................................93

Combination Truck Travel Time Reliability: Variability ............................................................ 70 MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES.................................................................... 105

Combination Truck Hours of Delay....................................................................................................71 Combination Truck Average Travel Speed....................................................................................72

LINKS................................................................................................................................. 169

Combination Truck Cost of Delay..................................................................................................... 73 Truck Empty Backhaul Tonnage........................................................................................................74 % Miles Heavily Congested.................................................................................................................. 75 Vehicles Per Lane Mile.......................................................................................................................... 76

III


IV

SECTION I INTRODUCTION

1

INTRODUCTION MOBILITY

The 2017 FDOT Source Book is a compendium of current and historical data and analysis describing the performance of Florida’s transportation system. It is intended to be the primary source of mobility performance measure results for the state of Florida.

Mobility is used here as a broad term encompassing the movement of people and goods. Four dimensions of mobility are discussed and analyzed:

The Source Book is published annually and represents data and analysis primarily for the State Highway System (SHS) using latest available data. Major modes considered in this Source Book are automobile, aviation, bicycle, pedestrian, rail, seaport, transit, and truck.

Quantity – How much freight is moved and how many people are served. Quality – How well people or goods are being transported. Accessibility – How easy it is to engage in activities.

CHANGES IN 2017 SOURCE BOOK

Utilization – How much of the transportation system is used or available.

Historically, the Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT) produced two Source Books: the Multimodal Mobility Performance Measures Source Book and a companion General Interest Highway Statistics Source Book that included data on public roads. For this year, the two Source Books are combined into one and duplicative measures are eliminated.

ONLINE ACCESS The Source Book is available on the FDOT’s website at www.FloridaMPMs.com. The tables provided in the Appendix are available for download on the website in MS Excel format. Additionally, a companion Methodology document describing the details in developing the data for the Source Book is also available on the website.

Several new performance measures are added to the 2017 Source Book. These new measures are: percentage of non-single occupancy vehicle (SOV) travel, transit revenue miles, job accessibility by auto and transit, resident access to transit, percentage of population within one mile of bike lane and shared-use paths, and safety measures. Another new feature is the inclusion of “Observation” section for each performance measure.

CORRECTIONS, ADDITIONS, OR QUESTIONS Users are encouraged to contact the Forecasting and Trends Office or the office from which the data originates for more detail.

Additionally, changes in data collection/reporting have been implemented by certain data providers which have a direct impact on the performance measures being reported in the Source Book. For example, technological improvements in probe speed data have resulted in potentially more accurate speed data on highways and arterials. Likewise, growing wages in the trucking industry have caused sharp increases in the combination truck cost of delay.

Please send any questions, suggestions, or corrections to: Monica Zhong Florida Department of Transportation Forecasting and Trends Office 605 Suwannee Street, M.S. 28 Tallahassee, FL 32399-0450 850-414-4808 [email protected]

This year, the Source Book includes a new section that provides trends affecting transportation in Florida, such as number of visitors, population growth, registered vehicles, etc. It also provides a clickable bookmark panel and links throughout the document to navigate between the table of contents, charts, and supporting data tables. 2

TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION This year, the Source Book includes a new section detailing trends occurring within the state of Florida. The movement of these trends directly and indirectly impacts the performance of the state’s transportation system.

DEMOGRAPHICS

USE CHARACTERISTICS

• Total Population

• Household Vehicle Availability

• Change in Population

• Licensed Drivers and Registered Vehicles

• Total Employment and New Housing Permits

• Seat Belt Usage

INTERACTIONS

VISITORS

• International Trade in Florida

• Domestic and International Visitors

• CO2 Emissions by Sector

• Travel Mode for Visitors

• Freight Growth

ROADWAY INVENTORY • Public Road Mileage • Mileage and Travel by System • Mileage and Travel by Functional Classification • Mode of Travel

3

DIMENSIONS OF MOBILITY The four dimensions of mobility are quantity, quality, accessibility, and utilization. In order to adequately address mobility by mode or from a multimodal perspective, all four dimensions should be considered. Page 5 contains a matrix of multimodal performance measures presented in this edition of the Source Book.

ACCESSIBILITY

QUANTITY OF TRAVEL

IZATION UTIL

QUALITY OF TRAVEL

UTILIZATION QUANTITY

QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

CESSIBILITY AC

The quality of travel describes how well people or goods are transported. This dimension of mobility has been the traditional focus for measures of effectiveness such as Level of Service (LOS).

IZATION UTIL

QUANTITY

QUALITY

Accessibility addresses the ease in engaging in activities. Such measures encompass the concepts of connectivity, modal options, and time to reach destinations.

IZATION UTIL

QUALITY

QUANTITY

CESSIBILITY AC

CESSIBILITY AC

The quantity of travel involves the magnitude of travel on a facility or service; how much freight is moved; how many people are served.

QUALITY

QUANTITY

IZATION UTIL 4

Utilization measures involve how much of the transportation system is used and what availability remains. They indirectly relate to users’ perceptions of how transportation facilities or services perform. However, they primarily describe the relative demand and supply of transportation facilities and services.

MULTIMODAL MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES MATRIX

PEOPLE

MODE

QUANTITY

ACCESSIBILITY

UTILIZATION

• Vehicle Miles Traveled • Person Miles Traveled • % of non-Single Occupancy Vehicle Travel

• % Travel Meeting LOS Criteria • % Miles Meeting LOS Criteria • Travel Time Reliability »» On-Time Arrival »» Travel Time Variability • Vehicle Hours of Delay • Person Hours of Delay • Average Travel Speed • Number of Fatalities • Number of Serious Injuries • Rate of Fatalities • Serious Injuries Rate

• Time Spent Commuting • Job Accessibility – Auto

• • • •

Transit

• Revenue Miles • Passenger Trips

• Revenue Miles between Failures

• Weekday Span of Service • Resident Access to Transit • Job Accessibility – Transit

• Passenger Trips per Revenue Mile

• Pedestrian Level of Service • Pedestrian and Bicycle – Fatalities and Serious Injuries • Bicycle Level of Service

• % Pedestrian Facility Coverage • % Bicycle Facility Coverage • % Population within 1 mile of Bike Lane and Shared-Use Paths

Pedestrian and Bicycle

FREIGHT

QUALITY

Auto/ Truck

Aviation

• Passenger Boardings

• Departure Reliability

Rail

• Passengers

• Departure Reliability

Seaport

• Passengers

Truck

• • • •

Aviation

• Tonnage • Value of Freight

Rail

• Tonnage

• Active Rail Access

Seaport

• Tonnage • Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units • Value of Freight

• Seaport Rail Access

Combination Truck Miles Traveled Truck Miles Traveled Truck Tonnage Combination Truck Ton Miles Traveled • Truck Value of Freight

% Travel Heavily Congested % Miles Heavily Congested Vehicles per Lane Mile Hours Heavily Congested

• Demand to Capacity Ratios

• Truck Empty Backhaul Tonnage • % Miles Heavily Congested • Vehicles per Lane Mile

• Travel Time Reliability »» On-Time Arrival »» Travel Time Variability • Combination Truck Hours of Delay • Combination Truck Average Travel Speed • Combination Truck Cost of Delay

5


6

S

INTE RA CT 7

E STICS US TERI C

SECTION II TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION

CHA RA

NS IO

AY ADW ROVENTORY IN

DEMOGRAP HIC

VISITORS

DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL POPULATION

CHANGE IN POPULATION

In 2008, Florida had a population of 18,807,600. Between 2008 and 2017, Florida’s statewide population increased by 9% while the urbanized area population increased by 14%. In 2017, Florida’s statewide population stands at 20,484,100 of which approximately 88% is in the urbanized areas.

Since 2010, Florida’s population has witnessed a steady increase. Between 2016 and 2017, about 336,000 more people have called Florida home.

Millions 25

Population Change (thousands) 400

20

300

15

200

10 100

5 0

0 2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

Urbanized Area

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

-100

Non-Urbanized Area

2008

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Source: FDOT’s Office of Policy Planning – Urbanized Area Population Estimates; U.S. Census Bureau – Year 2010 U.S. Census; University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) – Florida Estimates of Population

Source: FDOT’s Office of Policy Planning – Urbanized Area Population Estimates; U.S. Census Bureau – Year 2010 U.S. Census; University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research (BEBR) – Florida Estimates of Population

Go to Contents or Go to Data

2009

8

DEMOGRAPHICS TOTAL EMPLOYMENT AND NEW HOUSING PERMITS Total non-farm employment has been increasing since 2010. New housing permits issued have also been increasing since 2010, with the exception of 2014. In 2016, total non-farm employment stands at 8.2 million while approximately 116,000 new housing permits were issued.

Employment (Total Non Farm) Employment (Total Non Farm) (thousands) 10,000

New Housing Permits Issued (thousands) 500

8,000

400

6,000

300

4,000

200

2,000

100

0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 New Housing Permits Issued Employment (Total Non Farm)

0

Source: U.S. Census Bureau – Building Permits Survey; U.S. Department of Labor’s Bureau of Labor Statistics – State and Metro Area Employment, Hours, & Earnings


9

VISITORS DOMESTIC AND INTERNATIONAL VISITORS

TRAVEL MODE FOR VISITORS

Florida hosted 112 million visitors in 2016. Between 2007 and 2016, total visitors to Florida increased by 33%. During the same time, international visitors increased from 7.2 million to 14.5 million (102% increase) while domestic visitors increased from 77.3 million to 97.9 million (27% increase). In 2016, international visitors made up 13% of total visitors to Florida.

The percentage of visitors traveling by air has varied between 49% and 53% over the last decade. In 2016, 49% of all visitors to Florida arrived by air.

Millions 120

60%

100

50%

80

40%

60

30%

40

20%

20

10%

0 2007 2008 2009 2010

2011

International

2012

0%

2013 2014 2015 2016

Domestic

2011

2012

2013

Non-Air

Source: Visit Florida – Annual Florida Visitor Study


2010

2014 Air

Source: Visit Florida – Annual Florida Visitor Study

10

2015

2016

ROADWAY INVENTORY STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM (SHS) MILEAGE BY DISTRICTS SHS Mileage by Districts

TOTAL SHS = 12,106 MILES

2 TOTAL = 2,557 MILES Jacksonville 139 93 Other Urbanized 20 Rural

Rural

231

1,307

Other Urbanized

223

Rural

7 TOTAL = 1,075 MILES Hillsborough/ Pinellas Other Urbanized Rural

163

54

169 42 188 233 149

41 43 43

Rural

1 TOTAL = 1,871 MILES

Rural

121

767

NOTE:

HIGHWAY

Miami Dade

19

135

Other 50 37 Urbanized

ARTERIAL

CITY OR COUNTY NAME REPRESENTS THE URBANIZED AREA OF THE METROPOLITAN PLANNING ORGANIZATION (MPO).


18

183

515

133

83

101

2

6 TOTAL = 700 MILES

596

Rural 33 FREEWAY

230

Other Urbanized 53 66

233

656

512

Ft. Lauderdale/ Palm Beach

231

134

159


446

29 25

Other Urbanized

138

1,262

Orlando

573

177

298

129


3 TOTAL = 2,408 MILES Other 64 63 Urbanized

249

11

22

424

ROADWAY INVENTORY PUBLIC ROAD MILEAGE

MILEAGE AND TRAVEL BY SYSTEM

Florida’s total public road mileage is 122,736 miles, of which the SHS constitutes 12,106 miles (10%); Federal Roads constitute 2,280 miles (2%); City Streets constitute 37,942 miles (31%); while the County Roads constitute the remaining 70,408 miles (57%).

Florida’s public roads supported approximately 588 million daily vehicle miles of travel in 2016. Of this, 55% of travel has been on the SHS, 31% on the Strategic Intermodal System (SIS), and 48% on the National Highway System (NHS). (Note: the percentages do not add up due to overlap between roadway systems).

Centerline Mileage 140,000 City Street System, 31% 37,942

County Road System, 57% 70,408

SHS, 10% 12,106

Federal Roads, 2% 2,280

120,000

600,000

100,000

500,000

80,000

400,000

60,000

300,000

40,000

200,000

20,000

100,000

0 Total Public Road Mileage = 122,735.7 mi

SHS SIS NHS Public Roads Centerline Mileage Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled

0

Source: FDOT’s Transportation Data and Analytics Office – Mileage and Travel (DVMT) Report for NHS, SHS and SIS

Source: FDOT’s Transportation Data and Analytics Office – Public Road Mileage and Miles Traveled


Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (thousands) 700,000

12

ROADWAY INVENTORY MILEAGE AND TRAVEL BY FUNCTIONAL CLASSIFICATION

MODE OF TRAVEL From 2015 to 2016, the percent of travelers using auto, cruise, and airline modes of travel have increased while those using rail and transit have decreased.

Interstates, Turnpike, and Principal Arterials carry a heavy share of Florida’s travel while constituting a minority of centerline mileage. Interstates comprise only 1% of mileage while carrying 18% of Florida’s Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT). On the other hand, local roads comprise 75% of mileage while carrying 21% of VMT.

Percent Change from 2007

Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled (thousands) 150,000

Centerline Mileage 100,000

40%

80,000

120,000

30%

60,000

90,000

20%

40,000

60,000

20,000

30,000

10% 0%

0

Centerline Mileage

Local

Minor Collector

Major Collector

Minor Arterial

Principal Arterial

Turnpike

Interstate

0

-10%

Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled

-20%

Source: FDOT’s Transportation Data and Analytics Office – Public Road Mileage and Miles Traveled


2007

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Transit Vehicle Miles (Auto) Cruise

2014 Rail

2015 2016 Airline

Source: FDOT’s Transit Office – Florida Transit Information and Performance Handbook; FDOT’s Transportation Data and Analytics Office – Public Road Mileage and Miles Traveled; Florida Ports Council – Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan; Amtrak – Annual Fact Sheet; U.S. Federal Aviation Administration – Air Carrier Activity Information System (ACAIS)

13

USE CHARACTERISTICS HOUSEHOLD VEHICLE AVAILABILITY

LICENSED DRIVERS AND REGISTERED VEHICLES

Approximately 7% of Florida households do not have a vehicle; 78% have one or two vehicles, and the remaining 15% of households have 3 or more vehicles.

In 2017, Florida had 18.2 million registered vehicles and 16.6 million licensed drivers.

Drivers and Vehicles

Household Vehicle Availability 50%

Millions

45%

19

40%

18

35%

17

30% 25%

16

20%

15

15% 10%

14

5% 0%

13 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 No vehicles available 2 vehicles available

2012

2010

2013 2014 2015 2016 1 vehicle available 3 or more vehicles available

2012

2013

Licensed Drivers

Source: U.S. Census Bureau – American Community Survey


2011

2014

2015

2016

2017

Registered Vehicles

Source: The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Driver and Vehicle Reports & Statistics; The Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Motor Vehicle Registrations

14

USE CHARACTERISTICS SEAT BELT USAGE Seat belt usage in Florida has remained at approximately 90% over the last three years, up from 82% in 2008.

100% 90% 80% 70% 60% 50% 40% 30% 20% 10% 0% 2008 2009 2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

2017

Source: FDOT’s Safety Office – Safety Belt Use in Florida Annual Reports


15

INTERACTIONS INTERNATIONAL TRADE IN FLORIDA

CO2 EMISSIONS BY SECTOR

In 2016, the total international trade (imports and exports combined) stood at $142.8 billion, up from $114.8 billion in 2007. In 2016, the imports constitute approximately 52.4% of the total international trade.

Electric power and transportation are the main sources of fossil fuel CO2 emissions in Florida. Together, both sectors contribute approximately 92% of CO2 emissions in Florida.

Florida Fossil Fuel CO2 Emissions by Sector Billions

Annual Metric Tons (millions) 150

$180 $150

100

$120 $90

50

$60 0

$30

2006 2007 2008 2009 2010

$0 2007 2008 2009 2010

2011

Exports

2012

2013 2014 2015 2016

Imports

Source: Enterprise Florida – Florida Annual Trade Summary


2011

2012

Commercial

Residential

Electric Power

Transportation

2013

2014

2015

Industrial

Source: U.S. Department of Energy’s Energy Information Administration – State Carbon Dioxide Emissions Data

16

INTERACTIONS FREIGHT GROWTH Airline freight tonnage in Florida decreased from 2015 to 2016. Waterborne cargo and truck daily vehicle miles traveled (DVMT) increased from 2015 to 2016. Rail tonnage data is not available for 2015 and 2016.

Percent Change from 2007 20% 10% 0% -10% -20% -30% -40% -50%

2007 2008 Rail Freight

2009

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Airline Freight Seaport Freight

2015 2016 Truck DVMT

Source: American Association of Railroads – Rail Fast Facts; FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory; FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory; Florida Ports Council – Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan; U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics


17


18

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC IZATION UTIL

SECTION III MULTIMODAL MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

19

2016 STATE HIGHWAY SYSTEM PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

2016 ROADWAY PERFORMANCE SUMMARY QUANTITY

QUALITY

DAILY VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED

TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL

The product of vehicle traffic volume and road (segment) length.

322.1

77%

On-time arrival is defined as the percentage of peak hour/peak period freeway trips traveling at least 45 mph for the 7 largest Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs) and 5 mph under the posted speed limit for all other areas.

MILLION

DAILY COMBINATION TRUCK MILES TRAVELED

COMBINATION TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL

The product of combination truck traffic volume and road (segment) length.

15.4 MILLION

Combination truck on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of peak hour/peak period freeway trips by combination trucks traveling at least at 45 mph for the 7 largest MPOs and 5 mph under the posted speed limit for all other areas.

TRUCK TONNAGE Freight tonnage carried by trucks.

82%

637

MILLION TONS

VEHICLE HOURS OF DELAY

UTILIZATION

% MILES HEAVILY CONGESTED

The sum of roadway miles operating at LOS E and F during peak hour/peak period, divided by total roadway miles.

5% Go to Contents

20

Delay is the product of directional hourly volume and the difference between travel time at “threshold” speeds and travel time at the average speed. The thresholds are based on Level of Service (LOS) B as defined by FDOT.

219

MILLIONS OF HOURS

2016 MODAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY 2016 MODAL PERFORMANCE SUMMARY

QUANTITY

QUALITY

TRANSIT

AVIATION RELIABILITY

Annual number of passenger trips on the transit vehicles. A trip is counted each time a passenger boards a transit vehicle. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between buses to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger trips.

Departure is deemed reliable if the flight departs within 15 minutes after the scheduled time shown in the carrier’s Computerized Reservations Systems (CRS). In the aviation industry, this is commonly known as on-time departure.

PASSENGER 251 MILLION TRIPS

83%

SEAPORT Annual number of passengers embarking on cruise ships at Florida ports.

16

ACCESSIBILITY PERCENT OF BICYCLE FACILITY COVERAGE

MILLION PASSENGERS

The percentage of centerline miles of non-freeway State Highway System (SHS) facilities that have bike lanes, paved shoulders, or shared-use paths available to bicyclists.

AVIATION

75%

The total number of revenue passengers who board an aircraft at a Florida airport. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between planes to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger boardings.

78 MILLION BOARDINGS

PERCENT OF PEDESTRIAN FACILITY COVERAGE

RAIL

The percentage of centerline miles of non-freeway SHS facilities in urban areas (5,000+ population) that have sidewalks and/or shared-use paths available to pedestrians.

Tons of freight carried by rail mode originated or terminated in Florida.

OUT

43

MILLION TONS

Go to Contents

IN

67%

68 MILLION TONS 21

AREA TYPES

¯ !

Mobility performance measures included in the Source Book are categorized by the following area types: urbanized areas of the seven largest Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs), other urbanized areas, and non-urbanized areas.

JACKSONVILLE

!

TAMPA

ORLANDO

!

!

Other Urbanized Areas

MIAMI

Urbanized Areas of the 7 Largest MPOs Non-Urbanized Areas Counties 0

Freeways

Go to Contents

22

50

100 Miles

PEOPLE-RELATED MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

23

Auto/Truck

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED

IZATION UTIL

People > Quantity > Auto/Truck >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Vehicle Miles Traveled on SHS by Area During Peak Hour

Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) is the product of vehicle traffic volume and road (segment) length.

Millions 30

CALCULATION

25

Σ (Segment Length×Volume)

20 15

REPORTING PERIODS ☑ Peak hour

□ Peak period

10

☑ Daily

□ Yearly

5 0

2007 2008 2009

OBSERVATION

2010

7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized

Travel on Florida’s SHS has been increasing over the last few years. From 2015 to 2016, VMT on Florida’s SHS during peak hour increased by 5%.

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

Non-Urbanized Areas

Vehicle Miles Traveled on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour Millions

SOURCES

30

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory

25

• FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory

20 15 10 5 0

2007 2008 2009

2010

SHS Freeways NHS


24

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

SHS Highways SHS Arterials SIS Highway Corridors

2016

QUANTITY QUALITY


PERSON MILES TRAVELED People > Quantity > Auto/Truck >

Person Miles Traveled (PMT) is determined using vehicle traffic volume, segment length, and average vehicle occupancy for highway motor vehicles.

QUANTITY

Person Miles Traveled on SHS by Area During Peak Hour

METHODOLOGY Millions 50 40

CALCULATION

30

Σ (Segment Length×Volume×Average Vehicle Occupancy)

20


□ Peak period

☑ Daily

10

□ Yearly

0

OBSERVATION

2007 2008 2009

2010


Travel on Florida’s SHS has been increasing over the last few years. From 2015 to 2016, person miles traveled on Florida’s SHS during peak hour increased by 5%.

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

Non-Urbanized Areas

Person Miles Traveled on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour Millions 50

SOURCES

40

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory

30

• U.S. DOT – National Household Travel Survey 2009 Florida Add-On

20 10 0

2007 2008 2009

2010

SHS Freeways NHS


25

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015


2016

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% NON-SINGLE OCCUPANCY VEHICLE TRAVEL

IZATION UTIL


QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Percent of Non-SOV Travel 30%

The non-Single Occupancy Vehicle (SOV) travel includes travel via carpool, van, public transportation, commuter rail, walking, or bicycling as well as telecommuting.

20%

CALCULATION Travel using non-SOV in Florida Total travel within Florida

x100 10%

REPORTING PERIODS

□ Peak hour □ Peak period □ Daily

☑Yearly

0%

OBSERVATION

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

20.6%

20.7%

20.1%

20.3%

20.7%

20.4%

20.3%

20.3%

20.8%

Non-SOV Travel

The share of non-SOV commuting trips in Florida has remained steady between 20% and 21% over the last decade.

SOURCE • U.S. Census Bureau – American Community Survey


2007 20.4%

26

QUANTITY QUALITY


% TRAVEL MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

% Travel Meeting LOS Criteria on SHS During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The percentage of travel meeting LOS criteria is determined by summing the VMT on roadways operating acceptably and then dividing by the total system VMT. The term “acceptably” is defined as LOS D (two-hour peak) for the urbanized areas of the 7 largest MPOs, LOS D (one-hour peak) for other urbanized areas, and LOS C (one-hour peak) everywhere else.

100%

90%

80%

70%

∑ (VMT|Peak Performance ≥ Acceptable LOS Criteria Threshold) ×100 ∑ (VMT)

60%

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

SHS Total Non-Urbanized Areas

REPORTING PERIODS

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Other Urbanized Areas 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized

Urbanized Areas of the 7 largest MPOs:

□Peak hour All Others: ☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period ☑ Daily

□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

% Travel Meeting LOS Criteria on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period 100%

90%

OBSERVATION As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, the percent of travel meeting the acceptable LOS criteria during peak hour/ peak period has decreased. From 2015 to 2016, it decreased from 80.5% to 78.5% on Florida’s SHS during peak hour/peak period.

80%

70%

60%

SOURCES

2008 2009

SHS Total SHS Arterials

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data Go to Contents or Go to Data

2007

27

2010

2011

2012

2013

SHS Freeways SIS Highway Corridors

2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

QUALITY

CALCULATION

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% MILES MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

% Miles Meeting LOS Criteria on SHS During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The percentage of miles meeting LOS criteria is determined by summing the centerline miles of roadways operating acceptably and then dividing by the total system centerline miles. The term “acceptably” is defined as LOS D (two-hour peak) for the urbanized areas of the 7 largest MPOs, LOS D (one-hour peak) for other urbanized areas, and LOS C (one-hour peak) everywhere else.

100%

90%

80%

QUALITY

CALCULATION

70%

60%

∑ (Segment Length|Peak Perf. ≥ Acceptable LOS Criteria Threshold) ×100 ∑ (Segment Length)

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012


REPORTING PERIODS

2013

2014

2015

2016


Urbanized Areas of the 7 Largest MPOs:

□Peak hour All Others:

☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period

□ Daily □Yearly

% Miles Meeting LOS Criteria on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period

□ Peak period □ Daily □Yearly

100%

OBSERVATION

90%

As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, the percent of miles meeting the acceptable LOS criteria during peak hour/peak period has decreased. From 2015 to 2016, it decreased from 94.4% to 93.6% on Florida’s SHS during peak hour/peak period.

80% 70% 60%

SOURCES

2007


• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data Go to Contents or Go to Data

2008 2009

28

2010

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

On-Time Arrival on Freeways by Area Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period

For the urbanized areas of the 7 largest MPOs, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips traveling at least 45 mph. For all others, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips traveling at greater than or equal to 5 mph below the posted speed limit.

100% 95% 90%

For example, 80% on-time arrival indicates that the traveler is anticipated to arrive at the destination on time on 4 out of 5 trips.

80%

CALCULATION

∑ (VMT|Travel Speed ≥ 45 mph) ×100 ∑ (VMT)

75%

∑ (VMT|Travel Speed ≥ (Speed Limit-5 mph) ×100 ∑ (VMT)

70%


All Others: ☑ Peak hour


□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

OBSERVATION From 2015 to 2016, on-time arrival for travel on Florida’s SHS freeways during peak hour/peak period dropped from 79% to 77%.

SOURCES • FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data Go to Contents or Go to Data

2008 2009 2010

2011


REPORTING PERIODS

□Peak hour

2007

29

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


QUALITY

Urbanized Areas of 7 Largest MPOs= All Others=

85%

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: VARIABILITY

IZATION UTIL


METHODOLOGY

Variability on Freeways During Peak Hour/Peak Period

Travel time variability is defined as 95th percentile travel time index (TTI95), and is known as the Planning Time Index (PTI).

TTI95 2.0

This measure represents the additional time that a traveler should budget to ensure on-time arrival 95 percent of the time.

1.8 1.6

QUALITY

CALCULATION TTI95=

1.4

Travel Time95th percentile Travel Timefree flow

1.2

REPORTING PERIODS

1.0



☑ Peak hour


□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

2008 2009

2010

2011


OBSERVATION From 2015 to 2016, travel time variability on Florida’s SHS freeways during peak hour/peak period increased from 1.48 to 1.50. For a trip that would take 10 minutes in free-flow conditions, the 95th percentile travel time is 14.8 minutes with a 1.48 PTI and 15 minutes with a 1.50 PTI.


2007

30

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY


VEHICLE HOURS OF DELAY People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Vehicle Hours of Delay on SHS by Area During Peak Hour

Delay is the product of directional hourly volume and the difference between travel time at “threshold” speeds and travel time at the average speed. The thresholds are based on LOS B as defined by FDOT.

Thousands 150

100

CALCULATION ∑ (Daily or Peak Travel Time – Travel Time at LOS B) X Peak Volume

50

☑ Peak hour

□ Peak period

☑ Daily ☑Yearly 0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized Other Urbanized Areas Non-Urbanized Areas

OBSERVATION

Vehicle Hours of Delay on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour

From 2015 to 2016, delay along Florida’s SHS increased by 14% during peak hours. Better data capturing techniques and increased VMT could partially explain the increase.

Thousands 150

SOURCES • FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory

100

• HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data

50

0


31

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SIS Highway Corridors NHS

2016

QUALITY

REPORTING PERIODS

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

PERSON HOURS OF DELAY

IZATION UTIL


METHODOLOGY

Person Hours of Delay on SHS by Area During Peak Hour

Person hours of delay is calculated as the product of directional hourly volume, average vehicle occupancy, and the difference between travel time at “threshold” speeds and travel time at the average speed. The thresholds are based on LOS B as defined by FDOT.

Thousands 250 200 150

QUALITY

CALCULATION

100

∑ (Daily or Peak Travel Time-Travel Time at LOS B) × Peak Volume × Average Vehicle Occupancy

50


□ Peak period

0

2007 2008 2009 2010


☑ Daily ☑Yearly

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Non-Urbanized Areas

Person Hours of Delay on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour

OBSERVATION Thousands 250

From 2015 to 2016, person hours of delay along Florida’s SHS went up by nearly 14% during peak hours. Better data capturing techniques and increased person miles traveled partially explain the increase.

200 150

SOURCES

100

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • U.S. DOT – National Household Travel Survey 2009 Florida Add-On

50 0


2007

2008

2009

2010

SHS Freeways NHS


2011


32

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015


2016

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Average Travel Speed on SHS by Area During Peak Hour/Peak Period

Travel speeds are attained from a private vendor. Speeds are provided in 15-minute increments and gathered from fleet vehicles, bluetooth signals, and navigational devices.

MPH 60 50

CALCULATION

40

∑ (VMT × Average Travel Speed) ∑ (VMT)

30 20 10 0



☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period

□ Daily □Yearly


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Total Non-Urbanized Areas

2013 2014 2015 2016 Other Urbanized Areas 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized

Average Travel Speed on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period MPH 80

OBSERVATION Statewide average speed in 2016 on Florida’s SHS during peak hour/peak period stood at 46.5 mph, the same as in 2015.

60

SOURCES

40


20

• FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data

0

2007

2008

2009



2012

33

2010

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

QUALITY

REPORTING PERIODS

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

NUMBER OF FATALITIES

IZATION UTIL


METHODOLOGY

Number of Fatalities 3,000

Total number of fatalities on Florida’s roadways.

2,500

CALCULATION ∑ Fatalities

2,000

REPORTING PERIODS

1,500

QUALITY


☑Yearly

1,000

OBSERVATION

500

Between 2014 and 2015, the number of fatalities on Florida’s roadways increased by 18%. There were 2,939 fatalities in 2015.

0

SOURCE • FDOT – Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan


34

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

QUANTITY QUALITY


NUMBER OF SERIOUS INJURIES People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Number of Serious Injuries

Number of Serious Injuries

25,000

Total number of serious injuries (non-fatal) on Florida’s roadways.

20,000

CALCULATION ∑ Serious Injuries

15,000

REPORTING PERIODS

10,000

☑Yearly

QUALITY


5,000

OBSERVATION 0

Between 2014 and 2015, the number of serious injuries on Florida’s roadways increased by 3%. In 2015, 21,551 people were seriously injured.

2011



35

2012

2013

2014

2015

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

RATE OF FATALITIES

IZATION UTIL


METHODOLOGY

Rate of Fatalities/100M VMT 1.5

Total number of fatalities on Florida’s roadways per 100 million VMT.

1.2

CALCULATION 0.9

∑ Fatalities/100 million VMT

0.6

QUALITY

REPORTING PERIODS


0.3

☑Yearly

OBSERVATION

0.0 2011

Between 2014 and 2015, the rate of fatalities per 100 million VMT on Florida’s roadways increased from 1.24 to 1.42.

SOURCE • FDOT – Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan • Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Traffic Crash Facts Annual Report


36

2012

2013

2014

2015

QUANTITY QUALITY


RATE OF SERIOUS INJURIES People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Serious Injuries Rate/100M VMT 11.0

Total number of serious injuries (non-fatal) on Florida’s roadways per 100 million VMT.

10.6

CALCULATION ∑ Serious injuries /100 million VMT

10.2

REPORTING PERIODS ☑Yearly

QUALITY


9.8

9.4

OBSERVATION 9.0

Between 2014 and 2015, the rate of serious injuries per 100 million VMT on Florida’s roadways increased from 10.40 to 10.43, but is down from its peak of 10.50 in 2013.

2011

SOURCE • FDOT – Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan • Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles – Traffic Crash Facts Annual Report


37

2012

2013

2014

2015

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TIME SPENT COMMUTING

IZATION UTIL

People > Accessibility > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Percentage of Auto Commuters with Drive Time Accessibility > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Number of Jobs Accessible by Auto by an Average Worker within a 30-Minute Travel Time Threshold

Job accessibility is a “cumulative opportunity” metric — it reflects the total amount of jobs reachable by auto within a 30-minute travel time threshold. It is calculated for each census block, and the results are aggregated to provide a statewide average. This calculation assumes a departure time of 8:00 a.m. in order to represent job accessibility during the morning peak period.

560,500 jobs

CALCULATION ∑ (Block-level # of jobs1×# workers1, Block-level # of jobs2×# workers2,…) ∑ # workers1, # workers2,…

REPORTING PERIODS

□Peak hour □ Peak period □ Daily

☑Yearly

ACCESSIBILITY

OBSERVATION In 2015, approximately 560,500 jobs were accessible by auto by an average worker within a 30-minute travel time threshold.

SOURCE • FDOT Pooled Fund Study – Access Across America

Go to Contents

39

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% TRAVEL HEAVILY CONGESTED

IZATION UTIL

People > Utilization > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

% Travel Heavily Congested on SHS During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The percentage of travel heavily congested is determined by summing the VMT on roadways operating at LOS E and F and then dividing it by the total system VMT.

35% 30% 25%

CALCULATION

20% 15%

∑(VMT|Peak Performance at LOS E and LOS F) ×100 ∑(VMT)

10% 5%

REPORTING PERIODS

0%



☑ Peak hour


□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


% Travel Heavily Congested on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period 30%

As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, the percent of travel heavily congested on Florida’s SHS has also increased. From 2015 to 2016, it increased from 14.4% to 15.7% during peak hour/period on Florida’s SHS.

25% 20% 15% 10%

SOURCE

5%


UTILIZATION

2011


OBSERVATION

0%


2007



2007 2008 2009 2010

2008

2009


40

2010

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

QUANTITY QUALITY


% MILES HEAVILY CONGESTED People > Utilization >Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

% Miles Heavily Congested on SHS During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The percentage of miles heavily congested is determined by summing the miles of roadway operating at LOS E and F in the peak hour/peak period and then dividing by the total highway miles.

20% 15%

CALCULATION

10%

∑ (Segment Length|Peak Performance at LOS E and F) ×100 ∑ (Segment Length)

5% 0%

REPORTING PERIODS Urbanized Areas of the 7 Largest MPOs:


☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period

2011

2012


□ Daily □Yearly

2013

2014

2015

2016


% Miles Heavily Congested on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period


12%

OBSERVATION

10%

As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, the percent of miles heavily congested on Florida’s SHS has also increased. From 2015 to 2016, it increased from 4.3% to 4.9% during peak hour/period on Florida’s SHS.

8%

SOURCE

2%

6% 4%

0%


2007 2008 2009 2010 SHS Total SHS Arterials


41

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

UTILIZATION



2007 2008 2009 2010

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

HOURS HEAVILY CONGESTED

IZATION UTIL


METHODOLOGY

Hours Heavily Congested during a Day on SHS by Area

The vehicle hours heavily congested is the total number of hours during which a segment operates at LOS E and F, weighted by lane-miles.

Hours 10,000 8,000

CALCULATION

24

Daily Hours Heavily Congestedi= LOS E and LOS F

∑

6,000

Hourly Performance at

t=1

4,000

24

Yearly Hours Heavily Congestedi=365× Performance at LOS E and LOS F

∑ Hourly

2,000

t=1

0

REPORTING PERIODS

□ Peak hour □ Peak period

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011


☑ Daily ☑Yearly

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


Non-Urbanized Areas

Hours Heavily Congested during a Day on SHS by Facility Type

OBSERVATION

Hours 10,000

As travel on Florida’s roadways has gone up, hours heavily congested has also increased. From 2015 to 2016, hours heavily congested during a day on Florida’s SHS rose by 5%.

7,500 5,000


2,500

UTILIZATION

• FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory 0


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Freeways NHS


42

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016

SHS Highways

SHS Arterials

SIS Highway Corridors

QUANTITY QUALITY


VEHICLES PER LANE MILE People > Utilization > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY The vehicles on a road segment, divided by the number of lane miles on that segment.

1,000 800

CALCULATION

600

Volume ∑ × (Lane Miles) Number of Lanes

400

∑ (Lane Miles)

200


Vehicles Per Lane Mile on SHS by Area During Peak Hour


0

OBSERVATION

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Total Non-Urbanized Areas

2012


Vehicles Per Lane Mile on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour

As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, the number of vehicles per lane mile has also increased. From 2015 to 2016, it grew by 2% on Florida’s SHS.

1,200 1,000

SOURCES

800

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory 600


400 200


43

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 SHS Total SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SIS Highway Corridors NHS

UTILIZATION

0

Transit

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS

IZATION UTIL

People > Quantity > Transit >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Transit Passenger Trips Millions 300

Annual number of passenger trips on the transit vehicles. A trip is counted each time a passenger boards a transit vehicle. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between buses to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger trips.

250 200

CALCULATION

150

∑ Passenger Trips

100

REPORTING PERIODS


50

☑ Yearly

0

OBSERVATION The number of transit passenger trips decreased by approximately 7% between 2015 and 2016. In 2016, Florida’s fixed route transit agencies served 251 million passenger trips.

SOURCE • FDOT – Florida Transit Information and Performance Handbook


44

2007 257.0

2008 262.2

2009 248.8

2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 245.2 260.7 270.2 278.2 277.5 Transit Passenger Trips (millions)

2015 270.8

2016 250.6

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRANSIT REVENUE MILES People > Quantity > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

160

CALCULATION

120

QUANTITY

Number of annual miles of vehicle operation while in active service (available to pick up revenue passengers).

140

100

Number of annual miles of vehicle operation while in active service

80

REPORTING PERIODS

60


40

☑ Yearly

20 0

OBSERVATION Transit revenue miles increased by approximately 2% between 2015 and 2016. In 2016, transit vehicles traveled 148 million revenue miles.

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

140.8

137.0

136.4

135.8

134.5

137.7

140.5

143.4

145.7

148.2

Transit Revenue Miles (millions)



Transit Revenue Miles

Millions

45

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRANSIT REVENUE MILES BETWEEN FAILURES

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

Transit Revenue Miles Between Failures Miles

Number of total annual revenue miles divided by the number of revenue vehicle system failures; an indicator of the average frequency of delays because of a problem with the equipment.

6,000

5,000

QUALITY

CALCULATION Total Annual Revenue Miles Number of Revenue Vehicle System Failures

4,000

REPORTING PERIODS

3,000


☑ Yearly

2,000

OBSERVATION 1,000

Transit revenue miles between failures increased by 7% between 2015 and 2016, which translated into fewer system failures and more reliable transportation for the passengers. In 2016, there was one failure every 4,260 miles.

0

2008 4,588

2009 4,627

2010 5,302

2011 4,665

2012 4,950

2013 4,438

2014 3,974

Annual Revenue Miles between Failures



2007 4,650

46

2015 3,965

2016 4,260

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRANSIT WEEKDAY SPAN OF SERVICE People > Accessibility > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

Weekday Span of Service on Transit

The number of hours that transit service is provided on a representative weekday in the operation of the transit agency. This indicator is determined by computing the number of hours between the time service begins and the time service ends for an average weekday.

Hours 24

CALCULATION

16

22 20 18

14

∑ (Service Spans) ∑ (Transit Agencies)

12 10

REPORTING PERIODS

8


6

☑ Daily

□ Yearly

4 2

OBSERVATION

0



47

2007 16.8

2008 16.7

2009 16.8

2010 16.6

2011 2012 16.5 16.6 Hours of Service

2013 16.6

2014 17.5

2015 17.5

2016 16.3

ACCESSIBILITY

Over the last decade, weekday span of service on transit has remained steady between 16 and 18 hours.

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

RESIDENT ACCESS TO TRANSIT

IZATION UTIL

People > Accessibility > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

Resident Access to Transit

The percentage of the population within a half-mile of fixedroute transit.

56%

CALCULATION ∑ Population within a half-mile of Transit ∑ Total Population

REPORTING PERIODS


☑ Yearly

OBSERVATION

ACCESSIBILITY

In 2016, the resident access to transit was approximately 56%.


Go to Contents

48

QUANTITY QUALITY


JOB ACCESSIBILITY – TRANSIT People > Accessibility > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

Number of Jobs Accessible by Transit by an Average Worker within a 30-Minute Travel Time Threshold

Job accessibility is a “cumulative opportunity” metric — it reflects the total amount of jobs reachable by transit within a 30-minute travel time threshold. It is calculated for each census block, and the results are aggregated to provide a statewide average. This analysis uses the 7:00 a.m. - 9:00 a.m. time period.

CALCULATION

6,700 jobs

∑(Block-level # of jobs1×# workers1, Block-level # of jobs2×# workers2,…) ∑ # workers1, # workers2,…

REPORTING PERIODS


☑ Yearly

ACCESSIBILITY

OBSERVATION In 2015, approximately 6,700 jobs were accessible by transit by an average worker within a 30-minute travel time threshold.

SOURCE • FDOT Pooled Fund Study – Access Across America

Go to Contents

49

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS PER REVENUE MILE

IZATION UTIL

People > Utilization > Transit >

METHODOLOGY

Passenger Trips Per Revenue Mile

The ratio of annual transit passenger trips to total annual transit revenue miles of service; a key indicator of service effectiveness that is influenced by the levels of demand and the supply of service provided.

2.0

CALCULATION

1.0

1.5

∑ (Annual Transit Passenger Trips) ∑ (Annual Transit Revenue Miles)

0.5

REPORTING PERIODS


0.0

☑ Yearly

OBSERVATION Transit passenger trips per revenue mile decreased approximately 9% between 2015 and 2016.

SOURCE

UTILIZATION

• FDOT – Florida Transit Information and Performance Handbook


50

2007

2008

2009

2010

1.8

1.9

1.8

1.8

2011

2012

1.9 2.0 Annual Trips

2013

2014

2015

2016

2.0

1.9

1.9

1.7

Bicycle/Pedestrian

QUANTITY QUALITY


PEDESTRIAN LEVEL OF SERVICE People > Quality > Pedestrian >

METHODOLOGY

2015 Pedestrian LOS, Urban Areas

Pedestrian LOS in urban areas (5,000+ population) of SHS measures a roadway’s quality of service to pedestrians with LOS A being the highest quality, and LOS F the lowest quality.

1,147 miles, 27%

CALCULATION

465 miles, 11%

∑ Miles of Each LOS Letter Grade

REPORTING PERIODS

121 miles, 3%

□ Peak period □ Daily □ Yearly

1,639 miles, 39%

OBSERVATION

833 miles, 20%

In 2015, 62% of urban area miles had a pedestrian LOS of D or better during peak hour. Total Urban Miles: 4,219

SOURCES

LOS A

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Pedestrian LOS Model

Go to Contents

51

LOS B

LOS C

LOS D

LOS E

LOS F

QUALITY

☑ Peak hour

14 miles, Quality > Bicycle/Pedestrian >

Pedestrian and Bicyclist, Fatalities and Serious Injuries

METHODOLOGY

4,000

Total number of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries (non-fatal) on Florida’s roadways.

3,500 3,000

CALCULATION

2,500

∑ Pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries

2,000

QUALITY

REPORTING PERIODS


1,500 1,000

☑ Yearly

500

OBSERVATION

0 2011

From 2014 to 2015, the number of pedestrian and bicyclist fatalities and serious injuries increased by 2%. In 2015, 785 pedestrians and bicyclists were killed and 2,596 were seriously injured.



52

2012 2013 2014 Fatalities Serious Injuries

2015

QUANTITY QUALITY


% PEDESTRIAN FACILITY COVERAGE People > Accessibility > Pedestrian >

METHODOLOGY

% of Pedestrian Facility Coverage on Non-Freeway SHS, Urban Areas

The percentage of centerline miles of non-freeway SHS facilities in urban areas (5,000+ population) that have sidewalks and/or shared-use paths available to pedestrians.

100% 90%

CALCULATION

80%

∑ Sidewalk Miles In Urban Areas ×100 ∑ Centerline Miles In Urban Areas

70% 60%

REPORTING PERIODS


50%

☑ Yearly

40%

OBSERVATION

2011

2012

7 Largest Counties

2013

2014

Other Urban Areas

2015

2016

Total State Urban

In 2016, approximately 67% of Florida’s non-freeway SHS facilities in urban areas had pedestrian facility coverage.

ACCESSIBILITY

SOURCE • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory


53

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

BICYCLE LEVEL OF SERVICE

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Bicycle >

METHODOLOGY

2015 Bicycle LOS

Bicycle LOS measures a roadway’s quality of service to bicyclists with LOS A being the highest quality, and LOS F the lowest quality.

1,270 miles, 30%

CALCULATION

464 miles, 11%

23 miles, 1%

∑ Miles of Each LOS Letter Grade

226 miles, 5%

QUALITY


1,801 miles, 43%

□ Peak period □ Daily □ Yearly

434 miles, 10%

Total Urban Miles: 4,219

OBSERVATION In 2015, 88% of urban area and non-urban area miles had a bicycle LOS of D or better during peak hour.

824 miles, 20%

SOURCES

449 miles, 11%

1,649 miles, 39%


364 miles, 9%

• FDOT – Bicycle LOS Model

191 miles, 5%

1,949 miles, 46% Total Non-Urban Miles: 5,426 LOS A

Go to Contents

54

LOS B

LOS C

LOS D

LOS E

LOS F

QUANTITY QUALITY


% BICYCLE FACILITY COVERAGE People > Accessibility > Bicycle >

METHODOLOGY

% Bicycle Facility Coverage on Non-Freeway SHS

The percentage of centerline miles of non-freeway SHS facilities that have bike lanes, paved shoulders, or shareduse paths available to bicyclists.

100% 90% 80%

CALCULATION (∑ Bike Lane Miles) (∑ Centerline Miles)

70% 60%

×100

50% 40%

REPORTING PERIODS


30% 20%

☑ Yearly

10% 0%

OBSERVATION In 2016, approximately 75% of Florida’s non-freeway SHS facilities had bike lanes, paved shoulders, or shared-use paths.

2012

2013

2014

7 Largest Counties

Total State Urban

Other Urban Areas

Non-Urban Areas

2015

2016 SHS Total

ACCESSIBILITY

SOURCE • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory


2011

55

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% POPULATION WITHIN ONE MILE OF BIKE LANE AND SHARED-USE PATHS

IZATION UTIL

People > Accessibility > Bicycle >

METHODOLOGY

% Population Within One Mile of Bike Lane and Shared-Use Paths

Ratio of population within one mile of bike lanes and shareduse paths to Florida’s total population. The bike lane and shared-use path miles include those on the SHS and a limited number of non-SHS miles deemed of interest to FDOT.

60%

50%

40%

CALCULATION 30%

Population within One Mile of Bike Lane and Shared-Use Paths Total Population in the state of Florida

20%

REPORTING PERIODS


10%

☑ Yearly 0%

ACCESSIBILITY

OBSERVATION In 2016, 42% of Florida’s statewide population lived within one mile of a bike lane or shared-use path.

SOURCE • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • U.S. Census Bureau – American Community Survey


56


Non-Urbanized

Other Urbanized

Statewide

Aviation

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVIATION PASSENGER BOARDINGS People > Quantity > Aviation >

METHODOLOGY

Aviation Passenger Boardings QUANTITY

Millions 80

The total number of revenue passengers who board an aircraft at a Florida airport. If a passenger has to transfer between planes to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger boardings.

70 60

CALCULATION

50

∑ Revenue Passengers Boarding Aircraft

40

REPORTING PERIODS


30

☑ Yearly

20

OBSERVATION

10

Aviation passenger boarding increased by 6% between 2015 and 2016. Florida commercial airports served 78.1 million passenger boardings in 2016.

0

SOURCE • Federal Aviation Administration – Air Carrier Activity Information System (ACAIS)


57

2007 69.7

2008 68.1

2009 63.8

2010 2011 2012 2013 65.4 68.0 68.1 68.6 Aviation Boardings (millions)

2014 72.3

2015 74.0

2016 78.1

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVIATION DEPARTURE RELIABILITY

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Aviation >

METHODOLOGY

Aviation Departure Reliability 100%

QUALITY

Departure is deemed reliable if the flight departs within 15 minutes after the scheduled time shown in the carrier’s Computerized Reservations Systems (CRS). In the aviation industry, this is commonly known as on-time departure. Departure reliability is based on departure from the gate and can be influenced by various factors such as heavy traffic volume, weather, and mechanical reasons beyond the control of the airport.

90% 80% 70% 60% 50%

CALCULATION ∑ (Departures < 15 Minutes of Schedule) ∑ (Departures)

40%

x100

30% 20%

REPORTING PERIODS


10% 0%

☑ Yearly

OBSERVATION

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

85.3%

80.3%

84.3%

85.9%

83.5%

75.4%

80.5%

82.6%

82.9%

% On-Time Departure at Airports

Aviation departure reliability was estimated to be between 80% and 85% over the last decade.

SOURCE • U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics


2007 80.1%

58

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVIATION DEMAND TO CAPACITY RATIO People > Utilization > Aviation >

METHODOLOGY

Aviation Demand to Capacity Ratio

The ratio of the annual operational demand to annual service volume. Annual service volume is determined by the quantity of airports’ runways and taxiways.

50% 40% 30%

CALCULATION

20%

∑ Operations ×100 ∑ Airport Service Volume

10% 0%

REPORTING PERIODS


2011

2012

2014

30.5%

31.0%

44.9%

Aviation Demand to Capacity Ratios

☑ Yearly

OBSERVATION Aviation demand to capacity ratio increased to 45% in 2014 from 30% in 2011. Data is not available for 2013, 2015, and 2016.

SOURCE • FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office – Airport Demand/Capacity Study

UTILIZATION


59

Rail

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

RAIL PASSENGERS

IZATION UTIL

People > Quantity > Rail >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Rail Passengers

Annual number of revenue paying rail passengers. For the purpose of this performance measure, rail passengers include those riding on Amtrak, SunRail, and Tri-Rail. SunRail began operations in 2015.

Millions 7.0 6.0

CALCULATION

5.0

∑ Rail Passengers

4.0

REPORTING PERIODS


3.0

☑ Yearly

2.0

OBSERVATION

1.0

From 2015 to 2016, rail ridership decreased by 4%. In 2016, the rail services carried 6.1 million passengers.

0.0

2010

SunRail

SOURCES • Amtrak – Amtrak Fact Sheet • South Florida Regional Transportation Authority – Transit Development Plan • SunRail – Ridership Data


2007 2008 2009

60

2011

2012

Amtrak

2013

Tri-Rail

2014

2015

2016

QUANTITY QUALITY


RAIL DEPARTURE RELIABILITY People > Quality > Rail >

METHODOLOGY

Rail Departure Reliability 100%

Rail departure reliability captures the on-time performance of a passenger rail system operating within Florida. A train is considered on-time if arrival at endpoint is within a specified threshold timeframe of scheduled arrival time. The threshold timeframe varies based on the trip length.

90% 80% 70%

CALCULATION ∑ On Time Trains ∑ Trains

60%

×100

50%

QUALITY

40%

REPORTING PERIODS


30%

☑ Yearly

20% 10%

OBSERVATION

0%

Rail departure reliability remained steady at 75% between 2015 and 2016.

2008

2009

2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

65%

69%

67%

69%

74%

74%

72%

74%

75%

75%

Statewide Rail Departure Reliability

SOURCES • Amtrak – Ridership Data • South Florida Regional Transportation Authority – Transit Development Plan • SunRail – Ridership Data


2007

61

Seaport

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

SEAPORT PASSENGERS

IZATION UTIL

People > Quantity > Seaport >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Seaport Passengers Millions 18

Annual number of passengers embarking on cruise ships at Florida’s seven cruise ports.

16

CALCULATION

14

∑ Cruise Passengers

12

REPORTING PERIODS


10

☑ Yearly

8

OBSERVATION

6

In 2016, seaport passengers increased by 1% from 2015. This translates into an additional 214,000 passengers that took a cruise trip at Florida seaports.

4

SOURCE

0

2

• Florida Ports Council – Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan


62

2007 2008 2009 2010

2011

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

FREIGHT-RELATED MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

63

Truck

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK MILES TRAVELED

IZATION UTIL

Freight> Quantity > Truck >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Combination Truck Miles Traveled Daily on SHS By Area

Combination Truck Miles Traveled (CTMT) is the product of combination truck traffic volume and segment length.

Millions 18 16

CALCULATION

14

∑ (Segment Length×Combination Truck Volume)

12 10

REPORTING PERIODS


8

☑ Daily

6

□ Yearly

4 2

OBSERVATION

0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized Other Urbanized Areas

Combination truck miles traveled on Florida’s SHS witnessed a rebound in recent years. Between 2015 and 2016, it increased by 3%.

2014 2015 2016 Non-Urbanized Areas

Combination Truck Miles Traveled Daily on SHS By Facility Type Millions 18


16


14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0


64

2007

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SHS Freeways SHS Arterials NHS SIS Highway Corridors

2014 2015 2016 SHS Highways

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRUCK MILES TRAVELED Freight > Quantity > Truck >

METHODOLOGY The product of a road’s VMT and the percentage of vehicles that are trucks. If a road has a daily VMT of 50,000 and an average percentage of trucks of 10%, then its daily Truck Miles Traveled (TMT) is 5,000.

Millions 35 30 25

CALCULATION

20

∑ (Segment Length × Volume × % Trucks)

15 10

REPORTING PERIODS


QUANTITY

Truck Miles Traveled Daily on SHS By Area

☑ Daily

5

□ Yearly

0

2007 2008 2009 2010


OBSERVATION

2011

2012

2013


2014 2015

2016

Non-Urbanized Areas

Truck Miles Traveled Daily on SHS By Facility Type

Between 2015 and 2016, annual truck miles traveled on Florida’s SHS grew by 5%. Millions 35

SOURCES

30


25


20 15 10 5 0


65

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SHS Arterials SHS Freeways NHS SIS Highway Corridors


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRUCK TONNAGE

IZATION UTIL


QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Truck Tonnage

Freight tonnage carried by trucks. The Freight Analysis Framework (FAF) tonnage data is interpolated using a combination truck miles traveled factor and an average truck load factor to calculate Truck Tonnage.

Millions 800

CALCULATION

500

700 600

400

∑ Truck Tonnage

300 200

REPORTING PERIODS


100

☑ Yearly

0

OBSERVATION Between 2015 and 2016, truck tonnage carried on Florida’s SHS decreased by 17%. This decrease can partly be attributed to the changes in methodology in calculating the tonnage in FAF.

SOURCES • FHWA – Freight Analysis Framework 2012 • FDOT – Weigh-In-Motion Data


66

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

573.8

591.6

579.1 Million Tons

676.6

637.1

QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK TON MILES TRAVELED Freight > Quantity > Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Combination Truck Ton Miles Traveled on SHS Billions 80

CALCULATION

70

QUANTITY

The product of CTMT and average weight of the load.

60

∑ Average Combination Truck Load ×Combination Truck Miles Traveled

50 40

REPORTING PERIODS


30 20

☑ Yearly

10

OBSERVATION

0

From 2015 to 2016, combination truck ton miles traveled on Florida’s SHS increased by 1%. In 2016, combination trucks logged 56 billion ton miles.

SOURCES • FDOT – Weigh-In-Motion Data • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory


67

2009 49.5

2010 47.2

2011 48.5

2012 50.5

2013 52.3

2014 51.1

2015 55.9

2016 56.4

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRUCK VALUE OF FREIGHT

IZATION UTIL


QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Truck Value of Freight Billions

The value of truck freight in dollar amount is obtained from the FAF cargo value data, truck tonnage, and annual factors for CTMT and average truck load.

$800 $700 $600

CALCULATION

$500

∑ Value of Truck Tonnage

$400 $300

REPORTING PERIODS


$200 $100

☑ Yearly

$0

OBSERVATION The value of truck freight carried on Florida’s SHS decreased by 17%. This decrease can partly be attributed to the changes in methodology in calculating the value of tonnage in FAF. In 2016, truck freight was valued at $700 billion.

SOURCES • FHWA – Freight Analysis Framework 2012 • FDOT – Weigh-in-Motion Data • FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory


68

2012

2013

2014

2015

$637.3

$657.1

$643.1

$751.4

2016

$707.6

QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL Freight > Quality > Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Combination Truck On-Time Arrival on Freeways During Peak Hour/Peak Period

For the urbanized areas of the 7 largest MPOs, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips by combination trucks traveling at least 45 mph. For all others, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips by combination trucks traveling at greater than or equal to 5 mph below the posted speed limit.

95% 93% 91% 89% 87% 85%

CALCULATION

83%

∑ (CTMT|Combo Truck Travel Speed ≥ 45 mph) Urbanized Areas = ×100 of 7 Largest MPOs ∑ (CTMT)

79%

81%

75% 2007


All Others: ☑ Peak hour


□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

OBSERVATION From 2015 to 2016, on-time arrival for combination truck travel on Florida’s SHS during peak hour/peak period dropped from 83% to 82%.

SOURCES • FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data


2010

2011


REPORTING PERIODS

□Peak hour

2008 2009

69

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


QUALITY

77%

All Others = ∑ (CTMT|Combo Truck Travel Speed ≥ (Speed Limit-5 mph)) ×100 ∑ (CTMT)

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: VARIABILITY

IZATION UTIL

Freight> Quality > Truck >

QUALITY

METHODOLOGY Combination truck travel time variability is defined as 95th percentile travel time index (TTI95) and is known as the Planning Time Index (PTI).

TTI95

This measure represents the additional time that a shipper should budget to ensure on-time arrival 95% of the time.

1.60

CALCULATION

1.40

TTI95=

1.70

1.50

Travel Time95th percentile Travel Timefree flow

1.30 1.20

REPORTING PERIODS

1.10


1.00


☑ Peak hour


□Yearly

□ Peak period

□Yearly

☑ Daily

OBSERVATION Between 2015 and 2016, combination truck travel time variability on Florida’s SHS during peak hour/peak period remained steady at 1.35. For a trip that would take 10 minutes in free-flow conditions, the 95th percentile travel time is 13.5 minutes with a 1.35 PTI.


Combination Truck Variability on Freeways During Peak Hour/Peak Period

70

2007

2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Total Non-Urbanized Areas

2012


QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK HOURS OF DELAY Freight > Quality > Truck >

METHODOLOGY Combination truck hours of delay is based on combination truck speed. Delay is calculated as the product of directional hourly volume and the difference between travel time at “threshold” speeds (at LOS B) and travel time at the average speed.

Thousands

Combination Truck Hours of Delay on SHS By Area

25 20 15

CALCULATION ∑ (Daily Combination Truck Travel Time-Travel Time at LOS B) x Daily Combination Truck Volume

10

REPORTING PERIODS


☑ Daily

□Yearly

0

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized Other Urbanized Areas

OBSERVATION Between 2015 and 2016, combination truck hours of delay along Florida’s SHS increased by 9%. In 2016, combination trucks accumulated 18,200 hours of delay.

Thousands

2014 2015 2016 Non-Urbanized Areas

Combination Truck Hours of Delay on SHS By Facility Type

25 20

SOURCES

15

• FDOT – Traffic Characteristics Inventory 10

• FDOT – Roadway Characteristics Inventory • HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data

5 0


71

2007 2008 2009 2010 SHS Arterials SIS Highway Corridors

2011 2012 2013 SHS Freeways NHS

2014

2015 2016 SHS Highways

QUALITY

5

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Quality > Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Combination Truck Average Travel Speed on SHS By Area During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The calculation of combination truck average travel speed is identical to the methodology for passenger vehicle’s average travel speed, except that combination trucks are assumed to have a lower free-flow speed.

MPH 70 65 60

CALCULATION

55

QUALITY

∑ (CTMT×Combination Truck Average Travel Speed) ∑ (CTMT)

50 45

REPORTING PERIODS

40



☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period

2007

2008 2009 2010

2011


□ Daily □Yearly

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


Combination Truck Average Travel Speed on SHS By Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period


OBSERVATION

MPH 65

In 2016, statewide combination truck average speed on Florida’s SHS stood at 53.3 mph during peak hour/peak period.

55 45

SOURCES

35


25


2007 2008 2009 2010 SHS Total SHS Arterials


72

2011

2012

2013


2014

2015

2016

SHS Highways NHS

QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK COST OF DELAY Freight > Quality > Truck >

METHODOLOGY The monetization of combination truck cost of delay is based on combination truck hours of delay and the marginal cost of truck labor per hour.

Thousands $200

$150

CALCULATION Combination Truck Hours of Delay×Average Marginal Cost of Labor per Hour

$100

$50

☑ Yearly

$0

2008 2009 2010 7 Largest MPOs – Urbanized

OBSERVATION

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Other Urbanized Areas Non-Urbanized Areas

Combination Truck Cost of Delay on SHS by Facility Type

Combination truck cost of delay has been rising over the last few years. In 2016, it totaled $180,000 on the SHS. Between 2015 and 2016, it went up by 17%. This can largely be attributed to increases in wages and benefits in the trucking industry, caused by a shortage of qualified drivers.

Thousands $200

$150

SOURCES $100


$50

• HERE Technologies – Travel Time Data • American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) – An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking


$0

73

2008

2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SHS Freeways SHS Arterials NHS SIS Highway Corridors


QUALITY

REPORTING PERIODS


Combination Truck Cost of Delay on SHS by Area

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRUCK EMPTY BACKHAUL TONNAGE

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Utilization > Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Truck Empty Backhaul Tonnage Millions 30

Empty freight tonnage on trucks leaving the state of Florida. The FAF tonnage data is interpolated using combination truck miles traveled data to calculate incoming and outgoing truck freight tonnage. An average capacity to average load ratio is calculated and applied to the difference between incoming and outgoing truck tonnage.

26 22

CALCULATION

18

∑ Truck Empty Backhaul Tonnage

14

REPORTING PERIODS

10


22.1

☑ Yearly

OBSERVATION Empty backhaul tonnage decreased from its peak in 2015 and was at 24.7 million tons in 2016.

SOURCES • FDOT – Weigh-in-Motion Data

UTILIZATION

• FHWA – Freight Analysis Framework 2012


2012

74

2013 22.9

2014 22.8

2015 26.2

2016 24.7

QUANTITY QUALITY


% MILES HEAVILY CONGESTED Freight > Utilization > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

% Miles Heavily Congested on SHS During Peak Hour/Peak Period

The percentage of miles heavily congested is determined by summing the miles of roadway operating at LOS E and F in the peak hour and then dividing it by the total highway miles.

20%

15%

CALCULATION 10%

∑ (Segment Length|Peak Performance at LOS E and LOS F) ×100 ∑ (Segment Length)

5%

REPORTING PERIODS

0%



☑ Peak hour

☑ Peak period

□ Daily □Yearly

2007 2008 2009 2010



2012

2013

2014

2015

2016


% Miles Heavily Congested on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour/Peak Period 12%

OBSERVATION

10%

As travel on Florida’s roadways has increased, so has the percentage of miles heavily congested. Between 2015 and 2016, it rose from 4.3% to 4.9% during peak hour/peak period on Florida’s SHS.

8% 6%

SOURCES

4%


2% 0%


2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Total SHS Arterials

75

2012 2013 2014 2015 2016


SHS Highways NHS

UTILIZATION



2011

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

VEHICLES PER LANE MILE

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Utilization > Auto/Truck >

METHODOLOGY

Vehicles Per Lane Mile on SHS by Area During Peak Hour

The vehicles on a road segment, divided by the number of lane miles on that segment.

1,000 900 800

CALCULATION

700

Aggregating multiple segments:

600

Volume ∑ × (Lane Miles) Number of Lanes

400

500 300

∑ (Lane Miles)

200 100


0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 SHS Total Non-Urbanized Areas


OBSERVATION Due to growing travel on Florida’s roadways, the number of vehicles per lane mile has increased. From 2015 to 2016, it grew by 2% on Florida’s SHS during peak hour. In 2016, 610 vehicles per lane mile were on the SHS during peak hour.

1,200

2012


Vehicles Per Lane Mile on SHS by Facility Type During Peak Hour

1,000 800

SOURCES

600


400


200

UTILIZATION

0 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 SHS Total SHS Freeways SHS Arterials SIS Highway Corridors


76

2014 2015 2016 SHS Highways NHS

Aviation

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVIATION TONNAGE Freight > Quantity > Aviation >

METHODOLOGY

Aviation Tonnage

CALCULATION

2.5

∑ Tons Handled at Qualifying Cargo Airports

2.0

REPORTING PERIODS


1.5 1.0

☑ Yearly

0.5

OBSERVATION

0.0

Aviation tonnage at Florida’s public airports was estimated to be between 2.4 and 2.9 million tons over the past decade.

SOURCE • U.S. Bureau of Transportation Statistics


QUANTITY

Millions 3.0

All air cargo handled by weight at public airports.

77

2007 2008 2009 2.9 2.7 2.4

2010 2.6

2011 2.6

2012 2.7

2013 2.6

2014 2.8

2015 2.8

2016 2.8

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVIATION VALUE OF FREIGHT

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Quantity > Aviation >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Aviation Value of Freight Billions $250

Values of air cargo are extracted from FAF.

CALCULATION

$200

∑ Tonnage×Average Value Per Ton $150

REPORTING PERIODS $100

□ Peak hour □ Peak period □ Daily ☑ Yearly

$50

OBSERVATION

$0

Estimated value of freight via air cargo is approximately $250 billion in 2016.

SOURCES • FHWA – Freight Analysis Framework 2012 • FDOT Aviation and Spaceports Office – Air Cargo System Plan


78

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016

Rail

QUANTITY QUALITY


RAIL TONNAGE Freight > Quantity > Rail >

METHODOLOGY

Rail Tonnage Millions 120

CALCULATION

100

QUANTITY

Tons of freight carried by rail mode originated or terminated in Florida.

∑ Rail Tonnage 80

REPORTING PERIODS


60

☑ Yearly

40

OBSERVATION The amount of rail freight originated in Florida has consistently been lower than that terminated in Florida. In 2014, approximately 43 million tons of freight originated in Florida, while 68 million tons terminated in Florida. Data for 2015 and 2016 are not available.

20

0

SOURCE • American Association of Railroads – Rail Fast Facts


79

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 Originating Tonnage

2010 2011 2012 2013 Terminating Tonnage

2014

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

ACTIVE RAIL ACCESS

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Accessibility > Rail >

METHODOLOGY

Intermodal Centers and Seaports With Active Rail Access

Active rail access accounts for active rail serving intermodal logistic centers and seaports.

100%

CALCULATION

80%

Seaports With Active Rail+Centers With Active Rail ∑ Seaports and Centers

60%

REPORTING PERIODS


40%

☑ Yearly

20%

ACCESSIBILITY

OBSERVATION

0%

Approximately 75% of intermodal centers and seaports had active rail access in 2016.

SOURCE • FDOT Freight and Multimodal Operations Office


80

2013

2014

2015

2016

Seaport

QUANTITY QUALITY


SEAPORT TONNAGE Freight > Quantity > Seaport >

METHODOLOGY

Seaport Tonnage Millions 140

CALCULATION

120

∑ Waterborne Tonnage

100

REPORTING PERIODS


80

☑ Yearly

60

OBSERVATION

40

The amount of cargo handled at Florida ports has fluctuated over the past decade. Between 2015 and 2016, it witnessed an increase of 4%.

20

0

SOURCE • Florida Ports Council – Five-Year Florida Seaport Mission Plan


QUANTITY

International and domestic waterborne tons of cargo handled at both public and private terminals in port areas of Florida.

2007 121.2

2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 114.7 105.1 106.4 100.3 100.6 Million Tons

81

2013 105.1

2014 98.7

2015 103.0

2016 107.4

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

SEAPORT TWENTY-FOOT EQUIVALENT UNITS

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Quantity > Seaport >

QUANTITY

METHODOLOGY

Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units Millions 4.0

International and domestic waterborne cargo handled at both public and private terminals in port areas of Florida, expressed as twenty-foot equivalent units.

3.5

CALCULATION

3.0

∑ Twenty-Foot Equivalent Units 2.5

REPORTING PERIODS


2.0

☑Yearly

1.5

OBSERVATION

1.0

In 2016, twenty-foot equivalent units handled by Florida ports increased by approximately 100,000.

0.5 0.0



82

2007 2008 2009 2.9 2.9 2.7

2010 2.8

2011 3.0

2012 3.1

TEUs Millions

2013 3.2

2014 3.3

2015 3.5

2016 3.6

QUANTITY QUALITY


SEAPORT VALUE OF FREIGHT Freight > Quantity > Seaport >

METHODOLOGY

Seaport Value of Freight

$90

CALCULATION

$80

∑ Value of International Seaport Commerce

$70 $60

REPORTING PERIODS


$50

☑Yearly

$40

OBSERVATION

$30

Between 2015 and 2016, the value of freight handled by Florida ports declined by 8%. In 2016, Florida porttransported freight was valued at $80 billion.

$20 $10 $0



83

2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 $73.3 $82.5 $57.0 $69.7 $82.7 $85.6 $85.9 $86.8 $86.2 $79.3 VOF Billions

QUANTITY

Billions $100

Value of international and domestic waterborne cargo handled at both public and private terminals in port areas of Florida.

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

SEAPORT RAIL ACCESS

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Accessibility > Seaport >

METHODOLOGY

Seaports With Active Rail Access 100%

Seaport rail access accounts for the percentage of seaports served by an active railroad. An active railroad is determined by the presence of trains operating on the facility.

80%

CALCULATION Seaports With Active Rail ∑ Seaports

60%

40%

REPORTING PERIODS


☑Yearly

20%

OBSERVATION 0%

ACCESSIBILITY

Approximately 73% of seaports had rail access in 2016.

SOURCE • FDOT Freight and Multimodal Operations Office


84

2013

2014

2015

2016

SECTION IV APPENDIX

85


86

ACRONYMS

87

ACRONYMS AADT: Annual Average Daily Traffic BEBR: University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research CTMT: Combination Truck Miles Traveled FAF: Freight Analysist Framework FDOT: Florida Department of Transportation FHWA: Federal Highway Administration LOS: Level of Service MPO: Metropolitan Planning Organization NHS: National Highway System PMT: Person Miles Traveled PTI: Planning Time Index SHS: State Highway System SIS: Strategic Intermodal System TMT: Truck Miles Traveled VMT: Vehicle Miles Traveled WIM: Weight In Motion

Go to Contents

88

GLOSSARY

89

GLOSSARY Connectors: Highways, rail lines, or waterways linking hub-tocorridor, hub-to-hub, or strategic military installation-to-corridor.

95th Percentile Travel Time: The travel time that is higher than 94% of travel time observations or equivalently lower than 4% of the average speed observations.

Corridors: Highway, rail line, waterway, and other exclusive-use facilities that connect major origin/destination markets within Florida or between Florida and other states/nations.

Annual Average Daily Traffic (AADT): The average daily traffic for an entire year, 24 hours per day, 7 days a week. AADT is determined using measurements at thousands of locations each year by FDOT.

Daily VMT: The product of a road’s length and its AADT. If a ten-mile long road has an AADT of 5,000 vehicles, then its daily VMT is 50,000.

Area Type: The performance measures in the Source Book are reported for four area types – state, urbanized areas of the 7 largest MPOs, other urbanized areas, and non-urbanized areas.

Delay: Any additional travel time experienced by a traveler.

Arterials: Signalized roadways that primarily serve through-traffic with average signalized intersection spacing of 2.0 miles or less.

Empty Backhaul Tonnage: Amount of empty available tonnage that could have been carried by a truck while on a return trip from its original destination to its original point of origin, especially when carrying goods back over all or part of the same route.

Auto (automobile): a highway travel mode that includes motor vehicle traffic including motorcycles, passenger cars, and four tire, single units (FHWA Vehicle Category Classification, Classes 1- 3).

Facility Type: SIS, SHS, Freeways, Highways, Arterials, NHS.

Auto/Truck: a combination of the auto and truck modes (FHWA Vehicle Category Classification Classes 1-13).

Facility: Roadway composed of points and segments.

Average Weighted Speed: Calculated as the average speed weighted by the hourly vehicle miles traveled.

Fixed Route Transit: A system of transporting individuals (other than by aircraft) on which a vehicle is operated along a prescribed route according to a fixed schedule.

Centerline Miles: The total length of roads, without regard to number of lanes.

Free-Flow Travel Time: The average time spent by vehicles not under the influence of speed reduction conditions over a facility length.

Combination Trucks: A combination truck is defined as a truck tractor pulling any number of trailers (including a “bobtail” truck tractor not pulling any trailers) or a straight truck pulling at least one trailer. These are vehicles classified as Classes 8-13 by FHWA.

Freeway: A multilane, divided highway with at least two lanes for exclusive use of traffic in each direction and full control of ingress and egress. Freight: Any commodity being transported.

Congestion: Condition in which traffic demand causes the LOS to be at or below FDOT’s LOS target.

Go to Contents

Heavily Congested: Roadway segments operating at LOS E and F.

90

GLOSSARY CONTINUED Reporting Periods:

Highways: Uninterrupted-flow roadways that are not freeways.

Peak Hour – 5:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m. on a weekday. This hour is chosen to allow consistent comparisons among transportation modes. It may not be the hour of greatest travel for any given roadway or mode.

Lane Miles: The product of the centerline miles and the number of lanes. A four-lane road that is 10 miles long has 40 lane miles. Level of Service: A quantitative stratification of the quality of service to a typical traveler of a service or facility into six letters, with “A” describing the highest quality and “F” describing the lowest quality.

Peak Period – A multi-hour period (4:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.) in which travel is greatest. These peak period hours are chosen based on the hours of greatest travel in different area types.

Mobility Performance Measure: A metric that quantitatively describes something about the movement of people or goods.

Daily – For the average 24-hour day. Seven (7) Largest Counties: Florida’s seven most populous counties: Broward, Duval, Hillsborough, Miami-Dade, Orange, Palm Beach, and Pinellas.

National Highway System (NHS): The Interstate Highway System as well as other roads important to the nation’s economy, defense, and mobility.

Seven (7) Largest MPOs: The urbanized geographic areas with a population of at least 500,000 people covered by Florida’s seven most populous Metropolitan Planning Organizations (MPOs): Broward County, Hillsborough, MetroPlan Orlando, Miami-Dade, North Florida, Palm Beach, and Forward Pinellas.

Passengers: Aviation – The total number of revenue passengers boarding aircraft, which includes only passengers boarding at a Florida airport. If a passenger has to transfer between planes to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger boardings.

Shared-Use Paths: A shared-use path, also referred to as a multiuse trail, is typically 12 feet wide, but may commonly vary from 10 feet to 14 or more feet depending upon constraints or volume of use. It is differentiated from a sidewalk in that it is generally wider, is part of a larger regional and statewide systems of trails, and is accompanied by a higher level of facilities including trailheads, parking, wayside areas and other amenities.

Transit – The total number of passenger trips on transit vehicles. A trip is counted each time a passenger boards a transit vehicle. Thus, if a passenger has to transfer between buses to reach a destination, the passenger is counted as making two passenger trips. Seaport – The total number of passengers embarking on cruise ships at Florida’s 7 cruise ports.

Speed: Velocity in miles per hour. The daily average speed is the average for travel 24 hours of the day. The peak hour speed is the average speed from 5:00 p.m.-6:00 p.m.

Rail – The total number of revenue paying rail passengers for SunRail, Amtrak, and Tri-Rail.

Go to Contents

91

GLOSSARY CONTINUED State Highway System (SHS): All roadways maintained and operated by the FDOT.

Urbanized Area: An area with a population of at least 50,000 people.

Strategic Intermodal System (SIS): Florida’s transportation system composed of facilities and services of statewide and interregional significance, including appropriate components of all modes.

Vehicle Occupancy: The average number of persons in a vehicle, using a countywide average from the National Household Travel Survey conducted in 2009.

Transit: A travel mode in which vehicles (including buses, streetcars, and street-running light rail) pick up and drop off passengers at regular stops/stations.

Volume: The number of vehicles passing a point on a roadway during a specified time period.

Travel Time Reliability: On-Time Arrival – For the seven largest MPOs, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips traveling at least 45 mph. For all others, on-time arrival is defined as the percentage of freeway trips traveling at greater than or equal to 5 mph below the posted speed limit. For example, 80% on-time arrival indicates the traveler is anticipated to arrive at the destination on time in 4 out of 5 trips. Variability – Travel time variability, also known as the planning time index, is the ratio of 95th percentile travel time to the freeflow travel time. This measure represents the additional time that a traveler should budget to ensure on-time arrival 95 percent of the time. Trucks: Vehicles classified as Classes 4-13 by FHWA. Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit: The standard measure used for containerized cargo. One Twenty-Foot Equivalent Unit includes an 8-foot by 8-foot by 20-foot intermodal container. Urban: An area with a population of at least 5,000 people.

Go to Contents

92

TRENDS AFFECTING TRANSPORTATION

93

DEMOGRAPHICS 2017 Population by County and District POPULATION ESTIMATE 172,720 357,470 35,621 13,087 27,426 39,057 102,138 698,468 368,782 41,140 661,645 407,260 2,924,814

LAND AREA (SQ. MILES) 680 1,998 637 806 638 1,153 1,017 785 743 769 1,798 556 11,580

Alachua Baker Bradford Clay Columbia Dixie Duval Gilchrist Hamilton Lafayette Levy Madison Nassau Putnam St. Johns Suwannee Taylor Union District 2

260,003 27,191 27,642 208,549 68,943 16,726 936,811 17,224 14,663 8,479 41,015 19,377 80,456 73,176 229,715 44,690 22,295 15,947 2,112,902

875 585 294 604 798 705 762 350 514 543 1,118 696 649 728 601 689 1,043 244 11,798

297 46 94 345 86 24 1,229 49 29 16 37 28 124 101 382 65 21 65 179

Bay Calhoun Escambia Franklin Gadsden Gulf Holmes Jackson Jefferson

178,820 15,001 313,381 12,161 48,263 16,297 20,210 50,418 14,611

758 567 656 535 516 564 479 918 598

236 26 478 23 94 29 42 55 24

COUNTY Charlotte Collier Desoto Glades Hardee Hendry Highlands Lee Manatee Okeechobee Polk Sarasota District 1

Go to Contents or Go to Chart

POPULATION DENSITY (POP. PER SQ. MILE) 254 179 56 16 43 34 100 890 496 53 368 732 253

Leon Liberty Okaloosa Santa Rosa Wakulla Walton Washington District 3

POPULATION ESTIMATE 287,899 8,719 195,488 170,835 31,909 65,301 24,985 1,454,298

LAND AREA (SQ. MILES) 667 836 930 1,012 606 1,038 583 11,263

Broward Indian River Martin Palm Beach St. Lucie District 4

1,873,970 148,962 153,022 1,414,144 297,634 3,887,732

1,210 503 543 1,970 572 4,798

1,549 296 282 718 520 810

Brevard Flagler Lake Marion Orange Osceola Seminole Sumter Volusia District 5

575,211 105,157 331,724 349,267 1,313,880 337,614 454,757 120,700 523,405 4,111,715

1,016 485 938 1,585 903 1,327 309 547 1,101 8,211

566 217 354 220 1,455 254 1,472 221 475 501

Miami-Dade Monroe District 6

2,743,095 76,889 2,819,984

1,898 983 2,881

1,445 78 979

Citrus Hernando Hillsborough Pasco Pinellas District 7

143,801 181,882 1,379,302 505,709 962,003 3,172,697

582 473 1,020 747 274 3,096

247 385 1,352 677 3,511 1,025

20,484,142

53,625

382

COUNTY

State of Florida

POPULATION DENSITY (POP. PER SQ. MILE) 432 10 210 169 53 63 43 129

Source: University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research. Population estimates as of April 1. 94

DEMOGRAPHICS 2017 Population by Urbanized Area URBANIZED AREA

TOTAL POPULATION

URBANIZED AREA

TOTAL POPULATION

Bonita Springs

345,884

Panama City Baldwin

Cape Coral

598,626

Pensacola, FL-AL

363,584

192,779

Port St. Lucie

399,723

211,130

St. Augustine

83,609

Deltona Fort Walton Beach – Navarre – Wright Gainesville

197,396

Sarasota – Bradenton

Homosassa Springs – Beverly Hills – Citrus Springs

82,492

Sebastian – Vero Beach South – Florida Ridge (Formerly Vero Beach – Sebastian)

Jacksonville

1,164,569

Kissimmee

383,007

Lady Lake – The Villages

132,584

Lakeland

288,558

Leesburg – Eustis – Tavares

146,946

Miami North Port – Port Charlotte

182,587

Ocala

165,435

Orlando Palm Bay – Melbourne

479,310

Palm Coast – Daytona Beach – Port Orange (Formerly Daytona Beach – Port Orange)

372,919

63,692

Spring Hill (Formerly Brooksville)

156,467

Tallahassee

251,045

Titusville Winter Haven Zephyrhills

1,701,362

711,674 160,997

Sebring – Avon Park

Tampa – St. Petersburg

5,964,109

151,786

2,662,044 57,571 221,182 72,486

Total Urbanized Area Population (without Baldwin, AL)

17,958,265

Total State Population

20,484,100

Percent of the Total State Population in Urbanized Areas

87.7%

Source: U.S. Census Bureau; University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research; University of Alabama Center for Business and Economic Research. Population estimates as of April 1..

There are six urbanized areas of more than 500,000 population, including four over one million population. The urbanized areas together contain 17,659,864 people, almost 88% of the population of Florida.


95

DEMOGRAPHICS Total Population YEAR 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

STATEWIDE 20,484,100 20,148,400 19,815,100 19,507,500 19,260,200 19,074,400 18,905,600 18,801,310 18,750,200 18,807,600 18,680,300

URBANIZED AREA 17,958,265 17,659,865 17,361,014 17,082,688 16,861,570 16,692,248 16,533,341 15,723,680 15,665,302 15,726,421 15,638,906

NON-URBANIZED AREA 2,525,835 2,488,535 2,454,086 2,424,812 2,398,630 2,382,152 2,372,259 3,077,630 3,084,898 3,081,179 3,041,394

Change in Population YEAR 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

STATEWIDE POPULATION 20,484,100 20,148,400 19,815,100 19,507,500 19,260,200 19,074,400 18,905,600 18,801,310 18,750,200 18,807,600 18,680,300 18,349,300

CHANGE IN POPULATION 335,700 333,300 307,600 247,300 185,800 168,800 104,290 51,110 -57,400 127,300 331,000

Total Employment and New Housing Permits YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


NEW HOUSING PERMITS ISSUED 116,240 109,924 84,075 86,752 64,810 42,360 38,679 35,329 61,042 102,551

EMPLOYMENT (TOTAL NON FARM) 8,383,400 8,107,700 7,824,900 7,582,500 7,396,900 7,251,900 7,186,400 7,253,000 7,763,800 8,040,191

96

VISITORS Domestic and International Visitors YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

DOMESTIC (MILLIONS) 97.9 91.3 83.2 78.8 77.6 74.7 71.2 71.2 76.1 77.3

INTERNATIONAL (MILLIONS) 14.5 15.2 15.6 15.4 13.9 12.6 11.1 9.6 8.1 7.2

TOTAL (MILLIONS) 112.4 106.6 98.8 94.1 91.5 87.3 82.3 80.8 84.2 84.5

Travel Mode for Visitors YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


AIR 49.0% 49.8% 50.6% 50.7% 50.9% 52.2% 52.7% 51.3% 51.4% 52.2%

NON-AIR 51.0% 50.2% 49.4% 49.3% 49.1% 47.8% 47.3% 48.7% 48.6% 47.7%

97

ROADWAY INVENTORY Roadway Network Summary Public Road Mileage Summary, 2016 SYSTEM

CENTERLINE MILES

Roadway Designations, 2016 % OF PUBLIC MILEAGE

SYSTEM

CENTERLINE MILES

% OF PUBLIC ROAD MILEAGE

DVMT (1,000’S)

% OF PUBLIC ROAD DVMT

County Roads

70,408

57.4%

SHS

12,106

9.9%

322,051

54.8%

City Streets

37,942

30.9%

SIS

4,300

3.5%

183,751

31.2%

State Highways

12,106

9.9%

NHS

8,214

6.7%

281,800

47.9%

Federal Roads

2,280

1.9%

Bureau of Indian Affairs Roads Indian Nations Roads

27

USDA Forest Service Trails and Roads

1,241

National Park Service System Roads

188

U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Roads

32

U.S. Army Roads (other)

415

U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Roads

126

Total Public Roads

Notes: Roadway segments can have multiple designations. Therefore, the sum of roadways across all designation types exceeds that actual total of Public Roads.

7

U.S. Department of Defense Roads (excludes Army) National Aeronautical and Space Administration Roads

Source: FDOT Certification of Public Road Mileage as of December 31, 2016.

183

60 22,736

100.0%

DVMT is Daily Vehicle Miles Traveled, the product of a road segment’s length (in miles) and its AADT.

The SIS data above include only the SIS Highways and Emerging SIS Highways. There are also 257 miles of SIS Connectors and Emerging SIS Connectors.

The NHS data above include only the SHS portion of the NHS.


98

ROADWAY INVENTORY Roadway Network Summary – 2016 State Highway System COUNTY Charlotte Collier Desoto Glades Hardee Hendry Highlands Lee Manatee Okeechobee Polk Sarasota District 1

CENTERLINE MILES 97 206 83 86 95 65 133 172 210 104 462 159 1,871

LANE MILES 39 701 208 230 222 196 398 763 730 242 1,658 667 6,382

DVMT, 1000’S 2,667.4 4,022.2 603.8 392.9 630.2 723.4 1,412.5 7,064.9 5,826.0 1,020.5 11,293.9 6,482.4 42,140.3


293 84 69 110 204 46 482 60 91 62 182 139 112 141 186 129 110 58 2,557

1,040 226 179 369 625 151 2,055 122 297 124 515 361 401 377 672 332 318 115 8,279

5,686.3 937.6 711.9 2,088.5 2,612.1 284.5 20,290.4 299.7 1,185.3 161.5 839.4 1,131.4 1,939.8 1,226.8 5,065.3 1,307.6 444.5 237.2 46,449.8

Bay Calhoun Escambia Franklin Gadsden Gulf Holmes Jackson

215 96 259 91 140 79 105 242

671 196 855 182 417 160 246 638

3,335.6 319.4 5,420.6 298.3 1,572.9 329.8 526.9 1,776.6


COUNTY Jefferson Leon Liberty Okaloosa Santa Rosa Wakulla Walton Washington District 3

LANE MILES 331 682 143 696.5 565 162 537 293 6,776

DVMT, 1000’S 741.0 3,883.5 166.5 4,265.3 2,934.6 429.6 2,405.2 791.6 29,197.5


452 114 160 477 166 1,368

2,478 438 580 2,276 676 6,448

27,976.0 2,377.5 4,347.5 21,292.9 4,655.0 60,648.9


335 102 226 249 400 203 120 132 360 2,127

1,395 343 767 935 1,967 743 510 417 1,372 8,448

9,616.9 1,763.0 5,183.7 6,020.2 21,605.3 5,452.1 5,558.5 2,859.6 9,279.4 67,338.8


581 119 700

2,722 301 3,023

31,551.3 2,310.8 33,862.1


89 125 442 199 221 1,075

294 453 1,950 809 1,059 4,565

1,473.2 2,140.9 22,146.9 6,225.0 10,427.2 42,413.2

12,106

43,920

322,050.5

State Total

99

CENTERLINE MILES 111 194 70 214 196 81 204 112 2,408

ROADWAY INVENTORY Roadway Network Summary – 2016 National Highway System COUNTY Charlotte Collier Desoto Glades Hardee Hendry Highlands Lee Manatee Okeechobee Polk Sarasota District 1

CENTERLINE MILES 63 186 59 41 74 64 120 129 153 99 299 99 1,384

LANE MILES 266 626 160 141 180 193 371 638 593 232 1,265 477 5,141

DVMT, 1000'S 2,143.2 3,497.1 486.6 258.5 527.3 707.7 1,320.7 6,163.6 5,179.4 991.3 9,313.0 5,528.9 36,117.2


204 26 24 77 125 29 329 18 29 31 82 39 91 85 108 38 87 0 1,421

820 102 88 297 435 117 1,540 38 173 62 315 155 360 260 479 141 271 0 5,653

4,779.8 675.3 467.2 1,754.3 2,017.4 233.9 17,588.6 155.4 1,034.5 120.5 531.0 857.3 1,791.1 937.8 4,012.0 846.8 403.4 0.0 38,206.0


149 25 169 61 45 21 17 78

511 53 594 123 180 42 65 286

2,513.6 137.3 4,049.0 231.8 1,003.8 125.1 283.3 1,062.5



CENTERLINE MILES 62 131 21 111 47 56 140 80 1,212

DVMT, 1000'S 646.4 3,035.4 92.2 3,166.2 1,719.4 353.6 2,108.9 684.2 21,212.5


358 85 111 325 138 1,016

2,155 373 471 1,841 618 5,458

25,961.1 2,076.5 4,022.8 19,293.9 4,414.9 55,769.3


288 68 135 213 335 202 110 94 297 1,741

1,285 274 554 838 1,703 737 477 327 1,208 7,403

9,050.5 1,609.5 4,186.5 5,542.1 19,560.7 5,405.3 5,306.4 2,609.6 8,603.6 61,874.2


419 119 538

2,092 301 2,393

27,332.5 2,310.8 29,643.3


89 120 382 177 135 903

294 444 1,746 750 738 3,973

1,472.1 2,114.7 21,085.9 5,904.4 8,399.9 38,977.0

8,215

34,021

281,799.5

State Total

100

LANE MILES 233 506 46 430 192 112 406 224 4,000.8

ROADWAY INVENTORY Roadway Network Summary – 2016 Strategic Intermodal System COUNTY Charlotte Collier Desoto Glades Hardee Hendry Highlands Lee Manatee Okeechobee Polk Sarasota District 1

CENTERLINE MILES 31 99 59 41 41 65 86 66 55 81 190 43 857

LANE MILES 134 352 160 141 115 196 303 306 228 197 882 215 3,230

DVMT, 1000’S 1,269.7 2,421.7 486.6 258.5 386.9 723.4 1,148.1 3,617.9 2,771.3 904.1 7,023.9 3,434.1 24,446.2


102 25 42 36 68 29 145 18 29 0 75 39 63 103 48 29 45 14 910

470 102 125 155 306 117 744 38 172 0 299 155 276 296 260 124 179 28 3,848

3,076.4 675.3 599.7 890.2 1,760.1 233.9 11,131.3 155.4 1,034.5 0.0 498.5 857.3 1,223.5 1,042.6 2,652.4 801.4 268.9 56.7 26,958.1


41 0 63 0 34 0 32 65

163 0 273 0 134 0 95 260

658.4 0.0 1,923.7 0.0 881.5 0.0 360.3 1,013.6



LANE MILES 178 174 0 157 149 0 334 116 2,033

DVMT, 1000’S 583.2 1,210.9 0.0 1,152.3 993.5 0.0 1,887.7 488.5 11,153.7


169 52 81 213 83 598

1,049 222 305 1,137 395 3,108

17,330.4 1,293.7 2,857.7 14,241.3 3,148.7 38,871.9


90 42 61 105 163 100 32 48 141 783

505 167 244 435 889 371 158 207 587 3,563

4,641.0 1,249.2 1,955.5 3,352.5 13,212.7 3,324.8 2,798.5 2,126.0 5,179.8 37,840.2


188 13 201

1,039 40 1,079

18,393.5 342.4 18,736.0


53 71 157 67 62 410

214 312 834 339 357 2,056

1,094.7 1,668.6 14,251.1 3,136.4 5,593.8 25,744.7

4,300

18,915

183,750.6

State Total

101

CENTERLINE MILES 45 36 0 41 42 0 104 41 542

ROADWAY INVENTORY Mileage and Travel by Functional Classification CENTERLINE MILEAGE 1,495 750 6,594 6,403 10,474 5,076 91,943

SYSTEM Interstate Turnpike Principal Arterial Minor Arterial Major Collector Minor Collector Local

DAILY VEHICLE MILES TRAVELED (THOUSANDS) 108,567 46,051 144,983 89,029 62,622 13,978 122,834

Mode of Travel – Percent Change from 2007 YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


TRANSIT TRIPS -2.1% 5.8% 8.4% 8.7% 5.6% 1.8% -4.2% -2.8% 2.5% 0.0%

RAIL 13% 22% 29% 33% 38% 38% 28% 18% 15% 0%

VEHICLE MILES (AUTO) 5% 1% -2% -6% -7% -7% -5% -4% -3% 0%

102

AIRLINE 17% 12% 4% 1% 0% -1% -4% -7% -2% 0%

CRUISE ACTIVITY 10% 8% 11% 0% 0% -4% -10% -10% -6% 0%

USE CHARACTERISTICS Household Vehicle Availability YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

NO VEHICLES AVAILABLE 6.6% 6.8% 6.9% 7.2% 7.4% 7.3% 7.0% 6.6% 6.6% 6.2%

1 VEHICLE AVAILABLE 40.4% 41.0% 41.2% 41.6% 42.2% 41.7% 41.1% 41.2% 40.5% 39.7%

2 VEHICLES AVAILABLE 38.1% 38.0% 38.2% 37.7% 37.4% 37.8% 37.9% 38.3% 38.5% 38.8%

3 OR MORE VEHICLES AVAILABLE 14.9% 14.2% 13.7% 13.5% 13.0% 13.1% 13.7% 14.0% 14.4% 15.3%

Licensed Drivers and Registered Vehicles YEAR 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010

LICENSED DRIVERS 16,568,874 15,998,416 15,620,312 15,417,032 15,378,206 15,374,230 15,507,284 15,553,387

REGISTERED VEHICLES 18,150,259 17,783,652 17,705,417 16,722,667 16,207,185 15,989,103 15,258,939 15,708,245

Seat Belt Usage YEAR 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008


SAFETY BELT USE 90.2% 89.6% 89.4% 88.8% 87.2% 87.4% 88.1% 87.4% 85.2% 81.7%

103

INTERACTIONS International Trade in Florida YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

EXPORTS (BILLIONS $) 67.948 73.295 81.776 85.460 90.360 86.753 73.064 59.884 73.022 58.915

IMPORTS (BILLIONS $) 74.852 73.835 71.228 72.971 71.833 62.413 53.164 43.107 57.525 55.925

TOTAL MERCHANDISE TRADE (BILLIONS $) 142.800 147.130 153.004 158.431 162.193 149.166 126.228 102.991 130.547 114.840

CO2 Emissions by Sector YEAR 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006

COMMERCIAL (MILLIONS) 6.9 5.2 5.1 4.7 4.7 5.3 4.8 4.8 4.7 5.2

INDUSTRIAL (MILLIONS) 11.6 10.8 11 10.6 10.3 11.7 10.4 11.6 11.9 13.2

RESIDENTIAL (MILLIONS) 1.1 1.2 1.1 1.1 1.3 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4

TRANSPORTATION ELECTRIC POWER (MILLIONS) (MILLIONS) 104.1 107.6 101 109.2 100 104.6 99.4 107 102.3 110.4 104.1 119.5 97.2 110.5 103.7 117.1 114.4 124.5 116.0 123.4

Freight Growth – Percent Change from 2007 YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


RAIL FREIGHT -21% -17% -21% -25% -24% -30% -19% 0%

AIRLINE FREIGHT -4% -4% -4% -9% -9% -11% -11% -19% -8% 0%

104

SEAPORT FREIGHT -11% -15% -19% -13% -17% -17% -12% -13% -5% 0%

TRUCK DVMT -6% -11% -19% -18% -22% -25% -24% -19% -12% 0%

MOBILITY PERFORMANCE MEASURES

105

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC


IZATION UTIL

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

QUANTITY


FACILITY SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials NHS SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials NHS SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials NHS SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials NHS SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials NHS


STATE 26.8 15.2 0.4 12.6 3.3 10.8 24.8 25.6 14.3 0.4 11.9 3.1 10.6 23.5 24.6 13.8 0.4 11.4 2.9 10.3 22.7 23.9 13.3 0.3 11.0 2.8 10.2 21.9 23.6 13.0 0.3 10.8 2.8 10.1 21.6

PEAK HOUR (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 13.5 7.3 7.9 3.2 0.2 0.2 7.6 2.3 0.4 0.5 5.5 4.5 12.9 6.7 12.9 7.0 7.4 3.0 0.2 0.2 7.2 2.2 0.3 0.5 5.4 4.4 12.3 6.4 12.5 6.8 7.2 2.9 0.2 0.2 6.9 2.1 0.3 0.5 5.3 4.2 11.8 6.2 12.1 6.7 6.9 2.8 0.1 0.2 6.6 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.2 4.2 11.4 6.0 11.9 6.6 6.8 2.7 0.1 0.1 6.5 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.1 4.1 11.3 5.9

NONURBANIZED AREAS 5.9 4.2 0.1 2.7 2.4 0.8 5.1 5.6 3.9 0.1 2.5 2.2 0.8 4.8 5.4 3.8 0.1 2.4 2.1 0.8 4.7 5.2 3.6 0.0 2.3 2.0 0.8 4.5 5.1 3.6 0.0 2.3 2.0 0.8 4.4

106

STATE 322.1 183.0 4.8 151.9 39.8 130.4 297.6 307.5 172.6 4.7 143.0 36.9 127.6 282.8 296.3 166.0 4.5 137.7 34.6 124.0 273.0 288.0 159.5 4.1 132.3 33.5 122.2 263.8 284.1 156.6 3.9 129.6 33.2 121.2 259.8

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 160.7 88.1 93.2 37.9 2.0 2.2 89.7 27.7 4.4 6.6 66.6 53.8 153.8 80.6 153.6 84.7 88.0 35.7 1.9 2.1 84.7 26.0 3.8 6.2 65.1 52.5 145.9 77.1 148.4 81.8 84.6 34.3 1.9 2.0 81.5 25.1 3.6 5.8 63.3 51.0 140.8 74.4 144.2 79.9 81.3 33.0 1.7 1.8 78.3 24.1 3.5 5.6 62.4 50.2 136.1 71.9 142.1 79.0 79.9 32.4 1.6 1.8 76.7 23.6 3.5 5.6 61.9 49.8 134.1 70.9


QUANTITY QUALITY IZATION UTIL

CONTINUED

CESSIBILITY AC


2010 2009 2008 2007

FACILITY SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials


STATE 23.7 13.1 0.3 10.9 2.8 10.0 24.0 13.2 0.3 10.9 2.9 10.2 23.8 13.0 0.3 10.7 2.9 10.2 24.4 13.4 0.3 11.0 3.0 10.5 25.4 13.9 0.3 11.4 3.1 10.8

PEAK HOUR (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 12.0 6.6 6.8 2.7 0.1 0.1 6.6 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.1 4.1 12.1 6.7 6.9 2.7 0.1 0.1 6.6 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.2 4.2 12.0 6.6 6.8 2.7 0.1 0.2 6.5 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.2 4.2 12.3 6.8 6.9 2.8 0.1 0.1 6.7 2.0 0.3 0.5 5.3 4.3 12.7 7.1 7.2 2.9 0.1 0.1 6.9 2.1 0.3 0.5 5.5 4.4

NONURBANIZED AREAS 5.2 3.6 0.0 2.3 2.1 0.8 5.2 3.6 0.0 2.3 2.1 0.8 5.2 3.6 0.0 2.3 2.1 0.8 5.3 3.6 0.0 2.4 2.2 0.8 5.6 3.8 0.0 2.4 2.3 0.8

107

STATE 285.0 157.9 4.0 130.5 33.8 120.7 288.2 159.0 4.0 130.8 34.7 122.6 286.9 157.1 4.1 129.2 35.3 122.4 293.9 160.7 3.7 132.6 35.5 125.7 305.1 167.8 3.8 137.7 37.5 129.9

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 142.4 79.0 80.5 32.7 1.6 1.8 77.3 23.7 3.5 5.7 61.6 49.6 143.7 80.0 81.1 32.9 1.6 1.8 77.5 23.8 3.6 5.8 62.6 50.4 142.6 79.7 80.1 32.5 1.7 1.8 76.5 23.5 3.7 5.9 62.5 50.3 146.4 81.8 82.0 33.3 1.5 1.6 78.5 24.1 3.7 5.9 64.2 51.7 151.7 84.8 85.6 34.7 1.6 1.7 81.5 25.0 3.9 6.3 66.3 53.4


QUANTITY

2011


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

PERSON MILES TRAVELED

IZATION UTIL

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

QUANTITY




STATE 44.0 25.1 0.7 20.8 5.5 17.7 40.6 42.0 23.6 0.6 19.5 5.1 17.3 38.5 40.5 22.7 0.6 18.8 4.8 16.8 37.2 39.3 21.8 0.6 18.1 4.7 16.6 35.9 38.8 21.5 0.5 17.7 4.6 16.5 35.4

PEAK HOUR (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 22.1 12.0 12.9 5.2 0.3 0.3 12.5 3.8 0.6 0.9 9.0 7.3 21.1 10.9 21.1 11.5 12.2 4.9 0.3 0.3 11.8 3.5 0.5 0.9 8.8 7.1 20.0 10.4 20.4 11.1 11.7 4.7 0.3 0.3 11.3 3.4 0.5 0.8 8.6 6.9 19.3 10.1 19.8 10.8 11.2 4.5 0.2 0.2 10.9 3.3 0.5 0.8 8.4 6.8 18.6 9.7 19.5 10.7 11.1 4.4 0.2 0.2 10.7 3.2 0.5 0.8 8.4 6.8 18.4 9.6


108

STATE 528.7 301.2 7.9 249.6 66.2 212.9 487.5 504.8 284.0 7.6 234.9 61.6 208.3 463.3 486.4 273.3 7.4 226.4 57.7 202.3 447.3 472.8 262.6 6.7 217.4 55.8 199.6 432.3 466.3 257.8 6.5 213.1 55.3 197.9 425.7

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 262.4 143.5 152.2 61.7 3.2 3.5 147.1 44.9 6.9 10.9 108.3 87.7 250.6 130.8 250.9 137.9 143.7 58.3 3.1 3.4 138.8 42.2 6.1 10.3 106.1 85.5 237.6 125.3 242.5 133.3 138.3 56.1 3.0 3.3 133.8 40.7 5.7 9.6 103.0 83.0 229.4 121.0 235.6 130.2 132.9 53.9 2.8 3.0 128.5 39.0 5.5 9.3 101.6 81.9 221.7 116.9 232.1 128.7 130.5 52.9 2.7 2.9 125.9 38.3 5.4 9.2 100.8 81.2 218.4 115.1


QUANTITY QUALITY


PERSON MILES TRAVELED CONTINUED

2010 2009 2008 2007



STATE 38.9 21.6 0.5 17.9 4.7 16.4 39.3 21.8 0.5 17.9 4.8 16.7 39.2 21.5 0.6 17.6 4.9 16.6 40.1 22.0 0.5 18.1 4.9 17.1 41.6 22.9 0.5 18.8 5.2 17.6

PEAK HOUR (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 19.6 10.7 11.2 4.5 0.2 0.2 10.8 3.2 0.5 0.8 8.3 6.7 19.7 10.9 11.2 4.5 0.2 0.2 10.8 3.2 0.5 0.8 8.5 6.8 19.6 10.8 11.1 4.4 0.2 0.2 10.6 3.2 0.5 0.8 8.5 6.8 20.1 11.1 11.3 4.5 0.2 0.2 10.9 3.3 0.5 0.8 8.7 7.0 20.8 11.5 11.8 4.7 0.2 0.2 11.3 3.4 0.5 0.9 9.0 7.2


109

STATE 468.1 260.1 6.6 214.6 56.3 197.2 473.2 261.8 6.5 215.1 57.8 200.3 471.2 258.8 6.7 212.5 58.8 200.0 482.4 264.7 6.0 218.0 59.0 205.4 501.1 276.3 6.3 226.3 62.5 212.3

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 232.8 128.9 131.6 53.4 2.7 2.9 126.8 38.5 5.5 9.4 100.4 80.9 234.8 130.5 132.5 53.7 2.7 2.9 127.1 38.6 5.7 9.6 102.0 82.2 233.2 130.0 130.9 53.1 2.7 3.0 125.6 38.2 5.8 9.8 101.8 82.1 239.2 133.3 133.9 54.3 2.5 2.7 128.8 39.1 5.8 9.8 104.6 84.3 248.0 138.2 139.8 56.7 2.6 2.8 133.8 40.6 6.1 10.4 108.1 87.1


QUANTITY

2011


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% NON-SINGLE OCCUPANCY VEHICLE TRAVEL

IZATION UTIL

QUANTITY

People > Quantity > Auto/Truck > YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


NON-SOV TRAVEL 20.8% 20.3% 20.3% 20.4% 20.7% 20.3% 20.1% 20.7% 20.6% 20.4%

110

SOV TRAVEL 79.2% 79.7% 79.7% 79.6% 79.3% 79.7% 79.9% 79.3% 79.4% 79.6%

QUANTITY QUALITY


% TRAVEL MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA

2014 2013 2012



STATE 78.5% 69.4% 88.6% 63.9% 94.8% 90.5% 77.3% 80.5% 70.7% 90.5% 68.4% 94.3% 91.7% 79.8% 82.5% 71.9% 93.8% 69.8% 96.1% 94.4% 81.1% 84.7% 75.5% 95.1% 70.8% 97.0% 96.3% 83.5% 85.9% 78.0% 94.4% 73.7% 97.2% 95.8% 84.9%

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 65.0% 97.7% 50.2% 95.4% 80.4% 94.9% 48.9% 93.9% 80.6% 99.1% 85.7% 98.5% 64.5% 97.7% 68.3% 98.3% 52.5% 96.2% 82.5% 97.1% 55.4% 97.0% 79.7% 96.3% 87.4% 98.6% 68.1% 98.4% 70.3% 97.7% 54.1% 93.5% 89.2% 98.6% 56.7% 93.2% 87.1% 98.9% 90.8% 99.0% 69.2% 97.7% 73.0% 99.0% 58.8% 97.2% 88.9% 99.8% 56.7% 96.3% 87.4% 98.9% 93.8% 99.1% 71.7% 99.2% 74.4% 99.4% 61.3% 97.0% 87.5% 99.7% 59.3% 96.1% 90.4% 99.3% 92.7% 99.9% 73.3% 99.4%

DAILY NONURBANIZED AREAS 97.0% 97.1% 100.0% 96.8% 96.7% 97.5% 97.6% 97.2% 97.1% 100.0% 97.0% 96.0% 98.0% 97.6% 98.6% 98.5% 99.9% 98.4% 98.0% 98.6% 98.6% 99.2% 98.6% 99.9% 98.3% 99.3% 99.9% 99.2% 98.8% 98.8% 99.9% 99.0% 99.0% 98.4% 98.9%

111

STATE 93.6% 91.3% 96.9% 89.8% 97.6% 96.8% 93.6% 94.1% 91.4% 97.4% 91.0% 97.5% 97.2% 94.1% 94.6% 91.4% 98.6% 90.9% 99.0% 98.1% 94.5% 95.1% 92.3% 99.2% 90.7% 99.5% 98.7% 94.8% 95.3% 92.6% 97.5% 91.2% 99.5% 98.6% 95.0%

7 LARGEST MPOS 88.1% 83.6% 93.8% 83.1% 94.4% 94.4% 88.3% 89.0% 83.8% 94.5% 84.9% 94.9% 95.0% 89.1% 89.6% 84.0% 96.4% 84.9% 97.4% 96.6% 89.5% 90.2% 85.3% 97.7% 84.4% 97.4% 97.5% 89.9% 90.6% 86.0% 92.6% 85.2% 98.2% 97.2% 90.4%

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 99.5% 99.6% 98.8% 99.5% 99.7% 99.5% 99.6% 99.6% 99.6% 99.3% 99.8% 98.6% 99.6% 99.7% 99.4% 99.0% 99.6% 98.9% 99.6% 99.7% 99.4% 99.6% 99.4% 99.9% 99.2% 99.8% 99.8% 99.7% 99.9% 99.5% 99.9% 99.2% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8%

NONURBANIZED AREAS 98.6% 99.1% 100.0% 99.5% 97.6% 98.4% 99.0% 98.7% 99.1% 100.0% 99.8% 97.6% 98.6% 99.1% 99.5% 99.4% 99.9% 99.9% 99.2% 99.1% 99.5% 99.8% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8% 99.4% 99.9% 99.5% 99.8% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8% 98.4% 99.6%

QUALITY

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% TRAVEL MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011




STATE 84.7% 75.7% 94.4% 71.1% 97.0% 96.0% 85.6% 77.9% 93.5% 73.6% 97.1% 94.9% 84.9% 76.8% 90.3% 72.1% 97.5% 94.7% 82.8% 74.4% 95.7% 69.4% 97.5% 92.8% 80.7% 72.4% 93.5% 67.5% 96.6% 90.1%

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 72.7% 99.0% 58.3% 97.2% 88.4% 99.9% 56.3% 97.1% 89.7% 99.3% 93.6% 98.9% 74.5% 98.7% 61.7% 98.0% 89.0% 97.8% 59.7% 97.5% 89.5% 99.3% 92.5% 98.2% 74.1% 98.6% 61.2% 94.8% 82.4% 97.3% 59.1% 93.7% 91.2% 99.4% 92.1% 98.8% 70.7% 96.9% 57.4% 93.1% 93.6% 98.6% 55.1% 92.7% 90.1% 99.5% 89.7% 96.4% 69.3% 94.1% 56.2% 89.4% 87.1% 98.4% 54.0% 89.4% 87.6% 98.5% 88.0% 92.9%

DAILY NONURBANIZED AREAS 98.3% 97.7% 97.9% 97.3% 98.7% 98.5% 98.3% 97.6% 98.0% 97.3% 99.0% 96.5% 97.9% 97.5% 98.5% 97.3% 99.0% 95.0% 96.6% 95.9% 98.1% 94.7% 99.3% 95.8% 96.5% 95.6% 99.9% 94.4% 98.6% 94.0%

112

STATE 95.1% 92.3% 98.1% 90.8% 99.5% 98.6% 95.3% 92.8% 98.2% 91.5% 99.5% 98.4% 95.3% 92.8% 96.2% 91.4% 99.5% 98.2% 94.3% 91.5% 99.9% 89.9% 99.5% 97.6% 94.2% 91.7% 98.7% 90.2% 99.1% 97.1%

7 LARGEST MPOS 90.4% 85.4% 93.9% 84.7% 98.0% 97.5% 90.8% 86.3% 94.8% 85.7% 97.9% 97.1% 90.8% 86.2% 90.1% 85.5% 98.3% 97.2% 89.1% 84.0% 99.9% 83.2% 97.6% 96.3% 89.3% 84.7% 96.6% 83.9% 97.2% 96.0%

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 99.8% 99.5% 99.9% 99.3% 99.9% 99.9% 99.7% 99.5% 99.8% 99.2% 99.9% 99.9% 99.6% 99.5% 99.7% 99.2% 99.9% 99.9% 99.2% 99.2% 99.9% 99.1% 99.9% 99.3% 98.7% 98.7% 99.9% 98.6% 99.8% 98.7%

NONURBANIZED AREAS 99.4% 99.7% 99.8% 99.9% 99.7% 98.4% 99.4% 99.7% 99.9% 99.9% 99.7% 98.1% 99.2% 99.7% 99.9% 99.9% 99.7% 97.1% 99.1% 99.5% 99.9% 99.5% 99.7% 97.8% 98.8% 99.4% 99.9% 99.5% 99.4% 96.2%

QUANTITY QUALITY


% MILES MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA

2013 2012



STATE 93.6% 90.9% 93.3% 83.6% 97.9% 93.6% 92.6% 94.4% 91.4% 94.5% 86.9% 97.6% 94.5% 93.7% 95.5% 92.1% 97.9% 86.9% 99.7% 95.2% 94.8% 96.5% 94.0% 98.4% 87.8% 99.9% 96.8% 96.0% 96.6% 94.7% 98.3% 88.8% 99.9% 96.5% 96.2%

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 79.1% 98.5% 63.1% 98.2% 81.7% 95.8% 60.0% 96.9% 90.6% 99.3% 86.1% 98.6% 78.0% 98.4% 82.1% 98.8% 65.6% 98.4% 84.2% 97.6% 67.5% 98.6% 91.1% 98.3% 88.0% 98.9% 81.5% 98.8% 83.3% 99.7% 66.7% 99.0% 87.2% 99.1% 68.0% 98.2% 92.9% 99.9% 88.6% 99.6% 82.4% 99.7% 85.6% 99.9% 72.0% 99.9% 88.2% 99.9% 68.7% 99.3% 93.1% 99.9% 91.4% 99.9% 85.0% 99.9% 85.7% 99.9% 72.5% 99.9% 88.2% 99.9% 69.5% 99.9% 93.3% 99.9% 91.1% 99.9% 85.2% 99.9%

113

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 98.2% 98.6% 100.0% 99.0% 98.1% 98.0% 98.4% 98.2% 98.6% 100.0% 99.1% 97.9% 98.4% 98.4% 99.3% 99.2% 99.9% 98.9% 99.9% 99.1% 99.5% 99.8% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.7% 99.9%

QUALITY

2014

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% MILES MEETING LEVEL OF SERVICE CRITERIA CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011




STATE 96.4% 94.1% 98.2% 87.8% 99.9% 96.5% 96.3% 94.5% 97.0% 88.6% 99.9% 95.8% 96.1% 94.1% 96.2% 87.9% 99.9% 95.6% 95.5% 93.5% 97.1% 86.8% 99.9% 94.5% 94.4% 92.1% 96.3% 84.9% 99.9% 92.7%

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 85.6% 99.9% 72.1% 99.9% 88.1% 99.9% 68.7% 99.2% 93.2% 99.9% 91.2% 99.9% 85.5% 99.9% 72.4% 99.9% 87.0% 99.9% 69.3% 99.9% 93.2% 99.9% 90.5% 99.3% 85.3% 99.9% 72.1% 99.9% 86.2% 99.6% 68.8% 99.4% 93.3% 99.9% 90.3% 99.0% 84.7% 99.5% 71.6% 99.9% 87.1% 99.9% 67.9% 98.1% 93.3% 99.9% 89.2% 97.9% 83.7% 98.3% 70.5% 98.4% 86.3% 99.7% 66.4% 95.9% 93.1% 99.9% 87.6% 96.1%

114

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 99.7% 99.9% 99.9% 99.8% 99.9% 99.8% 99.6% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.0% 99.3% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 99.9% 98.8% 98.7% 99.4% 99.9% 98.8% 99.9% 97.6% 97.5% 97.9% 99.9% 96.6% 99.9% 95.8%

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL People > Quality > Auto/Truck >

STATE 77.3% 79.3% 81.7% 81.2% 82.5% 81.4% 82.3% 82.3% 78.7% 79.9%

Note: Data provided is for freeways only.


STATE 91.5% 92.3% 92.0% 91.9% 92.3% 92.0% 92.2% 92.2% 91.0% 91.7%

7 LARGEST MPOS 89.0% 89.9% 90.9% 90.7% 91.4% 90.9% 91.3% 91.3% 89.2% 90.4%

DAILY OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 94.2% 95.5% 93.0% 93.0% 93.0% 93.1% 93.0% 93.0% 92.7% 92.6%

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 96.4% 96.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4% 94.4%

QUALITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST OTHER URBANIZED NON-URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 74.0% 86.5% 94.8% 76.6% 88.9% 95.0% 80.1% 90.1% 94.1% 79.3% 90.0% 94.1% 81.3% 90.4% 94.1% 79.6% 90.6% 94.1% 80.8% 90.2% 94.1% 80.7% 90.2% 94.1% 75.2% 89.5% 93.8% 77.2% 88.7% 94.0%

115

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: VARIABILITY

IZATION UTIL


QUALITY

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

STATE

7 LARGEST MPOS

1.50 1.48 1.44 1.45 1.44 1.44 1.42 1.43 1.49 1.52

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS

1.74 1.71 1.62 1.64 1.62 1.64 1.59 1.62 1.69 1.71

1.25 1.23 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.21 1.19 1.18 1.25 1.30

DAILY NON-URBANIZED AREAS 1.16 1.15 1.17 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.16 1.18 1.16

1.38 1.36 1.34 1.34 1.32 1.34 1.33 1.33 1.39 1.38



STATE

116

7 LARGEST MPOS 1.58 1.55 1.50 1.51 1.47 1.49 1.49 1.49 1.60 1.57

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 1.18 1.16 1.16 1.17 1.17 1.17 1.14 1.14 1.18 1.18

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 1.14 1.14 1.16 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15 1.15

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

VEHICLE HOURS OF DELAY

IZATION UTIL

2014 2013 2012

FACILITY STATE SHS Total 121.2 SIS Highway Corridors 52.3 SIS Highway Connectors 2.9 SHS Freeways 50.1 SHS Highways 2.6 SHS Arterials 68.4 NHS 108.9 SHS Total 106.4 SIS Highway Corridors 49.9 SIS Highway Connectors 2.4 SHS Freeways 43.5 SHS Highways 2.1 SHS Arterials 60.8 NHS 94.9 SHS Total 98.8 SIS Highway Corridors 46.4 SIS Highway Connectors 2.2 SHS Freeways 40.5 SHS Highways 1.9 SHS Arterials 56.4 NHS 90.9 SHS Total 89.3 SIS Highway Corridors 42.0 SIS Highway Connectors 2.0 SHS Freeways 40.3 SHS Highways 1.9 SHS Arterials 47.2 NHS 83.3 SHS Total 84.9 SIS Highway Corridors 39.9 SIS Highway Connectors 1.9 SHS Freeways 38.3 SHS Highways 1.8 SHS Arterials 44.8 NHS 79.0


PEAK HOUR (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 107.6 11.6 2.0 49.9 1.5 0.9 1.9 0.8 0.1 48.7 0.8 0.7 1.4 0.7 0.5 57.5 10.1 0.8 97.5 10.0 1.4 95.7 9.3 1.4 48.0 1.2 0.6 1.8 0.5 0.1 42.6 0.6 0.4 1.1 0.6 0.4 52.0 8.1 0.7 86.2 7.4 1.4 88.8 8.6 1.3 44.8 1.1 0.6 1.7 0.5 0.1 39.7 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 48.1 7.6 0.7 82.5 7.0 1.3 80.7 7.4 1.2 40.5 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.1 39.5 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 40.2 6.3 0.6 75.6 6.5 1.2 76.7 7.0 1.2 38.5 0.9 0.5 1.4 0.4 0.0 37.5 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 38.3 6.0 0.5 71.8 6.1 1.2

STATE 600.5 201.7 15.9 191.2 11.0 398.3 506.7 544.9 199.2 13.7 171.8 8.9 364.1 460.6 491.5 180.8 12.3 155.9 8.1 327.5 424.7 444.0 163.4 11.1 154.9 8.0 281.0 394.4 424.9 156.3 10.6 148.3 7.7 268.9 379.5

DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 527.5 63.2 9.8 194.3 4.5 2.9 10.7 4.8 0.4 188.5 1.6 1.2 5.0 2.9 3.1 334.0 58.7 5.5 447.9 51.2 7.6 483.2 54.1 7.6 192.9 4.0 2.3 10.1 3.4 0.2 170.2 1.0 0.7 3.9 2.9 2.1 309.0 50.2 4.8 411.9 41.8 6.8 435.9 48.8 6.9 175.1 3.7 2.0 9.1 3.1 0.2 154.5 0.9 0.6 3.5 2.7 1.9 277.9 45.3 4.4 380.1 38.4 6.2 395.4 42.4 6.2 158.2 3.3 1.8 8.2 2.8 0.1 153.5 0.9 0.6 3.5 2.7 1.9 238.4 38.9 3.7 353.0 35.7 5.7 378.4 40.6 6.0 151.4 3.2 1.8 7.9 2.6 0.1 146.9 0.8 0.5 3.3 2.5 1.8 228.2 37.2 3.6 339.7 34.3 5.5

117

STATE 219,180 73,630 5,790 69,790 4,010 145,380 184,950 198,883 72,722 4,994 62,720 3,260 132,903 168,126 179,413 65,975 4,490 56,910 2,960 119,543 155,020 162,060 59,630 4,060 56,550 2,940 102,570 143,940 155,090 57,070 3,880 54,120 2,810 98,160 138,530

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 192,530 23,080 3,560 70,930 1,640 1,050 3,900 1,750 140 68,790 590 420 1,820 1,070 1,120 121,920 21,430 2,020 163,490 18,690 2,770 176,346 19,756 2,781 70,423 1,474 825 3,685 1,243 66 62,130 350 240 1,430 1,060 770 112,786 18,346 1,771 150,361 15,268 2,497 159,074 17,822 2,507 63,896 1,331 748 3,322 1,112 55 56,390 320 210 1,280 980 700 101,414 16,532 1,587 138,742 14,032 2,255 144,320 15,470 2,270 57,750 1,200 670 3,000 1,010 50 56,030 320 210 1,270 970 700 87,020 14,190 1,360 128,830 13,020 2,090 138,110 14,800 2,170 55,270 1,150 640 2,870 960 50 53,620 300 200 1,220 930 670 83,280 13,580 1,310 123,980 12,530 2,010

QUALITY

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

VEHICLE HOURS OF DELAY CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011


FACILITY STATE SHS Total 87.3 SIS Highway Corridors 41.0 SIS Highway Connectors 1.9 SHS Freeways 39.3 SHS Highways 1.8 SHS Arterials 46.1 SHS Total 85.5 SIS Highway Corridors 40.2 SIS Highway Connectors 1.9 SHS Freeways 38.6 SHS Highways 1.8 SHS Arterials 45.2 SHS Total 92.1 SIS Highway Corridors 43.3 SIS Highway Connectors 2.1 SHS Freeways 41.5 SHS Highways 1.9 SHS Arterials 48.6 SHS Total 118.7 SIS Highway Corridors 55.8 SIS Highway Connectors 2.6 SHS Freeways 53.5 SHS Highways 2.5 SHS Arterials 62.7 SHS Total 130.5 SIS Highway Corridors 61.4 SIS Highway Connectors 2.9 SHS Freeways 58.8 SHS Highways 2.8 SHS Arterials 68.9


PEAK HOUR (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 78.8 7.2 1.2 39.6 1.0 0.5 1.5 0.4 0.0 38.5 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.6 0.3 39.3 6.2 0.5 77.3 7.1 1.2 38.8 0.9 0.5 1.4 0.4 0.0 37.8 0.5 0.3 0.9 0.5 0.3 38.5 6.1 0.5 83.2 7.6 1.3 41.8 1.0 0.6 1.5 0.5 0.1 40.7 0.5 0.3 1.0 0.6 0.4 41.5 6.6 0.6 107.2 9.8 1.6 53.8 1.3 0.7 2.0 0.6 0.1 52.4 0.7 0.4 1.3 0.8 0.5 53.5 8.4 0.7 117.9 10.8 1.8 59.2 1.4 0.8 2.2 0.6 0.1 57.6 0.7 0.5 1.4 0.8 0.5 58.8 9.3 0.8

STATE 428.8 157.8 10.7 149.6 7.8 271.4 429.2 157.9 10.7 149.8 7.8 271.7 476.0 175.1 11.9 166.1 8.6 301.2 599.9 220.7 15.0 209.3 10.9 379.7 651.1 239.6 16.3 227.2 11.8 412.1

DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 381.9 40.9 6.0 152.8 3.2 1.8 7.9 2.7 0.1 148.3 0.8 0.6 3.4 2.6 1.8 230.3 37.5 3.6 382.2 41.0 6.0 153.0 3.2 1.8 7.9 2.7 0.1 148.4 0.8 0.6 3.4 2.6 1.8 230.5 37.6 3.6 423.9 45.4 6.7 169.6 3.5 2.0 8.8 3.0 0.2 164.6 0.9 0.6 3.7 2.8 2.0 255.6 41.7 4.0 534.2 57.3 8.4 213.8 4.5 2.5 11.1 3.7 0.2 207.4 1.2 0.8 4.7 3.6 2.6 322.1 52.5 5.0 579.8 62.2 9.1 232.0 4.8 2.7 12.0 4.0 0.2 225.1 1.3 0.8 5.1 3.9 2.8 349.6 57.0 5.5

118

STATE 156,530 57,590 3,920 54,620 2,840 99,070 156,670 57,650 3,920 54,670 2,840 99,160 173,730 63,920 4,350 60,620 3,150 109,950 218,960 80,570 5,480 76,410 3,970 138,580 237,660 87,450 5,950 82,930 4,310 150,420

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 139,390 14,940 2,190 55,780 1,160 650 2,900 970 50 54,110 300 200 1,230 940 670 84,050 13,700 1,320 139,520 14,950 2,200 55,830 1,160 650 2,900 970 50 54,160 300 200 1,230 940 670 84,130 13,710 1,320 154,710 16,580 2,430 61,910 1,290 720 3,210 1,080 60 60,060 340 220 1,360 1,040 750 93,290 15,210 1,460 194,990 20,900 3,070 78,030 1,630 910 4,050 1,360 70 75,700 430 280 1,720 1,310 940 117,570 19,170 1,840 211,640 22,690 3,330 84,690 1,770 990 4,400 1,480 80 82,160 460 310 1,860 1,420 1,020 127,610 20,800 2,000

QUANTITY QUALITY


PERSON HOURS OF DELAY

2014 2013 2012

FACILITY STATE SHS Total 201.2 SIS Highway Corridors 86.8 SIS Highway Connectors 4.7 SHS Freeways 83.3 SHS Highways 4.3 SHS Arterials 113.6 NHS 180.6 SHS Total 176.9 SIS Highway Corridors 83.0 SIS Highway Connectors 3.8 SHS Freeways 72.5 SHS Highways 3.4 SHS Arterials 101.0 NHS 157.4 SHS Total 164.1 SIS Highway Corridors 77.2 SIS Highway Connectors 3.6 SHS Freeways 67.5 SHS Highways 3.1 SHS Arterials 93.5 NHS 150.2 SHS Total 148.3 SIS Highway Corridors 69.8 SIS Highway Connectors 3.2 SHS Freeways 67.0 SHS Highways 3.1 SHS Arterials 78.2 NHS 137.6 SHS Total 141.7 SIS Highway Corridors 66.7 SIS Highway Connectors 3.1 SHS Freeways 64.0 SHS Highways 2.9 SHS Arterials 74.7 NHS 131.2


PEAK HOUR (THOUSANDS) DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NON7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED LARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS STATE MPOS AREAS AREAS 1,001.2 880.8 179.0 19.0 3.3 104.0 16.5 337.2 325.2 82.9 2.4 1.5 7.2 4.9 25.8 3.2 1.3 0.2 17.3 7.8 0.7 320.3 81.0 1.3 1.0 315.8 2.6 1.9 18.0 2.3 1.1 0.9 7.9 4.8 5.2 663.0 557.0 95.7 16.6 1.3 96.6 9.4 842.4 161.9 16.2 2.4 746.1 83.5 12.8 909.4 159.3 15.2 2.4 807.7 88.9 12.8 333.6 323.3 80.0 1.9 1.1 6.5 3.8 22.1 2.9 0.8 0.1 16.4 5.4 0.3 288.5 285.8 71.1 0.9 0.6 1.6 1.1 14.8 1.8 1.0 0.6 6.2 5.0 3.6 606.1 86.5 13.3 1.2 515.6 82.3 8.2 765.9 686.5 143.2 11.9 2.3 68.0 11.5 818.9 147.8 14.1 2.2 727.4 80.0 11.5 302.2 292.9 74.5 1.7 1.0 5.9 3.4 19.8 2.7 0.8 0.1 14.7 4.8 0.3 261.3 259.0 66.2 0.8 0.5 1.4 0.9 13.4 1.5 1.0 0.6 5.6 4.6 3.3 544.2 462.8 80.0 12.4 1.1 74.0 7.3 703.1 630.6 136.7 11.4 2.2 62.2 10.3 740.0 660.0 134.1 12.1 2.0 69.5 10.5 273.2 264.8 67.3 1.6 0.9 5.3 3.1 17.9 2.4 0.7 0.1 13.3 4.4 0.3 259.7 65.7 0.8 0.5 257.3 1.4 0.9 13.3 1.5 0.9 0.6 5.5 4.5 3.3 467.0 66.9 10.4 0.9 397.1 63.6 6.3 652.7 585.4 125.2 10.4 2.0 57.7 9.5 711.9 635.0 128.2 11.6 1.9 66.9 10.1 262.8 254.8 64.3 1.5 0.8 5.1 3.0 17.3 2.3 0.7 0.1 12.8 4.2 0.2 249.8 62.8 0.8 0.5 247.6 1.4 0.9 12.8 1.5 0.9 0.6 5.3 4.4 3.1 449.3 63.9 9.9 0.9 382.1 61.2 6.1 630.7 565.6 119.3 9.9 1.9 55.8 9.2

119

STATE 365,450 123,100 9,430 116,900 6,560 241,990 307,470 331,921 121,769 8,071 105,290 5,410 221,221 279,560 98,922 110,292 7,248 95,390 4,890 198,633 256,653 270,090 99,720 6,540 94,780 4,860 170,450 238,220 259,860 95,940 6,300 91,190 4,680 164,000 230,190

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 321,480 37,950 6,020 118,690 2,630 1,770 6,330 2,850 250 115,280 950 680 2,900 1,750 1,910 203,310 35,250 3,430 272,330 30,460 4,680 294,792 32,432 4,696 118,008 2,364 1,396 5,982 1,968 110 104,330 580 390 2,280 1,810 1,320 188,182 30,042 2,986 250,575 24,818 4,178 265,480 29,207 4,224 106,905 2,143 1,254 5,378 1,771 99 94,530 520 340 2,030 1,660 1,200 168,920 27,027 2,675 230,187 22,714 3,761 240,900 25,370 3,820 96,650 1,930 1,130 4,850 1,600 90 93,920 520 340 2,020 1,650 1,190 144,960 23,200 2,300 213,660 21,080 3,480 231,780 24,410 3,680 92,990 1,860 1,090 4,670 1,540 90 90,370 500 320 1,940 1,590 1,140 139,470 22,320 2,210 206,460 20,370 3,370

QUALITY

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

PERSON HOURS OF DELAY CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011


FACILITY STATE SHS Total 145.5 SIS Highway Corridors 68.5 SIS Highway Connectors 3.2 SHS Freeways 65.8 SHS Highways 3.0 SHS Arterials 76.8 SHS Total 141.8 SIS Highway Corridors 66.7 SIS Highway Connectors 3.1 SHS Freeways 64.1 SHS Highways 2.9 SHS Arterials 74.8 SHS Total 153.8 SIS Highway Corridors 72.4 SIS Highway Connectors 3.3 SHS Freeways 69.5 SHS Highways 3.2 SHS Arterials 81.1 SHS Total 196.5 SIS Highway Corridors 92.5 SIS Highway Connectors 4.3 SHS Freeways 88.8 SHS Highways 4.1 SHS Arterials 103.6 SHS Total 217.0 SIS Highway Corridors 102.1 SIS Highway Connectors 4.7 SHS Freeways 98.1 SHS Highways 4.5 SHS Arterials 114.5


PEAK HOUR (THOUSANDS) DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NON7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED LARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS STATE MPOS AREAS AREAS 717.1 639.6 131.7 11.9 2.0 67.4 10.2 264.8 256.6 66.1 1.5 0.9 5.1 3.0 17.4 2.4 0.7 0.1 12.9 4.2 0.2 251.7 249.4 64.5 0.8 0.5 1.4 0.9 12.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 5.4 4.4 3.2 452.6 384.9 65.7 10.2 0.9 61.6 6.1 714.2 637.0 128.3 11.6 1.9 67.1 10.1 263.7 255.6 64.4 1.5 0.8 5.1 3.0 17.3 2.3 0.7 0.1 12.8 4.2 0.2 250.6 248.4 62.8 0.8 0.5 1.4 0.9 12.9 1.5 0.9 0.6 5.3 4.4 3.1 450.7 383.3 64.0 9.9 0.9 61.3 6.1 797.2 139.1 12.6 2.1 711.0 74.9 11.3 294.3 285.3 69.8 1.6 0.9 5.7 3.3 19.3 2.5 0.7 0.1 14.3 4.7 0.3 279.7 68.1 0.8 0.5 277.2 1.5 1.0 14.3 1.6 1.0 0.6 6.0 4.9 3.5 503.1 69.4 10.8 1.0 427.9 68.5 6.8 996.4 888.7 177.7 16.1 2.7 93.6 14.1 367.9 356.6 89.2 2.1 1.2 7.1 4.2 24.1 3.2 0.9 0.1 17.9 5.9 0.3 349.7 346.5 87.1 1.1 0.7 1.9 1.2 17.9 2.0 1.3 0.8 7.4 6.1 4.4 628.8 534.8 88.7 13.7 1.2 85.6 8.5 1,086.0 968.6 196.3 17.7 3.0 102.0 15.4 400.9 388.6 98.5 2.3 1.3 7.8 4.6 26.3 3.6 1.0 0.1 19.5 6.4 0.4 381.1 96.2 1.2 0.8 377.7 2.1 1.4 19.5 2.2 1.4 0.9 8.1 6.6 4.8 685.4 582.9 97.9 15.2 1.4 93.3 9.2

120

STATE 261,760 96,640 6,340 91,850 4,710 165,190 260,680 96,240 6,320 91,470 4,690 164,510 290,980 107,430 7,050 102,110 5,240 183,640 363,700 134,270 8,810 127,620 6,540 229,530 396,390 146,340 9,610 139,100 7,130 250,160

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 OTHER NONLARGEST URBANIZED URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 233,470 24,590 3,710 93,670 1,870 1,100 4,710 1,550 90 91,030 500 330 1,960 1,600 1,150 140,480 22,480 2,230 232,500 24,480 3,690 93,280 1,870 1,090 4,690 1,540 90 90,650 500 320 1,950 1,590 1,150 139,900 22,390 2,220 259,530 27,330 4,120 104,130 2,080 1,220 5,230 1,720 100 101,190 560 360 2,170 1,780 1,280 156,170 24,990 2,480 324,390 34,160 5,150 130,150 2,600 1,520 6,540 2,150 120 126,480 700 450 2,720 2,220 1,600 195,190 31,240 3,090 353,550 37,230 5,610 141,850 2,840 1,660 7,130 2,340 140 137,840 760 490 2,960 2,420 1,750 212,740 34,050 3,370

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED

2014 2013 2012



STATE 46.5 56.5 30.2 58.6 51.6 30.7 47.1 46.5 56.6 30.6 58.9 50.7 31.1 47.2 47.5 57.7 31.7 60.1 52.1 31.7 48.2 47.3 57.7 33.4 59.9 52.3 32.5 48.1 47.5 58.2 32.8 60.4 52.4 32.4 48.3

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD (MILES PER HOUR) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 42.8 45.5 53.9 60.1 27.1 30.2 55.0 67.2 45.1 45.3 26.4 34.4 43.6 46.5 42.8 45.7 53.8 60.3 27.7 30.6 54.7 68.0 42.5 44.8 26.9 34.7 43.5 46.7 43.7 46.4 54.9 61.4 28.7 31.7 55.8 69.3 43.7 46.0 27.5 35.2 44.5 47.6 43.5 46.4 54.7 61.6 30.3 33.3 55.7 69.0 43.9 46.1 28.3 35.9 44.3 47.6 43.7 46.5 55.1 62.1 29.8 32.8 56.1 69.6 44.0 46.2 28.2 35.8 44.5 47.8

121

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 58.0 61.8 39.9 66.3 54.2 42.2 59.5 58.2 62.1 39.8 67.8 53.4 42.4 59.6 59.2 63.2 41.2 69.1 54.8 43.1 60.8 59.1 63.6 43.0 68.8 55.0 43.6 60.7 59.3 64.1 42.4 69.4 55.1 43.5 61.0

QUALITY

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011




STATE 47.4 57.8 32.5 60.0 52.5 32.4 47.4 58.1 32.3 60.5 52.5 32.0 47.2 58.1 31.6 60.3 52.5 31.8 46.2 56.9 31.6 58.9 52.5 31.1 46.0 56.7 31.0 58.9 52.3 30.4

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD (MILES PER HOUR) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 43.6 46.4 54.8 61.7 29.5 32.4 55.7 69.1 44.0 46.3 28.1 35.7 43.6 46.4 55.1 62.1 29.4 32.3 56.2 69.7 44.0 46.3 27.8 35.3 43.4 46.2 55.0 62.0 28.7 31.6 56.0 69.5 44.0 46.3 27.6 35.1 42.5 45.3 53.9 60.7 28.7 31.6 54.8 67.9 44.0 46.3 27.1 34.3 42.3 45.0 53.7 60.6 28.2 31.0 54.8 67.9 43.9 46.1 26.5 33.6

122

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 59.1 63.7 41.9 68.9 55.2 43.5 59.1 64.1 41.7 69.5 55.2 43.0 58.9 64.0 40.8 69.3 55.2 42.7 57.7 62.7 40.8 67.7 55.2 41.8 57.4 62.5 40.0 67.7 55.0 40.9

QUANTITY QUALITY


SAFETY MEASURES People > Quality > Auto/Truck > YEAR 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

FATALITIES 2,939 2,494 2,402 2,430 2,400

SERIOUS INJURIES 21,551 20,912 20,226 20,028 20,042

RATE OF FATALITIES 1.42 1.24 1.25 1.27 1.25

RATE OF SERIOUS INJURIES 10.43 10.40 10.50 10.49 10.44

QUALITY


123

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TIME SPENT COMMUTING

IZATION UTIL

People > Accessibility > Auto/Truck >

Percentage of Driving Workers with Commute Time Utilization > Auto/Truck >


STATE 15.7% 20.4% 11.5% 23.9% 4.3% 9.5% 15.8% 14.4% 19.7% 9.6% 21.7% 4.7% 8.4% 14.5% 13.8% 19.3% 7.3% 21.2% 3.7% 7.3% 14.1% 12.8% 17.8% 6.5% 21.0% 4.1% 5.8% 13.0% 12.5% 17.3% 6.4% 20.4% 3.5% 5.8% 12.8%

DAILY NONURBANIZED AREAS 2.0% 1.9% 0.0% 2.1% 1.9% 2.3% 1.6% 2.1% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.7% 1.9% 2.1% 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 1.9% 1.9% 1.8% 1.6% 1.8% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 2.1% 1.3% 1.8% 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 1.8% 1.7% 1.3% 1.8%

125

STATE 4.4% 5.3% 3.3% 6.1% 1.5% 3.2% 4.2% 4.1% 5.2% 2.7% 5.8% 1.8% 2.8% 4.0% 3.9% 3.2% 11.2% 2.9% 15.3% 10.6% 3.9% 3.7% 3.0% 9.6% 2.9% 14.9% 8.4% 3.7% 3.6% 2.9% 9.9% 2.8% 13.5% 8.3% 3.5%

7 LARGEST MPOS 8.2% 9.9% 6.6% 10.2% 6.4% 5.7% 7.8% 7.7% 9.8% 5.9% 9.7% 5.6% 5.1% 7.4% 7.4% 6.0% 22.9% 4.9% 55.0% 18.8% 7.1% 6.9% 5.7% 20.5% 4.9% 53.5% 15.0% 6.7% 6.7% 5.4% 21.3% 4.7% 48.5% 15.0% 6.5%

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 0.3% 0.1% 1.2% 0.1% 0.1% 0.5% 0.3% 0.3% 0.1% 0.7% 0.0% 1.1% 0.4% 0.2% 0.3% 0.1% 4.9% 0.0% 5.4% 1.6% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 2.5% 0.0% 5.2% 1.1% 0.2% 0.2% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 4.8% 1.1% 0.2%

NONURBANIZED AREAS 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.3% 1.1% 1.4% 0.7% 0.8% 0.7% 0.0% 0.2% 1.4% 1.2% 0.8% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 11.6% 4.4% 0.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 11.3% 3.6% 0.7% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 10.3% 3.6% 0.7%

UTILIZATION


PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 29.3% 1.4% 37.9% 1.0% 22.4% 5.1% 38.6% 1.2% 25.1% 0.7% 17.1% 1.5% 28.8% 1.3% 26.8% 1.1% 36.7% 0.7% 20.2% 2.9% 35.2% 0.5% 21.0% 3.4% 15.0% 1.4% 26.3% 1.0% 25.9% 1.2% 35.9% 1.9% 14.4% 3.2% 34.4% 0.5% 19.3% 1.7% 13.0% 1.2% 25.6% 1.1% 23.9% 1.0% 33.1% 0.5% 13.4% 2.2% 34.0% 0.5% 21.5% 1.8% 10.4% 1.0% 23.7% 0.9% 23.4% 1.0% 32.2% 0.5% 13.2% 2.1% 33.0% 0.5% 17.9% 1.5% 10.4% 1.0% 23.2% 0.9%

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% TRAVEL HEAVILY CONGESTED CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL


STATE 12.8% 17.9% 6.4% 21.0% 3.6% 5.8% 12.7% 17.3% 6.5% 20.4% 4.6% 5.9% 12.6% 17.2% 6.6% 20.2% 3.5% 5.9% 13.5% 18.6% 6.6% 21.8% 4.2% 6.3% 14.2% 19.2% 6.9% 22.4% 4.4% 6.8%

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 23.9% 1.0% 33.2% 0.5% 13.2% 2.1% 34.0% 0.5% 18.5% 1.6% 10.3% 1.0% 23.7% 1.0% 32.2% 0.5% 13.4% 2.2% 33.0% 0.5% 24.0% 2.1% 10.7% 1.0% 23.5% 1.0% 32.0% 0.5% 13.7% 2.2% 32.7% 0.5% 17.9% 1.5% 10.6% 1.0% 25.3% 1.1% 34.6% 0.5% 13.6% 2.2% 35.4% 0.5% 21.6% 1.8% 11.3% 1.0% 26.6% 1.1% 35.7% 0.6% 14.2% 2.3% 36.3% 0.5% 22.6% 1.9% 12.2% 1.1%

DAILY NONURBANIZED AREAS 1.8% 1.9% 0.0% 1.9% 1.8% 1.3% 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 1.8% 2.3% 1.3% 1.8% 1.8% 0.0% 1.8% 1.7% 1.3% 2.0% 2.0% 0.0% 1.9% 2.1% 1.4% 2.1% 2.0% 0.0% 2.0% 2.2% 1.5%

UTILIZATION

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



126

STATE 3.6% 3.0% 9.8% 2.9% 15.0% 8.3% 3.6% 2.9% 9.8% 2.8% 16.1% 8.6% 3.6% 2.9% 10.4% 2.8% 13.2% 8.6% 4.0% 3.2% 9.6% 3.1% 17.8% 9.2% 4.1% 3.2% 10.2% 3.1% 21.0% 9.8%

7 LARGEST MPOS 6.8% 5.6% 21.0% 4.8% 54.0% 14.9% 6.7% 5.4% 21.1% 4.6% 57.9% 15.4% 6.8% 5.5% 22.3% 4.7% 47.6% 15.4% 7.4% 6.0% 20.6% 5.2% 64.1% 16.4% 7.7% 6.1% 22.0% 5.2% 75.7% 17.5%

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 0.2% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 5.3% 1.1% 0.2% 0.0% 2.6% 0.0% 5.7% 1.1% 0.2% 0.0% 2.7% 0.0% 4.7% 1.1% 0.3% 0.1% 2.5% 0.0% 6.3% 1.2% 0.3% 0.1% 2.7% 0.0% 7.4% 1.2%

NONURBANIZED AREAS 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 11.4% 3.6% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 12.3% 3.7% 0.7% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 10.1% 3.7% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 13.6% 4.0% 0.8% 0.4% 0.0% 0.1% 16.0% 4.3%

QUANTITY QUALITY



2012

2013

2014

2015

2016



STATE 4.9% 6.1% 6.7% 11.0% 0.8% 6.4% 5.7% 4.3% 5.8% 5.5% 9.5% 1.0% 5.5% 5.0% 3.9% 5.6% 4.2% 9.2% 0.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.5% 5.0% 3.7% 8.9% 0.9% 3.6% 4.1% 3.4% 4.9% 3.7% 8.7% 0.7% 3.5% 4.0%



UTILIZATION


127

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% MILES HEAVILY CONGESTED CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL


STATE 3.5% 5.0% 3.7% 8.9% 0.8% 3.5% 3.5% 4.9% 3.8% 8.7% 1.0% 3.7% 3.5% 4.9% 3.8% 8.6% 0.8% 3.7% 3.7% 5.2% 3.9% 9.2% 1.0% 3.9% 4.1% 5.6% 4.1% 9.8% 1.0% 4.2%


UTILIZATION

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



128


QUANTITY QUALITY


HOURS HEAVILY CONGESTED

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016



STATE 8676 2640 201 2511 488 5677 7081 8282 2646 171 2655 619 5008 6520 7779 2499 160 2499 566 4713 6454 7870 2900 164 2855 674 4340 6540 6175 2280 130 2248 509 3419 5283

NONURBANIZED AREAS 1008 145 0 10 321 677 710 987 145 0 5 368 614 667 915 145 0 5 331 578 660 970 167 0 6 405 558 686 742 130 0 5 295 443 551

129

STATE 3,166,800 963,700 73,400 916,600 178,200 2,072,000 2,584,700 3,023,111 965,785 62,321 969,200 225,900 1,828,011 2,379,889 2,839,181 912,002 58,544 912,196 206,619 1,720,365 2,355,621 2,872,473 1,058,332 59,960 1,042,185 246,032 1,584,256 2,387,075 2,254,021 832,306 47,515 820,374 185,637 1,248,011 1,928,298

YEARLY TOTAL 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 2,519,900 279,000 905,600 5,100 61,300 12,100 910,000 2,800 52,300 8,800 1,557,600 267,400 2,092,700 232,900 2,393,871 268,907 905,757 6,959 54,805 7,515 965,600 1,600 39,700 51,800 1,388,571 215,507 1,950,399 186,008 2,252,705 252,603 852,391 6,542 51,484 7,060 908,696 1,500 37,431 48,228 1,306,577 202,876 1,930,622 184,002 2,310,720 207,872 975,104 22,140 54,713 5,246 1,038,202 1,733 42,819 55,372 1,229,699 150,766 1,980,671 156,155 1,818,406 164,641 767,573 17,220 43,358 4,158 817,257 1,367 33,461 44,655 967,688 118,620 1,601,157 126,006

NONURBANIZED AREAS 368,000 52,900 – 3,800 117,200 247,000 259,200 360,332 53,069 – 2,000 134,400 223,932 243,482 333,873 53,069 – 2,000 120,960 210,913 240,997 353,881 61,088 – 2,250 147,840 203,791 250,249 270,973 47,513 – 1,750 107,520 161,703 201,135

UTILIZATION


DAILY AVERAGE 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 6904 764 2481 14 168 33 2493 8 143 24 4267 733 5733 638 6559 737 2482 19 150 21 2645 4 109 142 3804 590 5344 510 6172 692 2335 18 141 19 2490 4 103 132 3580 556 5289 504 6331 570 2672 61 150 14 2844 5 117 152 3369 413 5426 428 4982 451 2103 47 119 11 2239 4 92 122 2651 325 4387 345

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

HOURS HEAVILY CONGESTED CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL


STATE 6073 2244 127 2208 502 3362 6283 2306 132 2274 547 3462 6817 2504 143 2480 565 3771 8430 3091 177 3054 728 4647 9778 3606 206 3556 815 5408

DAILY AVERAGE 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 4896 441 2066 47 116 11 2200 4 90 117 2606 320 5042 455 2128 48 120 12 2265 4 93 122 2684 329 5500 495 2321 53 130 12 2471 4 102 132 2927 359 6772 609 2858 65 161 15 3043 5 125 161 3604 442 7883 711 3327 75 188 18 3542 6 145 191 4195 515

NONURBANIZED AREAS 736 130 0 5 295 437 785 130 0 5 331 449 822 130 0 5 331 486 1049 167 0 6 442 601 1184 205 0 8 479 698

UTILIZATION

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



130

STATE 2,216,557 818,993 46,384 806,017 183,283 1,227,257 2,293,171 841,834 48,081 829,989 199,644 1,263,538 2,488,204 914,049 52,040 905,275 206,335 1,376,594 3,077,006 1,128,176 64,485 1,114,886 265,880 1,696,239 3,569,040 1,316,317 75,232 1,297,779 297,410 1,973,851

YEARLY TOTAL 7 OTHER LARGEST URBANIZED MPOS AREAS 1,786,971 160,828 754,261 17,220 42,325 4,059 802,933 1,333 32,894 42,869 951,143 116,626 1,840,406 166,137 776,692 17,630 43,874 4,207 826,872 1,367 34,029 44,655 979,505 120,115 2,007,478 180,807 847,267 19,270 47,487 4,554 902,025 1,500 37,148 48,228 1,068,305 131,080 2,471,919 222,260 1,043,309 23,780 58,842 5,642 1,110,803 1,833 45,655 58,945 1,315,461 161,482 2,877,139 259,693 1,214,185 27,470 68,649 6,583 1,292,895 2,133 53,028 69,662 1,531,215 187,897

NONURBANIZED AREAS 268,758 47,513 – 1,750 107,520 159,488 286,629 47,513 – 1,750 120,960 163,919 299,919 47,513 – 1,750 120,960 177,209 382,827 61,088 – 2,250 161,280 219,297 432,208 74,663 – 2,750 174,720 254,738

QUANTITY QUALITY



2012

2013

2014

2015

2016



STATE 610 807 491 1,099 254 559 678 595 794 480 1,046 240 553 660 577 768 482 1,012 227 539 641 552 717 467 974 219 524 613 547 707 476 959 218 524 608

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 929 620 1,436 808 609 503 1,520 996 564 418 623 546 971 639 905 607 1,410 792 593 493 1,441 938 522 405 615 541 945 625 876 588 1,364 767 595 495 1,393 906 494 383 601 528 919 607 837 564 1,269 712 576 480 1,341 873 477 370 584 514 879 582 830 559 1,252 702 588 490 1,321 860 473 367 583 514 871 577

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 339 441 300 652 217 362 402 330 435 291 627 205 356 390 319 421 292 606 194 347 379 305 394 282 583 187 335 362 302 389 288 574 186 334 358

UTILIZATION


131

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

VEHICLES PER LANE MILE CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL


STATE 552 719 481 976 222 524 559 725 490 980 228 535 560 723 494 981 232 537 576 745 551 1,015 234 553 602 784 569 1,070 249 574

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 837 564 1,272 714 593 494 1,343 874 482 374 584 515 848 571 1,282 719 605 505 1,349 878 494 383 595 525 850 573 1,281 718 609 508 1,351 879 505 391 598 527 874 589 1,319 740 680 567 1,397 909 508 394 616 543 914 616 1,388 779 702 586 1,473 959 540 419 639 564

UTILIZATION

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



132

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 305 395 290 584 189 335 309 398 296 587 194 341 310 398 298 588 198 343 318 410 333 608 200 353 333 431 344 641 212 367

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRANSIT MEASURES People > Quantity > Transit >


TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS (MILLIONS) 250.6 270.8 277.5 278.2 270.2 260.7 245.2 248.8 262.2 257.0

133

TRANSIT REVENUE MILES (MILLIONS) 148.2 145.7 143.4 140.5 137.7 134.5 135.8 136.4 137 140.8

QUANTITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRANSIT REVENUE MILES BETWEEN FAILURES

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Transit > ANNUAL REVENUE MILES BETWEEN FAILURES 4,260 3,965 3,974 4,438 4,950 4,665 5,302 4,627 4,588 4,650

QUALITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


134

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRANSIT WEEKDAY SPAN OF SERVICE People > Accessibility > Transit > YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

WEEKDAY SPAN OF SERVICE (HOURS) 16.3 17.5 17.5 16.6 16.6 16.5 16.6 16.8 16.7 16.8

ACCESSIBILITY


135

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRANSIT PASSENGER TRIPS PER REVENUE MILE

IZATION UTIL

People > Utilization > Transit > PASSENGER TRIPS PER REVENUE MILE 1.7 1.9 1.9 2.0 2.0 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.9 1.8

UTILIZATION

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


136

QUANTITY QUALITY


PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE – FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES People > Quality > Bicycle/Pedestrian >

FACILITY 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

FATALITIES 785 741 633 589 617

PEDESTRIAN AND BICYCLE – FATALITIES AND SERIOUS INJURIES SERIOUS INJURIES 2596 2563 2514 2620 2206

TOTAL 3,381 3,304 3,147 3,209 2,823

QUALITY


137

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

% PEDESTRIAN FACILITY COVERAGE

IZATION UTIL

People > Accessibility > Pedestrian >

LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED 79.2% 77.9% 76.1% 75.8% 75.4% 73.1%

PERCENTAGE OF SIDEWALK COVERAGE ON SHS OTHER URBAN AREAS 58.9% 57.2% 56.1% 56.9% 54.6% 50.5%

ACCESSIBILITY

FACILITY 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011


138

TOTAL STATE URBAN 66.5% 65.0% 63.6% 64.1% 62.8% 59.4%

QUANTITY QUALITY


BICYCLE MEASURES People > Accessibility > Bicycle >

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011

YEAR 2016

7 LARGEST COUNTIES 47.6% 46.1% 44.8% 44.3% 44.7% 43.6%

OTHER URBAN AREAS 71.2% 70.8% 69.7% 70.3% 67.9% 66.8%

% BICYCLE FACILITY COVERAGE TOTAL STATE URBAN NON-URBAN AREAS 62.4% 89.2% 61.5% 89.5% 60.3% 88.0% 60.4% 58.8% 57.6%

% POPULATION WITHIN ONE MILE OF BIKE LANE AND SHARED-USE PATHS 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED NON-URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED 53% 8% 40%

TOTAL STATE 75.2% 74.9% 73.6%

STATEWIDE 42%

ACCESSIBILITY


139

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVIATION PASSENGER BOARDINGS

IZATION UTIL

QUANTITY

People > Quantity > Aviation > YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


AVIATION BOARDINGS (MILLIONS) 78.1 74.0 72.3 68.6 68.1 68.0 65.4 63.8 68.1 69.7

140

QUANTITY QUALITY


AVIATION DEPARTURE RELIABILITY People > Quality > Aviation > YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

AVIATION DEPARTURE RELIABILITY 82.9% 82.6% 80.5% 75.4% 83.5% 85.9% 84.3% 80.3% 85.3% 80.1%

QUALITY


141

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVIATION DEMAND TO CAPACITY RATIO

IZATION UTIL

People > Utilization > Aviation > AVIATION DEMAND TO CAPACITY RATIO 44.9% 31.0% 30.5%

UTILIZATION

YEAR 2014 2012 2011


142

QUANTITY QUALITY


RAIL PASSENGERS People > Quantity > Rail >


AMTRAK PASSENGERS 949,710 1,027,196 1,084,506 1,120,959 1,222,222 1,157,537 1,076,472 988,303 963,092 840,095

TRI-RAIL RIDERSHIP 4,240,699 4,292,705 4,400,977 5,122,671 4,941,886 4,305,058 3,775,344 4,520,810 4,303,509 3,501,704

143

SUNRAIL RIDERSHIP 887,224 1,020,425

TOTAL PASSENGERS 6,077,633 6,340,326 5,485,483 6,243,630 6,164,108 5,462,595 4,851,816 5,509,113 5,266,601 4,341,799

QUANTITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

RAIL DEPARTURE RELIABILITY

IZATION UTIL

People > Quality > Rail > AMTRAK

TRI-RAIL

SUNRAIL

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

27% 26% 33% 46% 47% 30% 24% 34% 31% 44%

81% 81% 85% 78% 80% 86% 82% 75% 78% 70%

96% 97%

QUALITY

YEAR


144

STATEWIDE RAIL DEPARTURE RELIABILITY 75% 75% 74% 72% 74% 74% 69% 67% 69% 65%

QUANTITY QUALITY


SEAPORT PASSENGERS People > Quantity > Seaport >


MILLION PASSENGERS 15.5 15.2 15.6 14.1 12.2 13.3 12.7 12.7 13.2 14.1

145

QUANTITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK MILES TRAVELED

IZATION UTIL

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

QUANTITY




STATE 15.4 12.0 0.1 10.3 2.2 2.9 14.6 14.9 11.6 0.1 9.9 2.2 2.9 14.1 13.9 10.8 0.1 9.1 2.2 2.7 13.1 13.9 10.7 0.1 9.0 2.1 2.8 13.0 13.4 10.2 0.1 8.6 2.1 2.7 12.0

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 5.0 3.9 3.9 2.7 0.0 0.1 3.8 2.4 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.3 4.9 3.7 4.9 3.8 3.8 2.6 0.0 0.1 3.7 2.3 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.3 4.9 3.6 4.6 3.5 3.5 2.5 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2 4.5 3.4 4.6 3.6 3.5 2.4 0.0 0.0 3.4 2.1 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2 4.5 3.4 4.4 3.4 3.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2 4.1 3.1

146


QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK MILES TRAVELED CONTINUED

2010 2009 2008 2007



STATE 12.7 9.8 0.1 8.3 2.0 2.4 12.7 9.8 0.1 8.1 2.1 2.5 13.5 10.2 0.1 8.5 2.3 2.8 14.7 11.1 0.1 9.2 2.4 3.0 16.6 12.7 0.1 10.5 2.7 3.4

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 4.1 3.2 3.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.1 1.9 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.1 4.1 3.2 3.2 2.2 0.0 0.0 3.1 1.9 0.1 0.2 1.0 1.1 4.4 3.4 3.4 2.3 0.0 0.0 3.2 2.0 0.1 0.2 1.1 1.2 4.8 3.7 3.7 2.5 0.0 0.0 3.5 2.1 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.4 5.4 4.2 4.2 2.9 0.0 0.0 4.0 2.4 0.1 0.3 1.3 1.5

147


QUANTITY

2011


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRUCK MILES TRAVELED

IZATION UTIL

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012

QUANTITY

Freight > Quantity > Truck >



STATE 28.4 20.4 0.3 16.7 4.6 7.0 26.6 26.9 19.3 0.3 15.8 4.4 6.9 25.3 24.5 17.6 0.3 14.3 4.0 6.2 23.0 24.6 17.4 0.3 14.3 3.9 6.5 23.0 23.7 16.6 0.2 13.5 3.9 6.3 20.9

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 10.8 7.0 7.6 4.3 0.1 0.1 7.4 3.5 0.3 0.5 3.1 3.0 10.5 6.7 10.4 6.8 7.4 4.2 0.1 0.1 7.1 3.4 0.2 0.5 3.2 2.9 10.2 6.4 9.4 6.1 6.7 3.8 0.1 0.1 6.4 3.0 0.2 0.5 2.8 2.6 9.2 5.8 9.5 6.2 6.6 3.7 0.1 0.1 6.4 3.0 0.2 0.5 2.9 2.7 9.2 5.8 9.1 6.0 6.3 3.6 0.1 0.1 6.0 2.9 0.2 0.5 2.9 2.6 8.4 5.3

148


QUANTITY QUALITY


TRUCK MILES TRAVELED CONTINUED

2010 2009 2008 2007



STATE 22.5 16.1 0.2 13.0 3.8 5.7 22.8 16.3 0.2 13.1 3.9 5.8 24.5 17.1 0.3 13.7 4.3 6.5 26.6 18.6 0.3 14.9 4.6 7.1 30.2 21.3 0.3 17.1 5.1 7.9

DAILY (MILLIONS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 8.6 5.6 6.1 3.5 0.1 0.1 5.8 2.8 0.2 0.5 2.6 2.4 8.7 5.7 6.2 3.5 0.1 0.1 5.9 2.8 0.2 0.5 2.6 2.4 9.3 6.2 6.5 3.7 0.1 0.1 6.1 2.9 0.2 0.5 3.0 2.7 10.1 6.7 7.1 4.0 0.1 0.1 6.7 3.2 0.2 0.6 3.2 3.0 11.5 7.6 8.1 4.6 0.1 0.1 7.7 3.6 0.3 0.6 3.6 3.3

149


QUANTITY

2011


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

TRUCK FREIGHT MEASURES

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Quantity > Truck >

QUANTITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009


TRUCK TONNAGE (MILLION TONS) 637 677 579 592 574

COMBINATION TRUCK TON MILES TRAVELED (BILLIONS) 56 56 51 52 50 49 47 50

150

TRUCK VALUE OF FREIGHT (BILLIONS) $708 $751 $643 $657 $637

QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: ON-TIME ARRIVAL


STATE 82.4% 82.9% 85.3% 84.8% 86.2% 85.0% 86.0% 86.0% 82.2% 83.4%



STATE 90.3% 90.2% 89.9% 89.8% 90.2% 89.9% 90.1% 90.1% 88.9% 89.6%

7 LARGEST MPOS 91.7% 92.1% 93.2% 93.0% 93.7% 93.2% 93.6% 93.6% 91.5% 92.7%

DAILY OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 87.0% 88.2% 85.9% 85.9% 85.9% 86.0% 85.9% 85.9% 85.6% 85.5%

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 90.5% 89.2% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3% 87.3%

QUALITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST OTHER URBANIZED NON-URBANIZED MPOS AREAS AREAS 79.8% 79.2% 90.9% 81.2% 82.1% 89.9% 85.0% 83.2% 89.1% 84.2% 83.1% 89.1% 86.2% 83.5% 89.1% 84.4% 83.7% 89.1% 85.7% 83.3% 89.1% 85.6% 83.3% 89.1% 79.7% 82.7% 88.8% 81.9% 82.0% 89.0%

151

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK TRAVEL TIME RELIABILITY: VARIABILITY

IZATION UTIL


QUALITY

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

STATE

7 LARGEST MPOS

1.40 1.35 1.31 1.32 1.31 1.31 1.30 1.31 1.36 1.38

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS

1.60 1.62 1.53 1.55 1.53 1.55 1.51 1.53 1.61 1.62

1.30 1.25 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.23 1.21 1.20 1.27 1.32

DAILY NON-URBANIZED AREAS 1.20 1.17 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.19 1.18

1.30 1.27 1.26 1.26 1.24 1.26 1.25 1.25 1.31 1.30



STATE

152

7 LARGEST MPOS 1.50 1.48 1.43 1.44 1.40 1.43 1.43 1.43 1.53 1.50

OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 1.20 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.19 1.17 1.17 1.20 1.20

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 1.20 1.16 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18 1.18

QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK HOURS OF DELAY

2013 2012



STATE 18.2 8.2 0.5 7.7 0.3 10.2 16.3 16.7 8.1 0.4 6.9 0.2 9.6 15.1 13.5 6.9 0.3 5.9 0.2 7.4 12.2 14.3 6.7 0.4 6.3 0.2 7.8 12.5 11.6 5.5 0.3 5.2 0.2 6.3 9.6

DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 15.5 2.1 7.6 0.3 0.3 0.2 7.4 0.2 0.1 0.1 8.1 1.8 13.9 1.9 14.4 1.9 7.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 6.7 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.6 1.7 13.0 1.7 11.7 1.5 6.4 0.3 0.2 0.1 5.7 0.1 0.0 0.1 5.9 1.3 10.5 1.4 12.4 1.5 6.3 0.2 0.3 0.1 6.1 0.1 0.1 0.1 6.2 1.3 10.9 1.3 10.1 1.2 5.1 0.2 0.2 0.1 5.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 5.1 1.0 8.4 1.0

153


QUALITY

2014

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK HOURS OF DELAY CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011




STATE 10.7 5.0 0.3 4.8 0.2 5.8 10.6 5.0 0.3 4.7 0.2 5.8 12.5 5.9 0.3 5.5 0.2 6.8 16.9 8.0 0.4 7.5 0.2 9.2 21.7 10.2 0.6 9.6 0.3 11.8

DAILY (THOUSANDS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 9.3 1.1 4.7 0.2 0.2 0.1 4.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.7 1.0 9.2 1.1 4.7 0.2 0.2 0.1 4.6 0.1 0.0 0.0 4.6 1.0 10.8 1.3 5.5 0.2 0.2 0.1 5.4 0.1 0.0 0.1 5.4 1.1 14.7 1.7 7.5 0.3 0.3 0.1 7.3 0.1 0.1 0.1 7.4 1.5 18.9 2.2 9.6 0.3 0.4 0.2 9.3 0.2 0.1 0.1 9.4 2.0

154


QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED

2013 2012



STATE 53.3 58.2 29.7 59.8 52.1 30.5 53.9 53.4 58.3 30.1 60.2 51.5 30.9 53.9 54.5 59.4 32.0 61.7 52.4 31.6 55.1 54.0 59.2 32.5 61.1 52.5 32.2 54.6 54.4 59.8 32.3 61.9 52.5 32.3 55.4

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 46.5 52.8 52.6 61.0 27.1 28.7 53.2 64.2 45.3 46.2 24.1 33.0 46.8 53.8 46.5 53.0 52.6 61.2 27.6 29.2 53.1 64.9 44.5 45.6 24.6 33.3 46.8 54.1 47.7 54.1 53.8 62.3 29.4 31.2 54.5 66.4 45.3 46.4 25.3 34.0 48.1 55.2 47.2 53.6 53.4 62.2 29.8 31.6 54.0 65.7 45.3 46.5 26.1 34.5 47.6 54.9 47.6 54.1 54.0 62.9 29.7 31.5 54.7 66.6 45.3 46.5 26.1 34.6 48.3 55.7

155


QUALITY

2014

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK AVERAGE TRAVEL SPEED CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008 2007

QUALITY

2010

2011




STATE 54.8 59.8 31.8 61.9 52.6 32.1 54.7 59.9 31.7 62.1 52.6 31.9 54.3 59.9 32.1 62.2 52.4 31.8 53.6 59.1 30.5 61.3 52.6 31.2 53.4 58.7 29.9 60.9 52.5 30.5

PEAK HOUR/PEAK PERIOD 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 47.9 54.4 54.0 62.9 29.2 30.9 54.7 66.6 45.4 46.6 26.0 34.5 47.8 54.3 54.0 63.0 29.1 30.8 54.8 66.8 45.4 46.5 25.8 34.2 47.5 53.9 54.0 63.0 29.5 31.3 55.0 66.9 45.3 46.4 25.7 34.1 46.9 53.3 53.3 62.1 28.0 29.7 54.2 65.9 45.4 46.5 25.3 33.5 46.6 53.0 52.9 61.7 27.5 29.2 53.8 65.5 45.3 46.4 24.7 32.7

156


QUANTITY QUALITY


COMBINATION TRUCK COST OF DELAY

2013 2012



STATE $180,056 $80,930 $4,955 $76,180 $2,845 $101,032 $161,402 $153,696 $74,314 $4,112 $63,841 $2,097 $87,758 $138,865 $116,424 $59,658 $2,999 $50,998 $1,550 $63,876 $104,773 $118,937 $56,003 $3,138 $52,694 $1,741 $64,502 $104,051 $90,564 $42,643 $2,390 $40,123 $1,325 $49,115 $80,102

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS $153,714 $20,557 $75,152 $3,065 $3,048 $1,740 $73,163 $1,847 $834 $687 $79,718 $18,023 $137,617 $19,246 $132,091 $17,026 $69,072 $2,773 $2,726 $1,277 $61,867 $1,166 $549 $623 $69,675 $15,237 $119,468 $15,641 $100,518 $12,524 $55,481 $2,213 $1,987 $931 $49,436 $927 $399 $467 $50,682 $11,131 $90,250 $11,731 $103,255 $12,191 $52,468 $1,824 $2,182 $887 $51,080 $958 $448 $524 $51,726 $10,709 $90,469 $10,927 $78,623 $9,283 $39,952 $1,389 $1,662 $675 $38,895 $729 $342 $399 $39,387 $8,155 $69,645 $8,412

157

NON-URBANIZED AREAS $5,785 $2,713 $166 $1,170 $1,324 $3,291 $4,539 $4,578 $2,469 $109 $808 $925 $2,846 $3,756 $3,381 $1,964 $80 $635 $684 $2,062 $2,791 $3,490 $1,711 $69 $656 $768 $2,066 $2,656 $2,658 $1,303 $53 $499 $585 $1,574 $2,045

QUALITY

2014

2015

2016


QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

COMBINATION TRUCK COST OF DELAY CONTINUED

IZATION UTIL

2009 2008

QUALITY

2010

2011


FACILITY SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials SHS Total SIS Highway Corridors SIS Highway Connectors SHS Freeways SHS Highways SHS Arterials


STATE $95,655 $45,040 $2,524 $42,379 $1,400 $51,876 $94,248 $44,378 $2,487 $41,756 $1,379 $51,113 $96,561 $45,467 $2,548 $42,780 $1,413 $52,368 $142,819 $67,248 $3,769 $63,275 $2,090 $77,454

YEARLY (THOUSANDS) 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS $83,043 $9,805 $42,198 $1,467 $1,755 $713 $41,081 $770 $361 $422 $41,601 $8,613 $81,822 $9,661 $41,577 $1,445 $1,729 $703 $40,477 $759 $355 $416 $40,989 $8,486 $83,830 $9,898 $42,598 $1,481 $1,772 $720 $41,470 $777 $364 $426 $41,995 $8,695 $123,989 $14,639 $63,004 $2,190 $2,621 $1,065 $61,337 $1,150 $539 $630 $62,113 $12,860

158

NON-URBANIZED AREAS $2,807 $1,376 $55 $528 $618 $1,662 $2,766 $1,356 $55 $520 $608 $1,638 $2,834 $1,389 $56 $533 $623 $1,678 $4,191 $2,054 $83 $788 $922 $2,481

QUANTITY QUALITY


TRUCK EMPTY BACKHAUL TONNAGE Freight > Utilization > Truck >

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

YEAR

TRUCK EMPTY BACKHAUL TONNAGE (MILLION TONS) 25 26 23 23 22 24 24 26 27 36

UTILIZATION


159

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC


IZATION UTIL


STATE 4.9% 6.1% 6.7% 11.0% 0.8% 6.4% 5.7% 4.3% 5.8% 5.5% 9.5% 1.0% 5.5% 5.0% 3.9% 5.6% 4.2% 9.2% 0.8% 4.7% 4.7% 3.5% 5.0% 3.7% 8.9% 0.9% 3.6% 4.1% 3.4% 4.9% 3.7% 8.7% 0.7% 3.5% 4.0%


UTILIZATION

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016



160


QUANTITY QUALITY


% MILES HEAVILY CONGESTED CONTINUED

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



STATE 3.5% 5.0% 3.7% 8.9% 0.8% 3.5% 3.5% 4.9% 3.8% 8.7% 1.0% 3.7% 3.5% 4.9% 3.8% 8.6% 0.8% 3.7% 3.7% 5.2% 3.9% 9.2% 1.0% 3.9% 4.1% 5.6% 4.1% 9.8% 1.0% 4.2%



UTILIZATION


161

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC


IZATION UTIL

UTILIZATION

2012

2013

2014

2015

2016




STATE 610 807 491 1,099 254 559 678 595 794 480 1,046 240 553 660 577 768 482 1,012 227 539 641 552 717 467 974 219 524 613 547 707 476 959 218 524 608

PEAK HOUR 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 929 620 1,436 808 609 503 1,520 996 564 418 623 546 971 639 905 607 1,410 792 593 493 1,441 938 522 405 615 541 945 625 876 588 1,364 767 595 495 1,393 906 494 383 601 528 919 607 837 564 1,269 712 576 480 1,341 873 477 370 584 514 879 582 830 559 1,252 702 588 490 1,321 860 473 367 583 514 871 577

162

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 339 441 300 652 217 362 402 330 435 291 627 205 356 390 319 421 292 606 194 347 379 305 394 282 583 187 335 362 302 389 288 574 186 334 358

QUANTITY QUALITY


VEHICLES PER LANE MILE CONTINUED

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011



STATE 552 719 481 976 222 524 559 725 490 980 228 535 560 723 494 981 232 537 576 745 551 1,015 234 553 602 784 569 1,070 249 574

PEAK HOUR 7 LARGEST MPOS – URBANIZED OTHER URBANIZED AREAS 837 564 1,272 714 593 494 1,343 874 482 374 584 515 848 571 1,282 719 605 505 1,349 878 494 383 595 525 850 573 1,281 718 609 508 1,351 879 505 391 598 527 874 589 1,319 740 680 567 1,397 909 508 394 616 543 914 616 1,388 779 702 586 1,473 959 540 419 639 564

NON-URBANIZED AREAS 305 395 290 584 189 335 309 398 296 587 194 341 310 398 298 588 198 343 318 410 333 608 200 353 333 431 344 641 212 367

UTILIZATION


163

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

AVIATION MEASURES

IZATION UTIL

QUANTITY

Freight > Quantity > Aviation > YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007


AVIATION TONNAGE (MILLION) 2.8 2.8 2.8 2.6 2.7 2.6 2.6 2.4 2.7 2.9

164

AVIATION VALUE OF FREIGHT (BILLIONS) $245 $245 $247 $232 $233

QUANTITY QUALITY


RAIL TONNAGE Freight> Quantity > Rail >


ORIGINATING TONNAGE 42.6 48.8 43.7 39.5 40.1 37.7 44.7 55.8 68.6 60.4

165

TERMINATING TONNAGE 68.4 68.3 66.7 65.1 66.7 60.5 69.1 84.5 100.6 92.8

QUANTITY

YEAR 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 2006 2005

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

ACTIVE RAIL ACCESS

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Accessibility > Rail > ACTIVE 75% 70% 85% 75%

ACCESSIBILITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013


166

QUANTITY QUALITY


SEAPORT MEASURES Freight> Quantity > Seport > YEAR


SEAPORT VALUE OF FREIGHT (BILLIONS) $79.3 $86.2 $86.8 $85.9 $85.6 $82.7 $69.7 $57.0 $82.5 $73.3

167

TWENTY-FOOT EQUIVALENT UNITS (MILLIONS) 3.6 3.5 3.3 3.2 3.1 3.0 2.8 2.7 2.9 2.9

QUANTITY

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

SEAPORT TONNAGE (MILLION) 107.4 103.0 98.7 105.1 100.6 100.3 106.4 105.1 114.7 121.2

QUANTITY QUALITY

CESSIBILITY AC

SEAPORT RAIL ACCESS

IZATION UTIL

Freight > Accessibility > Seaport> ACTIVE 73% 73% 85% 64%

ACCESSIBILITY

YEAR 2016 2015 2014 2013


168

LINKS

169

LINKS FDOT RESOURCES

Public Transit Office http://www.fdot.gov/transit/

Aviation and Spaceports Office http://www.fdot.gov/aviation/ •

FDOT Air Cargo System Plan http://www.fdot.gov/aviation/cargo.shtm

Forecasting and Trends Office

•

2016 Florida Transit Information and Performance Handbook http://www.fdot.gov/transit/Pages/2016_Florida_Transit_ Information_and_Performance_Handbook%20FINAL.pdf

Transportation Data and Analytics Office http://www.fdot.gov/planning/statistics/

•

FDOT Mobility Performance Measures Program https://www.floridampms.com/

•

Reports of Highway Mileage and Travel (DVMT) http://www.fdot.gov/planning/statistics/mileage-rpts/

•

Florida Transportation Trends adn Conditions http://www.fdot.gov/planning/trends/

•

FDOT RCI Features & Characteristics Handbook http://www.fdot.gov/planning/statistics/rci/

•

Florida’s Population http://www.fdot.gov/planning/demographic/

Office of Maintenance http://www.fdot.gov/maintenance/ •

Weigh Station Location Information http://www.fdot.gov/maintenance/WeighStationListing.shtm

State Safety Office http://www.fdot.gov/safety/ •

FDOT 2016 Florida Strategic Highway Safety Plan http://www.fdot.gov/safety/SHSP2016/SHSP-2012.shtm

•

Florida Seat Belt Use http://www.fdot.gov/safety/moreresources.shtm

Go to Contents

Freight and Multimodal Operations Office http://www.fdot.gov/rail/ Office of Policy Planning http://www.fdot.gov/planning/policy/ Florida Performance Report www.fdotperforms.org Seaport Office http://www.fdot.gov/seaport/ Systems Implementation Office http://www.fdot.gov/planning/systems/

170

LINKS CONTINUED OTHER FLORIDA RESOURCES Visit Florida https://www.visitflorida.org/ •

•

Tourism Data https://www.visitflorida.org/resources/research/

Florida Ports Council http://flaports.org/ •

University of Florida’s Bureau of Economic and Business Research https://www.bebr.ufl.edu/

Florida Ports Council – Seaport Mission Plan https://s3.amazonaws.com/fla-ports-resources/2017-2021-SeaportMission-Plan.pdf

NATIONAL RESOURCES Association of American of Railroads https://www.aar.org/ American Transportation Research Institute (ATRI) http://atri-online.org/

Enterprise Florida https://www.enterpriseflorida.com/ •

Florida Annual Trade Summary https://www.enterpriseflorida.com/wp-content/uploads/FloridaTrade-Summary.pdf

•

Crash and Citation Reports & Statistics https://www.flhsmv.gov/resources/crash-citation-reports/

•

Driver and Vehicle Reports & Statistics https://www.flhsmv.gov/resources/driver-and-vehicle-reports/

•

Vehicle and Vessel Reports and Statistics https://www.flhsmv.gov/resources/driver-and-vehicle-reports/ vehicle-and-vessel-reports-and-statistics/

Go to Contents

An Analysis of the Operational Costs of Trucking http://atri-online.org/atri-research/operational-costs-of-trucking/

Amtrak https://www.amtrak.com/home.html •

Florida Department of Highway Safety and Motor Vehicles https://www.flhsmv.gov/ •

Florida Estimates of Population https://www.bebr.ufl.edu/population/data

State Fact Sheets https://www.amtrak.com/state-fact-sheets

University of Minnesota Accessibility Observatory’s Access Across America (FDOT Pooled Fund Study) http://access.umn.edu/research/america/index.html HERE Technologies https://www.here.com/en

171

LINKS CONTINUED U.S. Census Bureau https://www.census.gov/en.html •

American Community Survey (ACS) https://www.census.gov/programs-surveys/acs/

•

Building Permits Survey https://www.census.gov/construction/bps/

U.S. Energy Information Administration https://www.eia.gov/ •

U.S. Department of Transportation https://www.transportation.gov/ •

National Household Travel Survey http://nhts.ornl.gov/

•

Bureau of Transportation Statistics https://www.bts.gov/

•

Federal Aviation Administration – Passenger Boarding https://www.faa.gov/airports/planning_capacity/passenger_ allcargo_stats/passenger/

•

Freight Analysis Framework https://ops.fhwa.dot.gov/freight/freight_analysis/faf/

U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics https://www.bls.gov/home.htm •

State and Metro Area Employment, Hours, & Earnings https://www.bls.gov/sae/

Go to Contents

172

U.S. Energy-Related Carbon Dioxide Emissions https://www.eia.gov/environment/emissions/carbon/
